Greetings!
Welcome to Kiesling Associates' monthly HR Matters newsletter.
Kiesling Associates is a CPA & Consulting firm in business since 1952. Our niche is in providing HR services to small and mid-sized organizations. We will provide proven solutions to enhance your business while allowing you to spend more time concentrating on operational matters.
Sincerely,
Brian Blahnik & Christie Hennessey
Kiesling Associates LLP
|
|
Clarifying On-Call Time
Some employers wish to have their employees ready to work in the event of an emergency or other occurrence. This is known as on-call time. On-call time is a specific application of the general concepts that underlie treatment of waiting time. Where employees can use on-call time for personal pursuits, the time is usually not part of hours worked.
The test for on-call cases usually looks at the following:
- The degree to which the employee is free to engage in personal activities.
- The agreements between the parties.
Factors courts will consider in determining the degree of freedom to engage in personal activities while on-call include whether the following occurs:
- There is an on-premises living requirement.
- There are excessive geographic limits on employee's movements. The frequency of calls is unduly restrictive.
- A fixed response time requirement is overly restrictive.
- The on-call employee can easily trade on-call responsibilities with another employee.
- The use of a pager could ease the restrictions.
- The employee is able to actually engage in personal activities during on-call time.
For instance, emergency service workers who are required to be on-call during a 24-hour period must be compensated for their on-call time if they frequently are called in to work. However, on-call time is not compensable for an employee who is required to wear a pager and answer emergency service calls several times each week, but who can go to movies, out to dinner, and travel within a reasonable radius.
One court recently ruled an employer was not required to compensate an employee for on-call time where the restrictions placed upon the employee were not burdensome. Aside from giving up skiing because of the geographical limitation of his pager, the employee did not forego various activities. Most callbacks occurred during snowstorms and were less frequent during other times. Although the employee was required to respond anywhere from 30 minutes to two hours depending on the type of call, there was no discipline for not answering the pager. Furthermore, the employee could ask not to be on call when he wished, and the request would be honored.
In contrast, an emergency medical technician (EMT) was entitled to be paid for his on-call time because the job demands sufficiently interfered with the employee's ability to effectively use his free time for personal activities. In this instance, the employee was on call 24 hours per day, five days a week. Although employer policies permitted EMTs to trade shifts with each other, as a practical matter it was difficult due to a shortage of qualified personnel. In addition, the employer's five-minute response time requirement restricted the employee's ability to leave the city limits.
Employees may be compensated at a lower rate of pay for their on-call time than for the performance of regular duties.
As an example, an employee who typically works 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. is paid an extra $50 for being on call over the weekend. This weekend period is approximately 64 hours. The $50 is clearly less than minimum wage for each hour during the on-call period, but this lesser amount is permissible because the employee is on call and not working. However, any lump-sum payments for on-call time must be included in the employer's regular rate for purposes of calculating overtime. |
|
Avoid 10 Common ADA Mistakes
The ADA Amendments Act of 2008 broadened the definition of disability previously established by ADA and effectively expanded the group of people who would qualify as disabled. The amendments put more pressure on employers to provide reasonable accommodations and created more potential liability for companies that are not in careful observance of the law. This article provides helpful guidance for employers to follow, as well as common mistakes to avoid.
What Employers Can Do
There are steps employers can take to protect themselves from liability and prepare their company in case of a future lawsuit.
- Keep Job Descriptions Detailed and Accurate. It is important that job descriptions are kept up-to-date and always include essential functions of a job. Remember that employers have a responsibility to at least attempt to reasonably accommodate an employee who cannot perform an essential function. Essential functions in a job description can be one factor in legally proving that the task is indeed essential to the job; these functions can include physical requirements like lifting or standing and stamina requirements like working long hours or weeks.
- Develop an Accommodation Policy. Creating and distributing a reasonable accommodation policy can demonstrate your commitment to honoring ADA. The policy should direct all reasonable accommodation requests to HR rather than supervisors, as HR professionals are more equipped to deal with the nuances and legal risks of handling such a request.
