Criminal Justice News |
 Every Monday -- check WKYT.com for the latest "A Message from Ray the D.A." |
American D.A. - LIVE
|
Forensic Friday
Every Friday
9 am
WVLK 590 AM |
Officer Don's Crime/Safety Prevention Tip |
Tips For Social Networking Safety
Social networking Web sites like Facebook, MySpace and Twitter are services people can use to connect with others to share information like photos, videos, and personal messages.
As the popularity of these social sites grows, so do the risks of using them. Hackers, spammers, virus writers, identity thieves, and other criminals follow the traffic.
Tips to help protect yourself when you use social networks.
1. Use caution when you click links that you receive in messages from your friends on your social Web site. Treat links in messages on these sites as you would links in e-mail messages.
2. Don't trust that a message is really from who it says it's from. Hackers can break into accounts and send messages that look like they're from your friends, but aren't. If you suspect that a message is fraudulent, use an alternate method to contact your friend to find out. This includes invitations to join new social networks.
3. To avoid giving away e-mail addresses of your friends, do not allow social networking services to scan your e-mail address book. When you join a new social network, you might receive an offer to enter your e-mail address and password to find out who else is on the network. The site might use this information to send e-mail messages to everyone in your contact list or even everyone you've ever sent an e-mail message to with that e-mail address. Social networking sites should explain that they're going to do this, but some do not.
4. Type the address of your social networking site directly into your browser or use your personal bookmarks. If you click a link to your site through e-mail or another Web site, you might be entering your account name and password into a fake site where your personal information could be stolen.
5. Be selective about who you accept as a friend on a social network. Identity thieves might create fake profiles in order to get information from you. This is known as social engineering.
6. Choose your social network carefully. Evaluate the site that you plan to use and make sure you understand the privacy policy. Find out if the site monitors content that people post. You will be providing personal information to this Web site, so use the same criteria that you would to select a site where you enter your credit card.
7. Assume what you write on a social networking site is permanent. Even if you can delete your account, anyone on the Internet can easily print the information or save it to a computer.
8. Be careful about installing extras on your site. Many social networking sites allow you to download third-party applications that let you do more with your personal page. Criminals sometimes use these applications in order to steal your personal information. To download and use third-party applications safely, take the same safety precautions that you take with any other program or file you download from the Web.
9. Think twice before you use social networking sites at work.
10. Talk to your kids about social networking and the precautions they should also use.
|
Sheriff Kathy Witt |

Fugitives Wanted by the Fayette County Sheriff's Office
WANTED |
|
Paul Lee Harris |
Burglary 2nd |
DOB: 11/29/1974 Race: Black Sex: Male Height: 5'11" Weight: 150 Hair: Black Eyes: Brown |
Click here to see who is wanted by the Fayette County Sheriff's Office. |
Join Our List |
|
Issue Archives |
Miss an Issue of
"A Message from Ray the D.A."?
Click here to go to our Archives Page | |
|
Welcome to our E-Newsletter
Feel free to forward our E-Newsletter to others.
Having trouble viewing A Message from Ray the D.A.? Click here. |
Join Ray The D.A. On Facebook! |
|
|
|
|
TOP STORIES
Straight Talk From Ray the D.A.
What in the world is going on with the media these days? Part IV Straight Talk From Ray the D.A. There they go again! Court system and prosecutors use the same method to count cases - NOT the public defender. Their case counting method seems to be right out of Fantasyland.
American D.A. - LIVE
Case #1 - The murder of Jerry Monroe.
Case #2 - The murder case of multimillionaire Ann Branson.
Justice News
Maricopa County, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio's "Tent City" jail is 16 years old, and going strong. Office News
"Prosecutors: The REAL Public Defenders" t-shirt presented to Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Office News
Prosecutor Erin Hayne recognized as a Lexington "Rising Star." Recent Court Case
No respect for the elders.
