Pristine Classical header
Newsletter - 16 September 2011  
Genesis Suite
QUICK LINKS
GENESIS Suite
SCHNABEL Beethoven
PADA Exclusives
INFORMATION
FREE ALBUM
 PASC 139

A FREE 128k MP3!

 

BEETHOVEN  

PIANO CONCERTO 4   

 

 Friedrich Wührer, piano
Bamberg Symphony Orchestra
conductor Joseph Perlea

Recorded  1957
Issued as VOX LP PL10640  

 

  XR restorations by
Andrew Rose
 

 

 

Download it now - it's only free from our Cover Page!

 

 

 

OR UPGRADE to full quality 320k MP3, lossless 16-bit or 24-bit FLAC downloads, download free covers and cue sheets, scores and notes here:

 

PASC 139 - Beethoven  

 
LATEST REVIEWS
MusicWeb International

September 12,
2011

KATCHEN VARIATIONS   

By Oleg Ledeniov

  

"All in all, if somebody wants to have just one single version of this work, this recording could be an excellent candidate. "

 
PASC266


The two works on this disc have much in common. Both are sets of variations on some well-known tune, each treats its theme rather liberally. They are as close to piano concertos as can be, but what distinguishes them from a concerto is the goal: the emphasis is not on the piano writing, but on the development of the music itself - the piano just happens to be the forward player.

The Variations on a Nursery Tune by Dohnányi start with a brooding introduction, as if extracted from a Brahms symphony. It is full of grand gestures, blaring brass, full orchestral attacks, and does not hint at what will follow. No sign of a variation yet: its motifs are not based on the main theme of the work, except for the phrase of the horns. Instead, the music seems to come from the drafts of Wagner or Franck. The theme then comes as a big surprise - what? that's what it is all about? Mozart already based variations on Ah, vous dirai-je, Maman (aka Twinkle Twinkle Little Star), but then the theme was not surrounded by such seriousness!

The theme is presented very simply, with minimal accompaniment. The variations are extremely diverse, passing through an array of late-Romantic styles. Starting with merry runs of the glimmering piano, through a burlesque with brass calls, we arrive at a sensual and suave waltz which mixes Richard Strauss with Tchaikovsky. This is followed by a healthy, rustic scene a-la Dvorák, then by the song of glittering silver bells, and by a prankish quarrel of high woodwinds. Another grand waltz - this time noble et sentimentale, just as Ravel would have had it. A fast march, with dark wood-notes of bassoon and odour of boots and rifles, evokes the Tralali, Tralalei, Tralala of Mahler. After it Holst's Uranus is mixed with some young Shostakovich for a jumping, sharply accentuated and mischievous episode. The resemblance to the theme is barely heard by now. After a Brucknerian brass chorale, the strings sing a warm Romantic melody that could fit a Rachmaninov concerto. The swirl is tighter and tighter, the music becomes anxious and frenetic, the wave rises and erupts in a powerful Wagnerian climax. The next variation is reminiscent of planetary mechanics - grandiose and elegant. Next comes the golden filigree, with transparent lightness and joie de vivre. Suddenly the theme returns and reminds us how simple the source of all this richness and variety was. A short, jubilant ending wraps all up.

If it is your first introduction to the Dohnányi Variations, you should be aware of its subtitle: "For the enjoyment of humorous people and for the annoyance of the others". In all the faux pathos of the Wagnerian introduction, the pregnant pauses and the overexcited climaxes, the composer is jesting, making fun of almost every name popular in 1914. Katchen enjoys wearing all these masks, and plays with bravura and character. Together with Boult, they produce sparkles and a lot of fun.

The same forces in the same year and venue recorded Rachmaninov's Rhapsody. Unlike Dohnányi's work, this is a developing story, like music to a ballet. The variations are bold and adventurous, projecting the famous theme by Paganini in all possible directions. Its demonic and lyrical sides are explored all the way to deepest abysses and highest peaks. The Dies irae motif is recurring, as it appears to be a close relative of the theme. We spend much time in the midnight world of the Symphonic Dances. The episodes are not separate, as in Dohnányi Variations, but form a cinematographic chain of scenes - ghostly, heroic, sinister, triumphant. The orchestration is colorful and inventive. The performance is rather on the "fast and furious" side, the piano is recorded closer than on Dohnányi, and its sound is grand yet beautiful. The entire work is done compactly and coherently. The coordination between the soloist and the orchestra is excellent, both rhythmically and dynamically. The 18th Variation is not over-sugared. The last few variations are performed with white-hot intensity and are positively mind-shattering. All in all, if somebody wants to have just one single version of this work, this recording could be an excellent candidate.

