FREE ALBUM
|
| |
A FREE 128k MP3!
Brahms
A German Requiem
Vivian della Chiesa Herbert Janssen The Westminster Choir NBC Symphony Orchestra Arturo Toscanini
Recorded 1945
"Musically, the reading may well surprise those accustomed to hearing the music in another performance... In short, this broadcast provides a stunning walk into history and a prime example of Toscanini's giving new life and meaning to work that was often thought to be depressingly dreary"
- Fanfare
Download it now - for one week only - it's only free from our Cover Page!
"UPGRADE" to full quality lossless 16-bit or 24-bit FLAC downloads with notes here:
PACO 050
|
LATEST REVIEW
| Classic Recordings Quarterly
Spring 2012
DOWNLOADS
By David Patmore
"There are very few, if any, musical duds in the Pristine catalogue"
| |
The first thing to be observed about all these recent releases from Andrew Rose's Pristine Audio label is that the sound quality achieved is second to none. Even the oldest recording is made to yield exceptional results, which is sure to delight both aficionado and newcomer alike. So whether your taste is for the familiar, such as Beethoven piano music played by Schnabel, or the unfamiliar, for instance Howard Hanson conducting Charles Griffes, you are certain to be delighted with the sonic results achieved by this label. In addition, as Andrew Rose has such a vast pool of out-of- copyright recordings from which to choose for remastering, one can generally be confident that the musical performances will always be of a very high standard. There are very few, if any, musical duds in the Pristine catalogue.
Thus the major point of both interest and distinctiveness is likely to lie in the choice of repertoire presented. This current crop contains recordings that are well-known as well as some rarities. Among the latter is the aforementioned Hanson disc, which brings together some early 1950s Mercury recordings with Hanson conducting the Eastman-Rochester Symphony Orchestra. The works featured are Roy Harris's Symphony No. 3, Griffes's The Pleasure Dome of Kuhla Khan and The White Peacock, Clouds, and Bacchanale, and Barber's First Symphony (® PASC315, 59mins). Hanson was a major leader for American music at this time, and his readings are uniformly excellent. The originally rather dry recorded sound has been opened out sympathetically. Rare Beecham repertoire is featured in another compendium disc, with Sir Thomas directing Richard Arnell's Punch and the Child, Delius's An Arabesque, and Lord Berners's The Triumph of Neptune (© PASC314, 59mins), all again hailing from the early 1950s. Musical inspiration is at a premium here, despite Beecham's best efforts, and so this CD does tend to outlive its welcome slightly, but if you want this repertoire, then it will not fail to please.
Unusual repertoire for stringed instruments is a consistent feature of the Pristine Audio catalogue. Two good examples are in this current crop. The first brings together two major performances of concertos by Dvorak from the post-war era: Ida Haendel's account of the Violin Concerto, with Karl Rankl conducting the National Symphony Orchestra, which appeared originally on Decca 78s, and Enrico Mainardi playing the Cello Concerto for DG in 1955, with Fritz Lehmann directing the Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra. The overall honours go fairly decisively to Haendel and Rankl, perhaps surprisingly, with Lehmann not always achieving the required head of steam, despite Mainardi's best efforts. Nonetheless this CD provides an interesting and worthwhile pairing of the two major Dvorak concertos for stringed instruments (® PASC308, 69mins). Now let's have the Piano Concerto! Any recording featuring the great English violinist Albert Sammons is sure to be of interest, and Pristine's new offering is no exception. It features Sammons playing the Elgar Violin Sonata in partnership with the pianist William Murdoch, recorded by Columbia in 1935. Set alongside this is the Rubbra Violin Sonata, recorded for HMV with Gerald Moore at the piano in 1946, towards the end of Sammons's career. Both performances have numerous points of interest and sound well. This programme is neatly rounded off with Sammons playing four salon pieces with a natural grace and ease (® PACM079, 55mins).
