FREE ALBUM
|
| |
A FREE 128k MP3!
Fauré
Piano Quintet No 2
Ray Lev, piano
The Pascal Quartet
Recorded c.1951
""Frankly, the LP was very rough...After heavy doses of restoration medicine...a very nice performance has finally been revealed, perhaps for the first time since it left the studio! " PETER HARRISON"
Peter Harrison, remastering engineer
Download it now - for one week only - it's only free from our Cover Page!
OR PURCHASE "UPGRADE" to full quality 320k MP3, lossless 16-bit or 24-bit FLAC downloads (where available), download free covers and cue sheets, scores and notes here:
PACM 062 - Fauré
|
LATEST REVIEW
| MusicWeb International
Forthcoming review
SCHNABEL BEETHOVEN VOLS 9 & 10
By Ralph Moore
"Andrew Rose's superb reincarnation of these classic performances, by far the finest to-date"
| |
As a comparative Schnabel virgin, I hesitate to offer many supposed insights regarding his interpretative prowess. Litres of ink have already been spilled by the real devotees to illuminate his genius. Most readers will already have decided whether they want to hear historical recordings or whether they respond to Schnabel's style. Can you tolerate his slips and "splashiness" in return for the energy and spontaneity of his interpretations? We have perhaps become far too accustomed to technical perfection at the expense of expressive freedom. Now that modern economic conditions having hastened the decline of studio recordings in favour of live issues we should now perhaps be more tolerant of the vicissitudes inherent in live recordings. Schnabel famously disliked the restrictions and inconveniences of the recording studio. Even if modern pianists are technically more adept, if we heard performances such as these live today we would hardly react with anything other than gratitude and astonishment. From a practical point of view, the main area of concern will be the sound quality and that is probably of interest to two main groups. The old hands will want to know whether it's worth the investment replacing their current versions. Pristine offer these latest re-masterings of the late piano sonatas by Andrew Rose. Then there are those aficionados who are curious about the Schnabel legend and might simply want to start with the best available. There is an alternative from Naxos in Mark Obert-Thorn's re-engineering of the sonatas for Naxos. They are cheaper than Pristine's issues, but they cannot compare as a listening experience with Andrew Rose's superb reincarnation of these classic performances, by far the finest to-date. Regis have issued a super-bargain complete 8 CD set licensed from Nuova Era but don't touch it with the proverbial barge-pole: there is absolutely no comparison between what Andrew Rose has done here to enhance the original 78s and the sad, distant splatterings you hear on Regis. On Pristine, there is very little hiss or "muddiness" at the bottom and a minimum of "clanginess" at the top. The added depth of sound allows the left hand a greater, welcome prominence. The extra reverberation is perhaps a little wearing on the ear but that's remedied by turning down the volume a little. The ferocity of Schabel's attack, the pathos, delicacy and poignancy of his tender touch in the slow movements and the freedom and poetry of his genius emerge more cleanly and clearly than ever before. Despite the aforementioned technical weaknesses in faster passages such as the Allegro opening Op.106, his strengths more than compensate and his dynamism virtually silences criticism. Schnabel's way with the Scherzo is decidedly aggressive but his interpretation is all of a piece, contrasting wonderfully with the rapt Adagio sostenuto which follows. There is wonderful sonority in the left hand beginning at 2:35 and the new melody anticipating Chopin which sings over that bass ground makes one more grateful than ever for the richness of Pristine's sound. The odd slip notwithstanding, Schnabel's technique and fingerwork reveal remarkable virtuosity in the Fugue of the last movement. The opening to Op.30 reveals Schnabel's cantabile quality, especially in his lightness of touch when returning to the first subject. His thunderous assurance in the concluding Andante is mightily impressive - but that is the essence of Schnabel's' art: he encompasses all the moods