Spectrogram
Newsletter - 24 February 2012
E-mail header
QUICK LINKS
BEECHAM conducts Haydn
BACKHAUS Beethoven Edition Volume 3
PADA Exclusives
FREE ALBUM
 PASC 328

A FREE 320k MP3!

 

Beecham

Haydn Symphony Rehearsals  

   

Recorded 1958, mono   




"At one point in this record Sir Thomas Beecham can be heard to say, "I'm all against rehearsing ... a most tedious and unnecessary affair." But the record itself gives the lie to this tart observation. Engraved within these grooves lies evidence aplenty that musical rehearsal can be the very opposite of tedious and that, far from being against it, Sir Thomas enjoyed the sport hugely."

FROM THE ORIGINAL NOTES, ENCLOSED WITH THE FLAC DOWNLOADS  
 

 

 

Download it now - for one week only - it's only free from our Cover Page!

 

 

 

"UPGRADE" to full quality lossless 16-bit or 24-bit FLAC downloads with notes here:

 

PASC 328  

 
LATEST REVIEW
Audiophile Audition

17 February 2012


POULENC  

By Gary Lemco

 

"Andrew Rose restores these brilliant 1961 stereophonic Poulenc staples to their aurally "correct" standards, reviving their ecstatic energies in glowing terms"

 
PASC324

 

Originally released 21 February 1961 through EMI, the 1938 Organ Concerto for Tympani and String Orchestra with Maurice Durufle and Georges Pretre suffered poor synchronicity between organ and orchestra, each having been pitched badly, and Andrew Rose of Pristine has remedied much of the situation. Now, the one-movement work, which falls into four classical sections much in the manner of a Schubert or Liszt concert piece, achieves an incandescent luster that can boast tonal accuracy as well as brilliant execution. Devout in character, the piece elicited from Poulenc that it lay "on the fringe of my religious works."

Pretre and Durufle take the Allegro giocoso at a furious pace, the layering by Durufle thickly ecstatic. Immediately following, the Subito andante moderato expresses a meditative devotional character and ethereal spirituality as only a composer comfortable in plainchant can attain. The influence of Bach and Buxtehude becomes quite palpable, and we hear Poulenc "en route to the cloister." The Molto agitato becomes emotionally inflamed, with Durufle's sounding out pedaled chromatics that explode into a rather dizzy melodic line that well might owe debts to Liszt, especially in his own transcription of Bach's G Minor Organ Fugue. The texture of the Tres calme: Lent moves in diaphanous wisps after the piled chromatics that preceded it. Materials from the concerto's opening recur cyclically in bravura style; and after a semi-cadenza by the organ, Durufle and Pretre bring the ambitious, diversely colored concerto to dignified conclusion.

Soprano Rosanna Carteri (b. 1930) appears in the Poulenc 1961 Gloria in G Major (rec. 15 February 1961), and she reaches several fine lyric, coloratura moments that remind us of her impressive work with Monteux in Verdi's La Traviata.  Commissioned by the Koussevitzky Foundation, the work elicits from Poulenc extraordinary writing harmonically and texturally, the askew treatment of words suited to the equally angular rhythmic pulses. The B Minor Laudamus Te, after a brass fanfare, extends the metric virtuosity, despite its "easy" key signature of C Major.  The Domine Deus belongs to Carteri's haunting collaboration with the chorus,  woodwinds and harp. The short but extroverted Domini Fili unigenite in G leads to the Domine Deus, Agnus Dei in B-flat Minor, in which Carteri returns to the trembling augmented melodic line with renewed, eerie piety, celebrating the Lamb of God's sacrifice. The final Qui sedes in G opens with a poignant "Miserere nobis" of declamatory power, a cappella, the orchestra's interjecting fanfare figures. The procession to Calvary assumes cosmic grandeur, especially as Carteri intones a soaring "Amen" that modulates into the resigned bliss of B Minor and G Major, respectively. Carteri's stunning Amen on D, surrounding by glowing soft chords, leaves us rapt in valediction.