On the operatic front, Pristine fields a rarity and something a little more familiar. The rarity is a recording of Gounod's Paust, broadcast from the Metropolitan Opera on 19 December 1959, featuring Jussi Björling in a late appearance, singing opposite a young Elisabeth Söderström and the incomparable Cesare Siepi as Mephistopheles (® PAC0064, two discs, 156mins). The conductor is Jean Morel, who taught at Juilliard and was by reputation something of a martinet. The recording is taken from the LP issue published by Robin Hood Records, and is perfectly respectable in terms of both sound and performance. Björling enthusiasts will definitely want this recording if they do not have it already, but if you are after a good Paust it might be worth considering looking elsewhere. Similarly the extracts from Wagner's Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg featuring the great Friedrich Schorr and recorded in performance at the Berlin State Opera on 22 May 1929 will be of interest both to Wagner mavens as well as Schorr admirers, rather than to the general listener (® PACO065, 79mins). The original recording has had fairly wide circulation on various EMI labels. Therefore a major point of interest in this particular reissue, produced and transferred by Mark Obert-Thorn, is the inclusion of two previously unpublished takes from an earlier staged performance given on 29 April 1929, one of which covers repertoire not present in the earlier selection, the duet between Sachs and Eva, "Sieh, Evchen! Dacht ich's doch, wo sie blieb!".
Pristine have made something of a niche for itself with the remastering and reissue of several complete piano cycles of note from the past. Their reissue of the Beethoven piano sonata cycle of Artur Schnabel has been well received, and it is useful to have as a valuable appendix the same pianist's complete account of the Beethoven Bagatelles (CD PAKM049, 71mins), in which Andrew Rose has worked from EMI's reissues on vinyl from the 1960s and 1980s. The results sound amazingly good, with none of the imperfections of the original 78 surfaces. Equally satisfying is Schnabels 1937 recording of the Diabelli Variations (® PAKM047, 71mins), once again transferred from EMI's own vinyl transfers.
Now for two stalwarts from the mono catalogue of the early 1950s: Guido Cantelli conducting the Orchestra of La Scala, Milan, in Tchaikovsky's Fifth Symphony and, with the Philharmonia Orchestra, the same composer's Romeo and Juliet (@ PASC316, 62mins). Both these recordings were pillars of the early EMI catalogue and hearing them duly refreshed in these fine transfers it is not hard to see why they were so successful. Lastly we have two excellent mono concerto recordings by Clifford Curzon: the Brahms First Piano Concerto with Eduard van Beinum conducting the Amsterdam Concertgebouw Orchestra in 1953, and the Grieg Piano Concerto with Anatole Fistoulari directing the London Symphony Orchestra, from 1951. Both recordings stand as fitting tributes to one of this country's most outstanding musicians, and have been done full justice in Pristine Audio's excellent transfers (® PASC 312, 77mins).
|
LATEST REVIEW
| Audiophile Audition
5 April 2012
VAN KEMPEN
By Gary Lemco
"Paul van Kempen's Beethoven efforts from 1940-1941 receive glorious, even glamorous restoration that releases the visceral power of his musical vision"
| |
Producer and restoration engineer Mark Obert-Thorn has assembled three Beethoven studio sessions of Paul van Kempen (1893-1955), 1940-1941, taken from the German Polydor label. Kempen, a conductor raised in the heroic tradition of Willem Mengelberg and his Concertgebouw Orchestra of Amsterdam, became noted for his deft attention to orchestral detail, complemented by a cultivated sense of musical architecture. His readings of the Tchaikovsky Fifth and Capriccio Italien on the Philips label, along with his natural affinity for the music of Brahms, Bruckner, and Mahler, sustain Kempen's reputation. Beethoven collectors have long treasured his concerto cycle with pianist Wilhelm Kempff, and his Brahms B-flat Concerto with Adrian Aeschbacher maintains a kind of cult status for cognoscenti.
The opening excerpts from Beethoven's ballet, The Creatures of Prometheus (rec. 7 July 1941) conveys a rugged, virile energy, especially in the ballet music, in which brass, tympani, and strings achieve some mighty harmonies in brisk motion. Curious, that Beethoven's Symphony No. 2 elicited several German inscriptions from this fertile period in recording history: we have two potent readings from Fritz Lehmann and Paul van Kempen, to name but a pair. Kempen (April 1940) takes his cue from Mengelberg, but his approach bears fewer 19th Century atavistic practices in regard to tempo, phrasing, and rhythmic license. The broad cello line in the opening Adagio molto possesses singing energy and a dramatic sense of the figures as they move to fulfillment in the Allegro con brio. The latter section literally explodes with whistling excitement, the strings, woodwinds, and tympani in colossal motion, fervent and convinced of their collective mission.