- Train Supervisors. Even if you direct employees to HR, supervisors still need to know how to handle the situation if a reasonable accommodation is requested of them. They should not respond either yes or no to the request, regardless of how feasible it may or may not be, but should instead refer the situation to HR. In addition, supervisors must be trained to handle potential ADA situations that may arise during a job interview or in their daily work with employees.
Common Mistakes
In navigating ADA, employers should be careful to avoid these common mistakes.
- Ending accommodation dialogue with an employee if no reasonable accommodation can be found to help the employee perform an essential job function. In this situation, employers should consider other accommodations such as working part time, reassigning the employee or providing an unpaid leave of absence.
- Taking a manager's word that a function is, in fact, essential. This will be contested if the issue goes to court, so employers should investigate themselves to determine if a function in question is essential or not.
- Using the "undue hardship" provision too liberally. For instance, reasons such as cost or other employees' reactions will generally not be accepted by the court as an undue hardship for providing a reasonable accommodation.
- Discussing details of a disability with the employee's manager. The manager should generally only know the nature of the accommodation being provided. An exception is if the disability affects how the manager will interact with the employee, such as a hearing impairment.
- Failing to consider other laws applicable to an employee's disability. For instance, a disability under ADA often also qualifies as a serious health condition under FMLA, so FMLA laws and provisions might come into play.
- Rejecting an employee's request because it seems unreasonable or impractical. Employers should still engage in a dialogue with the employee to see if a solution can be reached. Even if you still determine that the request is not feasible, it is important to follow the full process to reach that decision (and document it completely).
- Eliminating essential functions as an accommodation, even for a limited period. Though sometimes this is a feasible solution, it can also make it harder to argue later that the function is essential for this or any employee. In addition, other employees may argue that the function should not be essential for them either, or claim discrimination. To do this safely, emphasize that suspending or relaxing the essential function is temporary and document the specific reasons for this action to avoid discrimination claims from other employees.
- Failing to properly document a denied accommodation request. Documenting the process followed and the reason for denial will help your defense in the event of litigation.
- Taking performance into account when deciding if an accommodation is reasonable. All workers should be treated the same in this process, whether high performers or underachievers.
- Not considering reasonable accommodations just because the employee doesn't offer any specific ideas. If an employee tells HR that he or she needs an accommodation, it is the employer's responsibility to investigate potential accommodations.
Now more than ever, the burden has shifted to employers to provide reasonable accommodations when possible and show care in handling disability-related issues in the workplace. It is important that you are familiar with the nuances of ADA and the ADA Amendments Act, to keep your company in compliance and avoid costly lawsuits and penalties.
© 2011 Zywave, Inc.
|
|
The Motivation Tool
The key to sparking employee motivation to support your vision is turning your good intentions into actions. What specifically have I done in the last 3 months to.............
- Involve people in the processes, decisions, and changes that affect them?
- Help others learn, develop, and grow?
- Communicate, listen, and keep people informed?
- Support the people who work for, and with me?
- Recognize performance and reward achievement?
- Create and encourage fun and enjoyment?
- Maintain high standards and expectations?
- Exhibit contagious enthusiasm?
- Demonstrate that I care - about performance and people?
- Set the example for the behaviors I desire from others?
When individuals and teams are motivated, extraordinary things happen. Employees are committed and eager to make contributions.
Although you can't control motivation, you certainly can affect it. It's a critical component of leadership.
|
|
Our firm provides the information in this e-newsletter for general guidance only, and does not constitute the provision of legal advice, tax advice, accounting services, investment advice, or professional consulting of any kind. The information provided herein should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional tax, accounting, legal, or other competent advisers. Before making any decision or taking any action, you should consult a professional adviser who has been provided with all pertinent facts relevant to your particular situation. Tax articles in this e-newsletter are not intended to be used, and cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding accuracy-related penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. The information is provided "as is," with no assurance or guarantee of completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of the information, and without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of performance, merchantability, and fitness for a particular purpose. |
|
|
Quick Links
Handbooks/Development
Business Insurance Experts |
| | |
Brian Blahnik, PHR
Sr. HR Consultant
608-664-9110
|
| | |
Christie Hennessey, PHR
HR Manager
515-223-0159
|
|
|