As a filler of some consequence, we hear Francis Poulenc and Georges Auric on two pianos from 1 August 1937 in music by the ultimate Gallic iconoclast, Erik Satie. The opening Prelude from Parade has the designation "Prestigitateur Chinois" to indicate its mock-oriental ethos. The second excerpt, Petite fille americaine is marked "Rag Time" and exudes a glossy ironic surface that touches upon Joplin and American minstrel tradition. Acrobates combines ostinato patterns with colorful aspects of etude figuration, the meters shifting into alternately languorous or exotic textures. The Three Pieces in the Form of a Pear, first revealed to me by the partners Casadesus, have two episodes of jaunty, nostalgic or animated disposition, wistful and mocking, as per expectation.    

      

LINK 

 

 

        
LATEST REVIEW
Classical CD Review

February 2012


SCHNABEL SONATAS 8   

By S.G.S

  

  

"...With the second-movement, a scherzo-march, you feel you've time-traveled ahead to Schumann and his Davidsbündler, and Schnabel electrifies..."

 
PAKM045


Singing and dancing. After completing the monumental "Appassionata" Sonata No. 23, Beethoven left off writing piano sonatas for a few years. When he returned to the genre, he moved in another direction. The next few sonatas are primarily lyrical, rather than epic.

Sonata No. 25 breathes the air of a jeu d'esprit. The first movement as a whole rests on a German dance, a Teutscher, basically a fast waltz, for its foundation.. It lies within the ability of intermediate players, but you shouldn't underestimate it. It may be Beethoven in a more easy-going mood, but it's still Beethoven, full of zany humor. The first theme leaps about like lambs in Spring. Some refer to the sonata as the "Cuckoo," because of cuckoo calls in the development. Its harmony also interests me -- many enharmonic modulations of the kind characteristic of the later Schubert. The second movement moves like a Venetian gondolier song, a genre that would have great currency through much of the 19th Century with composers, both serious and salon, like Mendelssohn, Fauré, and Hahn.

For a guy who talked a lot of Oedipal smack about his teacher, Beethoven certainly took a good deal from Haydn. You could be forgiven for thinking the final rondo by Haydn, at least at first, for it has that same witty caprice practically invented by the older man. The main theme uses a harmonic sequence later taken up in Beethoven's Sonata No. 30, op. 109.

Although providing a lot of visceral excitement, Schnabel plays the first movement much too fast, obliterating much of the counterpoint and sliding over many of the jokes. On the other hand, the slow movement sings with an elegant lyricism, a quality Schnabel doesn't get enough props for. In the third movement, Schnabel again races through. However, it seems to matter less and stresses the madcap twitches of the music.

This sonata was followed relatively quickly by the Sonata No. 26 (1809-10), the nicknamed "Lebewohl" ("Les adieux," farewell). Of the Beethoven piano sonatas, this is the most programmatic, in the way of Bach's Capriccio on the Departure of a Beloved Brother. The French under Napoleon were about to invade Vienna, and the aristocracy bugged out, including Beethoven's patron and pupil, the Archduke Ferdinand, to whom the composer had dedicated at least three masterpieces: the "Archduke" Trio and the Fourth and Fifth Piano Concertos. The sonata has three movements, all subtitled: "Lebewohl" (farewell), "Abwesenheit" (absence), and "Wiedersehen" (return). The titles provide all the program Beethoven needs. As in the Pastoral Symphony, he's really interested in moods, rather than in pictures.

The first movement actually has the syllables "Le-be-wohl" written under the first three notes of the slow introduction. Accordingly, this cell is called the "Lebewohl" motif. The first two sounds remind me of two horns, with a B'/G' and A'/D'. You would expect the third notes to be G'/B, but Beethoven pulls off what's known as a deceptive cadence -- essentially an e-minor rather than a G-major tonality. The minor gives unexpected poignance to the phrase. The introduction contains most of the ideas of the movement, but the workhorse is the "Lebewohl" -- a scalar descent through a third. The following allegro sounds like a complete break with the intro, as if it takes a completely new track, but one soon hears the "Lebewohl" all over the place -- in the bass, in the soprano, and at points in between. Beethoven varies the idea -- inverted, in the minor, and inversion in the soprano over original in the bass in a kind of "mirror writing." Toward the end, "Lebewohl" gets a "clipping" -- first to two notes, then to one. The movement represents Beethoven at his clearest and most compact.