The A Major Larghetto has reigned as the heart of this symphony, which Berlioz well admired. Kempen molds its delicate phrases in legato strings and hymnal winds with loving care, the phrases breathed in dramatically poised periods. The sustained pedal points achieve a muscular girth quite anticipatory of the Fifth Symphony, which shares honors in this fine restoration. A slight ritard or marcato infiltrates the tempo of the Scherzo, played for rustic lyricism rather than rough-house athletics. The tips of the violin bows bespeaks volumes about niceties of lithe articulation. Equally suave bassoon and French horn work in the Trio. The 2/2 Allegro molto rather hustles forward, yet it refuses to relinquish the naturally lyric buoyancy Kempen has established just by the minutest of rhythmic restraints. The influence of late Mozart, especially his K. 543, emerges at key points. The exquisite balances Kempen elicits from his excited, virtuoso forces might well have been attributed to the equally classical tradition in the music-making of the more famous contemporaries Eugen Jochum and Erich Kleiber.
The Beethoven Fifth (7 July 1941), from the same session as the Prometheus, announces its forward drive from the outset of the Allegro con brio, Kempen's not opting for a halting sense of "profundity." That Kempen raised the Dresden Philharmonic's level of execution to stellar status has been long granted and finds ample testimony here. The textural alignments of differing masses of sound becomes a dramatic conflict as compelling as the organization and permutations of the ground-motif itself. The inevitability of the peroration rivals anything in the Germans' conducting catalogue of the period, from Furtwaengler to Abendroth.
The A-flat Major Andante con moto receives a broad treatment from Kempen, its double-theme and subsequent variants eventually allowing the four-note motif in the bass to exalt the suspensions to heroic proportions. The Dresden cello line sings elegantly, the triplet arpeggios in the violas luxurious. The woodwinds reassert their aerial transparency before the brass and tympani, in march like procession, move the music into heraldry. Kempen underplays the graduated crescendos as the music moves to a poised, eminently noble conclusion. The melodic impulse dominates even the militant Allegro third movement, the interior counterpoint's moving at a brisk, articulate pace. The diaphanous pizzicati pursue their ineluctable course to the transition to the timpani and string crescendo to the jubilant C Major finale. How many seeds of the Seventh Symphony already burst forth in the lusty throes of the Fifth! Brilliant rocket figures from the Dresden string and wind choirs reaffirm the tempestuous bravura of Kempen's performance, perhaps unheralded in its own time, but now released with the quality of the sonic splendor its vision demands.
LINK
|
|
|
CONTENTS
| |
Editorial XR re-equalisation - why does it work as it does?
Beecham A stunning Mozart Requiem & Schubert 5 Backhaus Beethoven Sonatas Volume 6 - 23-26
PADA Siegfried Wagner conducts Good Friday Music
|
XR remastering's equalisation mystery
Why equalising Toscanini to Haitink actually works My inclusion of a link to a YouTube video of Abbey Road's engineer Simon Gibson's excellent explanation of how he went about remastering archive recording by Furtwängler (see the link after this article) caught a lot of people's attention, and prompted one reader in Italy, Angelo Pagan, to e-mail this question to me: I think that the YouTube vide about EMI remastering (suggested in the
last newsletter) is very interesting.
Their equalization process compared with your (at least, what I can
read in "A brief history of XR remastering, 2007-2012" in the FAQs)
suggested a question: how much model-dependent is your method? That
is: what's the difference between a Toscanini equalized using Haitink
and the same Toscanini equalize using Karajan? Is there any audible
difference?
The Beethoven's 7th involves only an orchestre: with voices, what
happens? Or whit solo instruments, like a piano?
