|
|
October 6, 2010
Welcome to On Our Minds Twice a month we enjoy sharing what WolfBrown consultants are reading, thinking, and talking about -- what's On Our Minds. It's our way of staying in touch with valued friends and colleagues, and passing along some worthwhile ideas. Sign up to be a fan on WolfBrown's Facebook page! |
|
Nonprofit Status Revocation - Deadline October 15! by Jane Culbert Most
readers of this newsletter are probably well aware that the IRS has changed reporting requirements for nonprofit organizations, including new
requirements for small organizations (budgets under $5,000)
to file an annual 990-N report. I was startled when I read in a recent report by Guidestar
that as of July 2010, over 355,000 nonprofits (over a quarter of those required
to file) had failed to do so! The price of not filing? Revocation of nonprofit
status. The
implications of that revocation fall on donors, who would lose the ability to
deduct their donations, and the organization itself, which would be required to
pay income taxes.
Why do we
care? Grassroots nonprofit organizations are doing important work in
communities across the country. In volunteering for my community in the past, I have worked
with small-budget parent-teacher organizations that had not filed annual
reports with the state. It wasn't
that the forms were difficult to complete- they simply were not aware of the
requirement. The amount of money these organizations raise makes a difference
to the schools they serve, and the fact that contributions are deductible
matters to the folks contributing. Anyone who alerts his or her friends, neighbors,
or community organizations of the new filing requirement could save the nonprofit
status for a small organization doing important work. Guidestar's
report provides support, encouragement, and advice for those who have
not yet filed.
It also points to the added responsibility of donors to verify that
nonprofits
are in fact complying with these regulations. Additionally, the IRS
provides a list of organizations (by state) that are delinquent and at risk of
losing their
nonprofit status, as well as information on what an organization can do
to preserve its nonprofit status.
Please
share this with any organization you may know that is at risk! The
deadline for
filing is October 15, 2010.
|
|
A New Frontier for Music Organizationsby Tom Wolf and Dennie WolfThe recent
news that Riccardo Muti, one of the world's greatest orchestra conductors, was performing
at the Warrenville, Illinois all-girl juvenile prison might have been regarded
by some as little more than a public relations photo-op. But those who follow the classical music world know this is
part of an important trend. Orchestras, chamber music organizations, and music
presenters have long seen "outreach" as important to their missions. But for
the majority, non-concert-hall activity has focused on students in school
settings. Today, some of the more important musical organizations view
their missions more expansively, wanting to reach and have impact on the lives
of people wherever they may be found. Prisons, homeless shelters,
hospitals, and hospices are increasingly important venues for making these musical
connections. In a
previous On Our Minds entry, we wrote about Carnegie Hall's Music Connections as an example of how new programs in community
engagement help foster more "complete" musicians. Another benefit may be that these programs also enable arts organizations, including symphony orchestras, to expand their relevance and connection to underserved communities. Not only does this enrich the exchange between musicians and audiences, it extends the boundaries of typical arts appreciation and expands the nature of the relationship. |
|
Diversified Revenue: Best Practice or Financial Myth?by Laura Mandeles
In a recent blog post, "Shattering the Myth About Diversified Revenue," the Nonprofit Finance Fund's Clara Miller proposes that seeking a more
diversified funding base is often more of a burden than a boon to non-profit
leadership, and leads to staff and board burnout. Rather than a "best
practice," she sees fund diversification as a "financial myth." I must
say, I plead guilty to having advised many nonprofit clients that they must
look toward a more diverse funding base in order to enhance
sustainability. Miller provides an example of an organization with very
diverse revenue sources, including 15 percent of revenue from "the dinner
dance, the golf outing" and other labor intensive strategies. Like all
best practices, fund diversification should be applied differently in different
organizations. I would agree, for example, that it may not be worthwhile
to add events to the mix if they yield relatively little for the work involved. Indeed, my general advice about events
is that they must have value as a means of building the donor base permanently,
not as one-offs with no lasting impact. But fund diversification is often
a good idea. I have seen too many instances where over-reliance on a small
number of funders has skewed programming decisions, adversely affected the
balance of power on the board, and made the organization vulnerable to sudden
changes in the priorities of the funders. I have also seen lack of funder
diversity as an issue in founder transition- when the organization relies on
revenue from a few sources with which the founder has built close
relationships, it is that much harder to make the change in leadership. Whether or not funding diversity is fundamentally counterproductive, or a necessary financial strategy, it works best when applied thoughtfully with a well-identified objective. |
|
|
About WolfBrown WolfBrown helps funders, nonprofit institutions and public agencies
understand their potential, set priorities and fulfill their promise.
For more information, please visit http://wolfbrown.com.
|
SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE 808A Oak Street San Francisco, CA 94117 415.796.3060
|
CAMBRIDGE, MA OFFICE 8A Francis Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 617.494.9300 |
WASHINGTON OFFICE Red Maple Court 10627 Jones St, # 301A
Fairfax, VA 22030 703.591.3661 | | |
|
|
|
|
|