banner myriad
images banner
High Tide 3:09amLow Tide 9:25amHigh Tide 3:29pmLow Tide 10:45pm*
 ~ by & large ~
bylarge
Photo coverage of recent happenings
at and on local water
s. Send photos to 
asimko@waterfrontalliance.org

Sept. 10, 2012
New Waterfront Opens in Brooklyn

A new park opened at the Greenpoint, Brooklyn waterfront. Located on the site of the former WNYC radio transmission towers, the new park includes an overlook to the south, a waterfront esplanade, and a pedestrian bridge across an excavated historic ferry slip and restored wetland. A new recreational pier at the end of Kent Street will open at the end of this year. Photo by Ed Reed of the Mayor's Office.
WW follow-up
Corrections, clarifications, updates and letters to the editor
follow-up 
Are We Rushing to Over-Develop the Port of New York and New Jersey? Readers Respond 

Editor's note: In the last edition of WaterWire, waterfront advocate Rob Buchanan questioned the wisdom of the accelerated and expensive expansion of shipping industry infrastructure projects in the Port of New York and New Jersey. In particular, he suggested that the fast-tracking of the raising of the Bayonne Bridge project was inappropriate without more public dialogue. His comments were spurred by the August 20 New York Times article  Panama Canal's Growth Prompts U.S. Ports to Expand. Below are responses to Mr. Buchanan's thoughts: 

From Erik Baard
Rob's letter usefully highlights the tensions accompanying the New York-New Jersey Harbor's transition back to a broad mix of usage after a brief period (about 150 years) of industrial domination. Readers of this list are more likely than most to see our local waterways through two lenses, as both harbor and estuary. Planners and the public tend to wear a twentieth century harbor monocle, as it were.

A truer valuation of our regional waterways recognizes that the living estuary provides economic services, adding greatly to our Gross Sustainable Product. With ecological recovery, that boon will grow. A tighter harbor (shallower, with lower bridges) might bring the dual benefits of habitat regrowth and the inhibition of big box consumerism, an often-cited arch villain in our environmentally destructive disposable culture.

But I worry that the more certain and quantifiable result of blocking supership accommodation might be to push freight onto trucks, resulting in greater net damage to the environment and human health. Has anyone run the inter-modal comparison numbers for this, accounting for new and anticipated shipping exhaust regulations?
Mr. Baard is founder of the LIC Community Boathouse and HarborLAB and progenitor of City of Water Day 

Mr. Buchanan responds
I've heard the more trucks argument a couple of times, but never in any depth. If we effectively prevent monster ships from getting to Newark by not raising the bridge, the argument is that those giant ships will go somewhere else and all the stuff on them will have to get to us by truck. But there are some big assumptions there--including the idea that trucking stuff from Halifax or Norfolk would be cheaper than bringing it here in the current, merely giant container ships. Also, if we do raise the bridge, all the stuff on those ships will still have to get to where it's going by truck, so it's hard to envision a major impact on truck traffic.

Anyway, the short answer to the 'has anyone done a study' is no, unless you count the long-outdated stuff produced by paid consultants who just spew back what they are supposed to. And that's the point--there's no real information here, just boosterism, and no process.

One other thing: while I appreciate the emphasis on shipping exhaust--ships are a major source of air pollution--I don't think we should be willing to trade slight or even moderate improvement on that front for destruction of estuary habitat and water quality, which is essentially the 'environmental' argument that the monster ship crowd is making. That's not progress.
Mr. Buchanan is co-founder of the Village Community Boathouse, the Brooklyn Bridge Park Boathouse and the NYC Water Trail Association, and the New York co-chair of the Citizens Advisory Committee to the EPA's Harbor & Estuary Program

From Johna Till Johnson
As someone who's done my share of community and environmental activism, I'm all in favor of communities speaking out. There's pretty much no other way to have our voices heard--and as you point out, "fast-tracking" is all-too-often basically a bum rush designed to get pork-barrel projects rammed through against the wishes of people who are most affected.

