|
|
May 14, 2012
Equity Research
| |
|
Market Bulletin |
Issue No. 154 |
|
|
|
Canadian jobs data score unexpected encore
Economy's two-month jobs gain largest since 1981
Elvis Picardo, CFA |
|
The Canadian economy beat expectations of payroll growth by a huge margin for the second straight month. The robust performance was quite unexpected, given the recent spate of soft economic data, notably the unexpected contraction in the Canadian economy in February and sub-par US jobs numbers in March and April.
Canada created 58,200 jobs in April, after adding 82,300 jobs in March, the most since September 2008. The combined payroll growth of 140,500 was the biggest two-month increase since the first two months of 1981. More people looked for work as the job market strengthened; with the labour force increasing by 72,500, the unemployment rate rose to 7.3% last month, from 7.2% in March. While the unemployment rate was in line with economists' forecasts, job creation was substantially better than the average projections of 10,000.
As was the case in March, the jobs added last month were mainly full-time, with 43,900 added in this category, compared with 14,300 part-time positions. The corresponding figures in March were 70,000 full-time jobs and 12,400 part-time positions. Over the past 12 months, all of the jobs created by the Canadian economy have been full-time; 217,300 full-time jobs have been generated, and 3,400 part-time positions eliminated, for net job creation of 213,800.
The decrease in the number of self-employed, as well as private-sector job growth, provide additional evidence of the unexpected strength in the Canadian employment market. The ranks of the self-employed fell by 8,400, while the number of employees increased by 66,600. The net addition of 66,600 employees was wholly on account of private-sector payroll expansion, as an increase of 85,800 offset a decline of 19,200 public-sector jobs.
On a sectoral basis, the goods-producing sector added 70,000 jobs - led by strong gains in construction, manufacturing and natural resources - while service producers lost 11,800 jobs. This was a reversal of the situation in March, when service providers created the most jobs. Provincially, while Quebec recorded the biggest absolute increase in jobs of 23,300, these were all part-time positions, with an increase of 32,300 offsetting a decline of 9,000 full-time jobs. BC had the second-highest number of jobs added at 19,700, of which 16,700 were full-time positions. |
|
Bottom-Line
The strong jobs numbers have marginally increased the odds of a rate hike in September, with overnight index swaps indicating a 42% chance that the Bank of Canada will raise its overnight lending rate by 25 basis points to 1.25% after its September 5 meeting. The probability of a rate hike is higher than 36% yesterday, but well below the 75% level of end-April. The jobs data may indicate that the Canadian economy is chugging along, but for now, judging by the floundering TSX and TSX-V indexes, the overwhelming perception is that it may be undermined by events in the rest of the world. |
|
Economic Event of the Week
Minute by minute - FOMC minutes to be released on May 16
As has been the case ever since the Federal Reserve began releasing the minutes of the FOMC meetings a few years ago, the proceedings of its most recent meeting on April 24-25 will be intensely scrutinized for clues on the central bank's future course of action.
Recall that the Fed had left interest rates unchanged in its April 25 FOMC statement - as unanimously expected - but had made reference to some improvements in the economy. At the same time, it reiterated its intention to leave the federal funds rate at "exceptionally low levels" at least through late 2014.
However, the Federal Reserve's effort to increase transparency into its workings is causing some confusion, according to a Bloomberg report. While the headlines may convey the impression that all 17 members of the FOMC are on the same page with regard to the timing and magnitude of increases in the federal funds rate, the reality is actually quite different. This divergence in opinion among the 17 FOMC members can be seen from the information posted at the following link -
http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomcprojtabl20120425.htm
Specifically, only seven of the 17 members think that the first increase in the fed funds rate from the current range of 0 to 0.25% (assuming appropriate monetary policy and no further shocks to the economy) should occur in 2014. A total of 6 members are of the opinion that a rate increase should take place earlier than 2014, with three members calling for a rate hike as soon as this year.
A few FOMC members are also forecasting fairly aggressive rate hikes once the Fed gets going. For instance, one member each forecasts the target for the federal funds rate at 1.00% or 1.25% by end-2012. Two members think the rate should be at 1.75% by end-2013, and as many as seven members are forecasting a fed funds rate of at least 2.00% by end-2014.
Although some talk of QE3 has again resurfaced after the weak bias to US economic data over the past couple of weeks, the hawkish forecasts mentioned earlier make it a little difficult to believe that another round of quantitative easing may be in the cards. The upcoming FOMC minutes should provide some interesting insights on this subject. |
|
| Key Earnings Releases
Summary of Q1 earnings reports from select companies this week
|
Company |
Ticker |
Earnings
Date |
Estimated
EPS |
Prev. Report -
% Surprise * |
Prev. Report-Approx.