I may be wrong, but it seems to me that these are the same performances that were recorded by Decca/London and issued in the Julius Katchen II volume of the Philips series "Great Pianists of the 20th Century" (those brown "books"). However, the sound quality is definitely different, as the Pristine record benefits from an XR re-mastering by Andrew Rose - a new transfer from the original tapes. While the difference is not radical, it is noticeable if you compare side by side. The Decca/Philips record has more tape hiss, but the sound there is more unified. The tape hiss was tamed on the Pristine record - not completely, and is still rather noticeable in Rachmaninov. The Pristine sound is deeper; the music suddenly acquires more dimensions. Rachmaninov in particular became even more spectacular. The surrounding ambience is rather "dead" in Philips, more "alive" in Pristine. This is all great, but at the same time the minor fluctuations that were veiled before have become more apparent now. Andrew Rose in his restoration notes mentions a tendency to mild distortion during brass peaks, and I still hear it. So, the new restoration is better for loudspeakers, but probably worse if you listen via headphones. Also, Pristine put each work in a single track, while Philips has each variation on a separate track, which is more convenient. Philips also has the benefit of the company: the generously filled double-disc set also contains both Ravel's concertos, Liszt's Second, Prokofiev's Third, Rhapsody in Blue and a rondo by Beethoven - a true constellation! If you already have it, you probably won't need this new release. The liner-note is minimal and not very informative.  

  

     

PASC 266 - Katchen

 

   
LATEST REVIEWS
MusicWeb International

September 6,
2011

MARGUERITE LONG  

By Jonathan Woolf

  

"These are important documents - as indeed is everything on this well transferred and engaging disc"

 
PASC285


This disc gives us the rare opportunity to hear Marguerite Long perform on a single disc the Ravel Concerto in the two recordings she made. The first was made in 1932, conducted by Pedro de Freitas Branco - the long fiction that this was conducted personally by the composer was ended years ago - and the second followed twenty years later, when Georges Tzipine was the conductor. The earlier recording is the one more often encountered on disc, so it's good to hear the later version, though not everyone will be keen as mustard to have the duplication.

The 1932 performance is brisk, business-like, rather boxily recorded, and sometimes indifferently performed by the anonymous orchestra. That said, it has real personality and a sense of occasion. Long is far faster here in the first two movements than she was in the 1952 recording. This has the advantage of strong, rhythmic dynamism, but the disadvantage of seeming slightly matter-of-fact in the slow movement. In her second recording she is more circumspect, and occasionally this leads to a slight feeling of a lack of direction in the first movement. I do, however, prefer the generosity of phrasing in the Adagio assai where she adds a minute and a quarter to her earlier recording's timing, and it makes a difference. It's now less chipped and brittle, rounder of tone and more long-breathed in phrasing - less detached, really, and less objectified, albeit more conventionally beautiful. Some may yet prefer the more taut construction of the 78 set.

There's also the chance to hear Milhaud's go-getting pocket 1933 First Piano Concerto - all twelve or so minutes of it - in this first-ever 1935 recording with the composer this time very definitely on the rostrum. This is a juicy, freewheeling and virtuosic work that plumbs absolutely no expressive depths and doesn't mean to either. The highlight, of the work and the recording, is the lovely fluid Barcarolle second movement which is very lightly textured, well balanced - the violin and wind balancing is good here - and played beautifully. Then Long unleashes some powerful chordal roulades in the mock pompous finale.

The 'fillers' are just as good; more Milhaud solo works where the brio of Alfama contrasts with the brooding Paysandú, and then a perhaps even more important quartet of Debussy works. There are the Arabesques, a glittering and excellently recorded Jardins sous la pluie, and a lovely La plus que lente. Given her position as a leading exponent of the composer's music these are important documents - as indeed is everything on this well transferred and engaging disc.  

  

     

PASC 285 - Long

 

   
LATEST REVIEWS
Audiophile Audition

August 31,
2011

BEETHOVEN SYMPHONY NO. 9 BY KOUSSEVITZKY 

By Gary Lemco

  

"A performance of varying quality and intensity this Koussevitzky Ninth, but it behooves us to hear this maestro in the music of Beethoven"

 
PASC300


Serge Koussevitzky (1874-1951) who usually instantiates Russian-born intensity in music-making delivers (6-13 August 1947) a conscientious but linear and relatively lackluster Beethoven Ninth Allegro ma non troppo from Tanglewood in his commercial version for RCA. The transfers, made from red vinyl 78 rpms, enjoy a marvelously restored surface patina-clean, clear, rich in the bass. While the sound of the Boston string section maintains its luster--so much so Virgil Thomson labeled it "overtrained"--the dramatic elements--in this first movement--proceed rather perfunctorily, in the manner of an aesthetic exercise. This does not deny the richness of the BSO's response, but rather that the depth of emotion--especially for Koussevitzky--lacks punch and viscera.

