FREE ALBUM
|
| |
A FREE 128k MP3!
Toscanini
Live in 1950
Prokofiev Symphony 1
Debussy Ibéria
Saint-Saëns Danse Macabre
R. Strauss Don Juan
NBC Symphony Orchestra Arturo Toscanini
Broadcast from Studio 8H, 25th March 1950
Download it now - for one week only - it's only free from our Cover Page!
"UPGRADE" to full quality lossless 16-bit or 24-bit FLAC downloads with notes here:
PASC 208
|
LATEST REVIEW
| MusicWeb International
13 April 2012
GOUNOD'S FAUST
By Göran Forsling
"A must for Jussi Björling's many admirers"
| |
This broadcast recording by NBC from one of Jussi Björling's last opera performances, has been issued before on Robin Hood Records RHR 5021-5023 but in rather poor sound. I haven't heard the LPs but trustworthy 'ear-witnesses' state that the present issue is a vast improvement. My first reaction was also that for its age - the recording was made 62 years ago - the sound is remarkable. It is true that sound recording and reproduction technique had developed enormously during the first decade of the LP record. Stereo recordings had been made in some quarters for about five years and the dynamic range in some recordings and notably Decca had their Full Frequency Stereo Sound. It should be remembered that about this time Decca issued Solti's Das Rheingold, the first instalment in the epoch-making Ring cycle. They also had Karajan's tremendous Otello. Those were studio recordings but broadcasts were for many years hampered by poor frequency range. The sound here is mono and the dynamic expansion is fairly limited. It is however a clean sound and one gets a rather realistic image of the orchestra. The voices are well projected and free from distortion. At times the orchestra comes across as almost too brilliant, even aggressive, but that may be due to Jean Morel's not insensitive but energetic conducting. The waltz (CD 1 tr 8) is more thrilling than in any other recording I've heard. The reverse side of this coin is also notable: a number of unwanted sounds from the stage are also reproduced with true fidelity. We have, however, become used to stage noises during the first decade of the new millennium, when more and more opera recordings are made live - and now with even higher fidelity. I have reported in some reviews of especially noisy productions where I have taken shelter behind furniture to avoid being hit by flying objects. No such danger here but there is an assortment of extra-musical sources of sound that have to be coped with while enjoying the music and the singing. The music is well known. Even though Gounod's sometimes over-sweet idiom is quite unfashionable no one can honestly deny the abundance of beautiful, and sometimes dramatically valid, melodies. Those who know their Faust should be warned that there is far too little of the music on offer here. This is easy to understand from the number of discs. There isn't room for all the Faust music on two CDs. That was the state of affairs at the Met in those days. The opera had always been performed heavily cut. All the titbits are there but the filling is sometimes meagre. To some this may be a blessing, others want the whole thing - and 2:36:43 still makes a pretty big cake. Where no one can complain is in relation to the quality of the singing. Jussi Björling was a great Faust. I have friends who maintain that he was at his very best in French repertoire. Unfortunately he only retained two French roles when he embarked upon his international career - and neither Faust nor Romeo et Juliette was recorded commercially. We are lucky to have both in good live recordings from the Met, Faust twice. When I reviewed the 1950 Faust (review) some years ago the first paragraph read 'This 3 CD set contains some of the most glorious tenor singing ever recorded. Buy it!!!' Here, nine years later, almost to the day, he is still in tremendous shape. He was an extraordinary singer with remarkable stamina. Not yet five years old he gave his first public concert together with his brothers and his father. During the next twelve years the boys gave more than one thousand concerts all over Sweden and in the US. From the age of 19, when he made his debut at the Stockholm opera and until his untimely death in September 1960 when he was only 49, he sang another two thousand opera performances and recitals. His heart problems had increased during the 1950s and when this performance took place he had less than nine months to live. Even so, there is very little in his singing that reveals weakening health or diminishing vocal ability. He slightly fluffs the very first phrase but after that he is just as magnificent as on the 1950 recording. Once or twice the voice seems marginally heavier but it is, by and large, the same Björling as ever. Those who doubt my judgement need only lend an ear to Quel trouble ... salut, demeure (CD 1 tr 12) the famous cavatina. Whether it surpasses the 1950 recording is open to debate. Maybe the high C is not as free this time, but it is still a reading that must be counted among the best on record. The garden scene (CD 2 tr 1-3) is further evidence that here is a singer still in his prime. In this scene there is also a magical