The second movement opens with a startling phrase -- Wagner before the fact, although of course within a classical context, nearly operatic. There's an unsettling chromaticism here and an obsessiveness, as the days apart tend to run into each other. Again, it's not really a full-fledged movement. For one thing, it's pretty brief for a slow movement. Instead, it functions as a transition to the third movement, à la the "Waldstein," although not as radically conceived. The third movement follows directly and athletically, with the sound of pealing bells. Hooray! It's almost too much joy at the Archduke's return, a little in mood like the finale to the "Emperor" concerto. Incidentally, a lot of the piano writing seems to come from the "Emperor," as well as the shapes of some of the themes. As I noted, Beethoven dedicated that concerto to Rudolf. Was this a private message? However, Beethoven shades the jubilation in the development, marked very softly (pianissimo) throughout.

Schnabel stands out in this sonata, with one of the finest renditions of the first movement I've heard. In the second movement, he suggests not only Wagner, but the Baroque and Classical aria and stresses the vocal quality of the musical line. The finale -- usually extremely tricky -- comes close to hysteria without giving way. One of the best entries in this touchstone set.

Five years pass before Beethoven returns to the sonata form. With hindsight, we can say that the new sonata represents something transitional. An air of experimentation inhabits the work, from its two-movement form, inherited from Haydn, to its compactness, to its modes of expression. Many use this sonata to mark the composer's late period, although I would again argue for it as transitional. Beethoven reportedly described the first movement as a "battle between head and heart." The first movement begins with an angry stamping gesture, kin to a motive in the Egmont Overture, followed by softer, yielding phrases. Rhythm and the falling minor third bind the movement together. That falling third we have encountered many times before in Beethoven (see, for example, the "Lebewohl" sonata or even the Fifth Symphony). However, Beethoven amazes with the variety of music and expression he can wring from it. The second movement Beethoven described as a "conversation with the beloved." It ties back to the lyricism of other twenty-something sonatas. It has features of both a rondo and a sonata, in that the first idea returns several times throughout but that all ideas undergo development. The movement begins with a beautiful flowing theme, "water music," echoing the "By the Brook" movement of the Sixth Symphony and foreshadowing something like Schubert's "Wohin" from Die schöne Müllerin. Again, Schnabel earns his laurels as a Beethoven interpreter. In the first movement, you feel as if he channels the composer. In the second, he fully realizes the expressive marking, "Nicht zu geschwind und sehr singbar vorgetragen" (not too fast and played with great singing), especially the "singing" part.

With the Sonata No. 28, two years later, we begin enter the world of late Beethoven. This was Wagner's favorite Beethoven piano sonata, and you can hear why. The first movement continues the fluid mood of the No. 27 finale, but in a new way. It seldom finds a resting point (few full cadences to mark the end of a section), and, while not especially chromatic, it manages to keep the key in doubt or even hidden. In other words, Beethoven gives us the prototype of Wagner's "endless melody." One also notes Beethoven working the extreme highs and lows of the instrument, sometimes simultaneously with nothing in the middle. Schnabel shines here as a lyrical player.

With the second-movement, a scherzo-march, you feel you've time-traveled ahead to Schumann and his Davidsbündler, and Schnabel electrifies. Beethoven lades the march with a lot of counterpoint, including a lot of canonic writing and at least one super-stretto (a line repeating in one voice before it has finished in another). Other non-standard counterpoint as well moves things along. Instead of the usual imitative counterpoint (canon, stretto, and so on), we get lines moving along independent paths, rather than the same path at different times -- a strikingly modern conception of counterpoint. The movement also features Beethoven's favorite pedal "wash" effects. The scherzo has a trio, and thus the movement has an ABA form, with B as the trio. The trio itself is tripartite, and thus the movement is really an unusual ABCBA.