The Molto vivace fares better, the line crisp, the attacks angular and nervously urgent. New day, new rules?  Koussevitzky seems to work very hard to keep the entries level, in time, maintaining the inner pulsation of the outer Scherzo. I would have preferred closer miking of the BSO tympani and woodwinds, especially the bassoon. The flute--I assume Georges Laurent--projects a lovely tone and silken gloss in his part. The frequency range altered a bit at 4:47 in my copy, as though the lid were taken off the piano. Some kid-glove, loving phrasing in the trio, with solid punctuations in the brass and low winds. The Adagio cantabile allows Koussevitzky's forces to shine precisely in the strings, the source of his power. Long-breathed phrases, a dynamically graduated approach to the large arch of the melodies and their subsequent variants, add an especial poise and nobility to the line. If Koussevitzky's version lacks Furtwaengler's mysticism, it has a naïve honesty of expression that wins our hearts.

Two members of Koussevitzky's vocal quartet, Yeend and Lloyd, served Bruno Walter for his commercial Ninth on CBS. James Pease, who sang as well in Koussevitzky's Missa Solemnis, brings a decided weight to his opening incantation to replace abstract tones with human meanings. The vocal support of the Berkshire Chorus, directed by Robert Shaw, resonates powerfully. As per expectation, the string line of the main melody purrs and floats over the woodwind support. The tenor aria, a janissary march, balances marcato heaviness against a blithe spirit, leading to a potent fugato from Koussevitzky. The slow movement, "Seid umschlungen" forward, rings with a secular piety quite distinct and spiritually elevating. Strong ensemble carries the day for the final quartet and ensuing janissary figures with high woodwinds, quite energized. The huge pause in the momentum and its surge to glory redeems what had begun as a pedestrian reading and imparts upon it a decided glamour.  

  

     

PASC 300 - Koussevitzky

 

   
Join Our Mailing List
CONTENTS
Editorial         Changes to European copyright law
Genesis         Super-rare American 78s!
Schnabel       Sonatas Vol 7 - Waldstein, Appassionata etc
PADA              Jochum conducts CPE Bachs Symphonies 1-3

Editorial - Changes to European copyright law

European legislators don't appear to know what they've done!         


European legislators have finally caved in to major record company pressure and voted to change the legislation regarding copyright terms in sound recordings from 50 years to 70 years. Curiously this has probably happened just in time to keep The Beatles' back catalogue out of the public domain. One might be tempted to point to US copyright legislation which tends to extend the time period covered whenever it looks like Mickey Mouse might fall into the public ownership and see a curious parallel, but I'm sure that's just coincidence - after all this is all about starving musicians, isn't it?

Anyway, it seems it's too late for these kind of arguments now. Despite a number of countries steadfastly opposing the change, sufficient numbers swapped sides just in time for this to be resurrected and save Paul McCartney's pension.

[On Monday, having heard the news, I started writing this piece. The section below is what I wrote then, continuing from the paragraphs above - but do continue to the end because I got something crucially wrong...]

 

But it's a curious piece of legislation. I studied it with great interest when it was first proposed, and unless it's been significantly changed (in which case I've not heard) then it's not necessarily the worst thing which could have struck a business like ours.

 

 

Of primary concern would have been a retrospective application of the law, hauling recordings currently available entirely legally in the public domain back into copyright and wiping out a good proportion of our catalogue in the process. This effectively happened a few years ago in the USA (before we came into being) but, quite possibly for arcane legislative reasons, is not the case here.

 


Instead the politicians are drawing a line in the sand. It's a curious, moving line thanks to another clause in the act which I'll come to in a moment. But first of all it's not entirely clear exactly when this line is to be drawn. For the bill to come into effect it has to pass through the legislatures of each of the member countries of the EU, a process which will happen, but may not be complete until 2014. Indeed, it's considered only an outside chance that 2013 might be met across Europe. If that fails then Love Me Do, the first single by The Beatles, would pass into the public domain in Europe on 1st January 2014, as it was first published on 5 October 1962, together with B-side "P.S. I Love You" the only songs released by the group that year.

I expect some strong lobbying by EMI to speed legislation up but it is apparently quite likely that these two songs will fall by the wayside in this change. And because it won't be retrospectively applied nothing could then bring the two songs back into copyright.

Let's assume, therefore, that the next Beatles release, Please Please Me, does indeed remain in copyright. Now we come to the second important clause. If, by some bizarre decision in EMI's upper echelons, they decided to delete the song Please Please Me from their catalogue, and it remained unavailable to buy for a period of 24 months, it too would fall into the public domain. Yes, there's a use-it-or-lose-it clause in the bill too.

Of course nobody's expecting anything by that particular group to fall into this category. But it does offer some consolation to us and others like us, where we're often releasing recordings which have been out of the catalogue for decades, or broadcasts which have never been commercially issued but were - critically - deemed legally "published" when they were transmitted over the airwaves.