Price Change * | |
Silver Wheaton |
SLW |
14-May-12 |
$0.43 |
2.5% |
5.5% | |
Power Corp. |
POW |
15-May-12 |
$0.54 |
-12.7% |
4.9% | |
Home Depot |
HD |
15-May-12 |
$0.65 |
18.5% |
0.5% | |
Target Corp. |
TGT |
16-May-12 |
$1.01 |
5.5% |
2.9% | |
Just Energy |
JE |
17-May-12 |
$0.22 |
N/M |
1.6% | |
Wal-Mart |
WMT |
17-May-12 |
$1.04 |
-0.9% |
-3.9% |
Source: Bloomberg
* EPS surprise in previous earnings report, and approx. price change one day after report
While the week ahead is light on corporate earnings, reports from heavyweight retailers Home Depot, Wal-Mart and Target should provide important clues on the state of consumer spending in the US.
Last week was not a good one for Canadian corporate earnings, as can be seen from the following Table, with earnings misses from a number of heavyweights including Kinross, Emera and TMX Group. According to Bloomberg, while 80 of the 161 companies (or 50%) on the TSX index that have reported earnings so far have exceeded estimates, as many as 65 or 40% have missed estimates.
The groups with the largest number of negative surprises are the Materials and Energy groups. As many as 22 of the 35 companies that have reported earnings in the Materials sector have missed estimates, for a "miss" percentage of 63%. In the Energy group, 18 out of 51 companies have so far had negative surprises, or 35%.
The Canadian banks begin reporting from May 23, with Bank of Montreal scheduled to report fiscal Q2 earnings on that day. |
|
Earnings reported by select companies last week (May 4 - May 11)
|
Company |
Ticker |
Earnings
Date |
Estimated
EPS |
Reported
EPS (ex-items) |
% Surprise |
Price Change * | |
Uranium One |
UUU |
7-May-12 |
$0.024 |
$0.02 |
-16.7% |
-5.6% | |
Kinross Gold |
K |
8-May-12 |
$0.21 |
$0.18 |
-12.2% |
-1.2% | |
Tim Hortons |
THI |
9-May-12 |
$0.58 |
$0.56 |
-2.6% |
-2.2% | |
CML HealthCare |
CLC |
9-May-12 |
$0.20 |
$0.20 |
1.0% |
-1.8% | |
Telus |
T |
9-May-12 |
$1.05 |
$1.03 |
-1.8% |
0.1% | |
Enbridge |
ENB |
9-May-12 |
$0.48 |
$0.50 |
4.0% |
0.2% | |
Canadian Tire |
CTC/A |
10-May-12 |
$0.79 |
$0.87 |
10.4% |
4.2% | |
Iamgold |
IMG |
11-May-12 |
$0.27 |
$0.32 |
18.5% |
N/A | |
Emera |
EMA |
11-May-12 |
$0.71 |
$0.64 |
-9.5% |
-0.8% | |
TMX Group |
X |
11-May-12 |
$0.88 |
$0.76 |
-13.9% |
-0.1% | |
Baytex Energy |
BTE |
11-May-12 |
$0.44 |
$0.36 |
-18.0% |
-5.3% |
Source: Bloomberg
* % surprise based on reported EPS (ex-items); approx. price change one day after report |
Top of the Charts
TSX testing key support levels
The TSX came within 55 points of testing key support around the 11,500 region last week. While it managed to close the week about 150 points away from a 4½-month low reached on May 9, on current form a retest of that support level looks quite possible. If it falls through that level, it would be on track to test the next key support level of 11,000 (Figure 1).
The dismal performance of the TSX index over the past couple of months has belied our expectation that it could potentially play catch-up to the S&P 500, as posited in our March 16 Bulletin. Contrary to our expectation, the margin of underperformance in relation to the S&P 500 has widened from 7.1 percentage points at that time to 9.8 points currently. The "golden cross" (a positive cross-over between the 50-day and 200-day moving averages) completed by the TSX in mid-March, and on which we were pinning our hopes for further index gains, proved to be a false signal, with the index down 6.4% since then. Perhaps we should have paid more heed to the fact that the 200-day MA was descending in mid-March, rather than ascending. The purist definition of the golden cross requires both moving averages to be in an ascending pattern when the crossover occurs.