Intern '09 Reality Series Episode #21 - Alden Sears Trial Intern '09 Reality Series Episode #22 - Cease-Fire Project Intern '09 Reality SeriesEpisode #24 - Mounted Police Department Tour Intern '09 Reality Series
Episode #25 - The Senior Intern Program Intern '09 Reality Series
Episode #26 - NIBIN - Tracking Handgun "Fingerprints"
Information Center Want to know what cases were Indicted, Dismissed, or Transferred Back To District Court by the Grand Jury and what cases are set for Trial? Check it out here.
Who is on Home Incarceration in Lexington? Convicted criminals in the Home Incarceration Program (HIP) in Lexington.
Recent Circuit Court Sentencings
Who went to prison and who was probated. |
Straight Talk From Ray the D.A. |
|

What In The World Is Going On With The Media These Days? Part IV
From the Louisville Courier-Journal: "The Politics of a Newspaper EDITORIALS" "This is a Liberal Newspaper - but only on the opinion pages." Arnold Garson, President and Publisher of the Louisville Courier-Journal - August 2, 2009
 |
Arnold Garson | For some reason, Arnold Garson, President and Publisher of the Louisville Courier-Journal, felt compelled to tell their readers that, "This is a liberal newspaper." That really isn't news to those of us who have read the C-J over the years. We have known it all along. It's been obvious.  But then Garson goes on and on trying to convince anyone who continued to read his entire 27-paragraph opinion that the Courier-Journal is balanced, unbiased and apolitical in its news coverage. Now, that is news. It may come as a surprise to many readers of the Courier-Journal, as Garson claims, that their news reporting is balanced and apolitical. Garson's proclamations notwithstanding, long-time C-J readers will be hard to convince that the liberal editorial position of their newspaper does not creep into and influence its news reporting, or in their decision about what news to cover or how to cover it. The title of Garson's opinion is also very interesting, "The Politics of a newspaper EDITORIALS." There you have it, right from the top. Garson proudly proclaims that the Louisville Courier-Journal editorial philosophy is not only liberal but political as well. Subscribers pay around $244.00 a-year to learn their liberal, political editorial opinions about issues of the day. I really don't pay much attention to the C-J's "political" opinions, because, after all, they are simply the opinion of a handful of highly-paid employees of Gannett, a giant, national, for-profit, media corporation. However, I do like their sports section and Joe Gerson. |
Straight Talk From Ray the D.A. |
|

There They Go Again!
Court system and prosecutors use the same method to count cases - NOT the public defender. Their case counting method seems to be right out of Fantasyland.
We recently obtained a copy of the latest publication put out by the Kentucky Department of Public Advocacy (DPA, or public defenders). It's called the Annual Litigation Report, Fiscal Year 2008. In it, the DPA higher-ups devote considerable space trying to justify why they count cases differently than both the court system (AOC) and Kentucky's prosecutors. Their goal in the past, of course, has been to try to convince anyone who would listen that their caseload is astronomical and they are underfunded. Unfortunately, like the last time, their numbers just don't add up. They are at it again. Once again the DPA has insisted on using the same method of caseload calculation which they have used in their previous caseload reports which resulted in highly inflated caseload numbers. But you have to give DPA credit. Their case-counting scheme worked before! It clearly worked on the editorial writers, the Secretary of Kentucky's Justice Cabinet, as well as some legislators, and of course, the Governor. So why not try again, maybe it will work again. And they did. This time, however, DPA not only admits it, but says they do it for their own purposes. On page 14 they admit the real reason they inflate their caseload statistics. DPA "counts [cases] . . . in a way that fits the needs of the agency." Those agency needs? More funds from the Governor and the Legislature, and continued cheerleading by the editorial writers. The problem - their case numbers were inflated before and they are still inflated now. AOC and prosecutors count cases by defendant. It's simple - 1 defendant equals 1 case. Not DPA. They use their own case-counting system which appears to be solely designed to inflate their case numbers. Let's look at a few examples of DPA "case-counting" as compared with the procedure followed by both AOC and Kentucky's prosecutors. The following is paraphrased from page 14 of their publication. Each Persistent Felony Offender (PFO) charge is counted as a separate case by DPA. Every probation revocation hearing because a defendant's violated a condition of his/her probation is counted by DPA as a separate case. Every Parole hearing because a defendant violated a condition of his/her parole is counted by DPA as a separate case. Each count of an indictment is often counted as a separate case by DPA. Here is a hypothetical case used to compare the DPA method vs. the AOC & prosecutor methods:
Assume John Smith is charged in a single indictment as follows:
Charge |
DPA Case Count System |
Court & Prosecutor System |
Ct. 1- Jan. 1, 09 - Burglary |
Separate Case |
1 Case |
Ct. 2 - Jan. 15, 09 - Burglary |
Separate Case |
|
Ct. 3 - Feb. 1, 09 - Burglary |
Separate Case |
|
Ct. 4 - Feb. 15, 09 - Burglary |
Separate Case |
|
Ct. 5 - Persistent Felony Offender |
Separate Case |
|
Case Count: |
5 Separate Cases |
No Addition |
Then assume John Smith is probated by the judge, then violates one of the conditions set by the judge, a hearing may be held. DPA counts that as a separate case.