The latter category is a peculiar potential copyright black hole. Typically a BBC orchestral broadcast is licensed from the musicians for two airings. They can't be played out again without a highly expensive renegotiation with the musicians. This can be difficult at the best of times, but where a recording was made 50 years ago it effectively seals it in the vaults until the copyright expires, whoever you are.

If, however, that recording remains in the vaults for a further two years it will then be released into the public domain, allowing both the broadcaster and the likes of Pristine access to it. What I hope and expect this will mean is that, after a two year hiatus, a good proportion of the kind of recordings we're interested in will start to fall back into the public domain just as they do now.

Indeed, for recordings made in the 1960s there is frequently little merit in the kind of sonic resurrections Pristine's XR remastering technology can perform on older recordings. Likewise, with stereo being the norm, there's little call for Ambient Stereo processing either. The main interest for us of recordings made in the 1960s is in those which, like the Stokowski 1960 Philadelphia return concert broadcast, have been rendered inaccessible to music lovers by copyright law.

We already have a fine 1961 Stokowski broadcast waiting in the wings for January 2012. Nothing in what I have read about the changes taking place here in Europe suggests this release is likely to be in jeopardy - but even if it were, it would almost certainly do nothing more than push our release date back to January 2014. What my understanding of the original proposals means is that unless the current copyright holder(s) decided to issue that recording sometime in 2012 or 2013 its copyright would expire after 52 years rather than the current 50, and not the extended 70.

Furthermore, if the recording was reissued and then fell out of circulation after, say, 10 years, it would again be liable to fall into the public domain if another reissue didn't appear within 2 years.

Now I should stress that process of the resurrection of this bill may have introduced changes to the original proposals which, at the time of writing, are not yet clear. If that's not the case then what we have is a reasonable compromise. And unless popular musical tastes change drastically in the next 20 years, I predict we may be revisiting this topic sometime around 2031, just in time for the 70th anniversary of Love Me Do...


[At this point I had originally planned to end. Now I need to continue...]

 

 

It's an interesting fact that powerful corporations spend a lot of time and money trying to persuade politicians to do their bidding. And that's exactly what's happened here.

 

 

The original proposals, with regard to the newly extended period of 50 to 70 years, appeared to offer something both to the musicians and, thereafter, to the likes of you and I who are often interested in the rather more obscure aspects of our musical history.

Well you and I have had it in that respect. The entire clause designed to show that this wasn't simply a land-grab by the major record companies has been scrapped. There is no "back to public domain" option if a work goes unclaimed by both producer and musicians.

Meanwhile the wording of the "revert to performer" clause has been set up to make sure it's almost never going to happen - in fact just about all of the clauses inserted to supposedly help hard up musicians - a session musicians' fund, the writing off of advances as well as the use-it-or-lose-it - are virtually meaningless sops to the gullible that record companies can easily side-step. This posting, from an online discussion at The Guardian on the subject, deals neatly and, apparently with information from the 'inside', with all three:


These are not worth the paper they are written on. I now work for an independent record label, but I have friends who work for a couple of the major labels who confirmed my and the musicians' suspicions.

 

Use it or Lose It  

This will never work, at least one major is currently devising a plan to reject all requests.

 

Firstly, the wording in the directive. It only mentions the artist, nothing about a representative (i.e. the artist's estate if deceased). They will only negotiate with the original artists.

 

Second, most recordings are made by more than one person, they will require all performers and musicians (including session musicians) on the recording to submit the request together.

 

If the label suspects that artists can fulfil the first two requirements, they will place a unrestored version of the recording on some obscure music download website (preferably in an Eastern European EU Country without a roman alphabet). Therefore the recording is commercially available in the EU, so the artists can not use the "The Use It or Lose It" clause.

 

 

Session Musicians Fund 

It is proposed that 20% of income for recordings over 50 years old will be placed in a session musician fund. This will be administrated by an existing collection society within each country, in the UK it will probably be the PPL. Currently airplay royalties are spilt 50-50 between copyright holder and the musicians, after the change in the law the spilt will be 40-40-20. Therefore the musicians have already lost 20% of their airplay income.

 

There are numerous questions surrounding the session musicians fund:

 

What will be the PPL's deductions for overheads?

 

How is the money from the fund to be distributed to session musicians?

 

Are all session musicians to receive some, even if their recordings are not affected?

 

Only session musicians in music industry nursing homes?

 

Only session musicians in need?

 

Can session musicians' estates apply?

 

Is it Musician Union members only?


Can only session musician from recordings that contribute to the fund apply?

 

If you check the PPL repertoire database, many of the recordings of 1960s and 1970s do not have details of the session musicians. Airplay royalties only started to be paid in the late 1970s to session musicians in the UK and the 1990s across Europe. Most are unable to prove their involvement, because they lost or destroyed they receipts or contracts.

