FREE ALBUM
|
| |
A FREE 224k MP3 or CD-quality FLAC!
Beethoven
Fidelio (part)
Salzburg Festival, 1935
conductor: Toscanini
Something a little different this week. The sound quality of this legendary performance from the 1935 Salzburg Festival is poor - it's a private recording of a short-wave radio transmission picked up in the USA.
As an XR remastering is pointless at this level of sound quality, we've decided not to try and sell one, but instead to give lightly cleaned-up copies away to anyone who cares to download it, either as an MP3 or a lossless FLAC.
Download it now from the Toscanini Fidelio page!
|
LATEST REVIEW
| Classical CD Review
May 2012
THIBAUD - CORTOT
By S.G.S
"Breathe the genius of France "
| |
For most of the 19th Century, the genius of France went into opera and theater music. French composers did write orchestral and chamber works, but comparatively speaking, either the composers or the efforts were minor. Not until Saint-Saëns do we get anything comparable to German accomplishments, and you can put Fauré and Debussy at the level of Dvorák and Brahms without laughing or cringing.
There's really no mystery to it. French audiences flocked to opera and theater, while a narrow slice of cognoscenti subscribed to specialist chamber and orchestral societies. A composer didn't make his money there. The truly professional instrumental composer generally had a paying gig somewhere else. Franck and Saint-Saëns directed music for the church and taught, as did Fauré. Debussy essentially lived on patronage throughout his career and spent beyond his means. All these writers to a great extent, by their creations, leveled the hierarchy ever so slightly. Ballet and opera continued their popularity, but more listeners opened up to purely instrumental music.
A pioneer, César Franck did, I think, his best work in his Piano Quintet and Violin Sonata. Franck's music tends to bother me, since I find that its joins show through in obvious ways and that his use of cyclical form strikes me as mechanical. The cyclical form seems to me to derive both from Liszt and from Wagner and his Leitmotiven. In the latter, however, it directly serves the dramatic action, and drama and rhetorical focus is precisely what Franck's music generally lacks. The motives tend to reappear for no good rhetorical reason and thus become mechanical and arbitrary. Indeed, one might even suspect that Franck resorts to them when he runs out of new ideas. These weaknesses plague the Violin Sonata less, although they haven't disappeared. In four movements, the work begins with a melancholy serenade, not in sonata form -- more a development of two ideas in alternation. A neat moment occurs toward the end where the second idea morphs into the first, thus showing their kinship. The second movement works up a great passion, using, among other things, the two main ideas of the previous movement and the germ of the opening theme to the finale. An improvisatory movement follows, essentially allowing the violin to mull over the all the themes so far. What sounds like a new strain, a lyrical Slavic-like theme, actually turns out to be a variant of the sonata's opening idea, which Franck beautifully makes clear as the new leads to the old. Much has been made of the "canonic" finale. As a canon, it's pretty small beer, nothing more than soul music call-and-response, such as we got from Sam & Dave, where the last note of one instance overlaps the upbeat of the repetition. Fortunately, the outpouring is so heartfelt, the fact of canon means very little. After the main strain (itself deriving from the second movement), Franck again parades previous themes in variation -- the "Slavic" bit from the third movement, the opening basis of the second, and the subsidiary theme of the first -- all punctuated with the canonic idea. This finale satisfies me the most of the four.
With Fauré, we get a composer who has so absorbed classical structural principles that he can play masterfully with form. The first sonata begins with a melody I immediately think of as French, perhaps because of the strong hints of modality. The harmonies indicate Fauré, a composer with an idiosyncratic ear, who puts unexpected chords beneath passing tones and loves the enharmonic modulation. Compare this to Brahms's first (1878), for example. It's a different musical universe. The first sonata comes early in Fauré's career (1876) and forty years separates it from its successor, but even here Fauré has achieved a masterpiece which owes some debt to German practice, yet isn't a knock-off. The opening movement is an impetuous sonata, dominated by a singing line. The melancholy second moves to a languorous barcarolle rhythm. A puckish, syncopated scherzo follows, and, in refreshing contrast to common practice, a leisurely finale, something else that endears Fauré to me. He doesn't try to overwhelm a listener with slam-bang. Instead, he lets the listener come to him. One senses a tremendously cultured mind with, at times, an elfin whimsy, and always a sane, measured sense of proportion. This is music for mature listeners.