rapport between Björling and his Marguerite. She is the young Elisabeth Söderström, who had made her Met debut a couple of months earlier as Susanna in Le nozze di Figaro - she was later to become the Contessa. A couple of weeks before the broadcast she sang her first ever Marguerite. She had been Manon Lescaut opposite Björling in Stockholm but this was something much bigger. In her memoirs I min tonart (In My Key) (Bonniers, 1978, not available in English, I believe) she recalls the situation: 'It was with terror in my heart and on trembling legs that I walked to the theatre that evening: we had had only one run-through with orchestra and sets, I wasn't sufficiently prepared. I bewailed my distress to Jussi, who looked at me with compassion and answered: 'Little friend, you have nothing to be afraid of, there aren't many who demand much of you yet. It is much worse for me; everybody expects to find out whether I am finished or whether I can live up to my reputation.'" I haven't been able to find a review of her Faust debut but the reception of her house debut some weeks earlier should have strengthened her self-confidence: 'Elisabeth Soederstroem was a delightful Susanna in every respect. Her bright, flexible voice was always dependable and she proved to be a resourceful actress. One of the most impressive indications of her artistry was the fact that her singing in the ensembles was just as finished as it was in her solo arias.' (Robert Sabin, Musical America). Le nozze di Figaro was a new production and there had been adequate rehearsal time, while Faust had been in the repertoire for ages and guest singers just popped in and out. Listening to this recording one can conclude that everything worked exactly as it should. Ms Söderström shows her credentials with aplomb in a gloriously sung Jewel aria (CD 1 tr. 14). All through the performance she is in radiant voice and draws a vivid portrait of a character that can seem one-dimensional when sung prettily without proper characterization. I have admired Söderström ever since I first heard her - probably on the radio. I have enjoyed her on so many recordings and in the flesh in opera and recital. Vocally she has never sounded better than here. It should be mentioned that she had a long career and sang her last performances at the Met as the Countess in Queen of Spades in April 1999, almost forty years after her debut there. She passed away in November 2009. Readers who know little about this many-sided artist may access some information from my obituary (here). There is even more vocal splendour on offer in this performance. Cesare Siepi repeats his Mephistopheles from the 1950 recording and is as magnificent here. The intervening nine years gave him even more authority and the voice is still in fine fettle. Another stalwart at the Met, Robert Merrill, pours out golden tone that surpasses most of his baritone colleagues. Not the most charismatic of actors, he still manages to invest his portrait of Valentin with power and energy. Mildred Miller is a very fine Siebel and Thelma Votipka is a Marthe to reckon with. There is another irritant that must not pass unnoticed: the Met audience's bad behaviour. They start clapping long before a number is finished. As always with live recordings one has to accept blemishes like that. The singing is what counts and no one is likely to be disappointed on that account. This issue is a must for Jussi Björling's many admirers and it is a real bonus to get world class performances from Söderström, Merrill and Siepi in the bargain.
LINK
|
LATEST REVIEW
| Classical CD Review
March 2012
GENESIS SUITE ETC.
By SGS
"Kunstmeisters and Kitschmeisters"
| |
Kunstmeisters and Kitschmeisters. By the late Thirties, Los Angeles had become home to the cream of Jewish and anti-Fascist intellectuals fleeing from Europe. Nathaniel Shilkret, conductor and at that time working for the studios as a film composer, got the idea of asking the most illustrious of them to compose movements of a collaborative work based on the Book of Genesis. Alexandre Tansman, Ernst Toch, and Mario Castelnuovo-Tedesco had also worked in the movies, often uncredited, although Tansman did earn a screen credit for the Rosalind Russell flick Sister Kenny and Toch eventually earned three Academy Award nominations. With Arthur Honegger, Darius Milhaud had been one of the pioneer film composers in France, but Hollywood used him sparingly. Arnold Schoenberg and Igor Stravinsky tried to break into films, but no studio was interested, although producers loved announcing to the press that they were "considering" one or the other for their latest Prestige Project, thus trading off the cachet of their celebrity without actually having to take a real chance. At any rate, Shilkret was enough of a hustler to get up a performance and to make a recording with Edward Arnold as narrator. The recording, turned down by every major distributor, didn't sell very well. EMI acquired the rights to it years later, but for some reason couldn't use the Arnold narration. It advertised Arnold, but anybody familiar with the actor's deep, round tones knew immediately the voice wasn't his.