The slow third movement is another "Waldstein"-like intro to the finale, as if the composer were feeling his way toward resolution. Here, Beethoven experiments not only with form, but with the una corda pedal of the piano. Each piano key normally strikes three strings. The una corda shifts the keyboard action so that the hammer hits only one of those strings. The contemporary Beethoven piano also had a pedal whereby the player could strike two strings, an ability lacking in the standard modern piano. The theme resembles part of Bach's Musikalisches Opfer, not necessarily a coincidence. Beethoven knew Bach's music. Indeed, in his early days, he played parts of The Well-Tempered Clavier in public, and his notebooks, especially as he grew older, display Bach themes scribbled in the margins. Beethoven's late period shows a renewed interest in complex counterpoint, and it seems to me that he returned to Bach with renewed, studious vigor, all the while absorbing and transforming, rather than imitating. One startling feature of the section occurs at the very end, where we hear the very first theme of the sonata, and it makes sense. It marks a culmination of an expedition. As in the "Waldstein," Schnabel seems to suspend time, without becoming bogged down. His playing emphasizes the audacity of Beethoven's conception -- a written-out improvisatory exploration (as opposed to a genuine improvisation) within a formalized genre.

The finale crashes in -- a theme in stretto. Here, Beethoven goes on a contrapuntal spree, pursuing stretto, canon, and even fugue. However, he juxtaposes this with passages highly evocative of German country dances. So the rural and naïve stand side-by-side with the courtly and learned. Schnabel succumbs to his chief temptation -- playing it faster than his fingers can fly -- and makes a hash of much of the counterpoint. He also resorts to occasional banging, mostly because, at the tempo he chooses, he can't play clearly. He's trying to hang on by his fingertips. But for this movement, it would have been yet another gem in the set.

As with all the previous Pristine releases, the fine, clear sound often astonishes. Where the results disappoint, it's probably due to the currently-insurmountable limitation of the masters themselves.   

 

LINK

   

 

    
Join Our Mailing List
CONTENTS
Editorial          Pitch Perfect? Part 2 - illustrated!
Beecham        Haydn London Symphonies 1: Nos. 93-98
Backhaus       Beethoven Piano Sonatas 10-13
PADA                Reiner conducts Bach Orchestral Suite No. 2

Pitch Perfect recordings - part two, a closer look

Plus a free rehearsal recording to download 



Last week I wrote a column about pitch, and I'm going to add a bit more detail, with what I hope will be a revelatory illustration, today. This week's Beecham Haydn release, and its follow-up volume (due out in a couple of weeks), turns out to be an object lesson in pitch variation in 1950s taped recordings.

Take, first of all, the six symphony recordings which make up this week's first volume of Haydn's "London" or "Salomon" symphonies, nos. 93 to 98. With the exception of number 97, the symphonies were recorded over a short period in Paris in late 1957. There were two on the first day, two on the second, a one-day gap, before a final single symphony was recorded a day later, according to the information listed in the discography held at CHARM.

The records cut from these sessions, used for my remasters, were transferred using mint copies from the same box set, using the same equipment, one after the other - thus there should be no great variation between them, pitch-wise. Each symphony fits a side of an LP, and given the above you'd anticipate a real sense of continuity in every technical and musical respect from one side to the next.

You might expect the tuning the symphonies to match up particularly well. One assumes, naturally, that Sir Thomas tuned his orchestra to his principal oboe, and that this pitch remained constant over the five days of recording. Yet when we analyse the average frequencies of each symphony recording we see something different emerge. These are the average pitches (of A4) of each recording, as determined by Capstan:

Symphony 93: 446.14Hz
Symphony 94: 446.92Hz
Symphony 95: 444.85Hz
Symphony 96: 443.83Hz
Symphony 97: 446.40Hz
Symphony 98: 448.73Hz

There's a remarkable difference between Symphony No. 96, recorded on the 5th of October 1957, and Symphony No. 98, recorded on the 7th of October 1957! There are a number of possible reasons for these discrepancies, which I'll come to in a moment...

First though, I wanted to state that, having proposed last week that I really can't pin anything down too precisely regarding what pitch a recording was actually made at, I have assumed for the purposes of this release that the aforementioned oboe player probably didn't vary in pitch much, and therefore that the final release versions of these recordings should actually match up. On that assumption, the question arises as to what pitch the orchestra really did play at - and I figured that the average of the numbers above, 446.145Hz, is close enough to at least three of them to also be close to the reality. Therefore our release of Volume One has had each symphony re-pitched to 446.15Hz.