The Berceuse comes from 1879. Fauré later orchestrated it, a task he disliked, so he must have had really warm feelings toward this morceau. It's a light salon-like work, exquisitely done. It sings very tenderly.
Debussy projected a violin sonata as early as 1894. He didn't complete one until 1917, among his last works and the occasion of his final public concert appearance. This is the latest of a series of three chamber works begun in 1915, during World War I, and intended as a tribute to the spirit and culture of France. The triptych also includes the Cello Sonata (1915) and the unusual Sonata for flute, viola, and harp (1915). Each of these works inhabits weird universes, and each shows tremendous concentrated power. The violin sonata I find especially enigmatic, both rhetorically and emotionally. Compared to the luxuriousness we normally associate with Debussy, this sonata is stripped-down, with lean clear textures, and the movement structures come across as odd and fragmented. The first, "Allegro vivo," eschews sonata form. Its unusual shape begins meditatively and ramps up a bit at the very end. The scherzo second movement, "Intermède" (intermezzo), changes mood capriciously. "Finale" rounds things off with a busy dance, interrupted by pauses for breath.
" Minstrels" appeared in the first book of piano preludes of 1910. These minstrels have little do with the medieval minnesinger. Instead, Debussy evokes the proto-jazz of dances like the cakewalk and its capering steps.
Thibaud and Cortot miss only in "Minstrels." Thibaud treats the piece as mere grotesquerie and so distorts the rhythm that Cortot can't follow him -- yet another classical musician condescending to jazz. However, they play the other works magnificently. I can't think of a better version of the Franck sonata. They manage to convince you that Franck isn't really a klutz and handle the padding of the work with concentration and conviction. Concentration and elegance characterize their Fauré -- certainly one of the top five recordings of this work I've heard. It presents the composer's surface modesty while allowing its depths to come through. The Debussy sonata is a fine reading, even though it holds on to its secrets. I haven't heard a more penetrating account. Keep in mind that the score was still relatively new and "advanced" when the duo recorded it in 1929.
The other recordings come from 1927-31. Producer Mark Obert-Thorn transferred them from shellacs. There is a bit of hiss and swish, but for the most part, he has cleaned up the sound without losing the timbre of the instruments. Cortot's playing comes through in all its tremendous subtlety. Thibaud commits fully to every work but "Minstrels." Breathe the genius of France.
LINK
|
RECENT REVIEW
| Classical CD Review
February 2012
VARIOUS OPERA
by R.E.B.
"Thank you Pristine Audio for these remarkable reissues!"
| |
Thank you Pristine Audio for these remarkable reissues! . Furtwängler's 1952 EMI recording of Tristan and Isolde is surely one of the greatest operatic performances ever recorded commercially . Producer Walter Legge assembled a fine cast headed by Kirsten Flagstad, known in all opera houses as the Isolde of her era. Although at the end of her fabulous career, she was still in fine voice (although after the recording was issued it was found that Elisabeth Schwarzkokpf had contributed two brief high C's). Furtwängler's impassioned conducting brings out detail never heard before, and the superb Philharmonia Orchestra is in top form. The mono sound is well-balanced, but there were a few problems with the master recording all solved by Andrew Rose's XR remastering that provides extended frequency range and correction of pitch problems. This remarkable recording has always been in the catalog, and currently is available on other labels at budget price. However, even if you already have this recording , you should investigate this important issue to hear it in all its glory.