That said, I have some reservations about subjecting the Bayonne Bridge redesign to "death by perpetual study committee." Yes, we should have a comprehensive look at the potential impact of this massive project--but only if we're actually open to the idea that it might have to happen, and happen quickly, if New York is to maintain a future as an industrial shipping port.

Here's my issue: If Port Newark can't accept the supercargo ships, they'll go elsewhere. This isn't a hypothetical, or a "maybe". As Erik Baard pointed out on the nyc-water-trail Google group, they WILL go somewhere else. Now, maybe that's a good thing--and maybe it's not.

I have no way of knowing how much irreplaceable estuary environment would be destroyed by this project, but a safe bet is "some". (When does a development project NEVER destroy the environment?).

I would also wager that the answer to "how much of the New York industrial shipping business would be destroyed if we don't accommodate the supercargo ships?" is "quite a lot."

If supercargo ships don't come here, there goes not only New York's future as an industrial port, but also the 300,000-plus jobs that the NYC Working Harbor Committee estimates are tied to commercial shipping.

So yes, we can do more studies and try to better quantify things like "some" and "quite a lot."

But at the end of the day, the choice is pretty stark: We can either continue operating Newark Harbor as a commercial entity, or shut it down.

Personally, one of the things I like about New York is the mix of natural and industrial beauty. Yes, there are gorgeous natural habitats--but there are also working tugboats and container ships. There is not just an economic but also an esthetic cost to eliminating these. And I simply disagree that Walmart is the only (or even major) beneficiary of New York as a functional commercial shipping harbor.

So yes, openness is a good thing. And as a professional researcher, I'm all in favor of more studies. But if the goal is to shut down the project by subjecting it to the delaying tactic of "more studies"--then I can't agree. I really want New York to continue to have a future as a commercial shipping harbor.

Again, thanks for posting. I can't agree more that the most productive thing that can happen now is an active debate!
Ms. Johnson is President & Sr. Founding Partner at Nemertes Research  

From Rob Buchanan
I'm not sure what I'm advocating for here is "death by perpetual study." I think what I'm trying to say is that until now there hasn't been ANY real study here, either of the supposed economic benefits or the environmental consequences. Nor has there been any meaningful opportunity for public comment or participation. On those grounds alone--lack of due diligence and lack of democracy--I think a time-out is justified.

Another aspect of this that makes me uncomfortable is the supposed need for haste. You say we need to be "open to the idea that this might have to happen, and happen quickly"--but why, exactly? If you read the Times piece carefully, it's not at all certain that significant numbers of superships will start to call here anytime soon. Is it possible that the Port Authority is building a white elephant? It's happened before. Does anyone remember the Fishport project in Erie Basin?

I also don't understand the doomsday language. Would a delay of a year or two--or for that matter, ten--really "destroy" the port? Is our choice really between accepting the superships or "shutting down the Port of Newark"? I don't see how. It's not as if the harbor and the facilities we have now are going to dry up and blow away, and it's not as if the market--the 40 million people who live in the region--is going to evaporate. Shippers will still need to get goods to that market, and they'll still use ships to do it because moving freight by water is always going to be cheaper than moving it by land, regardless of vessel size.

I liked your argument in an earlier post about old European cities that were quaint but obsolete. I don't want New York to become that either. I think there's a sustainable vision for this harbor that includes an active working waterfront--in fact, one that's more active than what we've got now. I'd like to see more stuff moving locally by water and less by land, and I'd like to see more of our young people grow up using the waterways and eventually finding employment on them. I'd also like to see an estuary whose fisheries are restored, whose wetlands are robust enough to filter runoff from the land and absorb storm surge from the sea, and whose water is clean enough for swimming everywhere. I don't see how rushing to transform the Kill van Kull into another Panama, with no real research or public debate, will bring us closer to either goal.

From Erik Baard
One aspect of this that I didn't notice in the discussion is the possibility of environmental givebacks or offsets. We might not have enough force to overcome the momentum of this project, but perhaps we could reasonably demand that greater work be done to balance estuary damage with restoration. Keeping things local, some ideas: expansion of the marshy expanses of the Arthur Kill or seeding in new ones on the Kill Van Kull; better care of Shooters Island and its sisters; native plantings along the shores; local CSO mitigation in NJ and on Staten Island, etc. 
_______________________
small mwa logo

For a map of vessels navigating the NY/NJ waterways at this moment, check marinetraffic.com.