Case Count: |
6 Separate Cases |
No Addition |
Then, further assume John Smith is eventually paroled, then violates one of the conditions of parole, a hearing may be held in front of an Administrative Law Judge. DPA counts that as a separate case.
Case Count: |
7 Separate Cases |
No Addition |
Total Case Count: |
7 Separate Cases |
1 Case |
DPA claims in their report (pg. 18) to have represented 1,279 defendants in felony cases in Fayette County Circuit Court during 2008. If DPA used the same case-counting method used by the courts and the prosecutors, instead of their own self-serving method (set out above), the DPA caseload figure for Fayette Circuit Court would be closer to 654 cases not 1,279.
DPA "claimed" Fayette County cases in 2008 |
1,279 |
Subtract 318 Persistent Felony Offender charges |
-318 |
Subtract 307 Probation Violation hearings |
-307 |
TOTAL 2008 Fayette County DPA cases using AOC & Prosecutor "1 defendant = 1 case": |
654 |
Whoever said we have 'inflation" under control must not be talking about DPA and their case-counting scheme.
So, there you have it. The 2008 version of the DPA inflated caseload drama; same story, just a different year. |
American D.A. - LIVE |
|

Case #1: The Murder Of Jerry Monroe
 |
Defendants Vicki Monroe & Leslie Emerson |
At around 6 am on the morning of June 1, 2002, Louisville police received a phone call from Vicki Monroe who frantically reported that she had found her husband dead in their local bar. Police found Jerry Monroe, age 44, dead on the floor with two fatal gunshot wounds to his head. A large amount of money was also missing from the cash register. Investigators soon discovered, however, that Jerry Monroe did not die in a robbery gone bad, but was the victim of a plotted murder carried out by his wife Vicki Monroe and step-son Leslie Emerson.
 |
Prosecutor Carol Cobb | On Friday, July 31, 2009, Jefferson County, Louisville, Kentucky Prosecutor Carol Cobb joined Fayette Commonwealth's Attorney Ray Larson and NewsTalk 590 guest host Scott Johnson to discuss this case and the numerous trials involved. Tune in to American D.A. - LIVE to hear just how police discovered who shot and killed Jerry Monroe and what it took to put Jerry's wife and his step-son, Leslie Emerson, in prison for their involvement in his murder.
 |
Defendant Russell Winstead |
 |
Victim Ann Branson | On January 12, 2003, 85-year-old multimillionaire Ann Branson was brutally murdered in her Madisonville, Kentucky home. Police were called to Branson's home the following morning after she missed a lunch date; the scene they found was gruesome. Ms. Branson had been stabbed 90-100 times and her skull had been crushed by a blunt object, but her home remained in perfect order. There was no evidence of forced entry and nothing had been stolen, so it took some time and diligent investigation for officials to pinpoint their main suspect, Russell Winstead. Winstead, who was Ann Branson's nephew, owed Branson tens of thousands of dollars and was a gambling addict. Winsted fled to Costa Rica and led investigators on a two-year chase, and was even featured on America's Most Wanted.
 |
Prosecutor David Massamore | Listen to American D.A. - LIVE with NewsTalk 590 host Jack Pattie and Fayette Commonwealth's Attorney Ray Larson as they discussed the interesting details of this case with the prosecutor, Hopkins County, Kentucky Commonwealth's Attorney David Massamore, on Friday, August 7, 2009.
