Cervical Spine Manipulation Risks: An Update
 Keeping up with the research
SOTO-USA's Multidisciplinary Annual Event
SOT Related Research Information
SOT Research Literature
International SOT Events
The Alliance of TMD Organizations
SOT and SOT Cranial Events





Join our mailing list!

I have attempted to understand the current situation, which draws an association between cerebrovascular arterial (CVA) events and cervical spine manipulation. I am clearly not an expert in this field but have attempted to search databases, read various research studies, and attend multiple chiropractic research conferences that have discussed cervical manipulation and risk of stroke.

So far what has clearly been shown is that the risk is so small that any possible study to properly study the phenomena would take about 25 million subjects. The reason is that the incident appears to be so rare, that it is hard to differentiate between causal and coincidental factors. The coincidence factor is rare also; to the degree that research is showing in some cases seeing a visit to a chiropractor might reduce the incidence of stroke as compared to common incidental or trivial causes.

So what are we at this time as chiropractors are left with? Apparently as healthcare practitioners we are responsible to differentiate when a patient presents in our office whether or not they might be having a stroke in progress and making sure they are referred both immediately and appropriately. Part of the difficulty is that many factors associated with stroke in progress are reasons why patients seek our care.

What are some factors that we can use to differentiate patient care and the need for referrals?

Be cautious to watch for patient dizziness, drop attacks, blurred vision, difficulty speaking, swallowing, or walking, along with nausea, numbness, and nystagmus. Since a subset of patients treated by chiropractic care can receive relief from the above symptoms what is important in this differential diagnosis is a mix of ALL of these symptoms in one patient.

We need to be concerned when a patient tells us "I have a pain in my neck and/or head unlike anything I have ever had before." Also we will need to increase any investigation if the patient has posterior head pain that is throbbing, steady or sharp, called a "thunderclap headache."

In an effort to keep SOT chiropractors advised of the most current events that may affect our practices this newsletter will feature:

1. A recent article in Dynamic Chiropractic entitled, "Chiropractic and Stroke Risk: Setting the Record Straight."

2. An abstract of an article and comment published in the October 1, 200t issue of Spine entitled, "Safety of Chiropractic Manipulation of the Cervical Spine: A Prospective National Survey"

3. "Migraine With Aura Increases Risk for Ischemic Stroke" discussed in a prior SOT Research Update.


 Cervical Spine Adjusting and the Vertebral Artery:
 Contemporary perspectives on patient safety and protection, clinical reality and patient management

Please see the following link for a very helpful (updated) PowerPoint program on cervical manipulation and cerebrovascular events, how to predict them, and what you as a doctor can and should do. This PowerPoint program was produced by Dr. Gerald Clum, President of Life West Chiropractic College.

Contemporary perspectives on patient safety and protection, clinical reality and patient management · click here 


 Chiropractic and Stroke Risk: Setting the Record Straight
 Dynamic Chiropractic, September 24, 2007, Volume 25, Issue 20

A groundbreaking study on vertebral artery dissection (VAD) and stroke following chiropractic office visits is pending publication in Spine and the European Spine Journal. The study, conducted as part of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders, looked at the association between chiropractic office visits and the incidence of vertebral artery strokes.

"Current research suggests that dissections are probably multifactorial in origin," said Task Force President Scott Haldeman, DC, MD, PhD. "They appear to occur in a person with a genetic predisposition to arterial dissection. They also appear to require a second factor such as viral infection or possibly estrogen. They can then be triggered by a minor head movement, including activities of daily living, an adjustment or an examination of the neck."

Chiropractic and Stroke Risk: Setting the Record Straight · click here 


 Safety of Chiropractic Manipulation of the Cervical Spine: A Prospective National Survey
 Thiel HW, Bolton JE, Docherty S, Portlock JC. Spine. 32(21):2375-2378, October 1, 2007.

Objective. To estimate the risk of serious and relatively minor adverse events following chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine by a sample of U.K. chiropractors.

Summary of Background Data. The risk of a serious adverse event following chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine is largely unknown. Estimates range from 1 in 200,000 to 1 in several million cervical spine manipulations.

Methods. We studied treatment outcomes obtained from 19,722 patients. Manipulation was defined as the application of a high-velocity/low-amplitude or mechanically assisted thrust to the cervical spine. Serious adverse events, defined as "referred to hospital A&E and/or severe onset/worsening of symptoms immediately after treatment and/or resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity," and minor adverse events reported by patients as a worsening of presenting symptoms or onset of new symptoms, were recorded immediately, and up to 7 days, after treatment.