Tide times above are for the waters off New Rochelle on September 21, 2012.
For your waterfront's daily tides,
go to saltwatertides.com.

For information about environmental conditions (currents, water temperature, salinity, wave height, etc.) of the New York Harbor area, check the Urban Ocean Observatory at Stevens Institute's Center for Maritime Systems
_______________________

Events
Events on the Waterfront

Click on the links for more
information about these events.
A detailed calendar of events
may be found at www.waterfrontalliance.org/calendar

September 22
Gowanus Canal Clean-Up
All day, Gowanus Canal
College Point Beach Clean-Up
9am-1pm, College Point, Queens
Little Red Lighthouse Swim
9:45am start, Riverdale (254th St.)
Special Lighthouse Boat Tour
10am-1pm, departs from the Battery Maritime Building
Pepacton Reservoir Paddle
11am, Catskills
Bicycle Tour of Port Morris
12pm, South Bronx
Newtown Creek Armada
1pm-4pm, at the Newtown Creek Nature Walk, Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Tap Dance
Waterfront Museum and Showboat Barge, Red Hook

September 23
3rd Annual Thomas Pell Wildlife Sanctuary Cleanup
9am-3pm, east bank, Hutchinson River, Pelham Bay Park
Freshkills Park Sneak Peak
11am-4pm, Freshkills Park
NY/NJ Baykeeper Clambake
12pm-4pm, the Chapel at Fort Hancock, Sandy Hook, NJ
Anna Christie
7:30pm, Waterfront Museum and Showboat Barge, Red Hook

September 24
6pm-8pm, Manhattan VA Medical Center, 423 East 23rd St., 2 North Conference Room, 2nd floor

September 27
Harbor School Regatta
All day, Governors Island
Urban Waterfronts Conference
Through Sept. 29, Washington, DC
Hudson River Park's Annual Fall Fling
6pm, Pier 66

September 28
Titanic Tragedy: A New Look at the Lost Liner
6:30pm-8:30pm, South Street Seaport Museum, 12 Fulton St.

September 29
Newark Riverfront Boat Tours
All day, Newark
Rocking Manhattan: Rocking the Boat Fundraiser
7am, start at Governors Island
Little Neck Bay Festival: National Estuaries Day
11am-3pm, 228-06 Northern Blvd, Douglaston, NY
TOCCONTENTS: September 21, 2012
Click on the links below to read the stories in this edition of WaterWire.

ILA prepares workers to strike October 1 if agreement is not reached

Waterfront Construction Competition Announced
First deadline is November 16, 2012

The important restoration work of Eleanor Rae and the Hutchinson River Restoration Project

Army Corps of Engineers and Jamaica Bay Eco Watchers lead the way

See the latest designs and plans at a Sept. 24 meeting

NYC Economic Development Corp.: Heroes of the Harbor
As MWA's Heroes of the Harbor celebration approaches, we highlight honorees
 Photo coverage of recent events at and on the water

Corrections, clarifications and letters to the editor

 Newslinks
ILALONGSHOREMEN AND PORT OPERATORS HAVE LESS THAN TWO WEEKS TO AGREE ON A NEW CONTRACT
Dock Workers Prepare to Strike
Negotiations between the International Longshoremen's Association, AFL-CIO, the largest union of maritime workers in North America, and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX), an alliance of container carriers and port operators, are resuming this week with the assistance of a federal mediator after a lengthy stalemate. The two sides are debating the details of a master contract covering 14 ports on the East Coast and Gulf Coast, including the Port of New York and New Jersey.

The contract expires on September 30. In the event an agreement is not reached, the ILA is preparing to strike.