Shilkret likely pursued the project as a way to advance himself. He certainly had little respect for the men he worked with. Schoenberg, for example, had written an orchestral prelude, which Shilkret placed at the end of the recording. This allowed his piece to lead off the suite, which he justified by saying that his work had made a bigger hit with the audiences. He moved the two "difficult" composers to last in line, so his listeners could tune out early. The problem is that Schoenberg composed his Prelude with the idea in mind that it would lead to something else and wrote the end accordingly. In the Shilkret order, the music just peters out. Shilkret also issued instructions to "his" collaborators about the type of music he wanted from them, something very much like the typical Forties film scoring he provided. Tansman and Castelnuovo-Tedesco caved. Schoenberg and Stravinsky, thank God, largely ignored Shilkret. Milhaud and Toch to some extent modified their styles, but, thankfully, not to a fatal degree. When I first saw the word "Narrator," my heart sank, since narrator plus orchestra is probably my least-favorite genre, despite the rare examples of masterpieces. I usually feel either the music is so weak that it's unnecessary, as in the Shilkret, Tansman, and Castelnuovo-Tedesco movements, or the music is so good, the words get in the way, as in the Toch and the Milhaud. Schoenberg omitted the narrator altogether. With Babel and a characteristically elegant solution, Stravinsky actually found a way to convincingly integrate spoken word with music. I should note that the longer pieces are the weakest. Shilkret, Castelnuovo-Tedesco, and Tansman all run around ten minutes, while the others last roughly five.
Aside from the two acknowledged masterpieces, Babel and Schoenberg's Prelude, Toch's contribution interested me the most, in that it's not as chromatic or as tortured as he usually gets. Indeed, it sounds a little like Bloch. During the Thirties and the subsequent war, Toch had been too depressed to compose. He learned that the Nazis had wiped out the entire family he had left behind. The war's end got him writing again, and the new music sang more deeply. Unfortunately, the musical establishment had tuned its ears to new voices. Toch never regained his European reputation, although in the United States, he won a Pulitzer. I consider his neglect, especially in regard to his chamber music, a shame.
Speaking of neglect, Piston's Second Symphony comes from 1943. This performance, a broadcast for the Armed Forces, I believe was its second. G. Wallace Woodworth, known better as a choral director, turns out to be a capable conductor in a not-that-easy work, one which lacked both a performing tradition and a previous recording. Piston wrote a beautiful symphonic cycle, but since the Sixties, it hasn't received much in the way of performance or recording. The Second is both eloquent and elegant.
Pristine is known as an audiophile label. I think its incarnation of Schnabel's recorded Beethoven amazing. Both the Genesis and the Piston come, not from masters, but from actual records, and any digital cleanup is limited by the quality of the originals. All that said, Pristine's Andrew Rose has done a great job. I happen to have two other recordings of the Genesis Suite: one by Angel Records (Capitol/EMI) and another by Naxos. The Angel recording is essentially this one, with someone else (identified by Wikipedia as Ted Osborne) substituting for Arnold. Since the narration was recorded separately from the music, this substitution was possible, but definitely not desirable. It turns out that Arnold was a great reader of poetry, with a theater-trained voice that could have come from one of the heads on Mt. Rushmore. Furthermore, he's a good actor and avoids hamming it up or larding the narration with cinematic piety. The sound quality of the Pristine betters the Angel -- cleaner, clearer, not so bass-heavy. Naxos's Genesis has the best sound quality because it's stereo, but the performance, led by Gerard Schwarz, leaves much to be desired. He uses many narrators, for no good reason. Naxos could have saved itself a bundle by sticking with Fritz Weaver throughout. Furthermore, the orchestrations of many of these works were lost in a fire. The Stravinsky and Schoenberg scores escaped, thank goodness. Since then, others, particularly the Castelnuovo-Tedesco, have come to light. You avoid all this if you get the Pristine, my preference, because it uses the original recording. If you just want the Schoenberg and the Stravinsky, there are many other accounts that outdo Schwarz.