required, from the massive profundity of the first movement of Op.110 to the sparkling brilliance of its Allegro molto to the introspective serenity of the final Adagio. Op.111 is just as masterly; one is always completely absorbed by the integrity and aptness of his interpretation whichever sonata one is listening to. Given that the technical challenges stretch him to the limits, one sometimes has the impression that Schnabel is tilting at windmills but it is that dauntless courage which renders these performances so touchingly human. The second movement serves as a paradigm to illustrate this and the human condition in general. A starkly simple statement undergoes variations until it becomes increasingly fragmented and tormented, then order, reason and optimism are restored. The Op.35 "Eroica" Variations and Fugue is of a somewhat lower order but it was an ambitious and innovatory composition which calls for a huge variety of colour and mood, and the ability to take a long view in order to hold it all together. All of this plays to Schnabel's strengths. He gives us witty, relaxed accounts but rises to the mysteries unfolding in the last variation. The Fugue has a mercurial, plastic quality in his hands which perfectly underlines the teasing, pleasing irony of Beethoven's romanticising of that most baroque of forms. Comparisons with modern recordings are otiose; most serious collectors will want Schnabel's Beethoven on Pristine in the same way that they want Casals' Bach cello suites on EMI: they are both artistically deeply satisfying in their own right but also offer a unique and seminal Urtext by which to judge later accounts. I favour Richter, Gilels and early Lupu for more modern sound which clearly illustrates my own taste for the extrovert, demonstrative interpretative school of Schnabel rather than the more cerebral, refined mode of Brendel, Lewis or Pollini.. .
LINK
|
LATEST REVIEW
| Fanfare
Mar/Apr 2012
ZIMBALIST
By Robert Maxham
"For those who admire the performance of Brahms's Concerto, Pristine's release seems mandatory"
| |
Although Efrem Zimbalist Senior left, as Mark Obert-Thorn states in his note, only one commercial concerto recording-of Johann Sebastian Bach's Double Concerto with Fritz Kreisler-later in life, Kreisler considered that recording one of his favorite few. Zimbalist's broadcast recording of Johannes Brahms's Violin Concerto has been issued and reissued (it appears in somewhat less rich recorded sound on Doremi DHR-7739, Fanfare 22:5). Obert-Thorn took as his source a CD-R-from a tape-of the original acetates. Reviewing the performance itself in Doremi's incarnation, I reflected that Zimbalist might simply have been a victim of Jascha Heifetz's mystique, concluding that, at the very least, Zimbalist's "technical bravura and breadth of musicianship ... would easily make him an emperor among current performers" with "ample and luxurious phrasing, but no less ... willingness to take risks, virtually all of which paid off." Still, repeated listenings reveal a roughness in the declamatory double-stopped passages (compare Albert Spalding's from a similar period in the violinists' lives) that the overall musical and technical command nevertheless tends to overshadow (in both first and third movements). I also noted the "incandescent" second movement, and in Pristine's transfer, listeners can hear Koussevitsky's "bravo" at the end. The remarkably good recorded sound reveals the beauty of Zimbalist's tone in all registers and the commanding crackle of his bow stroke in the rugged détaché so plentiful in the concerto's first movement. I remarked that in the finale, "his technical facility provides many pleasant surprises." I might have paid more ample tribute to Serge Koussevitzky and the Boston Symphony Orchestra for the monumental accompaniment (the same forces had supported Heifetz so admirably in his recording of the same concerto in 1939, available, though apparently not in the United States, on Naxos 8.110936). Whatever the merits of Obert-Thorn's engineering, the sweeping and richly characterized performance itself carries the day-a perhaps surprisingly vibrant reading from an Auer student who left few documents of an orchestral soloist's career that established a reputation that's unfortunately dimmed over the years.