Businesses that rely on imports or exports -- toy and apparel industries, among many others -- are urging a swift conclusion to the negotiations. The executive director of the national Waterfront Coalition, Robin Lanier, had this to say: "Our members, representing many of the nation's largest importers and exporters, rely on continuous and efficient movement of cargo through American ports. Manufacturers depend on East and Gulf Coast ports to deliver raw materials and parts used in the production of final goods. Exporters and farmers depend on these ports to fill orders overseas, and retailers depend on them to make sure that store shelves across the U.S. are stocked. A prolonged labor disruption could result in significant supply chain costs and lengthy cargo delays for the ports' many customers, which would complicate the ability of the economy to rebound our of recovery."


Top photo: A crane operator at the New York Container Terminal, on the Kill van Kull. Bottom photo: What the crane operator sees when he looks down at the ship waiting to be unloaded. Photos by Robert Simko

In a statement to the press, USMX Chair/CEO James Capo said port operators are trying to address issues centered around "inefficiencies that have crept into our operations over the years. I'm referring to archaic work rules and manning practices, and the system of guarantees and overtime pay practices that result in millions of dollars being paid for time not worked. These inefficiencies are causing many of our ports to become prohibitively expensive, harming our competitive ability and threatening the long term viability of our operations."

Some of these issues were cited in a special report earlier this year from the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor.

Solidifying its power base last week, the ILA joined with five other major maritime labor organizations -- American Radio Association, Inlandboatmen's Union, International Longshore and Warehouse Union, Marine Engineers' Beneficial Association and International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots -- to establish the Maritime Labor Alliance.
 competitionCHANGE THE COURSE OF WATERFRONT PLANS
NYC EDC Announces a Waterfront Construction Contest
The NYC Economic Development Corporation has just announced a Request for Expressions of Interest for Change the Course, a competition that seeks innovative, cost-saving proposals for completing construction projects along NYC's waterfront.

The two-phase competition is a collaboration with the Hudson River Park Trust. Phase 1 will seek expressions of interest in order to identify factors that drive the increasing costs and duration of marine construction in the City (including obsolete technologies, permitting processes, current regulations, environmental issues, outdated science studies, labor issues and efficiencies). Phase 2 will receive creative solutions that are cost-effective, sustainable and ethically sound. According to the EDC, "in order to ensure that the responses address existing challenges along New York City's waterfront, each should address conditions identified in either the following areas along the City's waterfront:
  • Lower Manhattan Waterfront: structures between Fulton Fish Market (at the South Street Seaport) and Pier 35, along the East River in Manhattan; and
  • Hudson River Park Pier: The substructure of Pier 40, on the Hudson River, in Manhattan."

The final winning selections will be eligible for awards of $50,000, $25,000, and $15,000. Submissions for the first and second phases will be selected by the EDC with the assistance of an advisory committee of members from the Hudson River Park Trust, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, NY State Department of Environmental Conservation, local academic institutions, and engineering and construction professionals.

 

The deadline for submissions for the first phase RFEI is November 16, 2012. For more information, click here

HutchinsonTHE FUTURE BRIGHTENS FOR THE HUTCHINSON RIVER
The Last of NYC's Neglected Waterways Gets Attention 
New York's waterways are lately teeming with success stories of environmental restoration and shoreline revival -- but the forsaken Hutchinson River has not been one of them. Until now.

Vying for the title of most neglected waterway in New York City, the Hutchinson River meanders from Scarsdale through the Bronx, past Co-op City, to empty into the East River at Pelham Bay Park. Polluted, bordered by highways and chain link fences, the Hutchinson River lacks a single public access point along its entire five miles. An occasional barge makes it partway up the river to deliver oil, scrap metal or gravel to several companies that still operate ports on the Hutchinson, but accumulating silt is making barge traffic more difficult.

A Long Term Control Plan to improve the water quality of the Hutchinson River is being developed by the NYC Dept. of Environmental Protection and is due for completion in September 2014. Some people, however, don't want to wait two more years for a plan to revive this river.

Four years ago, Eleanor Rae founded the Hutchinson River Restoration Project (HRRP). Originally intrigued by the story of the river's historic namesake -- a Bronx woman named Anne Hutchinson who was killed by Indians in 1643 -- Ms. Rae's interest had expanded to the sorry state of the river itself.