In 1961 the Met presented Turandot, an opera they had not given for three decades because of the difficulty of finding singers who could cope with the two principal roles. February 24, 1961 they gave the first performance of a new production and there was no question they found what they were looking for: Birgit Nilsson and Franco Corelli were available, and an added plus was Leopold Stokowski had agreed to conduct. Dimitri Mitropoulos was scheduled for this but he died from a heart attack late in 1960, and when Rudolf Bing approached Stokowski, he accepted immediately. Stokowki and Bing disagreed over many production details, but everything eventually worked out. The premiere of the new production, with scenery by Cecil Beaton, took place February 24, a benefit performance, and it was a triumphant occasion. Thirteen performances were given including one each in Philadelphia and Boston. Nilsson and Corelli sang all of them except for two performances in which Richard Tucker replaced Corelli. Liù was sung by Anna Moffo 3 times, Teresa Stratas sung it twice, Lucine Amara 5 times, and Leontyne Price and Licia Albanese each sang it once-as did Gabriella Tucci in an extra performance led by Zubin Mehta. This new Pristine Audio set is of the broadcast March 4, 1961, and it is exciting indeed. Both Corelli and Nilsson are at their peak and seem to be trying to outsing each other. Moffo is wonderful as Liù; three years later she made her fine RCA recording of Songs of the Auvergne with Stokowski on the podium. Stokowski, 78 at the time of the premiere performance, had broken his hip and walked with crutches but once he started conducting he was the essence of vigor. He does make a few changes in orchestration, particularly in the final pages where he adds smashing gongs to great effect. This performance has been around for years in pirated versions, but Andrew Rose's restoration is superior to any of them. Lover of fine singing must have this set!
In 1960 Decca decided to issue a deluxe series of opera recordings, and this Fledermaus was the first. Their roster of singers was unrivaled at the time, and casting could not be more perfect. It included a gala sequence with guest appearances by a number of major singers performing for the assembled guests at Prince Orlofsky's party in Act II: Renata Tebaldi (Villa-Lied); Fernando Corena (Domino); Birgit Nilsson (I Could Have Danced All Night);Mario del Monaco (Passione); Teresa Berganza (Lullaby); Joan Sutherland (Il Bacio); Jussi Björling (Dein ist mein genzes Hertz); Leontyne Price (Summertime); Giulietta Simionato & Ettore Bastianini (Anything you can do); Ljuba Welitsch (Wien, Wien nur du allein). Applause and party sounds are heard, and everyone seems to be having a great time. The rich and resonant sound, an example of early Decca two-channel recording, was engineered by John Culshaw and his crew.The original album was issued on two disks for Fledermaus, with a separate disk for the Gala party sequence, and that 's the way Pristine Audio offers it. To fill out the Gala we have four Strauss waltzes conducted by Karajan with the Berlin Philharmonic recorded 1940-1942k, mono recordings remastered in effective ambient stereo. Karajan's 1955 Fledermaus recording with a cast headed by Elisabeth Schwarzkopf is still available, as is a live performance recorded live at the Vienna State Opera New Year's Eve 1960.
Recently Sony Classical issued a performance of Donizetti's L'Elisir d'amore featuring Carlo Bergonzi and Roberta Peters, a Met broadcast from March 5, 1966, and now we have another live performance of this opera from the Met. This features lyric tenor Bruno Landi (1900-1968) and Bidu Sayao (1902-1999), a broadcast of January 3, 1942. This issue is particularly important as the remarkable Brazilian soprano made few recordings in spite of the fact that she was loved in major opera houses, particular the Met. Sayao is best known for her 1945 recording of Villa Lobos' Bachianas Brasilieras No. 5 with the composer conducting. She sang at the Met from 1937 to 1951. Sayao is enchanting as Adina, totally secure vocally and it is easy to understand her popularity. Don't overlook her 1947 Met Gounod Romeo and Juliet in which she is paired with Jussi Bjöerling (REVIEW). It's unfortunate we don't have that luxury on this new reissue. Bruno Landi is adequate but little more. He sang 56 performances at the Met, 31 of which were as Count Almaviva in The Barber of Seville. Salvatore Baccaloni is perfect as Dulcamara, and conductor Ettore Panizza keeps things going at a brisk pace. The transfer was made by a master in audio restoration, Ward Marston, who used a set of five 16-inch glass base lacquer coated disks, and he worked his usual magic, audio is remarkable for an 80 year old recording.
|
|
|
CONTENTS
| |
Editorial Can a $25 PC satisfy all your audio-visual needs?