Now let us return to those pitch averages - and before we go any further, a fascinating and instructive picture for you of a kind you'll probably never have seen before:

Capstan image


This (rather small, I'm afraid) is a screen grab from Capstan, the pitch analysis and stabilisation software that's just won a technical Grammy, and which I'll attempt to explain. First of all, the screen is split into two graphs. At the top is a representation the waveform. In this case it's Beecham's 1958 recording of Haydn's Symphony No. 102 that we're looking at. The two horizontal blue lines at the bottom of this section are user-controls which regulate how Capstan reacts to pitch changes, and for the purposes of this illustration I've set them up in such a way as to assist in the viewing of pitch changes across the entire symphony recording.

The graph below represents pitch itself, relative to the standard A=440Hz, which is shown by a horizontal red line. Capstan analyses the recording, its harmonic structure and the notes within, to generate an overall pitch structure which it displays relative to that crucial A4 note. The somewhat jagged blue line above indicates the actual pitch of the orchestra relative to A440 through time. (In fact my settings have rendered it as smooth as possible, cutting out any attempt to fix flutter, and concentrating only on gross pitch variation.) The thick banding also illustrates this and helps indicate trends.(The next stripes up and down show where notes a semitone above or below A440 are falling, with a scale of cents, shown marked off ten at a time, on the left axis. To recap from last week: 100 cents=1 semitone.)

You'll see along the top of the top graph a notation of time. There's a loud bit at around 7 minutes - that's the end of the first movement which, as you can see, has been reasonably stable, pitch-wise. In the pause between movements Capstan can't find any harmonics to latch onto, hence there's a spurious peak in pitch suggested by the blue line on the lower graph that we can ignore.

Then things starts to get very interesting. First we carry on as before, with an average pitch just a few cents above 440. But at about 8'45" there's a sudden step up - it's about a third of a semitone - for a section of music which runs for nearly a minute, before returning suddenly back down to the previous pitch. This all happens during the second movement. The third movement is played pretty much entirely at the higher pitch, though when you look closer, it is actually split into two sections - the first third being a fraction sharper than the rest. Finally we reach the final movement, which for almost half of the movement appears to drift gradually upwards, from the pitch heard in the first movement and lower parts of the second, to that heard throughout the third, before stabilising for while and then sliding down again at the very end.

Are any of these pitches correct? Capstan tells me the average for the entire symphony is 444.85Hz - but it also indicates an average of 442.04 for the reasonably stable first movement, and 447.95Hz (a sniff under 448!) for the reasonably stable third movement. Is either correct? Are both correct? Did Beecham re-record chunks of the symphony later and have them dropped in? Which bits were done when, if that's the case? If not, do we have errant tape machines?

Loads of questions, few answers! Overall the 1958 Haydn recordings, symphonies 99-104, seem to use an average tuning that's ever so slightly lower than the 1957 recordings - more like 445Hz than 446Hz - and not all of them demonstrate the kind of changes seen in the graph above.

But some do, and some show up similar faults. That blue line should be essentially horizontal - when it gets all diagonal over a significant period of time you know something's not right, indicating a tape recording either speeding up or slowing down, and there are several instances of that in both the '57 and the '58 recordings. When it steps up and down there's inevitably an edit between taped takes running - for reasons unknown - at different pitches. I've also seen a sudden gross leap of more than a tone this week, in one of the Backhaus sonatas, almost certainly the result of a "sticky edit" causing a significant momentary reduction of tape speed. It's the kind of previously unfixable and nasty problem Capstan was developed for - it's obvious and its horrible to hear!

By contrast to the clunkers, I seem now to be uncovering issues which were rarely under consideration, but which would cause unease in those sensitive to pitch. In some cases, though, an edit would simply sound rather obvious to all who spotted it - but now we know that this might not just be down to the editor's skills with a razor blade and chinagraph pencil, but was also related to a jolting pitch change from a different take, suddenly joined at that particular moment. With the pitch change fixed the edit works and sound natural - and 54 years after the alleged crime was committed we find the editor was innocent of musical murder after all - it was Ampex whodunnit! (Perhaps...)