Starting slowly, with a small group of loyal volunteers, the HRRP has conducted exploratory trips of the river by canoe and sponsored clean-ups of shoreline sites (photo at right). In fact, the next clean-up -- of the Thomas Pell Wildlife Sanctuary -- will be held on Sunday, September 23, 9am-3pm. Volunteers are needed and welcome; see the website for details.

As HRRP president, Ms. Rae, with other members of the organization, were active participants in Mayor Bloomberg's Vision 2020 workshops, offering their perspective on the needs of the river.

Last year, the HRRP gained wider attention when it won a $14,000 grant to research a site for a canoe/kayak launch. The grant is funded by the Environmental Protection Agency and administered by the New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission in partnership with the New York-New Jersey Harbor Estuary Program. As the HRRP consultant, B. Laing Associates, investigates potential launch sites and environmental and legal concerns, the organization is planning two community meetings about public access to the river -- one for the general public and one for Co-op City residents.
This map shows potential sites for a canoe/kayak launch
on the Hutchinson River.


Marianne Anderson, the administrator of Pelham Bay Park for the NYC Parks Dept. is wholeheartedly supportive. "Pelham Bay Park attracts nearly 5.6 million visitors each year -- many of whom are drawn to its landscape, its respite, and the variety of recreational activities and institutions within its borders," she wrote in a letter supporting the HRRP's grant proposal. "The fact that the Hutchinson River remains inaccessible to canoes and kayaks is a significant drawback, and one that we would be eager to resolve."
ISLANDSJAMAICA BAY'S MARSH ISLANDS COME BACK TO LIFE
Community Groups Work with Government Partners
Restoring salt marshes and coastal wetlands in Jamaica Bay are a critical component of the Comprehensive Restoration Plan for the Hudson-Raritan Estuary.

In a coordinated initiative by the Army Corps of Engineers, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, National Park Service, NYS Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), NYC Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), National Resources Conservation Service and the NY/NJ Harbor Estuary Program,
the vanishing marsh islands are being restored with clean sand dredged from the New York-New Jersey Harbor deepening project.

"The Army Corps has a strong commitment along with our partners and stakeholders to restore critical habitat within Jamaica Bay, complementing the needs of the environment with the economic benefits of deepening the Port of New York and New Jersey," said Col. John R. Boulé II, recently retired commander of New York District.

Following sand placement at the marsh islands this season, a community effort next spring, led by the Jamaica Bay Ecowatchers and the American Littoral Society, will plant spartina alternaflora -- a saltmarsh cordgrass -- from seeds recently harvested from the bay.

"When completed, this wetlands restoration project will be a tremendous ecological boost to the critical habitat of our bay's waters," said Dan Mundy of Jamaica Bay Ecowatchers. "This is great example of a collaborative effort between the local, state and federal agencies and the local environmental community. We believe this is a model arrangement which may work well in other areas of environmental restoration as well."

Marshes and coastal wetlands help stabilize the shoreline, provide critical habitat and nursery grounds for hundreds of fish and wildlife species and provide an important food source and nesting ground for native and migratory birds. Wetlands also improve water and sediment quality by filtering chemicals and other nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphates. 

It's estimated that approximately 1,400 acres of tidal salt marsh have been lost from the marsh islands since 1924, with the rate of loss rapidly increasing in recent years.

During the restoration project, the Marine Parkway-Gil Hodges Memorial Bridge is being intermittently raised to accommodate waterborne vessels with loads of sand to transit the inlet to reach Jamaica Bay. "The Corps is committed to this work and will make every effort to minimize any inconvenience to the public from the bridge raisings," said Lisa Baron, Project Manager.
Photo and text by Vincent Elias, Army Corps of Engineers 
bluewayARE YOU A FAN OF THE FUTURE EAST RIVER BLUEWAY?
See the Latest Plans and Designs at Monday's Meeting
It's time for the community to weigh in on the latest concept designs for the East River Blueway Plan, a community-based waterfront initiative on Manhattan's East River waterfront between the Brooklyn Bridge and East 38th Street.