Furtwängler more Brahms: Symphony 2 & the Double Concerto Toscanini the legendary 1944 Fidelio in stunning sound
PADA Toscanini's 1935 Salzburg Fidelio
|
What will be beating at the heart of your next stereo
Can a 25 dollar PC replace your current set-up? Before I get into the main subject this week, I'd like to thank all those who helped make last week's new releases and the subsequent weekend's sales figures among the best we've ever had. Furtwängler has always had a very strong and dedicated following, but until now I didn't appreciate (because we hadn't had it in our catalogue) the interest in his Brahms. Whether that will continue this week remains to be seen - if the Second Symphony and Double Concerto can't quite top the First Symphony in terms of sound quality (or glowing decades-old reviews!) then they sure come very close. It's another remarkable release that shows just what can be locked away in a 1952 concert recording. Toscanini, likewise, has a major and often fanatical following to this day. If one can't expect quite the same audio quality from 1944 as one can find in 1952, then when you hear his live Fidelio you may still want to shake your head in disbelief, especially at the quality heard in the singers' voices. The recording itself lacks some of the extended frequency and dynamic range of the Brahms, but this is a 68-year-old recording sounding almost as good as new! I did have a go at his legendary 1935 Salzburg Festival Fidelio, but I suspect only the most truly dedicated Toscanini fans will want to listen all the way through to it. The recording was taken from a short wave relay picked up in the USA and comes from the first act only. The rest, if it was recorded at the time, is lost to history; the concert was regarded by many as one of the opera performances of the century. A very slightly tidied up - but not majorly remastered - copy of this recording can be downloaded from our website at no cost, in both FLAC and MP3 formats. I'm afraid I have no plans right now to try and fix this one up for a full release - I think we need a bit more technology before that's really worth attempting. Which kind of leads me onto this week's topic. A few months ago I wrote here of my attempts to silence the PC in my living room that serves as my primary music and video player. Several new fans and bits of kit later and it did indeed get quieter, but not for long, and I'm still not entirely happy. Some of you wrote to recommend an Apple Mac Mini, enthusing about their silence, power, good looks and versatility. My existing PC may be not as quiet as I'd like, but not noisy enough to justify the expense of the Apple, I regret. Last time I checked here in France I prices ranged from €599 up to €999 for one of those, and for the task in hand there are better options, I feel.  | Mac Mini - too pricey?
|
At the very opposite end of the spectrum is a development to warm the heart of anyone who's ever been involved in the more DIY end of computing, the "Raspberry Pi". This remarkable British machine costs just $25, yet in theory is capable of doing just about everything I'd want the Mac Mini to achieve. OK it doesn't look quite so pretty...  | | Raspberry Pi |
...but it's cheap, tiny, needs no cooling, plays full HD video and runs XBMC. If I could get it to hook into my home network and find my way around its Linux operating system (and perhaps find a box to put it in) this could, in theory at least, provide a cheap answer to the silence issue. Whether I can persuade it to drive my USB sound card and take instruction from my wireless keyboard and mouse I don't know, but it might be fun (or could that actually end up being frustrating?) to try. It's not the only show in tech-town's mini-mall though, and this is where it might be worth holding onto your twenty five bucks for a little while. Just this week we've seen the launch of a couple of similarly ultra-basic PCs, both from Chinese manufacturers and this time running Google's Android operating system - the same one that's sitting inside my mobile phone, on which I watched the last few minutes of this year's European Champions League Football final's TV coverage. Again the promise is of something tiny, with a handful of basic connectors and a free operating system. The user provides the storage space, keyboard; screen and so on, while the device just does the number crunching needed to link them all up and make them play what you want to see or hear. One of the new releases looks a lot like the Raspberry Pi - an unboxed circuit board PC for $50, but this one, barely bigger than a memory stick, costs just $79, yet could, with a little ingenuity, also take the place of that Mac Mini:  | | Rikomagic's MK802 even has a case! |