Obert-Thorn suggests that the opportunity to release his transfer of Jean Sibelius's Concerto from open-reel tape of the original acetates trumped the difficulties the material presents, including echoes delayed by a full eight seconds. Many will find the effect of that echo deeply disturbing, but it lasts only through the first four-odd minutes (it may be hard not to watch the clock for these to expire). But Zimbalist plays magisterially here, if not so crisply as Heifetz in 1959 or as terrifyingly (one of my students' adverbs) as Heifetz in 1935. Obert-Thorn claims to have attempted pitch correction, but some imprecision remains. In the first movement, Rudolf Ringwall and the Cleveland Orchestra spread the mists thickly for Zimbalist to penetrate, and the violinist doesn't linger indulgently in the rhapsodic landscape. Nevertheless, he isn't so incisive as Heifetz, and doesn't generate the same voltage in the solo passages-though he doesn't struggle in them either, although it sometimes sounds as though he strains to produce a rounded tone in the higher positions on the middle strings. He slows down to enhance the effect of the haunting double-stopped ruminations near the movement's end before plunging into a bracing account of the final passage with its treacherous glassy octaves. Zimbalist doesn't throb in the slow movement's opening; his vibrato seems too restricted and too slow for that. And most violinists would eschew the portamentos with which he adorns the statement of the theme. Once again, some wayward intonation, suspicious perhaps because it occurs in the upper positions on the lower strings, may not actually be Zimbalist's fault. But slowing down almost to immobility before and after the impassioned middle section and, to some extent, in that passage itself, results from an artistic choice. In the finale, some of the rushing passages sound insecure, although it's hard to believe that age could have been responsible; Heifetz made his crackling second recording at the age of 58.
For those who admire Zimbalist and honor his accomplishments, this disc may seem a somewhat mixed tribute, with a knowing reading of Brahms's Concerto paired with one of Sibelius's Concerto they're likely to find at the same time illuminating and disappointing. For those who admire the performance of Brahms's Concerto, Pristine's release seems mandatory, as arguably the most life-like remastering. A recommendation, therefore, of the Sibelius merely for its documentary value, but strongly and absolutely for its discmate.
LINK
|
|
|
CONTENTS
| |
Editorial Introducing the Backhaus Beethoven Edition Backhaus Beethoven Piano Sonatas 1-4
Poulenc Gloria, Organ Concerto, rare Satie piano duets
PADA Mengelberg conducts Richard Strauss
|
The Backhaus Beethoven Edition
Beginning a major new series A few weeks ago I was trawling through the thousands of records here at Pristine, looking for inspiration, and out of curiousity dug out a box set of Backhaus's Beethoven sonata recordings. A quick flick through them revealed that although the majority would be off limits due to their recording dates, a handful had fallen into the public domain. But would I be able to bring anything to them? I started with a couple of test transfers and they sounded promising. Certainly they seemed to have potential. But what a shame the entire set wasn't ever going to be possible, as a result of the changes in European copyright law due to take effect in the next year or two. Of course there was the earlier, mono collection - which might indeed hold more promise of remastering improvements. I decided to check when Decca had last reissued them so that I could download a few samples from iTunes. I searched and searched, but they were nowhere to be found. So I started doing some serious digging around, scouring discographies and old Internet discussions on the subject, and was astonished to find that, despite some people swearing by them as the better of the two cycles from Backhaus - and the only complete one, as he died before the final recording of his stereo cycle could be made - there had been no CD issue outside of Japan and an exceptionally rare Italian issue (which, confusingly, had the same catalogue number as the stereo cycle, leading me to wonder whether the Italian release was in error). I suppose this isn't entirely unusual. We've remastered a number of mono Mercury recordings over the last couple of years which have been passed over by the company themselves in favour of reissuing their stereo back catalogue. A lot of recordings fell into a bit of a mono "black hole" in the early-to-mid 1950s, and surprising as it seems for such an important release - possibly the first complete Beethoven sonata cycle of what you might call the "hi-fi" age - Backhaus's only truly complete cycle is one of them. The recordings were all made in Victoria Hall, Geneva, Switzerland. They began in July 1950 (Nos. 12, 21, 30), with the first six recordings being issued both on 78s and LPs, before dropping the 78rpm releases for the third batch of recordings, made in April and May 