 

The PPL already pay royalties for public domain recordings, although not officially and amounts are minimal.

 

Sales figures from record companies should never be trusted, there have been numerous court case concerning the under reporting of sales. It would not be economically viable for an individual or a group of session musicians to challenge a record company for such a small amount.

 

 

Written Off Advances

 

If a recording has been in print for the most of the last 50 years, the advance would have been paid off.


Unless the artist had a long successful music career, the 1960s rate will still apply from the original contract, which is a few pence per album. Most albums of 50 years old material sell only a few hundred copies a year.

The original record companies still pay mechanical royalties for CD and download sales to performers of public domain recordings, due to their contracts. EMI still pays Cliff Richard when it sells a copy of Move It, Adam Faith's Estate and the members (or their estates) of the John Barry Seven when it sell a copy of Made You.  

 

[In other words all of this will make no difference to the bottom lines of the major labels whatsoever, but they get to extend their control and incomes while spinning a line about musicians' pensions]  

 

 

So on reflection the record companies have all they wanted, and more. They've got The Beatles, almost certainly in perpetuity - we can expect this to be further extended in 2031 - even if they lose the first two songs they released, as the legislation will take two years to come into effect. They can easily and cheaply maintain a market block on anything and everything released or broadcast during or after 1963. Almost no musicians will see any benefit - and those few that do will mainly be better off by a matter of pennies rather than thousands.  

 

Of greatest sadness is the vast store of unplayable, unreleaseable live broadcasts - thanks to technological developments the quality of these improves rapidly through the home-recording booms of the 60s and 70s, (a period for which broadcasters' archives are often poorly maintained, if at all). As I've already explained, copyright law and contracts ensure these usually get two outings from the broadcasters before being locked away, unless you can find every single musician who played and renegotiate with them all, which might be difficult 69 years after a concert. Given my expectation that this law will be further extended for as long as anyone has any financial interest in the popular music of the 1960s (from 1963 onward), we'll probably never be allowed to hear or share those post-1962 live broadcasts legally again, anywhere.

 

Meanwhile the US can expect a further increase in copyright coverage from the present 95 years just as soon as Mickey Mouse's time gets close, and stuff the rest of the country's priceless musical heritage. That will remain firmly locked away until everyone who ever remembered it is not even a distant memory held by their ancestors. And not one of us will be alive to see the day either Mickey or the Fab Four pass into the public domain...  

 

 

Post Script: As of today, the European Commission's website states: "The directive also contains accompanying measures which aim specifically to help performers. The "use it or lose it" clauses which will now have to be included in the contracts linking performers to their record companies will allow performers to get their rights back if the record producer does not market the sound recording during the extended period. In this way the performer will be able to either find another record producer willing to sell his music or do it himself, something that is possible easily via the internet. In case neither the performer nor the producer would wish to market the recording, the recording would no longer be protected. In this way, the term extension would avoid "locking up" those recordings that are not commercially interesting."

 

The section I've highlighted would appear to contradict both the newly-agreed legislation and the argument I've outlined above. It is what the Commission originally proposed - and what the European Parliament specifically deleted from the proposed changes to the legislation in 2009 - something therefore the Commission seems still ignorant of more than two years after the event. I've written to the European Commissioner for Internal Market and Services, Michel Barnier, and will report back any response I receive in a future column here. 

 

 

Andrew Rose
16 September 2011


Links:
European Commission main page for this subject
Statement by Commissioner Michel Barner
Contact details for Commissioner Michel Barnier
Agreement of the European Council, 2011
Changes and amendments as agreed by the European Parliament, 2009
 

 
 

Two incredibly rare US 78rpm recordings finally available

Featuring music by Schoenberg, Stravinsky, Milhaud, Piston and more   

  

  

PASC306 American 78rpm Rarities 

Genesis Suite
PISTON Symphony No. 2 

Recorded 1944-1946              

Producer and Audio Restoration Engineer:  Andrew Rose    

  

Genesis Suite 

Edward Arnold narrator

Jenssen Symphony of Los Angeles Werner Jenssen    

  

PISTON Symphony No. 2

Boston Symphony Orchestra G. Wallace Woodworth  

 

 

Web page: PASC 306  

  

  

  

Short Notes  

This recording of the Genesis Suite, featuring movement composed by, among others, Stravinsky, Milhaud and Schoenberg, is one of the rarest commercially issued US 78rpm sets ever. Rarely seen or heard in this original version, here finally is a chance to hear the work as envisaged by its creators just three weeks after its première performance by the same musicians and narrator. Truly a slice of almost-lost recorded history.

 

 

Walter Piston's 2nd Symphony was the work which really launched him into the upper echelons of 20th Century American composers. Its second performance, in April 1944, was given by the Boston Symphony Orchestra, a concert recorded by the Office of War Information and pressed onto vinyl 78rpm discs which were supposed to be destroyed at the end of the war. Well, it seems not quite all the copies were as melted down as they should have been...

