by Suzy Walz, VP and
Legislative Chair
CAP is undertaking an active role preparing for the Sunset
Review. As you may know, the statute under which all mental health
professionals practice is the Mental Health Practice Act (MHPA). Under Colorado
law, this statute lasts for 10 year at which time it will expire unless the
legislature passes another statute. This process is called "sun-setting", hence
the name Sunset Review.
Prior to the actual Sunset, which would take place in 2012,
each of the mental health groups get together and form a Mental Health
Coalition. This coalition reviews the statute line by line and makes
recommended changes to the practice act. Each group (psychologists, licensed
social workers, licensed professional counselors, marriage and family
therapists, certified addiction counselors and the unlicensed psychotherapists)
submits their groups proposed changes. The whole coalition votes upon which
changes they support. These accepted changes become a report that is submitted
to the Department of Regulatory Agencies.
It is DoRA's job to draft a new Mental Health Practice Act.
They interview all the different groups, as well as individual practitioners,
members of the public, etc., and then submit their amended version to the
Colorado Legislature for approval. The legislature hears testimony on the
proposed changes, including any others that DoRA did not include, and then
votes upon the changes. This version becomes the new Mental Health Practice
Act.
CAP has been meeting regularly with The Mental Health
Coalition, our lobbyists, DoRA and legislators to get the word out on the
changes that we would like to see in the MHPA. Here is a summary of the changes
we support:
1. The Mental Health Coalition is supporting a change to amend the
language in the list of prohibited activities 12-43-222(1) (g) and (i):
A few years ago
there was a de facto policy with at least two of the DoRA mental health boards
and among some staff to interpret 12-43-222(1) (i) that there should be a
categorical prohibition of all dual relationships. This was happening even
though such a categorical prohibition/policy was not granted by the statute in the existing language usually
referenced around this issue (12-43-222(1) (i) and the standards of practice of
most of the National and State provider groups referred to in the current
paragraph 12-43-222(1) (g) state that some dual relationships are helpful and
therapeutic for clients while others may be harmful. Most of the codes
recommend that practitioners perform a self-assessment, consult with a
colleague and/or document the risk of exploitation in the client's chart.
These changes to these two paragraphs are being recommended
so that there is uniform interpretation of the statute by each practice group's
DoRA board in these areas.
By making the language more clear and concrete,
practitioners as well as the public, can better understand what activities are
prohibited from practice.
· In
12-43-222(1) (g), we recommend removal of the contradictory language so it shall
read: (A person has violated the
statute if she/he) has acted in a manner that does not meet the generally
accepted standards of the professional discipline under which such person
practices. Such standards shall include, but may not limited to, the standards
of practice generally recognized by state and national associations of
practitioners in the field of the person's professional discipline.
· In
12-43-222(1) (i) we recommend that it shall read: (that the person) Has maintained relationships with clients
where the person's professional judgment was impaired or where the person
exploited the client.
2. The Mental Health
Coalition supports changing the make up of the various professional boards to
FIVE professional members and TWO public members.
· The
reasoning behind this proposal is to have more board members that are educated
and experienced in the field they are regulating and therefore can make more
fully informed decisions affecting clients of health care professionals and the
professionals. We believe that this will be a more efficient way for boards to
operate and therefore save the public time and money.
3.
CAP is
recommending a nomenclature change in statute for identifying those
psychotherapists who are not licensed but are listed in the Mental Health
Grievance Board data base and regulated by DoRA. CAP is recommending that the
term "unlicensed psychotherapists" be struck and replaced with "registered
psychotherapists." This recommendation is in no way a proposal for a title protection,
per se.
· CAP
believes this change will represent this group of practitioners more accurately
and appropriately. The new language will describe what these psychotherapists
ARE rather than comparing them to a group of licensed practitioners, which they
are NOT.
· In doing
research, CAP found that there is otherwise no minimal educational standard in
Colorado law that would restrict using the term "registered", while "licensed"
is a term that indicates an educational standard.