This raises a number of questions which I'll endeavour to answer in a moment, but coincidentally this week I read through the new reviews in Fanfare and found this from Boyd Pomeroy, commenting on our Clifford Curzon release of concertos by Brahms and Greig: The 1953 Brahms is the second of three studio recordings Clifford Curzon made for Decca, between the Enrique Jordá/National Symphony Orchestra (1945-46) and the George Szell/London Symphony Orchestra (1962). All are available in Decca's gathering of his complete studio recordings in a series of bargain-priced Original Masters boxes. Although the difference in transfers is not huge, the advantage here goes to Pristine's (from LPs, as usual), sounding richer, warmer, and with an expanded dynamic range compared to Decca's own from the master tapes. The description "sounding richer, warmer, and with an expanded dynamic range" is a good one, but as is often the case also illustrates the trouble with language when trying to explain why something sounds better to our ears - in the same issue Henry Fogel explains what it is about our recent Furtwängler Tristan und Isolde which so appeals to him: The real question for collectors is whether this Pristine transfer is significantly superior to the earlier ones. I had praise for both EMI's and Naxos's versions, giving a very slight edge to the Naxos transfer by Mark Obert-Thorn. I was not expecting a meaningful difference in Andrew Rose's effort for Pristine, but in fact it is enough of an improvement to warrant its purchase by any serious collector. In addition to listening to it all the way through, I did a number of spot A-B comparisons to the EMI and Naxos. It seems to me that Rose has managed to come up with a sound picture that is fuller at both the upper and lower extremes of frequency, without ever turning the sound harsh. It is the bass that is particularly impressive here-never boomy, but satisfyingly solid with an impact missing until now. The orchestral colors are richer, the voices bloom more, and the whole is more satisfying than it has ever been.
Once again that word, "richer" comes into play. As I write this I'm listening through to this week's Beecham Mozart Requiem release (and making minor adjustments along the way) and noting exactly the same thing - the BBC Chorus has a fullness and rich tone it lacked on the LP, something duplicated in the orchestra and heard to superb effect in the vocal solos. There is a clear illusion - and I use that term wisely - of an increased dynamic range as perceived by Boyd Pomeroy in the Curzon. So what is actually causing this? Why do I diverge from Abbey Road when it comes to equalisation? How can we take a 1950s LP and make it sound appreciably better than a transfer from the original master tapes? Why does it sound "richer" and "fuller" without simply sounding like someone's increased the bass and treble controls? Given that I stumbled across this more by trial and error than by theory, I am lucky enough to have studied the physics of sound at university, but confess that although it allows me an explanation for how XR works, its "proof", so to speak, only lies in the ears of the expert listeners and reviewers, and the consistency of results in the 340 recordings thus far produced in this manner. (Incidentally "XR", standing for extended range, came about from the initial expectation that the technique would be used primarily for accessing upper frequencies in 78rpm recordings - it's turned out to have much wider use and broader implications than that.) So, to return to the original question: why doesn't equalising one orchestra to another make the first sound like the second? And to expand that question, why might it make the former sound richer and fuller? For this we have to examine a little the physics of sound - and I suggest that the answer should be better found in asking "what makes a violin sound like a violin?". I'm not a violinist. But if I was to pick up a cheap violin and run the bow along the strings I'd make a sound as instantly recognisable as a violin as if Nigel Kennedy, who I once had the privilege of broadcasting, were playing his Stradivarius. One might be badly played, the other brilliantly, one might have an inherently poor tone, the other sublime, but when you heard them both you'd immediately think "ah, violin". Yet if I played you a 60 or 70 year old recording of a violin you'd probably think "ah, old recording of a violin". It would be instantly recognisable both as a violin and as an old recording - even if it were devoid of hiss, crackle and surface noise and had a frequency range and dynamic range comparable to my modern recordings. Clearly there's something amiss in the old recording which adds that "old recording" tag when we listen to it. Yet there's enough "violin" there to allow us to identify the instrument, whereas between me and Kennedy we wouldn't think "old recording", just well-played and badly-played. XR remastering cannot turn badly-played into well-played. But it can tone down the "old" characteristics of a historic recording and make it sound, well, richer and fuller. The reason our two modern recordings sound so much like a violin, and my violin doesn't sound like a flute or an oboe, is down to the simple but inherent relationships between the note I'm playing, the "root" frequency, and the harmonics or multiples of that frequency which sound when that note is played. If I play concert A, at 440Hz, what comes out of the instrument is both 440Hz and a mixture of its possible multiples: 880Hz, 1320Hz, 1760Hz and so on up. In the case of a violin there may also be some random noise in the scrape of the bow over the strings, and there is also the question of the attack, but for our purposes it's the relationship between 440Hz and