  

  

Sleevenotes Genesis Suite 78rpm issue     

The massive concept of setting to music the first chapter of the Bible occurred to Nathaniel Shilkret, Composer and Conductor, after a survey of public opinion made while he was manager of the Victor Recording Co. He decided that so tremendous a project should be shared by leading contemporary creators and carefully selected and commissioned composers he considered best fitted to expound the various subjects.

 

"My colleagues," Shilkret declared, "have approached their task in a spirit of the most profound reverence. Their devotion is apparent in the music they have created."

 

The separate movements have been composed in complete independence, the composers each proceeding with their individual portion without reference to or knowledge of each other's work. The sole connecting link is the narrator, Edward Arnold, who delivers the Biblical story.

 

A detailed analysis of the individual movements is impossible because of space restrictions, since elucidation of their intricacies would involve a wealth of detail. Each is partly descriptive, partly psychological, yet each illustrates its portion of the spoken narrative, and is therefore easy to follow.

 

 

1. Creation · Nathaniel Shilkret

(Born New York City, January 1, 1895)

This episode is divided into two distinct parts, the first treating of the initial aspects of the Bible story, the second beginning with the words, "Let there be light."

 

 

2. Adam and Eve · Alexandre Tansman

(Born Lodz, Poland,June 12, 1897)

The tale of the Garden of Eden is expounded. The approach of the composer to the conception of this chapter of the Genesis is rather atmospheric than descriptive. He tried to express the mood of each particular part of the text through lyrical means of expression and by solely musical work. The work could be formally considered as a Suite with a series of fast and slow movements, framed by a slow Introduction and a robust Coda.

 

 

3. Cain and Abel · Darius Milhaud

(Born Aix-en-Provence, France, September 4, 1892

The story of discord andviolence is deftly underlined in music.

 

 

4. Noah's Ark · Mario Castelnuovo-Tedesco

(Born Florence, Italy, April 3, 1895)

The first of this episode's two portions illustrates events leading to the Flood; the second portion tells of the Flood and its subsidence.

 

 

5. The Covanent · Ernst Toch

(Born Vienna, Austria, December 7, 1887)

The story of Noah's debarking, and of the covenant that no further flood should occur.

 

 

6. Babel · Igor Stravinsky

(Born Oranienbaum, Russia,June 5,1882)

The concluding movement of the work tells of the confusion brought about by various languages. The music is in cantata form, with a "Greek chorus" supporting narrator and orchestra.

 

 

7. Postlude · Arnold Schoenberg

(Born Vienna, Austria, September 13, 1874)

This deals instrumentally with the opening words of the Bible, impressively establishing a devotional mood.

 

 

About My Babel Cantata

By Igor Stravinsky, Hollywood, California, November 5, 1945

 

"For those who are not very familiar with my compositions, knowing my name only by the reputation of my earlier works such as the Firebird, Petrouchka or the Rite of Spring, my Babel-a Cantata for Chorus with Orchestra and a Narrator-will present itself probably as a casual, an isolated work which has little to do with my previous compositions, with my actual features as a composer. This feature presents itself in an entirely different aspect to those who know my musical mind and my symphonic work, especially such as the Symphony of Psalms, the Melodrama Persephone or the Opera-Oratorio Oedipus-Rex, to mention only these capital compositions of my catalogue, compositions never played in Los Angeles. Yet the acquaintance with but these compositions could easily explain my bent toward musical forms cultivated by the best musical brains of all times. Therefore the approaching performance of my Cantata among other compositions of the Bible collected of Mr. Nathaniel Shilkret by the brilliant company of Werner Janssen Symphony seems to me most opportune and I welcome it."

   

 

Notes On this recording    

The two works presented here were both conceived and written at around the same time in the USA. Walter Piston's Second Symphony was written in 1943 and received its first performance on 5th March 1944. The present recording is the symphony's second performance, which took place about a month later and was preserved by the US Office of War Information for distribution to its Overseas Branch on vinyl 78rpm discs, which would have been broadcast to forces serving during World War II. Vinyl was still in its infancy, quality-wise, but was preferred for its lightness and unbreakability by comparison to shellac 78s. The discs themselves were "to be destroyed at the termination of the emergency", yet a rare set survives from which I have taken the present transcription. A great deal of work has been necessary to overcome surface noise and distortion, so although the tone is full and the performance enjoyable, the listener will have to allow at times for the shortcomings of the original media. That said, given the sound heard on the discs themselves during initial transfer, it is astonishing what modern restoration technology has permitted me to achieve.