1952. And what a marathon that proved to be - Backhaus set down 11 of the sonatas during those sessions. Possibly this was too much for him, as he returned to Victoria Hall six months later to re-record three of them. Sadly, in no cases does the archive indicate precise recording dates. We know for sure that the majority, quite possibly all, were produced by Victor Olof, with either Arthur Haddy or Gil Went engineering, where this was noted. Went was at the controls for the final sessions, the most gruelling of the lot, in November 1953, when fourteen of the thiry-two were recorded, yielding some five LPs which were released during the course of 1954. Perhaps by this stage Decca had got wind of Wilhelm Kempff's DG series and wanted to get to the end first... Ironically, the next entry in Decca's Geneva recordings discography after this mammoth session, which took place in May 1954, bears the following prefix: "These were Decca's first stereo recordings". What a shame for Backhaus, who'd be going through the whole thing again a very few short years later - and already well into his mid-seventies. I'm pleased to report that a stereo recording was made of Backhaus's Diabelli Variations of October 1954, also the case of course for his 1958-59 Vienna recordings of the five concertos with Schmidt-Isserstedt. We hope to turn to these once the present sonata cycle is complete, but I'm also interested in the mono concerto recordings. Curiously here Backhaus recorded all five for Decca in 1950-53 with the Vienna Philharmonic under variously Krauss and Böhm, but the First was never issued. (I would make clear that in my Decca discography it doesn't appear even as an unreleased item, but my Backhaus discography states a recording of the First Concerto was made in April 1951 by Decca and remains unissued.) So what do we make of the earlier sonata recordings. Well I'm going to reserve comment on performances because (a) I've not heard them all, and (b) there are far better experts than myself who will no doubt pass judgement in due course. Contemporary reviewers' reactions in many way mirror those for the Schnabel series twenty years earlier - a mixture of rapturous approval and some quite pointed criticism. Whether the years since their recording have changed opinions generally or specifically remains to be seen. Backhaus certainly had heritage and was already a seasoned "veteran" performer (to quote from a Gramophone reviewer) by the time he began the first cycle, at the age of 64. Technically there are few surprises. The sound quality Decca achieved in its Geneva recordings of this period has never particularly excited me - they're just not on a par with what they were capable of in London at the time - but they're adequate as far as the early years of high fidelity tape are concerned. They've certainly benefited from a good dusting off with XR remastering putting some real life back into the rather dull, dusty originals, but it's been a constant battle against hiss to do so. Pitch also has proved erratic. On one movement of the first four sonatas I spotted a clear change of pitch midway through, as a result of a tape edit. Elsewhere another bad edit meant the same note was effectively struck twice. All of this is correctable today, as is the wobbliness of pitch in the Third Sonata, and the wide variation of tuning frequencies heard across the sonatas - of those analysed so far I've seen them range from A=433 up to A=444, something which seems more likely to be caused by slight inaccuracies in tape record and replay speeds than the piano itself. For the sake of argument I'm adjusting them all to A=440 and leaving them there. Thanks to a combination of tempi and choices of repeats, we should be able to get all 32 sonatas, in order, onto 8 CDs rather than the 10 of the Schnabel series. Thereafter we'll see what we can do with the rest of the recordings - concertos and variations - that Backhaus made during this era, ultimately making up a set which includes all five concertos, all 32 sonatas and the Diabelli Variations. On the subject of tuning, you might want to take a listen to our Poulenc Organ Concerto sample. Here I've used the magic of Capstan to retune the orchestra and organ so that they actually match, unlike the astonishingly out-of-tune original LP! No wonder this otherwise excellent recording has never been reissued - every junction between organ and strings was painful to hear if you'd any sensitivity towards pitch. No surprise really - though they must have had cloth ears at the time: straight from the LP the organ comes in at A=444.85 whilst the orchestra plays up at A=452.11. For the curious, the latter is almost a quarter-tone sharp of standard pitch, where A=440Hz... Andrew Rose 3 February 2012
P.S. As a result of our release of Zimbalist's Brahms and Sibelius concerto recordings, and the trouble with the first 4 minutes of the latter, Mark Obert-Thorn has been contacted and sent an alternative source for that troublesome movement which, in his copy, suffered from an 8 second post-echo - as noted in the Fanfare review below.