Figure 1: TSX Technical Picture - Moving averages and support levels (2007 to Present)
 | | Source: Bloomberg |
|
Recommendations
(Update) Kinross Gold - Reiterate Buy, target lowered to $13
We reiterate our Buy rating on Kinross Gold (TSX: K, $7.91) based on valuations that we believe are quite compelling as the stock trades at its lowest levels since 2005. Concurrently, we are lowering our price target to $13, from an earlier target of $16.
Kinross is now trading well into the single digits after falling below the $10 level earlier this year for the first time since the market panic of 2008. The company has lost about a third of its market value so far this year, and ranks No. 52 on the 64-member TSX Global Gold index in terms of YTD performance.
With Kinross having lost more than 60% of its value since it completed the $8-billion acquisition of Red Back Mining about 1½ years ago, it is clear that the deal has been anything but positive for the company. The stock had plummeted in January after Kinross said it would take a non-cash charge primarily relating to the goodwill recorded for its Tasiast mine in relation to the acquisition of Red Back Mining. Kinross recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $2.94 billion when it reported Q4 and fiscal 2011 results on February 15, of which $2.49 billion was attributable to Tasiast.
The company's Q1 results released last week revealed lower production and spiralling costs, offset to some extent by its unchanged guidance for the rest of the year. It produced 604,247 attributable gold equivalent ounces (GEO) in Q1, down 6% from a year ago, due to expected declines in grade at Kupol and an increase in processing lower-grade stockpiled ore at La Coipa, as well as production that was below plan at Tasiast. (A less favourable gold equivalent ratio - 51.82 compared with 43.51 eyar ago - also had an impact on production). Production cost of sales per GEO surged 36% to US$742/oz, from US$545 a year ago, due to increased processing of lower-grade ore, and higher power, labour and contracting costs.
Revenue rose 11% from a year ago to US$1036.6 million due to a higher realized gold price, which rose 24% to US$1,644/oz. Higher gold prices resulted in margin per GEO increasing 15% to US$902 despite rising costs. Adjusted operating cash flow fell 14% to US$339.7 million or US$0.30 per share, while adjusted net earnings rose 16% to US$203.1 million or US$0.18 per share. Reported net earnings plunged almost 58% to US$105.7 million or US$0.09 per share. The decrease in net earnings was mainly due to an increase of US$110.3 million in deferred tax liabilities (a non-cash item) as a result of an increase in the corporate income tax rate in Ghana from 25% to 35%.
Operating earnings in Q1 fell 5% to US$313.2 million. The biggest contributors to operating earnings were Kupol (US$96.2 million), Paracatu (US$66.0 million) and Maricunga (US$64.9 million). The Tasiast mine had an operating loss of US$6.1 million, compared with operating earnings of US$26.2 million a year ago, due to a 27% decline in production. Kinross said the drop in output at Tasiast was due to the leaching metallurgy being affected by a high proportion of near-surface fine material and a clay-like substance called felsite. It also said that the issue is being resolved and production is expected to improve in the second half of the year.
Figure 2 shows operating metrics for Kinross' various mines. The biggest increase in per-ounce production cost of sales of 70% occurred at the Tasiast mine in Mauritania and La Coipa in Chile due to output declines combined with the leaching issue noted earlier at Tasiast and significantly lower grades at La Coipa (0.56 g/t of gold compared with 0.83 a year earlier, and 38.78 g/t of silver compared with 75.64). Kinross expects grades and production at La Coipa to improve in the second half as processing shifts from stockpiled ore to ore from the Can Can and Ladera Farellon pits. Per-ounce production cost at the Kupol mine in Russia also 50%, although it was among the lowest-cost of Kinross' mines, due to sharply lower output caused by a scheduled decline in grade and lower mill throughput. Kinross noted that performance metrics remained strong and Kupol is expected to meet production and cost guidance.
Figure 2: Kinross' Mine Metrics
Kinross left its outlook unchanged, with production of 2.6 - 2.8 million GEO expected in 2012, with production cost of sales per GEO forecast at US$670 - $715. On a by-product basis, the company expects gold production of 2.5 - 2.6 million ounces of gold and 7.5 - 8.0 million ounces of silver, at an average production cost of sales of about US$620 - 665 per ounce of gold.
Capital expenditures for this year are forecast at US$2.2 billion. Capital expenditures in Q1 were US$534 million, more than double year-earlier capex of US$256 million, due to project-related expenditures at the Tasiast, Paracatu and Dvoinoye mines.
