S P O T L I G H T


October 6, 2010
SIGN UP!





Links

Firm Overview
Client List
Insurance Expertise
Case Studies
Events & Sponsorships
Quarterly Newsletter
About Nolan
The Robert E. Nolan Company is an operations and technology consulting firm specializing in the insurance industry. For over 37 years, we have helped insurance companies redesign processes and apply technology to improve service, quality,
productivity, and costs.

Our staff members are all senior industry experts with 15+ years in the industry. Visit www.renolan.com to download our insurance industry studies, white papers, and client success stories.


Putting "Benefit" Back
in Cost-Benefit Analysis
Eugene Reagan
Senior Consultant

One of today's most tiresome catchphrases is "total cost of ownership." Obviously, no one is interested in knowing the partial cost of ownership. The idea of the net cost of ownership is nothing but a recycling of the old idea of cost-benefit analysis, comparing total costs with total benefits—a concept that has been around for 50 years or more.

The cost side of the cost-benefit equation is usually pretty straightforward. A new system has specific costs related to its purchase (e.g., licenses and maintenance). That system or any new process may also require changes to personnel, either added or eliminated, with more or less salary expense. There may be ancillary service or support costs. All of these can be quantified fairly easily. Addressing the benefit side of the equation, however, can be a little more complex. Benefits can be classified and analyzed in several different ways:

  • Hard dollars vs. soft dollars: If you can stop writing a check for something, you're saving hard dollars. Soft dollars are often difficult to quantify. However, if you are aggressive, you can turn soft dollars into hard dollars. If a process change is going to eliminate 20 hours of work for an employee, there is a soft-dollar benefit in that he or she is now free to take on additional work. That can be turned into hard dollars only if you can identify another 20 hours of work that can be eliminated. Combining the two savings can indeed create the opportunity for elimination of a full-time position. It takes aggressive thinking and planning to achieve these savings, but they are real and attainable.
  • One-time vs. ongoing benefits: Again, it is easy to identify one-time benefits. I can replace an outdated machine with a state-of-the art one, or I can cut out a planned expenditure. Ongoing benefits would include reductions in employee costs (including benefits), production costs, outside services, and productivity improvements.
  • Tangible vs. intangible benefits: How can you measure intangible benefits? First, you have to identify them. Then you consider their impact on things like growth in market share or customer retention. For instance, a change designed to improve quality should result in improved customer satisfaction (an intangible). This should lead to higher rates of customer retention. Goals can be set and progress can be measured, turning the intangible benefit into a tangible one. Similarly, changes that improve employee morale can lead to reduced turnover, which can be measured.

In many ways, cost-benefit analysis, as its name implies, is just a straightforward math problem. Total cost minus total net benefit over some period tells you if the investment is worthwhile.

Another useful tool is a staffing model. A staffing model should be composed of three factors: volume drivers, transaction times, and allowances (training time, absenteeism, turnover, etc.). An effective cost-benefit analysis considers potential increases in work volume resulting from the change in process or system, and it can determine the impact of shortened transaction times. Improvements in turnover rates or other allowances can also be factored into the equation. A good staffing model pulls all of these elements into one place to evaluate the long-term effects of future changes.

Grinding out a meaningful cost-benefit analysis is nothing new, but it is the only way to be certain that the varied benefits to your organization outweigh the costs.

10 Minute Card Survey and
Chance to Win iPad!
The Robert E. Nolan Company and Network Branded Prepaid Card Association (NBPCA) are announcing a new survey of the regional and community banks regarding their use of network-branded (American Express, MasterCard, Visa, Discover) prepaid cards as active products for consumers and small businesses.

The purpose of this study is to better understand how prepaid cards are perceived and used by regional and community banking markets and to determine how the branded networks or NBPCA can provide additional support in helping to increase distribution of these products in their relative markets.

Individual responses will be kept fully confidential. Aggregated and cleansed results will be published and participants will receive the results of the survey at no charge. Having access to these results will enable participants to better understand how their experience in the market ranks with their peers' and to see improvement and ideas from other survey participants.

The survey has approximately 30 questions broken into five categories, and we estimate it should take no longer than 10-15 minutes to complete.

In return for your participation, you will be able to see how your replies stack up with those of the other respondents, and you will be invited to a conference call to review the findings. Also, one lucky participant will win a new iPad through a random drawing—see the website for more details!

To participate in the survey, go to www.renolan.com/cardsurvey.

An iPad will be Given Away to One Lucky Participant!