Mark has worked away to try and match as well as possible the new source to his existing original, and sent me a FLAC file of the results a few days ago. Had I not been battling through a dose of influenza this week it would by now be online as a free download - but do watch out for it on our website early next week.
|
Backhaus's magnificent first Beethoven Sonata cycle begins our new series
Long only available on rare imports, and in new
32-bit XR remasters - this is unmissable
BACKHAUS
Beethoven Edition, Volume 1
Recorded 1952/53
Producer and Audio Restoration Engineer: Andrew Rose
BEETHOVEN Piano Sonatas 1-4
Wilhelm Backhaus piano
Web page: PAKM 051
Short notes
This week sees the start of a major new series at Pristine as we exhume, dust off and - finally - restore to the catalogue Wilhelm Backhaus's ground-breaking, and only complete, cycle of Beethoven Piano Sonatas.
These early 1950s recordings, almost certainly the first complete LP set, were hailed in their day and remain something of a bone of contention today for collectors and music-lovers - a later, incomplete stereo re-recording led to the mono originals being dropped from the catalogue, and they've rarely been seen since outside of a pricey and hard-to-obtain Japanese issue.
Now available in 32-bit XR remasters that blow some of the cobwebs off these wonderful recordings, we invite you to listen once more to some of the finest recordings ever made by one of the great Beethoven interpreters of the recording age.
Notes On this recording
Wilhelm Backhaus's first Beethoven Piano Sonata cycle, recorded between 1950 and 1953, was one of the first for the Long Playing record, and may well have been the first of several contemporary accounts to reach completion. Backhaus was already considered, as the review below points out, a "veteran" pianist, yet later that same decade he started the sonatas all over again, once more for Decca, this time in stereo, a cycle which he almost completed prior to his death in 1969, leaving only the Hammerklavier not re-recorded.
The existence of the stereo cycle has led to this mono cycle, which a number of listeners consider the better of the two, to be neglected by Decca - outside of Japan and a very limited Italian issue, it has never been reissued by the company. Sonically there's no doubt that the later recordings improved considerably over these early 50s mono versions, but there's much that can now be achieved in improving considerably the sound quality of these recordings, as well as correcting the "slight mechanical erraticisms of pitch and surface-hum" referred to in the review above.
In making these historic recordings, from one of the greatest of Beethoven interpreters, available again in fine-sounding 32-bit XR remasters, collectors can at last and with ease determine their own preferences with regard to the Backhaus discography.
Finally a note about pitch: The recordings so far analysed suggest some wayward tape speeds, resulting in pianos pitched variously at between A=432 and A=444, as well as some notable pitch changes, both sudden and sliding, during movements within recordings. One later recording in the series (to be released as part of Volume Three) includes what I take to be a "sticky edit", causing the pitch to lurch alarmingly (at one point it drops more than a semitone) over the course of several notes before steadying itself. Previously just about unfixable, these problems have all been resolved and the pitch of each recording standardised to A=440.
Andrew Rose
Review in The Gramophone
The Backhaus series of Beethoven's Sonatas on long-players continues. Sufficient consideration of the style and achievement of the veteran pianist (he is 70 this year), and of his previous recordings of the Sonatas, has been given in THE GRAMOPHONE already, by M.M. in the issue of September 1952 and by the present writer in those of June and October 1951. The two newly recorded Sonatas need to be discussed-the one an early work from 1795, the other a " middle-period" work from 1802, and perhaps the best of a remarkable trio of Sonatas, of which the third in E flat is an almost equal companion.