Woodworth's Piston, while interesting historically, has serious competition. Schwarz issued an okay version with the Seattle Symphony (now on Naxos). However, the best recording by far -- and a classic recording of American music -- is the young Michael Tilson Thomas directing the Boston Symphony (when I was hoping like mad he would succeed Steinberg; the conductorship went instead, of course, to Ozawa). This performance sets the roof on fire, and the DG sound quality excites you all by itself. In addition, you get Ives's Three Places in New England and Ruggles's Sun-treader, again in definitive performances. You can get this disc as an ArkivCD from www.arkivmusic.com, worth every penny.
LINK
|
|
|
CONTENTS
| |
Editorial XR re-equalisation - visualising the changes
Hanson Conducts Hanson, Barber & Gould Backhaus Beethoven Piano Concertos 4 & 5
PADA Wagner Highlights from Franz von Hoessler, 1927
|
XR remastering's equalisation mystery, part 2
A visual guide Last week I wrote quite a lengthy article describing the basics of how XR remastering uses equalisation to dramatic effect. This week I plan to write a good deal less but, based on the notion that a picture speaks a thousand words, offer instead some graphic food for thought and give you even more! Because space is limited in an e-mail newsletter such as this you'll see the six graphs below cannot be easily reproduced in the kind of detail needed for a proper examination, so I've bundled them all together as high resolution scans into a single PDF file which you can download now by clicking here. You'll find the pictures shown below each occupying a full page in the same order in the PDF file, and getting a closer look at the should help you in understanding the accompanying notes here. I should finally add that my notes here are quite brief - this could easily be expanded out to a much longer article and include more evidence to back up my assertions. Please bear this in mind when making a critical assessment of what I've written! 1. Basic comparison - Two Beethoven NinthsI'm starting this off with a general introduction to one of the fundamental ideas underpinning XR - that there's a "sonic fingerprint" common to a reasonably accurate recording of every musical work that exists independently of the recording or performance itself. Before we get into this directly, it's worth looking at what regular equalisation, room acoustics, or different recording set-up can do to a recording, in order to rule these influences out when looking for that unique fingerprint. Here are two modern digital recordings of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony, expressed together in a graph of their sonic properties:  We're deliberately looking here at a low resolution of harmonic. Note that the lines graphed indicate the average frequency response of each recording across the entirety of that recording, from first note to last. For the purposes of this examination we'll start looking above 50Hz - there's little if any musical information below this level and some recordings roll it off completely. Others, such as these, have inaudible or near-inaudible very-low-frequency tones which were most probably picked up from air conditioning and the like. These are both modern, digital recordings, one from Solti on Decca and one from Naxos. Whilst the overall pattern is very similar, you can see one recording is slightly lighter in the upper-bass to lower-midrange, and one recording has a little more high treble. These differences could be the result of the recording or mastering engineer's preferences, or possibly differences between microphone set-ups, and could also indicate broad differences in orchestral tone. They're the find of alterations one can make on a mixing desk or with tone controls at home, but they don't speak about the fine resolution harmonic detail that XR looks at, and can be discounted in this regard. 2. A closer look - two Beethoven NinthsNow let's up the resolution, zoom in to the finer detail, and take a closer look at the crucial middle area where the main musical and harmonic contents lie, sticking with the same two recordings as above:  At twelve times the previous resolution we can see that even at this level of detail the two recordings are exceptionally closely matched - a sure sign of this being two ensembles performing the same work with a very similar group of instruments - i.e. two orchestras, two choruses, two sets of soloists. Despite the striking performance differences between the two recordings, there's no major difference to be seen in this kind of analysis. To be absolutely clear - this is the same analysis as above, just shown with a higher resolution so we can get down to "individual note" levels. We're looking at a distinct pattern of peaks and troughs which follow each other remarkably closely - the common "sonic fingerprint" of this piece of music which we find in two very different performances. 