On a lighter note, there's a little bonus for downloaders (and those who'd like to try for free) with the Haydn series - nearly half an hour of rehearsal recordings made in 1958 during practise sessions before the recording of symphonies 100, 101 and 104. I've not attempted any re-equalisation or Ambient Stereo-ising of these, which were made with a single microphone, apparently without the conductor's knowledge, so weren't in any way scripted or planned for release.

As the accompanying notes indicate, what you hear has been stitched together from a number of hours of rehearsal tapes. What I have done is to unstitch those tapes, run the musical sections through Capstan to cure a minor wow (especially towards the end of No. 104), then re-assemble the whole. They've been de-clicked and had digital noise reduction, which helped make the speech content clearer, and we're offering the recordings as a free download. It'll be on our front page for the next three weeks, where a single mouse-click will get you the MP3, at 320kbps, into a hard drive folder of your choice. If you fancy having a go with FLAC, you'll find this on the main page for Haydn Volume 1, where it's available as a 16-bit and a 24-bit FLAC. All versions are free, and the FLACs include the original notes as a part of the download. If you've never tried FLAC before, please use our help section as required - I'm not going to be around next week to answer technical queries, I'm afraid see below).

Good luck - and happy listening!

 

Andrew Rose
24 February 2012





NO RELEASES OR NEWSLETTER NEXT WEEK


I'm taking a short break up a high mountain next week, though I hope not to actually break anything while I'm up there! As a result we're not putting out any new releases on Friday 2nd, nor will you receive a newsletter from me. Normal service should be resumed the following week, as will our support lines. Your next newsletter is due on Friday 9th March.




PRISTINE AUDIO @ TWITTER

I must admit to knowing little about the workings of Twitter, but it's my intention to post the occasional "tweet", as well as the announcements of newsletters and new recordings through Twitter, which half the rest of the world seems already to have adopted. You can sign up to follow my occasional messages here: http://twitter.com/pristineaudio - I'll be appearing as @pristineaudio

I just hope I've have time to use it!




UNEXPECTED E-MAILS ANNOUNCING DOWNLOADS?

Our download service provider has recently sent out e-mails to announce new Pristine Audio recordings to unsuspecting "subscribers". Turns out there's a little box to tick (or un-tick) when you purchase one of our downloads, or at least there was - it should have gone by now. If you're getting these e-mails and don't want them, please click on the un-subscribe link at the bottom. They appear to have started at random - I received one myself - and should not have done. Unfortunately the matter was outside of my control at the time.



 

Beecham's supreme musicality exemplified in Haydn's symphonic masterworks

 

First six 'London' symphonies in superb new 32-bit XR-remastered transfers   

 

  

PASC 328 BEECHAM    

HAYDN London Symphonies,  

Volume 1     

  

Recorded 1957             

Producer and Audio Restoration Engineer:  Andrew Rose       

  

 

  

Symphony No. 93 in D major
Symphony No. 94 in G major,  The "Surprise" 
Symphony No. 95 in C minor 
Symphony No. 96 in D major,  The "Miracle" 
Symphony No. 97 in C major 
Symphony No. 98 in B flat major
   

  

Royal Philharmonic Orchestra
Sir Thomas Beecham
  conductor   
 

  

 

Web page: PASC 328  

    

  

  

Short notes  

  

Haydn's twelve "London" or "Salomon" symphonies, his final compositions in the genre, can be seen together to epitomise a degree of pure perfection in the Classical symphony. Written in two groups of six for his two outstandingly successful visits to the British capital in 1791-92 and 1794-95.

When Sir Thomas Beecham came to record the London Symphonies for EMI in the late 1950s he too divided them into two, matching Haydn's own division, and in a short series of sessions in October 1957 he recorded five of the first six symphonies with his Royal Philharmonic Orchestra for EMI (No. 97 had been recorded in March).

These marvellous recordings, followed a year later by the second six London Symphonies, have here been dusted off, fully 32-bit XR remastered, and received numerous corrections for wayward pitch and other technical issues. They are, simply, a delight.  