I admit there's a bit of a nostalgia buzz for someone like me, who grew up during the British home computer boom of the early Eighties, but I'd love to see if I could get one of these super-cheapies to take the place of a "proper" PC and run my audio and video system through it, if only for the challenge. My main concern though is that my super-fast USB wi-fi kit, which easily and happily streams HD video at high speed on the less-used 5GHz band from my server to my living room, only seems to support Windows. It seems that as soon as I solve one problem with any of these ideas a new, and rather major one, takes its place. A perhaps more sane, if once again more expensive, solution would be to take the best bits of what's already working well for me and find them a new home. A company called Streacom had put together a small range of PC cases that seem perfectly designed to fit into a hi-fi stack:  | | Streacom's hi-fi style PC case |
The case is the perfect size to fit in a regular stack of hi-fi gear and comes in black or silver, with or without a disc slot - you can choose whether you want this to support CD/DVD or CD/DVD/Blu-Ray if you choose to have it. There's a clever system of heat distribution and removal, with those heat-sink fan-like sides capable of dissipating any excess temperature from one of Intel's new range of high-performance low-wattage processors. The other main source of heat in a PC, the power supply, sits outside the case so doesn't contribute hot air to the inside of Streacom's aluminium case. Thus the entire system is able to operate as a full-power PC without any cooling fans. Drop in an SSD hard drive and skip the optical drive and I'd have a system with no moving parts that does exactly what I want it to do and talks to all my existing peripherals. QuietPC.com will build you a complete PC system in one of these boxes for around the higher price of that Mac Mini, but they'll also sell you the parts to put your own together. But price-wise it still sits closer to the Apple than the Raspberry, and it seems a lot to pay to do away with a noisy fan. If only it had a nice fruity name too, perhaps I would be sold on it enough to splash out! Andrew Rose 25 May 2012
|
Two major live Brahms recordings
from Furtwängler in 1952
Furtwängler's Brahms has never
sounded as superb as this!
FURTWÄNGLER
conducts Brahms
Recorded 1952/49
Producer and Audio Restoration Engineer: Andrew Rose
BRAHMS Symphony No. 2 in D major, Op. 73 BRAHMS Double Concerto in A minor, Op. 102
Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra
Willi Boskovsky violin Emanuel Brabec cello Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra
Wilhelm Furtwängler conductor
Web page: PASC 341 Short notes "The performance is incomparable ... for the moment I confess I know no performance of this symphony which more strikingly illuminates those points where this symphony is palpably at its greatest." - Gramophone, 1985, on Furtwängler's Brahms Symphony No. 1
The quote above referred to the First Symphony issued here a week ago - which came from the same concert as this week's Double Concerto recording. It's coupled with another tour de force from Furtwängler, a concert recording from May of the same year, 1952, in which he conducted the Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra in Brahms' Second Symphony
XR remastering by Pristine has revealed both to hold excellent sound quality far beyond that which has been heard these past 60 years. This really is musical gold!
Notes On this recording Both of these live recordings were made in the year of 1952 at a time when technical sound quality was undergoing a revolutionary step forward thanks to the advent both of tape and vinyl LP technologies almost simultaneously. However the equipment of the day was not without its sonic shortcomings, and both of these recordings suffered a slightly harsh, boxy sound quality in their original states. Fortunately this can now be largely remedied by Pristine's 32-bit XR remastering system, which has made great strides in improving the tonal qualities of both the Symphony and Concerto recordings.
In both cases the orchestras played slightly sharper than the standard A=440Hz, and I've used careful analysis of electrical tones captured in both recordings from mains interference as a guide to set pitch precisely to that heard at each concert. The end result of this work is to bring us closer than ever before to the sound of these concerts as heard by Furtwängler and his 1952 audiences.