3. Two different works, same conductor, same orchestraChange one piece and everything changes. We remain with Solti and the Chicago Symphony - even with Beethoven, but here we look at two different symphonies superimposed in a high resolution graph - his 5th and 9th:  In this graph the overall pattern (apart from a broad high top end lift in one of the recordings suggestive of a tone-control-style adjustment) is very similar. But contrast the neat alignment of the previous graph in the circled area to the mess of competing squiggles you see here in the same frequency range. If we zoomed out of this we'd see the orchestral tone looking very similar - they are of course two recordings of the same orchestra made at roughly the same time, probably with the same equipment in the same place (though one doesn't have air-con!). But close up they're most definitely not the same at all - because they're playing two works with a different sequence of notes, and thus producing a different balance of frequencies across the duration of each performance. For the record, everything we've looked at so far comes from good, modern digital recordings - both Solti recordings were made with the Chicago Symphony and are drawn from the 1990 Decca Beethoven symphony cycle. The Naxos Ninth was played by the Nicolaus Esterhazy Sinfonia under Béla Drahos. What I hope these pictures have demonstrated, or at least suggested to you (and this experiment can be done time and time again with similar results) is the concept that each work does indeed have its own "sonic fingerprint" - a pattern of musical interrelationships at the fine-frequency level which is unique to that piece and irrespective of performer. If this is the case - and hundreds of XR remasters suggest it is - then we have a key to unlock older recordings where more primitive recording technologies haven't captured the sound naturally and have messed up this "sonic fingerprint". It's something we can only work on with computer analysis because it's so detailed and so complex, which is partly why it's never been done before. Restoring the older recordings to match that work-specific pattern is at the very heart of what I do with XR remastering - but it's not all we can deduce from these graphs, as we shall now see. 4. Back in time - what exactly was "Living Presence"?
Mercury recordings of the 1950s developed a reputation for what one critic dubbed "a living presence", a phrase quickly adopted by the company. They claimed a purist audiophile approach, with the blurb for the following 1955 LP telling us about the careful placement of a single Telefunken microphone and so forth. Yet compare the LP to a modern reference file in this low-resolution graph:  Everything looks fine until about 1.5kHz. Then we start to see a big gap grow between the Mercury recording and the modern reference. I've not included the high-resolution graphs here - the sonic fingerprints were fine and the two matched up just as one would expect when looking at the same works recorded properly. But something, or someone, has created a huge treble boost in the Mercury recording. It's hard to believe the Telefunken microphone was to blame, especially as it did such a good job generally, suggesting someone at Mercury - the recording engineer or the mastering engineer? - wound in a lot of treble here to produce the "Living Presence" sound that became their trademark. Of course this is mere speculation - but when you undo this lift to match the reference the whole sound becomes far more natural! You can hear the end result on this week's Hanson American Music Volume 5 release - the graph refers to the two works written by the conductor therein. 5. Another Mercury mystery
Now we turn to a tricky recording for XR - Morton Gould's Symphonette No. 4 - AKA The Latin-American Symphonette, also on this week's Hanson release but from an earlier LP. I was unable to find a complete modern reference for matching here, just a single movement, which at least gave me some pointers. But what was particularly striking about this recording, made a couple of years before the Hanson above, is the opposite to the treble lift we've just seen - a very steep treble cut-off:  Because I've not got a complete modern reference for the Gould, I've kept here with the previous Hanson reference, which also helps me demonstrate another phenomenon: In the middle you'll see the difference the addition of human voices makes to an orchestral recording. Hanson's The Cherubic Hymn includes a full choir, and the human voice and its harmonics add a texture not present in an orchestra, which can be seen clearly by the two "bumps" in the middle, corresponding to areas where vocal frequencies and harmonics are particularly strong and cut through the orchestral texture well. But then look up around 10 kHz. In fact, why not look at this one really closely - because at our highest resolution we can see just how steep this drop really is:  Here we have the typical mess lower down which we can ignore right now as we're not comparing two identical works. I want to see just how steep that cut is at 10kHz - past which the