 

 

The Genesis Suite was conceived in 1943 and written by its various composers between 1943 and 1945. It is known to have received two live performances, and the present recording was made shortly after the première. The project was overseen by its creator, composer Nathaniel Shilkret, who had planned to sell the completed recording to one of the major record companies. Unfortunately these companies failed to show interest in the project, and Shilkret went into partnership with some businessmen associates to create "Artist Records", who pressed and issued the recording.

 

 

Its success was limited, to say the least, and financial irregularities and a falling out caused Artist Records to be wound up, sales halted and remaining stock to be destroyed, leaving the very few existing sets of this release as among the rarest commercially issued 78rpm album sets in the USA. Thereafter the orchestral recording, which had been recorded separately from the narration, was issued with a new narrator on a Capitol LP, copies of which are also rare enough to fetch three-figure sums today. By all accounts the new narrator was no Edward Arnold! The Genesis Suite quickly fell into neglect.

 

 

A resurrection of the piece took place early in the 21st century with a recording issued by Naxos of a reconstructed version of the piece, following evidence that most of the parts had been destroyed by fire. It now appears that original copies do still exist in the Shilkret archive, as prepared by Shilkret, as is the original score as submitted by Castelnuevo-Tedesco in 1944. The work has also received a further live performance, which took place in 2008.

 

 

In its original form, the work opened with Schoenberg's "Prelude" movement, but fearing a hostile response to the music's perceived difficulty and modernity, Shilkret repositioned it on the final disc (alongside the other "difficult" composer, Stravinsky") and retitled it "Postlude" for the Artist Records release. He also apparently felt his own "Creation" movement, which now took first place, was far preferred by audiences (even though at this stage it had only had one performance!) - Shilkret's letters suggest he was not a man overcome by modesty. I have elected to retain the running order and titling as presented on the Artist Records 78s.

 

 

The discs themselves are not perhaps the finest pressings in the history of shellac. Many of the openings presented difficulties in replay which may still be heard, together with high initial surface noise, making side joins particularly tricky. Thereafter in general the sides were fine. The aural tone of Edward Arnold's narration changes significantly between works, and this has been retained.. XR remastering has helped to enhance and fill the orchestral tone, which retains a distinctly 1940s Hollywood flavour, especially in some of the more filmic movements.

  

 

 

    

MP3 Sample  Genesis  1. Creation (Shilkret)             

Listen

 

Download purchase links:

Ambient Stereo MP3  

Mono 16-bit FLAC  

Ambient Stereo 16-bit FLAC
Ambient Stereo 24-bit FLAC


 

CD purchase links and all other information:

PASC 306 - webpage at Pristine Classical   

 
 

Fabulous new XR-remastered Beethoven Sonatas from Schnabel

Schnabel's Waldstein and Appassionata are among the greatest recordings ever    

  

PAKM043 BEETHOVEN

Piano Sonatas Volume 7    

Recorded 1932-1934     

  

Producer and Audio Restoration Engineer:  Andrew Rose      

  

  

Piano Sonata No. 21 in C major  Op. 53 "Waldstein"

Piano Sonata No. 22 in F major  Op. 54

Piano Sonata No. 23 in F minor  Op. 57 "Appassionata"

Piano Sonata No. 24 in F sharp major  Op. 78 "A Thérèse"

  

Artur Schnabel piano

  

 

Web page: PAKM 043  

  

  

  

Short Notes  

"As you know, I make regular purchases from you - and I have to say that the sound on the new Schnabel issues is truly astonishing. I have known these recordings for ages, and bought them in various editions - the EMI re-issues, Naxos etc, but I have never heard such beautiful and life-like sound as your recent re-issues. Congratulations!" S.W. (by e-mail)

  

Schnabel's 1930s interpretations of the Waldstein and Appassionata sonatas still rank today as, for many, the greatest set down in the recording studio.

 

 

Rarely out of print since, various attempts have been made to improve the sound quality of the original 78s. Now Pristine Audio's 32-bit XR remastering system has been brought to bear on them for the first time. Coupled with revolutionary new pitch stabilisation software, the results are astounding. An absolutely essential series.

  

  

Review March 1964, LP reissues      

Now that the reissue of all the Beethoven sonatas is well under way I suspect that the gibes people used to make at Schnabel's technique will become a good deal less common. A case could certainly be made for regarding Schnabel's Beethoven records as documents of supreme virtuosity, if the term virtuosity be understood to embrace a blazing intensity of interpretative vision as well as a breathtaking manner of execution. Time and time again I have been struck by this as I listened to Schnabel's playing : it's as though the force of his convictions dictates an altogether exceptional brilliance in his playing.