Note that the lack of applause and movement breaks were as found on my source material. Andrew Rose Review Double Concerto The Double Concerto was recorded at a live performance. Willi Boskovsky had been the VPO's concertmaster since 1939, and Emanuel Brabec was the orchestra's principal cellist. The acoustic is a little confined, and the solo cello seems to catch the microphone slightly, but the balance is reasonably good and the sound itself quite clear. The performance starts unpromisingly, with fairly ordinary contributions from the soloists and a rather heavy tutti from Furtwangler, but as the first movement procedes a greater spirit grows, and soon soloists and conductor establish a good rapport. The stow movement is given a lovely, serene performance, although the finale is taken at a dangerously slow tempo. There are some good touches here but a somewhat strained, impatient quality in the solo playing, as if Boskovsky and Brabec wanted to escape from the orchestra's somewhat lumbering presence. This is a flawed performance, then, but it has thought-provoking and stimulating qualities too. A.S., Gramophone, September 1990 MP3 Sample Symphony No. 2, 1st mvt Listen Download purchase links: Ambient Stereo MP3 Mono 16-bit FLAC Ambient Stereo 16-bit FLAC Ambient Stereo 24-bit FLAC CD purchase links and all other information: PASC 341 - webpage at Pristine Classical
|
Toscanini's Fidelio: "daring, fierce, mesmerizing"
And now in fabulous sound quality in these new XR transfers
BEETHOVEN
Fidelio
Recorded 1944/45
Producer and Audio Restoration Engineer: Andrew Rose
BEETHOVEN Fidelio
NBC Symphony Orchestra
Arturo Toscanini conductor
Jan Peerce (tenor) - Florestano
Rose Bampton (soprano) - Leonora
Nicola Moscona (bass) - Don Fernando
Herbert Janssen (bass) - Don Pizarro
Sidor Belarsky (bass) - Rocco
Eleanor Steber (soprano) - Marcellina
Joseph Laderoute (tenor) - Giacchino
Web page: PACO 077
Short notes
The nature of much of Toscanini's work during the later decades of his life, dedicated as it was from the late 1930s to the NBC Symphony Orchestra and their many radio broadcasts, left little room for Toscanini the opera conductor.
Yet his appearance conducting Fidelio at the 1935 Salzburg Festival was a sensation, described by some as the greatest operatic concert of the century. A part of it was captured, in a crackly, hissy, shortwave radio broadcast, which we're giving away as a free download.
But not only that, we've taken his "concert" version of Fidelio, prepared for two special radio broadcasts as part of his NBC Beethoven Festival of late 1944 by omitting the dialogue, and remastered it to bring out amazingly high standards of sound quality. "In its raw, unvarnished way, it is daring, fierce, mesmerizing, to be heard when you're feeling strong of spirit and mind." - Gramophone, 1992
Notes on this recording
The broadcasts from which this recording originated were transmitted a week apart, and the normal mid-programme talk was omitted in order to fit each act into a one-hour slot. Also omitted was almost all dialogue, with the opera staged more as a concert piece than a staged work. An error by soprano Rose Bampton in the Abscheulicher led to a re-recording of this at an RCA Toscanini recording session in Carnegie Hall the following June 14th, and it is this version which RCA subsequently used in their releases of the recording - we have stayed with this version for our issue.
The sound quality of the original recording was adequate, but huge strides forward have been made with the application of 32-bit XR remastering, which has particularly favoured the solo voices here. Although the frequency range tops out at around 10kHz, there is plenty of 'air' and brightness to be heard, albeit with a degree of background hiss at times. I was also able, for the first time, to iron out some quite pronounced pitch variations caused by the original recording equipment drifting up and down in speed.
Andrew Rose
Review 1992
This isn't music-making for the timid, used to the sanitized, faultless performances on your everyday CD. In its raw, unvarnished way, it is daring, fierce, mesmerizing, to be heard when you're feeling strong of spirit and mind. Toscanini views Fidelio and indeed Leonore No. 3 as stark drama, devoid of sentimentality. The winds leap from the speakers, the brass blare ferociously as the old wizard tells a story of the struggle for freedom in a year when, even in the United States, events far away in Europe must have felt very present. In achieving his end, he demands and mostly receives superhuman efforts from his charges: speeds are nervously fast, rhythms alert, as though the events were happening in the conductor's presence. The wind section is prominent in a way we have since heard from Norrington in Beethoven, indubitably influenced by his predecessor. An occasional untidiness is a price worth paying for such an edge-of-your-seat interpretation. Inevitably the epithet 'hard-driven' has been used about the performance: a visionary conductor, inclined to the dictatorial, demands much from his performers and listeners. No compromises can be made. We won't always want to hear the score done like this; once in a way, it is cleansing and salutary.