all those possible harmonics which we're interested in. Each instrument has a unique set of these relationships which make it sound like that instrument. Certain instruments favour certain harmonics, but each has its own "fingerprint", so to speak, which enables us to immediately distinguish between them. If we make a recording of an instrument we want to be sure that those harmonic relationships are preserved - that our oboe stays sounding like an oboe, our violin like a violin. Start to mess with them by, for example, adding in a random element of harmonic "reorganisation", and although it's unlikely to make the oboe sound like a violin, there's a fair chance it will start sounding like an old recording of an oboe. What we are hearing in older recordings is a complex combination of random harmonic "volume jumbling" (for want of a better term) and, often, more major peaks and troughs in the overall frequency response that are more akin to what might be achieved with a graphic equaliser or similar. The major peaks and troughs can, in the hands of a skilled and experienced engineer with a good equaliser, be dealt with reasonably successfully. This is, to an extent, what Simon Gibson is aiming for with his vintage equaliser at Abbey Road. But what it cannot compensate for is the apparently random fine frequency response of older recording equipment, which as far as I can tell boosts and cuts individual frequencies in ways which vary from recording to recording and as such are highly unpredictable. XR attempts to unpick this puzzle, using the simple observation already made - that the frequency relationship which makes a violin sound like a violin is inherent in the instrument. Spread that out over an entire work and add a full orchestra and the effect is the same - as long as they're in tune and are playing the same notes, the frequency response of two orchestras, at the resolution of instrumental harmonics, should match. It matters not who wields the baton, nor in which hall the orchestra was recorded; the fundamental harmonic relationships which define "violin", "flute", "trumpet" and "oboe" remain unchanged - and thus we have a means to unlock those older recordings where these relationships were muddled by the recording equipment of the day. By restoring that harmonic balance to the older recording, at the level of individual instrument harmonics (XR works to a fraction of a semitone) the result is a reduction or, in the best cases, an eradication of the "vintage" sound imposed upon the recording by the equipment used to make it. Thin, harsh and unnatural sound is transformed into something we describe as richer and fuller - with added psychological effects which suggest greater dynamic range, a sense of vibrancy and involvement, an immediacy and life lacking in the source recording. It's why XR can make an LP transfer sound better than the master tapes. "Better" is of course subjective - in this case it addresses specific shortcomings in the sound quality of the original recording which are independent of either medium and inherent in the recording itself. The improvements possible in that sound quality when put through the XR process outweigh the far lesser differences in quality found between vinyl and master tape, much of which are easily dealt with today anyway. Ultimately it's the message here which is flawed as well as the medium. We've spent years figuring out how to address the medium, be it tape, disc, cylinder, or whatever. Little attention has been paid to the message. XR changes this by tackling the message too. The results are there to be heard - and you needn't worry that they may turn Toscanini into Haitink or Backhaus into Ashkenazy. Toscanini's orchestra will sound more like it did to him; likewise Backhaus's piano. It can make huge differences, such as is last week's Furtwängler Mozart Symphony No. 39, or more subtle differences, as in some late-fifties and early-sixties recordings. And it can inject a previously-unheard sense of "life" into a recording - as heard to superb effect in Beecham's Mozart Requiem. Andrew Rose 6 April 2012
REMASTERING FURTWÄNGLER THE ABBEY ROAD WAY

Well worth a watch if you've half an hour to spare, this video on YouTube shows Abbey Road engineer Simon Gibson remastering recordings by Wilhelm Furtwängler from metal masters in the EMI archives. Almost all of it is similar to the way we do things here at Pristine until we get to the equalisation, where things couldn't be more different! You'll have to watch it to figure out why:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfA61_noOQQ
|
A fabulous Mozart Requiem is revealed in these new XR remasters
Beecham's brilliance heard here as never before, with sterling performances throughout
BEECHAM
MOZART Requiem SCHUBERT Symphony 5
Recorded 1954-59
Producer and Audio Restoration Engineer: Andrew Rose
MOZART Requiem Elsie Morison soprano Monica Sinclair contralto Alexander Young tenor Marian Nowakowski bass BBC Chorus dir. Leslie Woodgate
SCHUBERT Symphony No. 5 in B flat
Royal Philharmonic Orchestra Sir Thomas Beecham conductor
Web page: PACO 076 Short notes "the performance... is majestic and compelling, and the recording is throughout of excellent quality" - Gramophone, 1958, on Mozart's Requiem
A Gramophone reviewer might have been bowled over by this recording 54 years ago, but today it sounds distant and unsure - or at least it did prior to this new 32-bit Pristine XR remastering.
In an quite remarkable sonic transformation, the BBC Chorus now sing with a vigour, passion and surefootedness which appeared to elude them on the LP, indeed the entire recording has come alive and demonstrates a passionate performance previously lost to an indifferent sound quality. A truly stunning Mozart Requiem that must be heard!
