|
|
Legislative Bulletin
May 7, 2010
A Brief
Summary of Education Issues at the State House
_____________________________________________________________________________
State Budget Update
The House Finance Committee has formally voted 13-12 to
recommend budget reductions contained in SB
450. Cuts in the Dept. Education were reduced from almost $10 million to
approximately $6 million. Of this total, cuts in direct state aid to local
school districts represent approximately $4.8 million and simply downshift the
burden to local taxpayers to make up the loss in revenue that was anticipated
during the budget process and school district meetings. Cat aid is cut by
$3,946,405, reducing next year's reimbursement to approximately 79% of
entitlements. Other state aid cuts include $607,993 in Tuit & Transp;
$128,065 in Dropout Prev; $39,903 in Local Ed Improvement; $23,942 in Statewide
Spec Educ; $9,178 in Career Tech Student Orgs. Additional proposed education
cuts include $65,000 to eliminate the Parent as Teacher program; a $15,961
reduction in school nutrition reimbursements for breakfast; a $102,920
reduction in support of adult education programs; and a $240,420 reduction in
expenditures for state assessments.
The proposal also includes a one-year further reduction of
the state share of teacher, police and fire retirement contribution rates. For
FY 2011, the state share would drop another 5%, down to 20%, downshifting
another $9.4 million to locals. An effort to temporarily increase employee
rates for one year, helping to offset increases forced on school and municipal
budgets, failed on a 13-12 vote.
SB 450 now goes
to the full House for a vote next Wednesday. Lengthy floor debate and
competing amendments are expected.ACTION
ITEMPlease contact your local senator and representatives to make sure they understand the impact of the timing
of these cuts. The FY 2011 proposed cuts impact next year' budgets, most of
which were adopted at March annual meetings and based on higher levels of
anticipated state revenue. The FY 2011 cut of $4 million in Catastrophic Aid
is of special concern since Cat Aid is currently only reimbursing approximately
85% of the eligible expenditures that were made last year. The proposed FY
2011 reduction would reimburse an estimated 79% of current year entitlements. These current year expenses cannot be
modified or reduced: they are based on required programs that meet the
educational needs of these students. Since districts were not aware of these
lower estimates of aid during the budget process, such cuts will have
far-reaching impact on other areas of local budgets as well as increasing local
property tax rates next fall._____________________________________________________________________________
Pooled Rick Management ProgramsTwo separate efforts were presented in the legislature
attempting to force pooled-risk programs to deplete reserves and reimburse
participating school and municipal political subdivisions. A proposed
amendment by Rep. Eaton to SB 450 in
House Finance was narrowly defeated by a 13-11 vote. HB 1393, originally relative to NH investment trusts and currently
in the Senate Commerce, Labor and Consumer Protection Committee, has a proposed
amendment seeking to cap reserves of such organizations (Local Government
Center Health Trust, PRIMEX, SchoolCare). As proposed, the bill sets an
arbitrary cap of 5% of estimated annual claims as the maximum reserve allowed.
Current cash reserves of risk management pools are set by boards consisting of
local municipal and school representatives and based on standard actuarial
formulas. Target reserves of these organizations are lower than private
industry and lower than the target set by the Blue Cross Blue Shield National
Association. The goal of pooled risk programs is to provide high-quality
insurance at a cost effective price, as well as stability in the rates. These
services have been provided by the state's pooled risk organizations, and the
proposed arbitrary caps on reserves put those services at risk. Financial
instability would likely result and possibly force these providers to purchase
reinsurance, costing money and requiring further rate increases.ACTION
ITEMPlease contact your local senator and representatives and urge their opposition to these proposals. It is
not understood why the Secretary of State, one week before House and Senate
deadlines, suddenly feels compelled to oversee pooled risk management programs
and place arbitrary caps on their reserves. If such regulation/oversight is
needed, it should be within the insurance department, yet the NH Insurance
Dept. has expressed no such concern. As noted in comments made by SAU 48
Superintendent and LGC Board of Directors Chair Mark Halloran, in opposition to
this legislative effort, "Our reserves are based on standard actuarial
formulas. We have set a target ratio in the formula that is lower than private
industry, and that therefore requires a smaller reserve. Establishing reserve
levels by legislative action is risky. In fact, the various models offered by
the House and Senate would likely create a situation in which we would be
constantly insolvent and we would lose the confidence of our members and technically
be in receivership. We are sure this is not the intent of the sponsors, but
the consequences need to be carefully examined."______________________________________________________________________________
Labor Bill Requiring Notice to Education Support Staff and Non-certified Employees
HB 1411, requiring
notice to educational support personnel and non-certified school district
employees and opposed by NHSBA, is scheduled for a vote in the Senate next
week. This bill requires the superintendent to notify, in writing, all
qualified education support personnel and non-certified school district
employees, who have completed their probationary employment period, of the
intent to continue or not to continue that employment into the next school
year. Based on NEA testimony indicating that such notice was simply to provide
employees with "intent" of the district, Senator Bragdon has offered language
to clarify that such notice is not a binding commitment of the district.
ACTION
ITEM Please contact the Senate Education Committee and your local senator to voice your opposition to this important
bill. There has been no demonstrated problem indicating the need for this
bill. Many districts currently provide notice based on a collective bargaining
agreement, local policy or an employee handbook. The bill is not clear whether
part-time employees are included as well as full-time employees. The bill
provides for the notification to include "special circumstances as may be
defined by the employer", but what happens if "circumstances" change after the
notice but prior to the school year (budget, cuts in state/federal funding
sources, enrollment and corresponding staffing needs)? The proposed
requirement significantly reduces the flexibility that a school district needs
to meet ever changing and fluctuating needs. At a minimum, Senator Bragdon's
clarification should be incorporated into the bill.
____________________________________________________________________
Adequacy Aid Update SB 465, relative
to the adequacy aid formula, was amended and then adopted by the House on a
199-141 vote. The House version does not contain any collar/hold harmless
extension, nor provision that would prevent approximately 40 communities from
paying approximately $15.7 million in 'excess' statewide property tax payments
(donor towns). The bill allows those districts anticipating less adequacy aid
in FY 2012 compared to what is received in FY 2011 to carry forward an
unreserved fund balance in fiscal years 2010 and 2011. These funds would then
be used to offset the FY 2012 tax rate. The bill includes provision for a
committee to study the sustainability of the existing state programs for
funding K-12 education, including adequate education grants, fiscal capacity
disparity aid, and catastrophic aid. ____________________________________________________________________ House and Senate Action This Week In addition, the following bills were also acted upon: [OTP means
Ought to Pass - OTP/A means Ought to Pass as Amended - ITL means Inexpedient to
Legislate] HB 1324, establishing
a definition of a geographically isolated small school and a procedure for such
schools to petition the department of education for approval of an alternative
staffing plan: TABLED. HB 1469, relative
to instructional days and hours, and a specific NHSBA resolution brought
forward by the Governor Wentworth school board. The bill simply seeks to
remove the requirement for Commissioner of Education approval when a calendar
complies with Dept. Educ. rules: TABLED.
_________________________________________________________________________ For the complete text of any bill,
go to the general court web site and enter the bill number, e.g. HB1523, SB405 or CACR27, and
make sure the Session Year is 2010.
For more information on specific legislation, please call
Dean Michener, NHSBA Director of Governmental Affairs at 603-228-2061, or email: deanm@nhsba.org.
|
Dean Michener
NHSBA Director of Governmental Affairs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|