Results. Data were obtained from 28,807 treatment consultations and 50,276 cervical spine manipulations. There were no reports of serious adverse events. This translates to an estimated risk of a serious adverse event of, at worse [almost equal to]1 per 10,000 treatment consultations immediately after cervical spine manipulation, [almost equal to]2 per 10,000 treatment consultations up to 7 days after treatment and [almost equal to]6 per 100,000 cervical spine manipulations. Minor side effects with a possible neurologic involvement were more common. The highest risk immediately after treatment was fainting/dizziness/light-headedness in, at worse [almost equal to]16 per 1000 treatment consultations. Up to 7 days after treatment, these risks were headache in, at worse [almost equal to]4 per 100, numbness/tingling in upper limbs in, at worse [almost equal to]15 per 1000 and fainting/dizziness/light-headedness in, at worse [almost equal to]13 per 1000 treatment consultations.

Conclusion. Although minor side effects following cervical spine manipulation were relatively common, the risk of a serious adverse event, immediately or up to 7 days after treatment, was low to very low.

Safety of Chiropractic Manipulation of the Cervical Spine: A Prospective National Survey. · click here 


 Safety of Chiropractic Manipulation of the Cervical Spine: A Prospective National Survey.
 Comment: Paul Shekelle, MD, PhD, RAND Corporation

This paper is a good first step at trying to build the evidence base for one of the most vexing concerns about cervical spine manipulation, the possibility of serious adverse events. Data from 377 chiropractors in Britain gathered reports from treating 19,722 patients who received more than 50,000 cervical spine manipulations. No serious adverse events were reported. This is reassuring.

However, it is concerning that only about a third of chiropractors in Britain participated in the data collection; therefore, the safety of cervical spine manipulations performed by the other two thirds of British chiropractors is unknown. Also, for the chiropractors who did participate, no follow-up data were available for 413 treatment consultations. Even though this a small percentage of the total number of treatment consultations, a serious adverse event in a small number of these, even one serious adverse event, would be cause for a major revision of the conclusion.

What's needed now is for possible adverse events of cervical spine manipulation to be gathered the same way it is for adverse events of surgery: on every patient and every clinician. Then we'll really start to understand just how low the risk might be.

 


 Migraine with Aura Increases Risk for Ischemic Stroke
 Medscape Medical News 2007

August 14, 2007 - New research suggests that women who have recent onset of migraine with visual aura have an almost 7-fold increased risk for ischemic stroke. Results from the Stroke Prevention in Young Women Study found the risk for first-ever ischemic stroke was highest among women who reported new onset (within the past year) of probable migraine with visual aura (PMVA).

Key points to take from the article:

1. "...risk for first-ever ischemic stroke was highest among women who reported new onset (within the past year) of probable migraine with visual aura... "

2. "Women who had probable migraine with visual symptoms who also smoked and used oral contraceptives (OCs) had seven times the risk of stroke than women who had probable migraine with visual symptoms alone,"

3. In this study the group that had probable migraine with visual aura (PMVA) who smoked and used OCs had a 10-fold increased risk for stroke compared with women with no history of migraine, who did not smoke or use OCs.


Main point: The doctor should be cautious with HVLA (typical diversified type) cervical adjustment with women with PMVA who smoke and take OCs, possibly even exercise caution with cervical stairstep adjustments and consider investigating co-treatment with a neurologist, if clinically indicated.

To access following link you will need to open an account with Medscape, which is free and only takes minutes.

Migraine with Aura Increases Risk for Ischemic Stroke 


The important point of this newsletter is that while it is unlikely that chiropractic cervical spine manipulation may cause a CVA we must be aware of patients that present with a stroke in progress or with significant findings warranting a referral for a neurological consultation or to the local emergency room.

Sacro Occipital Technique Organization - USA is a non-profit, professional organization formed to promote the awareness, understanding and utilization of the Sacro Occipital Technique method of chiropractic as founded and developed by Dr. Major Bertrand DeJarnette.

The SOTO-USA family all looks forward to seeing you in Nashville for October 25-29th, 2007 Clinical Symposium. It will be a great opportunity learn the essence of SOT or advance your SOT training with integrative classes in SOT, CMRT, and Cranial. For those interested in working with the dental profession treating TMD then this symposium will be leading the way.


We respect your privacy, and if you believe that you have received this email in error, or would like to be removed from our mailing list for any reason, to protect yourself, please click on the link below that says, "Instant removal with SafeUnsubscribe."

Thank you for your dedication and interest