The feasibility study for the Dvoinoye mine was completed in Q1 and the Kinross Board has approved full construction funding. This is a high-grade mine (average gold grade expected to be 17 g/t and silver grade 21 g/t) that is located about 100 kilometres north of Kinross' existing Kupol mine in the Chukotka region of Russia. The mine is expected to produce about 1,000 tonnes of ore per day, which will be shipped by truck to the Kupol facility. Total life of mine gold production is expected to be about 1.1 million ounces, with 1.14 million ounces of silver.
Kinross' Russian operations are expected to become very significant contributors to revenues and earnings going forward, and Dvoinoye and Kupol results will be reported on a combined basis. Annual gold production from Dvoinoye is expected to average 215,000 - 250,000 ounces of gold for the first three years of production; combined with Kupol's average annual production of 435,000 - 470,000 GEO during this period, the region is expected to produce about 650,000 - 700,000 GEO annually from 2014 to 2016. Dvoinoye is forecast to have a mine life of seven years, and is on track to deliver first ore to the upgraded Kupol mine in the second half of 2013. Capital expenditures for Dvoinoye are estimated at US$370 million, which includes about US$175 million for infrastructure construction and upgrades to Kupol, which is being upgraded to process 4,500 tonnes of ore daily. Capex and commitments for the project at end-Q1 were US$206 million, or 56% of total expenditure.
Tasiast is of course the other big focus for Kinross. It has accelerated mining activity at the deposit, with mine production forecast to increase to about 90 million tonnes this year from 50 million tonnes in 2011. The company also reports progress in its other major growth projects, Fruta del Norte in Ecuador and Lobo Marte in Chile, although these currently a lower priority than Dvoinoye and Tasiast.
While the $2.5-billion goodwill write-down confirms that Kinross paid too much for Tasiast, the situation may be redeemed to some extent if it makes a prolific new discovery in the area. The company expects to allocate about US$80 million in exploration expense this year for Tasiast, with its efforts focused on finding new ore shoots along the 8-kilometre mine corridor and on satellite ore bodies in the district.
Given that 60% to 70% of the company's costs are denominated in US dollars, it has the following sensitivities -
· A 10% change in foreign exchange could result in an impact of about US$5 in per-ounce production cost of sales.
· A US$10 change in the price of oil per barrel could result in an impact of about US$2 in per-ounce production cost of sales.
· The impact on royalties of a US$100 change in the price of gold could affect per-ounce production cost by about US$4.
Kinross has a solid balance sheet, with shareholders' equity of US$12.5 billion compared with total debt of US$1.6 billion. Cash and investments amounted to almost US$1.5 billion at end-Q1, down by US$280 million at December 31, 2011, due to cash used in purchasing fixed assets. Working capital amounted to US$1.65 billion at March 31, with the working capital ratio at 2.34:1.
Analysts' opinion is divided on Kinross, with 13 rating it as a Buy or equivalent, 9 as a Hold, and 1 Sell rating. Average EPS estimates have come down in recent months, and are currently at US$0.90 for FY12, surging 30% to US$1.17 in FY13. On that basis, the stock trades at compelling single-digit forward valuations of 8.8x FY12 EPS and 6.8x FY13 EPS, which is about half its valuations in December 2011.
Kinross also pays a semi-annual dividend of US$0.08 per share, for an indicated annual yield of 2%. Like Rodney Dangerfield, the stock is getting no respect among investors, which presents an opportunity for patient investors. Potential catalysts in the near term could include positive news from Tasiast or some of its other exploration initiatives, or renewed appetite for gold stocks in general. We reiterate our Buy rating on Kinross, with a $13 price target. Investors who currently hold Kinross (especially those with a double-digit average cost for prior purchases) should consider averaging down at these levels. |
|
Figure 3: Kinross - 2001 to Present
 | | Source: Bloomberg |
|
|
Recommendations
(New) TransAlta - Hold
Power generation company TransAlta (TSX: TA, $16.85) is currently trading at its lowest levels since 2005 and is down 20% YTD. While TransAlta has been affected by a weak environment for power pricing, the biggest overhang on the stock is the arbitration process currently underway with regard to the destruction of the Sundance Units 1 and 2; a decision is expected in July.
