|
B
|
D |
R |
S |
BOSTON
DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICES | |
|
|
|
MICHAEL A. PEZZA JR., ESQ.
IS PLEASED TO ANNOUNCE THE OPENING OF
BOSTON DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICES
Providing Mediation and Other Dispute Resolution Services to the Legal, Insurance, and Business Communities
|
|
|
Michael A. Pezza Jr.
Michael Pezza has been a lawyer in Boston for more than 28 years. Before starting his own practice in late 2004, he was in the litigation groups of two of the largest firms in Boston. In addition to BDRS and his law practice, Michael is on the adjunct faculty at Northeastern University School of Law.
Michael received his primary mediation training with Mediation Works Incorporated, and is a frequent volunteer mediator in MWI's Trial Court mediation program.
Michael is a member of the Association for Conflict Resolution, the New England chapter of the ACR, the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolution, and other ADR-related bar association groups.
|
Visit
BDRS Web Site
Please visit the BDRS Web site to learn more about BDRS and our services and areas of focus, subscribe to our newsletter, and check schedule availability. | |
About BDRS
I founded Boston Dispute Resolution Services to provide mediation and other dispute resolution services to the legal, insurance, and businesses communities.
I have "been there, done that" for more than 28 years as a litigator, representing large businesses, small businesses, and individuals. I have represented both plaintiffs and defendants. I know about the time, expense, and uncertainty inherent in litigation. And I know that parties need a better way to resolve their disputes. The frustration and dissatisfaction I have heard from other lawyers regarding the way mediation often is conducted in civil cases, and my belief that mediation participants deserve more than the "arm twisting" that too often characterizes "old school" mediation, led me to explore different mediation styles and processes. While mediation and most other services at BDRS (case evaluation being an obvious exception) primarily use a facilitative model of mediation (derived in part from concepts developed at the Harvard Negotiation Project), the process is tailored as needed to meet the needs of the parties in an efficient and productive manner. I bring a balanced view and unique, practical perspective to my dispute resolution services, drawing on what I found to be most successful in my own ADR experiences as a litigator, while seeking to enhance the overall process and maximize satisfaction of those who use my services. I look forward to having the opportunity to work with you or others in your organization.
In that regard, please forward this announcement to others who might be interested in BDRS, by using the button here, or the Forward To a Colleague link at the bottom of the page.
|
Subscribe
Coming Soon!
The first issue of the BDRS email newsletter will arrive within the next few weeks. Each issue--to be published every four to six weeks-- will contain short, informative articles about the services offered at BDRS, dispute resolution topics, and practical tips.
To ensure that you receive future issues of the BDRS Newsletter and other updates, please take a moment to sign up now. It's as quick as typing your email address. Please click here, or on the button below. | | |
|
BOSTON DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICES
Anything Else Is Just a Compromise
|
MICHAEL A. PEZZA JR., ESQ.
BOSTON DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICES TEN POST OFFICE SQUARE, SUITE 400
|
Boston Dispute Resolution Services, BDRS and the BDRS logo, The Resolution Solution, and Anything Else Is Just a Compromise are registered service marks of Michael A. Pezza Jr., d/b/a/ Boston Dispute Resolution Services.
In providing mediation and other services at Boston Dispute Resolution Services, Michael Pezza does not provide legal representation or advice, or other professional services. This communication is for informational purposes only. Nonetheless, because Michael Pezza is a lawyer who maintains a law practice (Law Office of Michael A. Pezza Jr.), it is possible that this communication could be considered advertising under the rules of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. | |
|
|
|
|