According to Harvey Sachs's notes, Rose Bampton once said that Toscanini declared "the words came first and that the music was composed afterwards. So we had to understand the deepest significance of the words in order to be expressive." Certainly all the singers enunciate with the utmost clarity, to a fault in the case of the inadequate Rocco, whose German is poor. Bampton herself, although no Lehmann (Toscanini's Salzburg interpreter) in matters of voice or diction, is a determined and dedicated Leonore, whose "Abscheulicher" comes from a later session and is the best part of her performanceelsewhere she is sometimes off form vocally. The young Steber is a lovely Marzelline. Although not one's ideal Florestan, Peerce sings with his customary honesty and technical security. Janssen may not have the incisive bass-baritone for Pizarro, but he projects his part with biting venom. Nobody else makes much of an impression and the chorus is no more than adequate-Robert Shaw hadn't yet arrived on the scene-but the sum is greater than the parts.
Much as one may regret the break for Leonore No. 3, the performance is so electrifying as to silence criticism, but exception has to be taken to the complete absence of dialogue, an essential part of this score. The digital tapes, made from NBC acetates rather than RCA originals, have a little more breadth and reliability than previous transfers to LP. In any case, reservations about sound should deter nobody from sampling this unique experience.
A.B., Gramophone October 1992
Review 1956 Three names - Beethoven, Fidelio, and Toscanini - will be enough for many people and will ask no more. Though they may find the following of interest.
The new Fidelio goes onto four LP sides, as opposed to the six occupied by the previous complete version (reviewed by A.R. in May 1954). "Complete" in the sense that room is found for the Leonora No. 3, without which we should probably feel cheated, though it really has no business herewhile the spoken dialogue, except in the melodrames of the dungeon scene, is cut-giving an effect to anyone who did not know the work that this was an opera of continuous music and not an opera corrtique, as it properly is. Moods are sometimes hereby made to change too rapidly; but one concedes the omissions, in the interest of time-space-money. The interpolated Leonora No. 3 starts the last side and is "scrolled off", so that it may be left out if one wishes. Otherwise the new set is not scrolled at all, as the Vienna performance was, so that it is difficult to pick out individual "numbers", should you wish to.
"New" is also a relative term meaning: publication over here. Actually this Toscanini version, made up from two broadcasts of 12 years ago, is older in time than Furtwangler's, which was made just after the inaugural gala seasion at the new Vienna opera and with the cast and orchestra which had performed it on the opening night. These discs get more on to each side-the first side for instance concludes with the little march, which in the Vienna set is already the second band of the second side, and so on. Also, Toscanini's speeds are appreciably faster in many instances.
Judging between the two is not at all easy; to this opera, unique, one brings a special set of expectations and very varying responses. Music which is alternately sublime and homely, heroic and simple almost to the point of being humdrum, establishes a whole phalanx of contradictory postulates. Is one to insist on heroism and make allowances for the fact that heroes find it hard to wear clogs? Or insist first on the homely, the simple and the natural sounding and make corresponding allowance for "ordinary" characters dealing somewhat unheroically with the sublime? Comparing these two versions is made further difficult by the actual variability of one issue being taken from broadcast tapes.
In a very general way, I would say that those who already have the grand Furtwängler set, with its somewhat overstrained Leonora (Martha Mödl) but generally very authentically German sounding cast, should hesitate before abandoning it in favour of the Toscanini with a cast not so noticeably better, at least as far as Germanic authenticity goes. Rose Bampton enunciates German clearly and plausibly, but she acts with her voice less well than Mödl : there is less Innigkeit, less of the heroism we remember from Lotte Lehmann's interpretation. On the other hand her voice sounds better placed and less out of condition than Mödl's; the top is free and has a real soprano ring (as in the allegro of "Abscheulicher"). The veteran Janssen, too, sounds better than Edelmann in the villain's formidable aria-though there the quality of the recording is better in the Vienna set. In the matter of cast otherwise I would somewhat prefer the Vienna soloists, though the N.B.C. chorus in the ultimate pans of joy sound as if they had more deeper reserves of exuberant joy.