The first movement of the early C major is played with a splendid classicism of style, in a manner that would have suited Beethoven's own instrument. The reproduction is lifelike, even though the tone sounds hard in the development section. The same remarks apply to the Scherzo, which is near to the harpsichord in its effects. The Finale is similarly dry in tone, but one observes the careful continuity of thought and of graded weight and colour in tone which proclaims the true Beethoven pianist. The slow movement is made into a much more emotional experience ; this is a most moving performance, I have found, despite slight mechanical erraticisms of pitch and surface-hum. The poise is exquisite, not least in the relation of the ornamental to the fundamental passages..
H.F. The Gramophone, January 1953 (excerpt)
MP3 Sample 4th Sonata, 1st mvt.
Listen
Download purchase links:
Ambient Stereo MP3
Mono 16-bit FLAC
Ambient Stereo 16-bit FLAC
Ambient Stereo 24-bit FLAC
CD purchase links and all other information:
PAKM 051 - webpage at Pristine Classical
|
Première of Poulenc's Gloria, an amazing restoration of his Organ Concerto
Plus two rare 78rpm recordings the composer made in Paris in 1937 - first commercial reissue
POULENC
Gloria
Organ Concerto
plays Satie duets
Recorded 1961/1937
Producer and Audio Restoration Engineer: Andrew Rose
POULENC Gloria in G major
Rosanna Carteri soprano French Radio-Television Chorus Yvonne Gouverné director POULENC Organ Concerto in G minor
Maurice Duruflé organ
French National Radio & Television Orchestra Georges Prêtre conductor
SATIE Parade SATIE Deux Morceaux en Forme de Poire
Georges Auric piano Francis Poulenc piano
Web page: PASC 324
Short Notes
This release brings together two stereo recordings from 1961 - the first recording of his Gloria, recorded in the composer's presence a day after the work's European première in Paris, and the Organ Concerto, recorded a few days later but in need of some severe remedial action.
This release has, for the first time, managed to pull the organ and orchestra back in tune with each other. You can read the technical data on our web page, but basically the orchestra had tune considerably sharper than the organ was playing, to a painful end! A real shame, as the sound and performance was otherwise exemplary.
Finally we've unearthed two rare 78rpm discs of piano duets by Satie, as recorded in exuberant style by Poulenc himself, with Georges Auric, in 1937, for what we believe is their first commercial reissue.
Notes on this recording
The review quoted below, contrasts the present recording with a release by Munch and the BSO, and notes the problems of tuning. Indeed, for those sensitive to these matters the French recording is astonishing for the fact that it was ever passed for release.
This Pristine XR remastering has used the magic of the Grammy Award-winning Capstan pitch correction software to retune the orchestra and organ so that they actually match, unlike the astonishingly out-of-tune original LP! No wonder this otherwise excellent recording has never been reissued - every junction between organ and strings was painful to hear if you'd any sensitivity towards pitch. They must have had cloth ears at the time: straight from the LP the organ comes in at A=444.85 whilst the orchestra plays up at A=452.11. For the curious, the latter is almost a quarter-tone sharp of standard pitch, where A=440Hz. It is indeed now a recording transformed!
There is of course no such problem with the Gloria, which in this 32-bit XR remastering sounds, well, glorious - and fully in tune.
With the space left to me, I decided to add not a contemporary recording, nor even music by Poulenc, but four rare French 78rpm sides the composer recorded in 1937 of piano duets by one of his great mentors, Erik Satie, which I don't believe have seen any commercial issue since their rather obscure 78rpm incarnation. My thanks to Al Schlachtmeyer for his generous donation of these discs.
