 About Our Company Santa
Fe Services is a full-service personnel agency, offering temporary,
temp-to-hire & permanent staffing options to Northern New
Mexico employers. All of our staffing services include advertising,
recruitment, screening and pre-employment testing, new hire processing
and compliance, payroll, tax withholding & quarterly filing,
worker's compensation & general liability insurance. For pennies on
the dollar, we take care of every step in the complicated human
resources process.
Since 1987, we have worked with literally
thousands of companies, small & large, including private,
non-profit & government employers. For references & pricing information, please email or call us. We look forward to working
with you.
|
Contact Us! Santa Fe Services Inc. 41 Bisbee Ct Unit B1 Santa Fe, NM 87508
Ph: (505) 984-8511 Fax: (505) 986-8122
staffing@santafeservices.net www.santafeservices.net
|
|
Greetings, Friends!
We decorated the office Christmas tree over the weekend & hung our stockings with all due care, in the hopes that St. Nick will be good to us this year.
In recent weeks, we have remained busy, managing a sizable data-entry project for the NM Dept of Game & Fish, and closing positions in business management, paralegal work, general administration, retail management, housekeeping, reception & more, with organizations that include health services providers, law firms, retailers, non-profits, hotels, apartment complexes & others.
Around this time each year, many employers have employee performance appraisals on their agendas. In this issue of our newsletter, we will digest one expert's rampant disgust with performance reviews & explore how to turn them back into the useful tools they were intended to be.
Also, as many businesses contemplate recruiting new staff in the first quarter of 2009, we take a brief look at reference checks & share a few questions from our repertoire of reference questions.
If we can elaborate on our brief articles or be of any service whatsoever, please don't hesitate to contact us. We look forward to being of service.
Best wishes, today & always,
Santa Fe Services Inc.
|
Get Rid of the Performance Review?
An article by nearly this title appeared in the Oct 20th edition of the Wall Street Journal. You can read the entire article here. I found Professor Culbert's lively critique of the traditional "one-side-accountable, boss-administered" performance review insightful, thought-provoking & worthy of a wider Santa Fe audience.
Here's the Cliff's Notes version:
- Bosses & employees are focused on entirely different objectives during the review;
- Performance reviews have no actual bearing on pay determinations;
- PRs, like everything else, are completely subjective, no matter how hard we try to apply objective standards to them;
- Dissimilar characteristics/personalities/strengths/weaknesses between boss & employee (i.e., "diversity") create further barriers to honest assessment;
- The review process dissuades employees from confiding in their supervisors & otherwise impedes employee development;
- PRs undermine teamwork relationships;
- In sum, PRs undercut authenticity in co-worker relationships, erode employee morale, and cost businesses untold fortunes.
The author concludes by introducing what he calls "performance previews", where bosses & subordinates get together to plan for each other's mutual success. It strikes me as a tad on the warm & fuzzy side, but the teaser WSJ article was enough to get me to buy his book, Beyond Bullsh*t: Straight-Talk at Work. I don't believe I'm old-fashioned in thinking performance reviews can still offer something to employers & employees alike. (As I write this, I'm reminded that I need to schedule a couple of performance reviews for our staff.) Here is what we try to do in our office:
We begin with a boilerplate version of a short-answer evaluation & adapt it to suit the needs of our office & to address specific environmental issues that influence (or ought to influence) our work. I take a copy home, a copy goes home with our employee, and we establish a time to meet, a week or so later. (Some people will include an impartial third party as well.) When we arrive at the review, each of us will have prepared written answers to the same questions, which provide a focus to our conversation.
In their self-evaluations, I have invariably found that employees are more critical of their work than I am. We usually arrive independently at the same conclusions regarding successes & development objectives. Differences between our evaluations are enlightening & help shed light on where employees are focusing their attention & energy. The most valuable aspect I find in our review format, however, is the formal self-reflection & meditation-on-work that it requires of employees. Setting aside time to prepare for & hold the review invites both parties to reflect on the year gone by & re-evaluate our several roles.
Space requirements have kept this discussion frustratingly short. If you are interested in learning more, we have articles, templates, guidelines & other information available for sharing. Please inquire.
|
Reference Checks Can Still Be Valuable Tools
Although professional references remain a standard component of most employment applications, many employers--including many of our colleagues in HR--have all but abandoned checking references, since "anyone can find someone to say something good about them." Furthermore, behavioral psychology indicates that past behavior is not always an accurate indicator of future performance. In staffing, I have had many frustrating experiences at being burned by receiving a positive reference on a candidate, only to learn from my own experience that the reference was either false, or the employee suffered an unfortunate self-destruction shortly after being offered a new position. Reference checks are not perfect indicators of how an employee will perform in a new job, but as part of a comprehensive pre-employment evaluation, they can still have enormous value. Prior to checking references, it is important to consider who you are actually speaking with. In some cases, co-workers or subordinates, rather than supervisors, may offer better insight into how the candidate is likely fit into your position & organizational culture. Before you begin calling former employers not listed on a formal references page of your application, however, you should be familiar with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), which governs not only credit reports, but background checks of various kinds, including many pre-employment reference checks. I intend to discuss FCRA in the next newsletter, so stay tuned, or contact me directly (or your attorney) for more information. There are several types of reference checks, including (1) the "just the facts" style that confirms information supplied on an application & eligibility for rehire; (2) the ridiculously subjective "rank the employee on the following qualities" type of reference; and (3) the more detailed & more valuable (in my opinion) type of check that invites the reference to participate in a conversation about the applicant. As a rule, many larger organizations will only answer the first kind of
check, sometimes only confirming dates of employment & eligibility
for rehire. (For anyone concerned about creating legal liability for your organization, providing honest answers based on verifiable facts is not only an HR best practice, but almost always the best policy.) The second type of check is, in my view, all but worthless. The third type of check requires that you speak with someone who has worked closely with the candidate & will feel comfortable speaking candidly about them. If you run into an unwilling reference, ask your candidate to provide someone with the same organization that will be more receptive. Having gotten a good reference from your candidate, now what? The following is a list of selected questions from our repertoire. Good reference questions are open-ended & should help steer a structured, yet casual, conversation. Just as in employment interviews, you will always learn more from a natural conversation than from a robo-style, fill-in-the-blanks consultation. - Dates of employment?
- Candidate's title?
- General responsibilities?
- What is your relationship to the candidate (peer, subordinate, superior)?
- How long have you known the candidate?
- How would you describe the overall quality of work? (Ask for examples.)
- What areas of performance did you need to work on?
- Strenghts/weaknesses?
- How did the candidate's work compare to the work of others who performed the same job?
- What was the work environment like?
- How would you describe the candidate's communication skills? (Examples?)
- How does the candidate handle pressure/deadlines?
- How does the candidate get along with co-workers/managers/subordinates?
- Describe their management style.
- (After explaining the position for which you're considering the candidate...) Based on their performance with your company, do you think they would do well in this type of position? Do you recommend them?
- What motivates the candidate? How ambitious are they?
- Why did they leave your company?
- Would you rehire them?
- What type of work is the candidate ideally suited for?
- Were there any serious problems that we need to be aware of before making a hiring decision?
- Additional information?
The above questions are general enough to apply to a wide range of responsible positions. Questions specific to your position & organization should also be included. One final warning: To avoid some of the fallacies to which reference checking is subject, you should choose your questions in advance & establish the general framework around which each reference conversation will take place. A little structure in this respect will go a long way to helping make fair judgments about multiple candidates & even avoid the pitfall of involuntary discrimination. Silas Peterson, SPHR
Managing Partner, Santa Fe Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|