Furtwängler's handling of the score was masterly and the recording was all very much of a piece: Toscanini's is also masterly, but the recorded quality varies from bright to just faintly distorted. And there are one or two curious smudges in the ensemble, as if the maestro's titanic spontaneity had taken the players off their guard (one such occurs in the menacing orchestral passage which ushers in Florestan's "Welch dunkel . . " in the dungeon scene). Then there are some shifts of level hard to account for: for instance the Prisoners' Chorus seems to have been inserted afterwards like a gusset in a coat (and it will be recalled that it did not make its true theatrical effect in the Vienna set either). After it is over, we jump back to the soloists, like a sudden close-up in a film. Again towards the end of the dungeon scene where in the theatre the mounting excitement comes out at you in a rising tide, the performance here seems, on the contrary, to recede like a camera slowly panning backwards to take in an ever widening (but more distant) scene.
But, and it is an over-riding "but" for a great many people, Toscanini at many points brings an exhilaration to the music which is, quite simply, more purely thrilling than the stately and deeply considered interpretation by Furtwängler. I suggest that you try, one against the other, the trio beginning "Mein Sönnchen..." and play through each version from there to the end of Scene 1. It is not that Toscanini is a fraction brisker; it is that the ideal concept of the music and the performance of it suddenly fuses into one and the same thing. One is no longer conscious of music being made; it is the thing itself, and as the short orchestral postlude lets the pressure down again, one resumes one's ordinary breath rate exactly as one does in a theatre at the fall of a cutain on some scene which has burned you up like oxygen and made you forget everything about yourself and where you are. The scene, which brings the American players and singers to full incandescence, is an example of Toscanini's unique deamon (and unique is the keyword for this opera). For it, and some other like wonders, you may be prepared to jetison the steadier and finally less obtrusive qualities of Furtwängler and the honourable Vienna gala cast.
I should make it clear that the American cast "copes" magnificently - however much one may feel them out of touch with the German character of the dramatic element and the declamatory German style. Both Peerce and Miss Bampton are marvellously on top of "0 namenlose Freude" even at this pace, and for once Toscanini never seems to be overdriving anyone. It must indeed have been a thrilling couple of broadcasts and the issue is one well worth making, possibly of buying, certainly of comparing with the fine six-sided Furtwangler performance from Vienna. That either version makes a quite wonderful impression is of course only to be expected. P.H.-W., The Gramophone October 1956 MP3 Sample No. 1 Duett - Jetzt, Schätzcvhen Listen
Download purchase links:
Ambient Stereo MP3
Mono 16-bit FLAC
Ambient Stereo 16-bit FLAC
Ambient Stereo 24-bit FLAC
CD purchase links and all other information: PACO 077 - webpage at Pristine Classical
|
Toscanini's 1935 Fidelio
 | | Toscanini |
PADA Exclusives Streamed MP3s you can also download
Beethoven Fidelio
1935 Salburg Festival
featuring
Lotte Lehman Luia Helletsgruber Hermann Gallos Anton Pavman Alfred Jager
Salzburg Festival Orchestra & Chorus Arturo Toscanini conductor
Live concert, 31 August 1935 Shortwave Radio broadcast - Private transcription
Toscanini's "other" recording of Fidelio was a 1935 shortwave radio broadcast, picked up and privately copied to disc in the US at the time. Quality is rough at best, but the performance went down as one of the operatic events of the century.
Over 500 PADA Exclusives recordings are available for high-quality streamed listening and free 224kbps MP3 download to all subscribers. PADA Exclusives are not available on CD and are additional to our main catalogue.
Subscriptions start from €1 per week for PADA Exclusives only listening and download access. A full subscription to PADA Premium gets you all this plus unlimited streamed listening access to all Pristine Classical recordings for just €10 per month, with a free 1 week introductory trial.
|
|