We've coupled this with a wonderful stereo recording of Schubert's most Mozartian Symphony, in a Beecham album that's really very special indeed. Notes On this recording This recording of Mozart's Requiem is one of those happy instances which demonstrates the merits of Pristine Audio's 32-bit XR remastering system at its best, lifting what was a dull-sounding and indistinct choir into a degree of brilliance and clarity one would never have suspected from the original recording. Indeed, the entire recording has been transformed to an extent one can only really appreciate by hearing "before" and "after" side-by-side - especially in the Ambient Stereo version I wholeheartedly recommend here.
The later Schubert recording was far more successful in its original incarnation, but this, too, has been brought into even finer focus by the XR process, with additional use of phase-alignment software helping to produce a more sharply-defined stereo soundstage than before.
Together they're a superb-sounding record of Beecham at his very best. Andrew Rose Review excerpt Requiem In THE GRAMOPHONE for January, 1957, A.P. hinted that the best thing to do with this tiresome Requiem situation was to persuade Philips to release the Bruno Walter version, available for some time in America. Philips have done better : they have given us an English recording, with a fine team of soloists, the R.P.O., and the B.B.C. Chorus under Sir Thomas Beecham's meritorious baton.
The recording is remarkably vivid and sonorous, with just enough reverberation to add dignity, though not too much to impair clarity-at least in the orchestral part. I find the chorus less satisfactory in this respect, for, although they produce a good body of tone, the usual faults of balance are there (loud sopranos and tenors, reticent contraltos and basses) and the words are not too clear. Even the Vienna Opera Chorus in D.G.G.'s version, for all its subdued woolliness, manages to get some of the words across. After all, the one common and constant factor in all these performances is the Latin text, and it should moreover be a decisive factor. If the text is even slightly inaudible, the loss to the general quality of the performance is great. Happily, the four soloists chosen by Sir Thomas have excellent diction and an ability to blend well in ensembles.
Beecham's "Tuba mirum " is a resounding and remarkable triumph. Instead of the usual feeble apology for the last trump, sounding for all the world like a solitary and henpecked trombonist practising in a railway tunnel, we have all the spinechilling, blazing brass that we normally associate with Berlioz. The effect is truly magnificent. What is more, the obbligato trombone accompanying the bass soloist is here replaced by a more decorous violoncello -unauthentic perhaps, but the only way to avoid the kind of bathos that one usually associates with this noble number. Indeed, on replaying this passage, I am sure that if Mozart had ever corrected proofs of the Requiem, he would have switched the trombone solo elsewhere, just as Beecham has done.
I have hinted that Sir Thomas takes liberties with the score, but in nearly every case they are entirely justifiable liberties, and they add immeasurably to the power of the music. The organ's chordal support in " Rex tremendae " is an example of an eminently effective addition to the score, though I wondered whether this number coincided with the beginning of a new session, for a slight sharpening of pitch appears to take place at the beginning of this band.
In summing up, I have no hesitation in dismissing any small defects, for the performance as a whole is majestic and compelling, and the recording is throughout of excellent quality. Let us hope that Signor Fontana gives us more of the same kind. D.S., The Gramophone, February 1958 MP3 Sample Requiem Auternam Listen Download purchase links: Ambient Stereo and stereo MP3 mono and stereo 16-bit FLAC Ambient Stereo and stereo 16-bit FLAC Ambient Stereo and stereo 24-bit FLAC CD purchase links and all other information: PACO 076 - webpage at Pristine Classical
|
Sixth volume in Backhaus's magnificent first Beethoven Sonata cycle
Long only available on rare imports, and in new 32-bit XR remasters - this is unmissable
BACKHAUS
Beethoven Sonatas 23-26
Recorded 1951-53
Producer and Audio Restoration Engineer: Andrew Rose
Sonata No. 23 in F minor, Op. 57, "Appassionata"
Sonata No. 24 in F sharp major, Op. 78, "A Thérèse" Sonata No. 25 in G major, Op. 79 Sonata No. 26 in E flat major, Op. 81a, "Les Adieux"
Wilhelm Backhaus piano
Web page: PAKM 056
Short notes
"The classical, precise, authoritative Backhaus is presented here with uncommonly lifelike quality. He has his minor erraticisms, but they are no more than a part of the person who is presenting a great master for our full attention. Backhaus's own intense conviction of the composer's mastery fully overcomes any doubts one might have about the music." - Gramophone, 1951
Pristine Audio's excavation of Wilhelm Backhaus's indifferently - and at times badly - recorded but brilliantly-played Beethoven Piano Sonatas from the early 1950's continues in this, the sixth of eight volumes we're dedicating to the series.