frequency curve runs parallel to our reference but up to 15dB lower. That is one very significant cut! Why is it there? I don't know. Can it be reversed? Up to a point, yes - rather like the upper frequencies captured on 78s there is useful information there, but it's now so much quieter that it starts to disappear into hiss and LP surface noise, and may be more prone to distortion. Curiously the Barber which filled the other side of the Gould LP just discussed had a similar, but less severe reduction at the top end. The combination of less severity with the availability of direct reference material made this somewhat easier to XR-remaster, the end result being a slightly brighter and clearer high top end. In conclusion, each of these pictures shows a different story, and each can be examined in a number of ways. Furthermore these analyses, and the tools we have to re-equalise one recording to another at multiple resolutions and at different areas of the audio spectrum, allow us the unprecedented ability to re-engineer older recordings and get closer than ever before to their true sound. In his editorial in the latest issue of Classical Recordings Quarterly, Alan Sanders makes, on the subject of over-filtered restorations versus original 78rpm playback, warts and all, a rather strong assertion: " Well, you can't add anything to a recording; you can only take away, and if you home in on one characteristic it's likely to be at the expense of another." I'd like to suggest to him in response that there is now, in fact, a "third way" that neither adds nor necessarily takes away - rather, it realigns what's already there. Generally speaking this works to the benefit of the recording - whenever there's something amiss, of course... Andrew Rose 13 April 2012
|
Hanson conducts his own 5th Symphony, plus music by Morton Gould and Samuel Barber
More American treasures from one of the finest interpreters of this music
HANSON
American Music Volume 5
Recorded 1952-54
Producer and Audio Restoration Engineer: Andrew Rose
HANSON Symphony No. 5, Op. 43, "Sinfonia Sacra"
HANSON The Cherubic Hymn GOULD Symphonette No.4: Latin-American Symphonette BARBER Overture to "The School for Scandal", Op. 5 BARBER Adagio for Strings BARBER Essay for Orchestra No. 1, Op. 12
Eastman-Rochester Symphony Orchestra Eastman School of Music Chorus Sir Thomas Beecham conductor
Web page: PASC 332 Short notes "The whole work is played in great style - the Eastman-Rochester Symphony Orchestra seem completely at home with it. Few symphony orchestras can encompass this sort of music wholly satisfactorily - usually the brass section make it clear that the transition is too much of a strain. But here the style is changed with no apparent strain at all; and the brass and percussion are certainly beautifully caught by the fine recording" - Gramophone, 1954, on Gould's Symphonette
Once again we find American composer and conductor Howard Hanson at the helm for another collection of superb American music, recorded by Mercury in the early 1950s for LP issue.
Each composer here was granted an LP side - well-known works by Barber join Morton Gould's rare but thrilling Latin-American Symphonette, together with two excellent and - again - less heard major works by Hanson himself. An excellent addition to a very well-received series. Notes On this recording The Barber and Gould recordings, both made on the same day in the autumn of 1952, displayed a distinct loss of top-end treble. In the case of the Gould this was particularly acute with a very steep drop-off of around 15dB above 10kHz that suggests a quite severe filter was used in mastering the original LP. I've done what I can to try and restore what remains above these frequencies in both recording, more successfully perhaps in the Barber. The 1955 recordings of Hanson's own works show a more typical "Living Presence" lift of the lower treble, though happily not as severe as on some of their recordings of this era, and it's an anomaly which happily makes for lower hiss levels after XR remastering has corrected the tonal balance.
All of the recordings displayed degrees of pitch instability consistent with the tape recording equipment of the day, allowing the orchestral tuning to wander slowly between about A=440Hz and A=446Hz. Standard concert pitch seemed a reasonable point to re-tune the recordings to, something which appeared to be confirmed by the copious amounts of mains electrical hum (with multiple harmonics) I have removed. Each of these recordings was transferred from original, near-mint 1950s US Mercury pressings. Andrew Rose Review Barber & Gould LP I'm not sure that the two sides of this record fit very well together; but each, considered separately, is certainly a winner. The recording is throughout clear and vital, though perhaps lacking something in warmth; a deficiency that does altogether less damage here than it would in the classics, and which is in any case set off by many virtues in other respects-the brass and percussion in particular coming off extremely well.
