ACLU
Voice
October 2, 2009
In This Issue
Banned Books Week
ACLU Challenges Illegal Voter Disfranchisement
Facebook: Will We Have Control Over Our Own Information?
Meet the ACLU of Georgia Family
Mike Farrell - Bill of Rights Luncheon
Mike Farrell Don't Miss Out! 
 
Next Thursday, October 8, 2009
"W" Midtown
11:30 am - 1:30 pm

Price: $ 75
Special Guest: Al Bronstein
 
Awardees:
Mike Farrell
Martina N. Davis-Correia
Kathe Burch
Banned Books Week 
 
children reading books at library
Banned Books Week is the only national celebration of the freedom to read. It was launched in 1982 in response to a sudden surge in the number of challenges to books in schools, bookstores and libraries.
 
More than a thousand books have been challenged since 1982. The challenges have occurred in every state and in hundreds of communities.  People challenge books that they say are too sexual or too violent. They object to profanity and slang, and protest against offensive portrayals of racial or religious groups-or positive portrayals of homosexuals. Their targets range from books that explore the latest problems to classic and beloved works of American literature.

According to the American Library Association, out of 513 challenges reported to the Office of Intellectual Freedom in 2008.

To read more go to:   http://www.bannedbooksweek.org/
ACLU Challenges Illegal Voter Disfranchisement in Georgia
 
Group Represents Voters Unlawfully Refused Absentee Ballots In Jail

 September 29, 2009

ATLANTA - The American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit in a federal court today challenging the illegal disfranchisement of two Georgia voters who were refused absentee ballots in the November 2008 election while incarcerated in DeKalb County Jail for minor offenses. The two DeKalb County residents were barred from receiving ballots because of a Georgia law prohibiting absentee ballots from being sent to an address other than a resident's permanent mailing address except in cases when the voter is out of the county on Election Day. 

"Because of an arcane and unconstitutional statute, our clients were wrongfully robbed of participating in this last historic presidential election," said Nancy Abudu, senior staff attorney with the ACLU Voting Rights Project. "In the state of Georgia, individuals incarcerated in jails retain their right to vote. It's both absurd and unfair that nothing would have prevented our clients from voting had they been incarcerated in jails outside the county of their residence."

According to the ACLU's lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, the denial of absentee ballots to the ACLU's clients violated their rights to equal protection and due process under the U.S. Constitution. Defendants in the lawsuit include Georgia Secretary of State Karen Handel and the DeKalb County Board of Registrations and Elections.

One of the individuals the ACLU is representing is Hassan Swann, a registered voter and resident of DeKalb County, who during the 2008 presidential election was incarcerated in DeKalb County Jail under a DUI charge. He gave his absentee ballot application to jail officials, and they submitted it for him. However, because he was jailed in the same county he resides in, DeKalb County elections officials denied Swann's request to receive an absentee ballot at the jail. As a result, he was unable to vote in the November 2008 elections.

"I will never get the chance to go back and make my voice heard," said Swann. "It's especially disturbing to me that my vote was taken away because I was jailed in my hometown. I regret that I had a DUI, but that offense didn't take away my right to vote and wouldn't have if I had been jailed on the other side of the state."

"Every eligible voter in Georgia, including those who are in jail, has the right to exercise his or her vote," said Chara Fisher Jackson, Legal Director of the ACLU of Georgia. "We hope the court strikes down this law that is both ridiculous and illegal."

Attorneys on the case, Swann et al. v. Baker et al., are Abudu and Laughlin McDonald of the ACLU Voting Rights Project, Jackson of the ACLU of Georgia, and Atlanta civil rights attorneys Neil Bradley and Brian Spears.

A copy of today's legal complaint is available at: http://www.aclu.org/votingrights/exoffenders/41168lgl20090929.html
 
More information about the ACLU Voting Rights Project is available at: www.votingrights.org
Quiz Facebook: Will We Have Control Over Our Own Information?
From the ACLU Blog of Rights

August 27th, 2009
Posted by Chris Conley, ACLU of Northern California
Privacy & Technology

Today, in response to an inquiry by the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, Facebook announced plans to enhance user privacy over the next year. Some of these plans address third party applications, like quizzes and games, that have access to a lot of your personal information.

Wondering what this is all about? Concerned about your privacy on Facebook?

If you're a Facebook user, check out the ACLU of Northern California's very own quiz.  It's a behind-the-scenes look at all the personal details a Facebook app can collect about you and your friends - and some steps you can take to keep your private information from landing in the wrong hands (including changing your own privacy settings)!