Click here to listen to the program. |
Justice News |
|
Maricopa County, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio's "Tent City" Jail Is 16 Years Old, And Going Strong
 |
Sheriff Joe Arpaio | " Tent City," located in Maricopa County, Arizona, is the largest canvas incarceration compound in America. It is capable of housing up to 2,500 inmates in 65 tents on about 15 acres. " Tent City" was opened by Sheriff Joe Arpaio in 1993 at a cost of about $100,000. The canvas tents from the Korean War days were provided by the U.S. Department of Defense, and inmates supplied much of the labor to build " Tent City," which allowed. Since 1993, over 375,000 convicted inmates have served their sentences in " Tent City."  Despite the huge swings in desert temperature, ranging as high as 145 degrees in the hottest summer months to as low as 15 degrees in winter, no serious weather related incidents, according to Sheriff Joe. A separate " Tent City" area was opened in 2009 to house convicted inmates with immigration or other holders lodged against them. According to the office of Sheriff Joe, early critics predicted disaster for the Sheriff's initiative. " Tent City" has been and remains a nationwide model for inexpensive and safe inmate housing alternatives. Sheriff Joe clearly intends to keep it in operation so long as he is the Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona. |
Office News |
|
"Prosecutors: The REAL Public Defenders" T-Shirt Presented To Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio
 |
Jane, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, and Lori | Assistant Fayette Commonwealth's Attorney Lori Boling recently took a vacation to Scottsdale, Arizona with her friend, Jane Goss. While they were there they decided to try to meet the well-known Maricopa County, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Lori called his office and told the secretary that she was a prosecutor in Lexington, Kentucky and would like to meet Sheriff Joe. The secretary arranged it and off they went. Sheriff Joe welcomed them to his office and visited with them for about an hour. They discussed criminal cases and the differences between Arizona and Kentucky law. He also talked about illegal aliens. Arpaio has taken an aggressive stance on illegal aliens in Maricopa County. In fact, the day Lori and Jane were there they had to wade through protesters who were outside of his office protesting Sheriff Joe's strict enforcement of U.S. immigration laws. He was curious about the number of illegals in Kentucky, and how the illegal alien issue was dealt with here.  Arpaio also talked about " Tent City," his world famous jail set up using donated Army tents. The inmates assigned to "Tent City" are all convicted criminals serving a sentence of less than 12 months. Arpaio has also instituted " Chain-Gangs." He has a program for men, women and juveniles. Participation on the "Chain-Gangs" is strictly voluntary.
 |
Lori presents Sheriff Joe with a t-shirt. | Before they left his office, Lori took the opportunity to present Sheriff Joe with a T-shirt from the Office of the Fayette Commonwealth's Attorney. He was pleased that printed on the back was " Prosecutors: the REAL Public Defenders." |
Office News |
|
Prosecutor Erin Hayne Recognized As A Lexington "Rising Star"
Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney Erin Hayne was recently named a "Rising Star" by the Lexington Young Professionals Association (LYPA). The event recognizes exceptional young professionals and emerging Lexington leaders who have continued to give back to their community and their profession.
Erin is a graduate of DePauw University and the University of Dayton College of Law. She joined the Office of the Fayette Commonwealth's Attorney in 2006. As an Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney, she specializes in the prosecution of extremely difficult and complicated cyber-crime cases.
In addition, Erin serves as the Co-Chair of the joint federal-state Cease-Fire Project whose goal is the prosecution of gun and gang violence. She also serves as a member of the Project Safe-Child Work Group, which focuses on internet crime involving children.