Samuel Barber is the only contemporary American composer even reasonably well represented in the English catalogues but even so, the gaiety of the School for Scandal overture throws for us a new light on him. The quick-witted vein is an attractive one, and the piece is well presented by the orchestra.
So is the Adagio for Strings. This is more familiar; as well as some SPs there is a LP (Decca LX3042) called, I suppose unarguably correctly, Music of the Twentieth Century, which includes this piece in a hurried but rich-toned performance by the Boyd Neel Orchestra, along with an enveloping hum and some incongruous piano and 'cello pieces. Here there is no aggressive hum, though the string sound is not quite so rich as on the Decca ; but principally there is a considerably more intense performance, which reveals the moving elegy the better.
The Essay for Orchestra is not quite so convincing; it seems on the short side for what it has to say-the allegro molto section does not immediately declare itself capable of supporting the weight of the andante sostenuto which precedes it. But the three pieces taken together, and most admirably performed, give a most useful conspectus of Barber's achievement in the smaller forms.
One had always supposed that Morton Gould must have written something other than the Pavane, and here it is. A four-movement Sinfonietta is no novelty, but one based on four Latin-American dances is orchestral arrangements of a rumba, tango, guaracha, and conga by good musicians are no novelty, but ones done with musical rather than commercial ends in view seem, unfortunately, to be so.
Those four dances form the four movements, taking on something like the classical balance. The rumba has a first-movement fullness; the tango, of the Argentinian variety, is developed into a singularly attractive slow movement, with wisps of sound that are so wholly appropriate, but which could never be written for the audiences to whom Gould, or any other first-class arranger, normally has to direct his music, tango-style or otherwise. A guaracha is less familiar, but it forms an effective scherzo; the finale is a conga that begins and ends in a blaze, but has sober expanses in the middle, and is not quite the irresistible "orgiastic" affair the sleevenote led my baser instincts to hope for.
The whole work is played in great style the Eastman-Rochester Symphony Orchestra seem completely at home with it. Few symphony orchestras can encompass this sort of music wholly satisfactorily - usually the brass section make it clear that the transition is too much of a strain. But here the style is changed with no apparent strain at all; and the brass and percussion are certainly beautifully caught by the fine recording.
The choice of coupling remains curious. But it has, arguably, one advantage; with two sides so diverse and each so good in its own way, it would be cantankerous indeed to dislike both of them at once. M.M. - The Gramophone, June 1954 MP3 Sample Hanson Symphony No. 5 (long excerpt) Listen Download purchase links: Ambient Stereo MP3 mono 16-bit FLAC Ambient Stereo 16-bit FLAC Ambient Stereo 24-bit FLAC CD purchase links and all other information: PASC 332 - webpage at Pristine Classical
|
"Backhaus and Clemens Krauss give us a fine performance" - Gramophone
Backhaus's classic Concerto recordings have been completely transformed in these new remasters
BACKHAUS
Beethoven Concertos 4 & 5
Recorded 1951-53
Producer and Audio Restoration Engineer: Andrew Rose
Concerto No. 4 in G, Op. 58
Concerto No. 5 in E flat, Op. 73, "Emperor"
Wilhelm Backhaus piano
Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra Clemens Krauss conductor
Web page: PASC 333 Short notes "...there is thought and feeling behind this of Backhaus's performances, even though all will not find themselves permanently in agreement with its results. The Vienna Philharmonic do agree, or are made to seem to do so by Krauss - they, too, are unhurried and unruffled, and never fail to match their style to that of the soloist" - Gramophone, 1954, from review of Concerto No. 5 This third volume of Backhaus's Beethoven Concertos, 11th overall in our Backhaus series, concludes the orchestral section of this set. In both recordings here Backhaus receives excellent support from Clemens Krauss and a Vienna Philharmonic in absolutely peak form.