Representatives from the offices of Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer, Assemblymember Brian Kavanagh, the LES Ecology Center, Community Boards 3 & 6, and the NYS Department of State will be presenting details about the Blueway on September 24, 6pm to 8pm, at the Manhattan VA Medical Center, 423 East 23rd Street, 2 North Conference Room, 2nd floor. For more information, see www.eastriverblueway.org. Questions? Contact Adam Lubinsky, East River Blueway Project Director and WXY Principal, at 212-219-1953, x17.
 EDCHEROES AT THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Profound and Positive Changes at the NYC Shoreline,
From an Inspired and  Dedicated Group at EDC 
All heroes are singular. In the case of waterfront transformation fostered by the NYC Economic Development Corporation, heroes are singular and plural. When the Metropolitan Waterfront Alliance salutes the EDC on October 9 at the Heroes of the Harbor Awards Dinner, a group of hardworking people will stand and proudly receive your applause.

The agency is at the forefront of the profound changes that have occurred throughout New York City over the past decade. These projects touch every type of waterfront resource across all five boroughs, ranging from massive civil works such as the $250 million water siphon -- connecting Staten Island and the City's water supply system under the Narrows -- to the $100 million investment in new port and rail infrastructure on the Brooklyn waterfront. NYCEDC has also led the efforts for the purchase, design and construction of a new rail freight connection to Staten Island, the strong revival of Coney Island, the restoration of a viable ferry service on the East River, and the construction of new waterfront parks in West Harlem, Hunts Point, Hunters Point, Sunset Park, St. George, and along the East River (above right).

This year, NYCEDC launched the PortNYC initiative to create greater awareness among the transportation community and general public of the City's strategic seaport and inland transportation facilities that tie the City into the national and world economy. In addition, NYCEDC not only plans and builds waterfront infrastructure, it also maintains these facilities on behalf of the City, ensuring that these transformative projects can be enjoyed by all New Yorkers for years to come.

To join us in honoring these heroes on October 9 at MWA's Heroes of the Harbor Awards Dinner and Parade of Boats, please click here for more information or to purchase tickets.
NLWATERFRONT NEWSLINKS
 
City Agency Seeks to Shore Up Aging Piers
"The city is taking its waterfront development efforts a step further and turning to a less-apparent problem on its shoreline: how to fix aging piers and wharfs in a cost-effective way..."
Wall Street Journal, Sept. 19, 2012

A Pier to Pay for a Park
"New Yorkers cherish their access to the piers and green spaces that make up the Hudson River Park, which stretches from Pier 99 near 59th St. to Battery Place..."
The New York Times, Sept. 17, 2012

Seaport Museum Charts New Course
"Susan Henshaw Jones has found her sea legs..."
Wall Street Journal, Sept. 16, 2012

In Quest for River's Power, an Underwater Test Spin
"Could cars in New York City someday run on electricity generated at the bottom of the East River?..."
The New York Times, Sept. 11, 2012

New York is Lagging as Seas and Risks Rise, Critics Warn
"With a 520-mile-long coast lined largely by teeming roads and fragile infrastructure, New York City is gingerly facing up to the intertwined threats posed by rising seas and ever-more-severe storm flooding..."
The New York Times, Sept. 10, 2012

Port of New York's rising tide of jobs as Panama Canal expands
"New York's first industry is prepping for its next act. The Bayonne Bridge is being raised, the seabed in the Kill Van Kull beneath it is getting lowered, and the city is boring 100 feet underground with a 110-ton machine - all in preparation for the 2014 opening of the newly expanded Panama Canal, which will steer larger vessels into the port..."
New York Post, Sept. 9, 2012

Pollution as Art: Radio-Controlled Armada Floats Where Canoes Dare Not Go
"...The Newtown Creek Armada is a temporary installation by the three artists, built both to help people get acquainted with the creek and to explore a new way to monitor it..."
Wired, Sept. 8, 2012


(back to top)
logo w/ mission for waterwire