Andrew Rose
REVIEW
This strange accident of a simultaneous issue of two recordings of an unfamiliar and hitherto generally unavailable work-for the Poulenc organ concerto is known to the British record public only through an American disc which was obtainable on special order eleven years ago-is a singularly unfortunate one, for they both happen to be extremely good, and each will inevitably affect the other's sales. The concerto, written in 1938 and first performed by Maurice Duruflé, Columbia's soloist, is in one continuous movement, which however falls into four sections. Its essential unity is underlined by a four-note motive which appears throughout in various guises, and those who are usually put off by Poulenc's short-breathed phrases will find that there is here a far greater sense of continuity-it is certainly the best of his concertos. In the opening, and elsewhere, side-long reverences are made to the spirit of Bach (the echo of the G minor Fantasia can scarcely be accidental), and despite the marking of Allegro giocoso for the first main section and a most exuberant finale, there are undertones of serious drama-and the last pages of the work are prayerful (1938 and all that?). Prêtre takes the Allegro giocoso faster and more dramatically than Munch, and this is indeed almost the only real difference in reading between the two. Both soloists, and both orchestras, are excellent, both performances are alert, vital and rhythmic, and both, despite the formidable difficulties of balancing an orchestra against a modern full organ, are brilliantly engineered, giving clarity as well as warmth. The Boston strings make the more ravishing sound at the ires doux et intense section and in the final pages, and the RCA recording is very slightly more forward, but the reason why, after careful comparison, I come down on the side of RCA is nothing to do with the quality either of players or recording. It is simply that the French Radio Orchestra has not tuned exactly enough to the organ, and though the variation in pitch is not noticeable so long as the organ employs upper octave couplings, when it uses eight-foot one alone (as in the dialogues in the Andante moderato, or in solo reed passages) it is apparent that the strings are tuned ,lightly sharper.
The question of couplings is bound to enter into consideration, and here again both firms put up most attractive proposi'ions. RCA has the first decent LP (the one previous version was very poor) of Stravinsky's light-hearted ballet score for Balanchine, in which he cheerfully flirts with 'Fchaikovsky, Johann Strauss, The Barber of Seville and even previous works of his own. The Boston Orchestra, playing with virtuosity and the utmost subtlety of nuance, gives )t a witty, incisive, deliciously pointed performance which is beautifully balanced and recorded. All Stravinskians will want this.
All Poulenc fans, on the other hand, will want this first recording of his Gloria, written for the Koussevitzky Foundation and given 'ts premiere last year in-ironically enough, in the present context-Boston. (The first European performance took place in Paris on February 14th, 1961, and this recording was made the following day.) Like so many of Poulenc's religious works, it finds the composer at his best: behind its joyous, lucid façade lies a deep sincerity, which in the Doming Deus attains real beauty. In this movement Rosanna Carteri floats her octave rises exquisitely and is most touching in her litany of "Qui tollis peccata mundi". The chorus sings with firm tone (though the tenors are unnecessarily aggressive in their "Miserere nobis") and is well balanced with the orchestra and organ (no trouble with pitch this time). As in Jeu de Cartes, there are influences for those who care to discover them: Stravinsky himself (particularly in the jagged opening of the Laudamus te), Ravel, even Verdi (there is an almost exact echo of Otello at the end of the Domine Deus -but it always was a good phrase!) ; but there are so many individual fingerprints that it could never be mistaken for the work of anyone else.
L.S. - The Gramophone, June 1962
MP3 Sample Organ Concerto (excerpt)
Listen
Download purchase links:
Stereo and Ambient Stereo MP3
Stereo and Ambient Stereo 16-bit FLAC
Stereo and Ambient Stereo 24-bit FLAC
CD purchase links and all other information:
PASC 324 - webpage at Pristine Classical
|
 | | Willem Mengelberg |
PADA Exclusives Streamed MP3s you can also download
R. Strauss Don Juan, Op. 20
Concertgebouw Orchestra
Willem Mengelberg conductor
Recorded in Amsterdam,8 November 1938
Issued as Telefunken 78s SK2743/4
This transfer is remastering by Dr. John Duffy. Over 500 PADA Exclusives recordings are available for high-quality streamed listening and free 224kbps MP3 download to all subscribers. PADA Exclusives are not available on CD and are additional to our main catalogue. Subscriptions start from €1 per week for PADA Exclusives only listening and download access. A full subscription to PADA Premium gets you all this plus unlimited streamed listening access to all Pristine Classical recordings for just €10 per month, with a free 1 week introductory trial.
|
|