Generally well-recorded, these new XR-remastered transfers have much-enhanced orchestral and piano tone, lower hiss levels and a number of pitch corrections to recommend them. You can also now purchase the set of three concerto releases together at a special 'virtual box set' discount.
Notes on this recording As with previous recordings in this series, I have been able to tackle not just the issues of background hiss and tonal balance, but also pitch. The Concerto No. 4 showed a gradual slide upwards through the second movement from a low start, whilst the finale drooped off at the very end. The Emperor, whilst benefiting from significantly finer sound quality, proved to be considerably erratic, pitch-wise, suggesting multiple and quite frequent edits between takes from different days or machines causing regular jumps up and down. Both concertos have been leveled out to concert pitch.
I was able to release superb sound quality in both, and though the strings in the earlier recording still show a tendency towards shrillness, they are much improved over the original harsh sound here, without any imparment in the clarity of the piano tone which might have resulted from a straightforward reduction in treble. No such problems with the Emperor, where an already fine sound has been further rounded out, with greater extension in both treble and bass and a more generous overall feel from an excellent recording. Andrew Rose Reviews Backhaus and Clemens Krauss give us a fine performance, as one might expect; and from the recording point of view I find it commendable-more level in tone and more manageable than many LPs. The piano tone is mostly very good, but wears a little thin in the cadenza of the first movement, and perhaps the balance of soloist and orchestra is just a little less good in the second movement. The Backhaus-Krauss is, of course, much nearer to the Gieseking-Karajan than to the Rubinstein-Beecham. It is a restrained performance, with the design of each movement beautifully laid out before us, and with no attempt of any kind at display on the part of the soloist. The style of the performance may thus be called " classical". H.F. The Gramophone, January 1952 (Reviewing LXT2629, Piano Concerto No. 4, excerpt)
Five Emperors ; but this last of the house clearly reigns unchallenged in one respect- its recorded sound is fuller and richer than that of any of the others, and presents for the first time a completely acceptable piano tone. The balance, too, is good throughout ... The performance revealed by this good recording is unusual, and certainly unexpected. Backhaus can, and sometimes does, pin a Chopin Mazurka back by its ears and belabour it unmercifully. The Emperor Concerto, more able to stand up to such treatment, he approaches instead in a fashion almost to be described as coy ; when a lover goes a-wooing he could more appropriately indulge in these little fancies of hesitation, and of delicacy. I don't wish to suggest that it is erratic to a fault ; I do wish to suggest that there is thought and feeling behind this of Backhaus's performances, even though all will not find themselves permanently in agreement with its results. The Vienna Philharmonic do agree, or are made to seem to do so by Krauss they, too, are unhurried and unruffled, and never fail to match their style to that of the soloist.
M.M. The Gramophone, January 1954 (Reviewing LXT2839, Piano Concerto No. 5, excerpt)
MP3 Sample Piano Concerto No. 5, 3rd mvt. Listen
Download purchase links: Ambient Stereo MP3 mono 16-bit FLAC Ambient Stereo 16-bit FLAC Ambient Stereo 24-bit FLAC CD purchase links and all other information: PASC 333 - webpage at Pristine Classical
|
Hoesslin conducts highlights from Wagner's Ring
 | | Fritz von Hoesslin |
PADA Exclusives
Streamed MP3s you can also download
Wagner Excerpts from Die Walküre, Siegfried, Das Rehingold
Bayreuth Festival Orch. Fritz von Hoesslin conductor
Recorded at Bayreuth, summer 1927
Issued as Columbia L2014-17
This transfer is remastered by Dr. John Duffy. Over 500 PADA Exclusives recordings are available for high-quality streamed listening and free 224kbps MP3 download to all subscribers. PADA Exclusives are not available on CD and are additional to our main catalogue. Subscriptions start from €1 per week for PADA Exclusives only listening and download access. A full subscription to PADA Premium gets you all this plus unlimited streamed listening access to all Pristine Classical recordings for just €10 per month, with a free 1 week introductory trial.
|
|