· The fact
is that psychotherapists who are not licensed ARE registered with DoRA and
REGULATED (as all professional groups are) by The Mental Health Practice Act.
CAP believes that this title change will clarify and simplify the terminology
used in statute.
In April, The Mental Health Coalition will meet with DoRA
and review and submit all the changes we would like to see in the MHPA. After
that meeting, CAP representatives Suzy Walz and Greg McHugh along with our
lobbyists Cindy Sovine-Miller and Stephanie Matthews, will meet with DoRA
representatives privately and discuss the specifics of why we are requesting
our changes. DoRA will consider our recommendations when writing their own
report.
CAP has also been monitoring various bills that have been
introduced in the legislature that may affect unlicensed psychotherapists. One
bill in particular we have been involved with is SB 124, the Michael Skolnik
Medical Transparency Act. This
transparency act already exists for physicians in Colorado where they are
required to report information pertaining to their practice history including:
· Physician's
name, address, and telephone number,
· Information
relating to their license
· Board
certification and specialties
· Any
affiliations with hospital or health care facilities
· Any health
care related business ownership if the aggregate value of the contracts exceeds
$5,000 annually
· Any public
disciplinary action taken by the state board or the regulatory body of another
state or country
· Any
agreement or stipulation to temporarily cease or restrict practice or any order
restricting or suspending the license
· Any final
action regarding involuntary limitation, suspension, reduction, non-renewal,
denial, revocation of the physician's privileges at a health care facility on
or after April 1, 1990
· Any final
criminal conviction or plea arrangement relating to the commission or alleged
commission of a felony or crime of moral turpitude
· Any final
judgment, settlement or arbitration award in a medical malpractice claim, and
· The
refusal of an insurance carrier to issue malpractice insurance policy due to
past claims experience.
· IN
ADDITON, this bill requires physicians to report the location of the applicant's
practice if different than the applicant's address of record
· Report
information about the education and training the person received pertaining to
his or her profession
· Provide
info about other licenses, certifications or registrations to practice the
applicant's profession that were issued in the previous 10 years
· Comply
with their responsibility to report adverse actions to the appropriate
regulatory body as otherwise required by law.
The bill enacts the "Michael Skolnik Medical Transparency
Act of 2010" to extend similar reporting requirements, as applicable, to the
following health care professionals that apply for a new license,
certification, or registration to renew, reinstate or reactivate a license,
certification or registration on or after July 1, 2011: Audiologists, Acupuncturists,
Podiatrists, Chiropractors, Dentists and dental hygienists, Physician
Assistants, Mid-wives, nurses, Optometrists, Physical therapists,
Psychologists, social workers, marriage and family therapists, professional
counselors, addiction counselors and unlicensed
psychotherapists.
In addition to the information required to be reported, an
impacted professional is also permitted to submit the information pertaining to
relevant awards and recognitions received by the person.
This bill has passed the senate reading and is now in
appropriations. We will keep you posted of its status.
There are a few ways we could use your help with all of this
legislative work. First of all, consider an additional donation to the CAP
general fund to help pay for the cost of the professionals helping us with our
work. You can go to our website and donate under "friend of CAP" any amount you
choose. Or simply call us and we'll gladly help with your donation.
Secondly, pass this important information on to other
unlicensed psychotherapists and encourage them to join CAP. We would like to
double our membership over the next year. CAP represents all of the Unlicensed
Psychotherapists in Colorado. We believe as the only professional organization
in Colorado for Unlicensed Psychotherapists, that it is a professional
responsibility to support our efforts. We are currently working on new ways to
better serve our membership and welcome any suggestions or volunteers.
Lastly, familiarize yourself with what is going on with the
Sunset Review. DoRA may call random therapists and ask them about our proposed
changes. Knowledge is power so empower yourself and your practice by being
involved in CAP.
Suzy Walz
Vice President and Legislative Chair
Colorado Association of Psychotherapists
303-480-5733