TransAlta's contracted output is high, at over 65% of net generating capacity, and is expected to remain at this level until Alberta purchase power arrangements expire in 2020. However, the company is vulnerable to price weakness in the spot electricity market for its non-contracted output. The steady decline in natural gas prices has given combined-cycle natural gas plants a massive price advantage in capital and operating costs over coal-fired plants. According to DBRS, as TransAlta's coal-fired plants comprise 52% of its total net capacity (of which 31% is sold through power purchase agreements and 21% in the spot market), its percentage contracted output could decrease significantly after 2020 because low natural gas prices are a disincentive for customers to enter into new long-term sales contracts. DBRS believes TransAlta's operating margins could decrease as a result, which could have negative credit implications.
In Q1, TransAlta reported 40% decrease in comparable earnings from a year earlier, to $45 million or $0.20 per share, due to lower realized prices because of soft market conditions and higher planned maintenance activities. It said that spot prices in Alberta fell in Q1 due to mild weather and lower demand, while spot prices in the Pacific Northwest and Ontario decreased due to lower natural gas prices.
The most pressing issue in the near term, however, is the outcome of the arbitration proceedings. Some history may be in order here. In December 2010, the company shut down its Sundance coal-fired Units 1 & 2, declaring force majeure as per the power purchase agreement (PPA) that was in effect until 2017. The shutdown was effected down to conditions in the plants' boilers, and rendered the complete 560 MW of power unavailable. In February 2011, TransAlta issued a notice of termination for destruction, based on its assessment that it would not be economically viable to repair the units. However, the PPA buyer - which happened to be pipelines giant TransCanada - disputed TrasnAlta's notice of force majeure and termination for destruction, and said it would pursue the dispute resolution process under the terms of the PPA.
The resolution process involves a binding arbitration process, which is now underway. TransAlta continues to maintain that to the extent the units' shut down meets the force majeure criteria set out in the PPA, it is entitled to receive its PPA capacity payments and is protected from having to pay penalties for the units' lack of availability.
While investors' initially seemed to believe the company's claim that this event would not have any material adverse impact on its results or operations, very substantial doubts seem to have set in over the past couple of months, resulting in a precipitous drop in the stock. Moody's estimates that a negative arbitration ruling could cost TransAlta as much as $500 million (which works out to $2.22 per share). It notes that if this amount is financed with debt, it would negate the modest improvement expected in the company's credit metrics this year.
The company's 28% slide from its 52-week high of $23.42 in October has wiped out close to $1.5 billion in market value, or three times the worst-case estimate of a negative ruling. Despite this obvious over-reaction and TransAlta's huge 6.9% dividend yield, we believe it may be best to stay on the sidelines with regard to new purchases in the stock until the arbitration ruling is out of the way, even if it means missing out on a potential relief rally.
Disclosure: The writer of this report or a family member has a long position in TransAlta. |
|
Market Snapshot at Close on Friday, May 11
|
S&P TSX |
11694.67 |
-41.50 |
Commodities |
|
Yields (%) |
Can. |
US | |
TSX Venture |
1346.33 |
-8.98 |
Canadian $ |
99.93 |
+0.15 |
90 Day T-Bill |
1.02 |
0.09 | |
DJIA |
12820.60 |
-34.44 |
Gold (Spot)-US$ |
1584.00 |
-11.50 |
2-Year Bond |
1.30 |
0.26 | |
S&P 500 |
1353.39 |
-4.60 |
Oil (WTI-June) |
96.13 |
-0.95 |
10-Yr.Bond |
1.97 |
1.84 | |
NASDAQ |
2933.82 |
+0.18 |
CRB Index |
291.80 |
-2.79 |
30-Yr. Bond |
2.47 |
3.01 |
|
|
Thought for the Day
"The best way to predict the future is to invent it."- Alan Kay
|
This publication is not, nor is it to be construed as, a solicitation or recommendation to investors to purchase, sell or hold any of the securities referred to herein. Investors should consult their own broker(s) to determine the suitability of any securities referred to herein as these securities and the trading strategies incorporated into any trading recommendations will not be suitable to all investors. Further information concerning this publication, including information respecting Global's research dissemination procedures, recommendation rating system, recommendation follow-up matters, suspension or discontinuance of coverage and related matters may be found at the research page on Global's website, the address for which is www.globalsec.com, under the caption "Research". Unless noted otherwise, none of the material operations of the issuers referred to herein have been viewed by the report writer(s). The contents hereof may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Global Securities Corporation ("Global") Copyright 2012; All rights reserved. Member - Canadian Investor Protection Fund. |
| Global Securities Corporation
Head Office: 1100-595 Burrard Street Vancouver, V7X 1C4
1 (800) 455-5778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|