(And, yes, we know it's a little weird to warn you about Facebook quizzes by asking you to take a Facebook quiz - but at least you know who we are and that we are committed to living up to our privacy policy, unlike many quiz authors who haven't posted a privacy policy at all!)

Today's Facebook Quizzes Get a Failing Grade for Privacy
Even if your Facebook profile is "private," when you take a quiz, an unknown quiz developer could be getting access to almost everything in your profile:  your religious views, sexual orientation, political affiliation, pictures, and groups. Facebook quizzes also have access to most of the info on your friends' profiles. This means that if your friend takes a quiz, they could be giving away your personal information too. (But, again, don't just take our word for it: take our quiz and see for yourself!)

And Facebook's current restrictions on the collection and use of personal information by applications are simply inadequate. Although Facebook's Terms of Service require that applications limit the collection and use of information, enforcing terms like these is really difficult. That means that random developers who choose to ignore the Terms of Service could potentially sweep up vast amount of personal information about you and your friends - and once they've collected it, they could easily sell it, share it, or even turn it over to the government. This is a major privacy hole, and Facebook needs to take stronger steps to address this problem than just writing a sentence in a rarely-read document.

Facebook Responds - But We Still Need Your Help

In response to the Privacy Commissioner's investigation, Facebook has committed to taking several steps to improve user privacy. As part of these changes, Facebook needs to ensure that users are truly in control of their own information. That means changing the default privacy settings so that each user, and not that user's friends, can decide whether to share her information with a third-party application.

That's where you come in. Learn what you can do to protect yourself right now - and help us pressure Facebook to make meaningful changes in the coming months!
If you are a Facebook user, start by taking our quiz yourself and updating your own privacy settings.
 
Then tell Facebook that you want stronger protection by default by signing our online petition.
 
Be part of the movement by sharing the quiz via Facebook and by joining us on the dotRights fan page.
 
And, finally, help us spread the word by voting for our panel proposals for SXSW 2010 [registration required].
 
Don't let Facebook's default settings force you to silently pay with your privacy when you - or your friends - use Facebook. Demand that Facebook upgrade its privacy controls to give you control of your personal info. Demand Your dotRights!
         

Meet the ACLU of Georgia Family 
 
Ellen Spears
 
Ellen Spears, former Interim Director of the ACLU of Georgia, ACLU member since 1984.
 
Ellen Griffith Spears was a visiting assistant professor in the Graduate Institute of the Liberal Arts at Emory University, and currently teaches courses in Emory's Department of Environmental Studies. She is also the former associate director of the Southern Regional Council, and served as managing editor of the SRC's quarterly journal, Southern Changes. Ellen was interim Executive Director of the ACLU of Georgia in 1991 and has been a long time supporter.  During this time, the ACLU of Georgia was working to address the issue of police misconduct which was brought to the forefront of the national discourse with the Rodney King beating in Los Angeles. She noted that issues of police misconduct are still pertinent today, especially in light of the recent incident involving Henry Louis Gates.

During her brief tenure as director of the ACLU of Georgia, Atlanta was named the host of the 1996 Olympics. Ellen worked with a labor committee that worked with the Atlanta City Council on insuring that Olympic workers were treated fairly. She dealt with a case in which the Ku Klux Klan was attempting to march through a neighborhood in Gainesville, GA and worked to safeguard the community. She also worked with the city of Atlanta on a curfew ordinance.

After leaving the ACLU she went to the Southern Regional Council. She worked there for eleven years as managing editor for Southern Changes as well as serving as associate director. Having long harbored the ambition to pursue a degree in advanced education, she earned her PhD in American Studies from Emory University. She wrote a book titled: Newtown Story: One Community's Fight For Environment Justice about the Newtown Florist Club.  Ellen was awarded the ACLU of Georgia Civil Libertarian Award in 2002.   Reflecting on her accomplishments, she said that she "will continue working to link civil rights, civil liberties and environmental justice."
 
Mission Statement 
 
The purpose of this association shall be to advance the cause of civil liberties in Georgia, with emphasis on the rights of free speech, free press, free assembly, freedom of religion, due process of law and to take all legitimate action in the furtherance of such purposes
without political partisanship.

In Case You Missed It
 
 
 
Join Us 
Download a member application form or use Paypal to join more than 6,000 Georgians who contribute to the defense of liberty through their annual ACLU of Georgia membership.
Contribute 
Please visit www.acluga.org/donate.
Your contribution to the ACLU Foundation of Georgia is 100% tax-deductible.
 
Thank you for helping keep America safe and free! 
ACLUGA
Join Our Mailing List