 

The 'fluffs' and the rhythmic telescopings that occasionally make us raise our eyebrows are actually almost always the results of attempts at the impossible, attempts to push an idea to the very limits of its logic and even a bit beyond, rather than results of an imperfect control of mind or fingers. You can find several examples of this on these records. The finale of the E flat Sonata, Op. 31, No. 3, provides one. Beethoven marked it presto con fuoco, and obviously didn't intend it to go at a gentle amble; but with Schnabel it goes like a tornado, and although in itself the idea of this is perfectly convincing in the final reckoning clarity of texture and articulation do get sacrificed on the altar of excitement, and this is rather a pity. Yet I don't complain-the performance of the rest of the sonata seems to me quite perfect.

 

To a lesser extent parts of the Waldstein and the Appassionata show the same madness (if I dare call it that). Schnabel takes the finale of the Appassionata at something a good deal faster than an allegro ma non troppo and gives the ubiquitous semiquavers a light and almost fantastic touch; but although this again seems quite justifiable, and although the transition from the allegro into the presto is very well managed, there are, almost inevitably, places where the details don't have time to make effect. Not so in the first movement, however. This is unfolded with a tremendous sense of majesty and awe: nothing is over-driven and nothing too heavily underlined-the rhythmic detail is scrupulously correct and grandeur and spaciousness are everything; here indeed the music seems to be playing itself.

 

I was interested to find Schnabel observing Beethoven's pedalling indications in the finale of the Waldstein. These are something of a problem. Should they-on the one hand-be regarded as a mere adjunct to the huge harmonic spans of the melody at the beginning of this movement, an attempt to make the early nineteenth-century piano convey the unprecedented breadth of this music with the grandest possible sonority ?-in which case perhaps one should not observe them too literally when playing on the modern piano-or are they signals for cloudy, Aeolian harp effects? The evidence certainly points to the Aeolian harps, at least by deduction from Beethoven's own practice of indicating the pedalling he wanted in his piano works. Schnabel evidently agrees; or rather, once one has heard how he solves the problem, one is inclined to agree with him.

 

To turn from listening to the Waldstein and the Appassionata and Op. 31, No. 3 in E flat to the three smaller sonatas on these records makes a good contrast. COLH59 has the little F major Sonata, Op. 54, sandwiched between Opp. 53 and 57, COLH58 the two Op. 49s. The modest Op. 49s, written much earlier than their opus number implies, are of course really no more than sonatinas in scope. But Schnabel treats them just as affectionately as the more celebrated sonatas, and without ever attempting to inflate their expressive content invests them with much more than charm. In particular the first movement of the G minor Sonata, Op. 49, No. 1, has, as he plays it, a directness and a childlike simplicity of utterance that seem to look forward to the world of the Op. 119 Bagatelles.

 

A word of praise finally for the quality of the LP transfers. The earliest recording here is of the E flat Sonata Op. 31, No. 3 (March 1932) and this has a less clear sound than the others (and also a rather prematurely cut off last note at the end of the Minuet); but the quality of the rest is really extraordinarily good. Perhaps I might add that, in general, I would have liked longer scrolls between the movements-a small but by no means an unimportant point. Otherwise all gratitude to HMV for making available another splendid pair of discs. The interpretations are not likely to be surpassed: they seem to me to offer at once lasting satisfaction and a communication of Beethoven that is as compelling and immediate as it must have been thirty years ago: something that is indeed still vital for us today and in no sense of mere 'historical' interest.

  

S. P.. The Gramophone   

  

  

Notes On this recording   

In terms of overall sound quality and the difficulties of restoration, this volume has generally presented fewer problems than most, something the listener should immediately find apparent in the clarity of sound achieved in many of the movements presented here. The usual problems inherent in trying to extact as much musical information as possible do still arise, but overall to a lesser extent, and the piano tone is often more vibrant and extended than in some previous volumes. Naturally the playing is exquisite!

  

    

MP3 Sample  Sonata No. 21, 3rd movement               

Listen

 

Download purchase links:

Ambient Stereo MP3  

Mono 16-bit FLAC 

Ambient Stereo 16-bit FLAC   

Ambient Stereo 24-bit FLAC  

 

  

CD purchase links and all other information:

PAKM 043 - webpage at Pristine Classical   

Georg Ludwig Jochum
Georg Ludwig Jochum
PADA Exclusives
Streamed MP3s you can also download

 

    

CPE Bach        

Symphonies 1 - 3

 

 

Hamburg Chamber Orchestra
Georg Ludwig Jochum
conductor

Recorded May 1954
Issued as Pathé 33 DTX 155

  

 

This transfer is presented with Ambient Stereo remastering by Dr. John Duffy 

 

Over 400 PADA Exclusives recordings are available for high-quality streamed listening and free 224kbps MP3 download to all subscribers. PADA Exclusives are not available on CD and are additional to our main catalogue. 

 

 

Subscribe to PADA Subscriptions start from €1 per week for PADA Exclusives only listening and download access. A full subscription to PADA Premium gets you all this plus unlimited streamed listening access to all Pristine Classical recordings for just €10 per month, with a free 1 week introductory trial.