 

    

Notes On this recording   

  

These recordings were all made, with the exception of Symphony No. 97, at the Salle Wagram in Paris over a period of four days in October 1957, alas in mono - the second volume was recorded the following year in stereo. These transcriptions of the 1970s LP issue have done away with EMI's electronic stereo and (where ordered) have the far more subtle Ambient Stereo effect applied.

The symphonies were surprisingly varied both in tone and pitch; I've endeavoured to eliminate these variations as much as possible, bringing a new cohesion to the recordings. As the originalss varied in pitch between A4 = 444 and 449Hz I've used Beecham's average of 446.15Hz across the board. In a number of cases an individual movement or section was out of tune with the rest of the symphony, and this too has been rectified. Various tonal irregularities have also been ironed out - an unnatural high frequency "harshness" found in some recordings has been overcome, for example. 

  

Andrew Rose   

   

 

  

Reviews in The Gramophone     

  

 ...Not merely are they rarely heard: until very recently they were never heard correctly. The modern editions are almost without exception appallingly faulty, omitting Haydn's phrasing and dynamics and ornaments and tempi, or else flatly contradicting them; and in quite a number of cases even the notes are wrong. The Herculean labours of an American scholar, Mr. H. C. Robbins Landon, have clarified the situation a good deal. In his book, The Symphonies of Joseph Haydn (Universal Edition and Rockliff) he includes a list of errata for the Eulenburg miniature scores of the twelve "Salomon" symphonies; although inaccurate, these are the most nearly reliable current editions.

I mention this difficulty about the texts of the symphonies simply in order to make clear what it is that Sir Thomas Beecham has in fact done. He plays all these symphonies in uncorrected versions which differ in varying degrees from what Haydn wrote. In several cases his sheer musicianship has enabled him to supply nuances of phrasing or dynamics which Haydn did ask for but which have dropped out of all modern editions; in others he has introduced variants of his own which Haydn would surely have approved. But elsewhere the text has become too corrupt to be restored simply by intuition, however musical, and it is these points that make one regret the gulf that separates musicologists from practising musicians, particularly of the older generation. Against this we have to set Sir Thomas's other qualities, which compel forgiveness. There's just a touch of the chocolate-box in his interpretations of eighteenth-century music, of course, but only in some of the slow movements does this really matter. Elsewhere his acute ear for details of phrasing, rhythm and instrumental balance carry us wholeheartedly with him. This set is Haydn's triumph in the first place, but one can only be grateful that Beecham should lavish his immense gifts on music which far too many conductors neglect...

J.N. - The Gramophone, December 1958   

(Reviewing ALP1624-6, original LP issues, excerpt)

 

 

Free Rehearsal download - Haydn Symphonies      

  

Running to 26:14, this fascinating collection of rehearsal snippets and excerpts was originally released on LP by EMI in 1958, and documents Sir Thomas Beecham's style whilst preparing to record the second volume of Haydn's London Symphonies. Here we hear preparations underway for Symphonies 100, 101 and 104, recorded in May 1958. Each free FLAC download includes an edited transcript of the original EMI sleevenotes. The recordings are presented in their original mono format. Restoration processing here is limited to declicking, noise reduction and some pitch stabilisation during musical sections.

 

To download for free as a 320kbps MP3 or in 16-bit or 24-bit FLAC format, please visit the Pristine Classical website page here. Please note this is a download only - we have no plans to issue these rehearsal recordings on Compact Disc. 

 

         

     

MP3 Sample   Symphony 95, 1st mvt.            

Listen 

  

  

Download purchase links:

Ambient Stereo MP3   

mono 16-bit FLAC 

Ambient Stereo 16-bit FLAC 

Ambient Stereo 24-bit FLAC 

  

  

CD purchase links and all other information:

PASC 328 - webpage at Pristine Classical  

 

Third volume in Backhaus's magnificent first Beethoven Sonata cycle

 

Long only available on rare imports, and in new 32-bit XR remasters - this is unmissable

  

  

  

PAKM053 BACKHAUS BEETHOVEN EDITION 

Volume 3: Sonatas 10-13

  

Recorded 1950-53

 

Producer and Audio Restoration Engineer:  Andrew Rose                      

  

   