These new remasters fix numerous issues regarding wayward pitch, poor recorded piano tone, apparent lack of dynamics, background hiss and assorted unwanted noises, to present the recordings as new - one of the great Beethoven pianists of all time in his only complete recorded Beethoven sonata cycle.
Notes on this recording
I have pointed out in previous technical notes that it has increasingly become my opinion that this series of Beethoven sonata recordings is one neglected - and, in its day, often disparaged - not primarily as a result of the playing by Backhaus of these works, but the by the raw deal he was served up by Decca's inadequate recordings.
In this volume pitch is, for the most part, not the issue seen previously, the exception being the first movement of the Appassionata, which dips alarmingly to begin with before proceeding to waver and jump about throughout the movement, most probably the result of editing together various takes as much as poor general tape speed stability. This has, for the first time, been corrected.
I would have to take issue with The Gramophone reviewer's suggestion that Backhaus refuses to play below mp-mf throughout the work - but can well imagine that impression being given by poor reproduction of his playing. Much of this is now happily alleviated here, and these interpretations can be more clearly judged within the excellent sonata cycle they so clearly combine to produce.
Andrew Rose
Reviews
"TWhile Backhaus's understanding of Beethoven is not, at this time of day, in any dispute, there is room to question whether these particular performances succeed in conveying it to the listener. They are dominated by a savage attack, and a refusal to play below an mp-mf degree of volume; a refusal that may be the result of many years' experience of recording under less satisfactory technical conditions than to-day's-which are here not on their very best behaviour, but are nevertheless good, and of course greatly superior to those that may be in Backhaus's mind .. The Appassionata stands up to the strain fairly well ; and is, indeed, particularly in the last movement, an impressive display of technical powers of the most advanced kind."
M.M. The Gramophone, September 1952 (Reviewing LXT2715, excerpt concerning Sonata No. 23)
"The classical, precise, authoritative Backhaus is presented here with uncommonly lifelike quality. He has his minor erraticisms, but they are no more than a part of the person who is presenting a great master for our full attention. Backhaus's own intense conviction of the composer's mastery fully overcomes any doubts one might have about the music. In truth, not one of these three sonatas is of great magnitude-that in G major (op. 79), Beethoven himself entitled " sonate facile ou sonatine."... I like the brittle, guitarry effect Backhaus creates for the opening movement of Op. 79: it has a kind of peasant air about it. The andante is taken well under walking pace, and I could bear the vivace finale more headlong. From this disc I had slight trouble with blast, which remained even if one turned the dynamics down. Backhaus's percussive style need not lead to this fault."
H.F. The Gramophone, October 1951 (Reviewing LXT2603, excerpt concerning Sonata No. 25)
MP3 Sample Piano Sonata No. 25, 1st mvt.
Listen
Download purchase links:
Ambient Stereo MP3
mono 16-bit FLAC
Ambient Stereo 16-bit FLAC
Ambient Stereo 24-bit FLAC
CD purchase links and all other information:
PAKM 056 - webpage at Pristine Classical
|
Siegfried Wagner conducts Parsifal - Good Friday Music
 | | Siegfried Wagner |
PADA Exclusives
Streamed MP3s you can also download
Wagner Parsifal - Good Friday Music, Act 3
Fritz Wolff, tenor Alexander Kipnis, bass Bayreuth Festival Orch. Siegfried Wagner conductor
Recorded at Bayreuth, 15 August 1927
Issued as Columbia L2013/14
This transfer is remastered by Dr. John Duffy. Over 500 PADA Exclusives recordings are available for high-quality streamed listening and free 224kbps MP3 download to all subscribers. PADA Exclusives are not available on CD and are additional to our main catalogue. Subscriptions start from €1 per week for PADA Exclusives only listening and download access. A full subscription to PADA Premium gets you all this plus unlimited streamed listening access to all Pristine Classical recordings for just €10 per month, with a free 1 week introductory trial.
|
|