Sonata No. 10 in G major, Op. 14, No. 2
Sonata No. 11 in B flat major, Op. 22 
Sonata No. 12 in A flat major, Op. 26 "March Funébre" 
Sonata No. 13 in E flat major, Op. 27, No. 1  "Quasi una fantasia"
 
Wilhelm Backhaus   piano
 

  

 

Web page: PAKM 053  

  

  

Reviews    

"No words of mine are needed to establish Backhaus among the great living pianists, nor to analyse his qualities. But it has not been possible for him always to convey his greatness through the exacting process of wax and needle. In the Funeral March Sonata, he does so almost to perfection, in my judgement. This is a recording memorable on many grounds; perhaps the most important ground, and the one to vibrate longest in the memory, is that he gives us true, clear Beethoven unadulterated by Backhaus. Here he is the genuine performer of idealism- the transmitting post, the canal or pipe through which the dead pianist-composer's music comes to life as he meant and wrote it. The theme and variations of the first movement are kept moving along at a pace that allows feeling but not sentimentality. The pianistic points here are variety of tone colour, evenness, and an enviable leggiero. In the scherzo the repeats are performed as marked, which is gratifying. The Funeral March for the Hero's Death is taken at the right speed-a difficult one to settle on, and rarely attained; the forte interuptions are imperative but never strident. Backhaus's innate sense of classical style has its full expression in the finale, which is played in a model combination of charm, manliness, and Beethovenish humour."

 

H.F. The Gramophone, June 1951 (excerpt concerning Sonata No. 12)



"This disc shows Backhaus's great gifts in their most enjoyable light. He seems to revel in the "old-fashioned" Beethoven of Op. 22 , and brings out delightfully the humour of the middle section of the Minuet in which the composer seems to laugh at the period in which he is moving. In the opening movement of the same sonata Backhaus reminds us, in the course of the recapitulation, of how delicately he can play when he wishes to do so... The piano tone is good, and altogether the disc takes a high place in the long list of Backhaus's Beethoven recordings."

 

A.R. The Gramophone, June 1954 (excerpt concerning Sonata No. 11)

  

  

  

Notes  on this recording  

As with other releases in this series I've taken great care to bring consistency to the tuning of Backhaus's piano where previously it was absent - the average pitches for each of these four sonatas as presented by Decca were A4 = 433.9, 442.5, 432.7 and 438.7 hertz respectively. Furthermore the 12th started low, before drifting gradually upwards, whilst the opposite effect was to be heard in the 13th. Owners of the Japanese Decca (London) CD reissue of the 13th will also be familiar with a 'sticky edit' pitch lurch of more than a tone in the finale, not present here, as well as several completely missing notes in the middle of first movement!

Tonally I've continued to accept slightly higher than usual levels of tape hiss in order to bring out the full tone of Backhaus's piano, something which was considerably muted in the Decca incarnation. Once again it was no surprise to discover that the later recordings were of somewhat better audio quality than the earlier ones.

  

Andrew Rose 

   

        

    

MP3 Sample  Sonata No. 13, 1st mvt             

Listen

 

Download purchase links:

Ambient Stereo MP3 

mono 16-bit FLAC 

Ambient Stereo 16-bit FLAC 

Ambient Stereo 24-bit FLAC 


 

  

CD purchase links and all other information:

PAKM 053 - webpage at Pristine Classical   

  

 
Fritz Reiner
Fritz Reiner

PADA Exclusives

Streamed MP3s you can also download     

 

 

Bach
Orchestral Suite No. 2 in B minor, BWV 1067     

 

RCA Victor Symphony Orchestra
Fritz Reiner
conductor

Recorded 30 April 1953

Issued as Victor LM-6012


 

This transfer is remastering by Dr. John Duffy.  

  

 

Over 500 PADA Exclusives recordings are available for high-quality streamed listening and free 224kbps MP3 download to all subscribers. PADA Exclusives are not available on CD and are additional to our main catalogue. 

 

 

Subscribe to PADA Subscriptions start from €1 per week for PADA Exclusives only listening and download access. A full subscription to PADA Premium gets you all this plus unlimited streamed listening access to all Pristine Classical recordings for just €10 per month, with a free 1 week introductory trial.