Erin's other responsibilities include the management of the Prosecutor's Summer Internship Program, which works with law students in our intensive ten-week program. In addition to duties as a felony prosecutor, Erin devotes a great deal of her off time to the activities of the Central Baptist Cancer Foundation. She is an avid tennis player.
"Erin is a great addition to our office. She brings an enthusiasm and determination to make Lexington a better and safer place to live and raise families. We are fortunate that such a talented young woman has chosen to join our office," said Commonwealth's Attorney Ray Larson. "We've known that Erin is a rising star for a long time. We are delighted that others in our community recognize her leadership." |
Recent Court Case |
|
No Respect For The Elders
By Intern Joy Leksrisawat
 |
Defendant Heather Marshall |
In January of 2009, Lexington police responded to a forgery report filed by an elderly man. The victim, who is over 80 years of age, stated that a few days earlier two subjects, a male and a female, came to his house stating that they needed a ride, which he gave them. A few days later they returned seeking another ride and shelter from the cold weather. He let them inside his house, and when the subjects left, the victim realized that a box of his personal checks was missing.
 |
Prosecutor Dan Laren | The victim's bank provided copies of eight checks, which were used to purchase over $1,300 of general merchandise at various local businesses. Investigation, including video surveillance, identified Heather Marshall, age 30, as the user of the checks, and she was arrested soon after. Criminal records indicate that she has over 20 prior misdemeanor convictions for crimes including Prostitution, Alcohol Intoxication, Theft by Deception, and Theft by Unlawful Taking, as well as a Probation Violation.
The defendant pled guilty to the felony offense of Forgery in the Second Degree and was sentenced to one year in prison, probated for three years. |
Intern '09 Reality Series |
|
Episode #21 - Alden Sears Trial
By Intern Ramsey Groves
 |
Defendant Alden Sears | This past week was particularly exciting because I was able to participate in the Alden Sears trial. Everyone in our office referred to this as the "Pizza Man" case because Sears worked as a pizza deliveryman. When he delivered pizza, he would steal customers' checking or credit card information. Sears would then use their financial information and identities to purchase various items such as skin serum, many tubes of toothpaste, and numerous cartons of cigarettes. Ultimately, Sears was charged with 10 counts of Theft of Identity, 4 counts of Fraudulent Use of Credit Cards Over $100, Attempted Fraudulent Use of Credit Cards Over $100, 2 counts of Attempted Fraudulent Use of Credit Cards Under $100, Possession of Marijuana, and Possession of Drug Paraphernalia. Andrea Mattingly Williams and Kimberly Henderson Baird, Assistant Commonwealth's Attorneys, prosecuted this case. Thanks to the strong case and excellent work of the two prosecutors, the jury returned a verdict of guilty of all charges.
Prior to trial, I was given the opportunity to work on this case a bit. In particular, I assisted in obtaining certified documents, contacted detectives, and observed interviews of witnesses. Thus, I was enthusiastic to watch the trial from the beginning to the end. Andrea and Kimberly amazed me because they were great with the jury. They didn't appear the least bit nervous as they talked to the jurors and did a wonderful job of explaining a complicated financial case. Both Andrea and Kimberly referred to this case as a puzzle, and they put every piece together superbly for the jury. Watching them shine in the courtroom, I became even more convinced that I would love practicing law. I learned a great deal just by observing this three-day trial, and I'm sure I'll reflect on this experience when I'm preparing for my first legal battle in the courtroom.
Chantell's Comments: "This week I had the opportunity to witness my first full-length trial - The Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Alden Sears. After several weeks of assisting Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney Andrea Mattingly Williams in preparing for this trial, I was excited to finally witness how the courtroom dynamics would unfold. I am a huge fan of the television show "Law and Order." As a result, I expected Andrea Mattingly Williams and Kimberly Henderson Baird to be "tough-as-nails" prosecutors and the defense attorney to object strenuously throughout the trial. This may sound ridiculous, but being that this was the first trial that I had witnessed first-hand, I didn't know what to expect. As the trial proceeded, my initial perceptions were transformed by reality. Although Assistant Commonwealth's Attorneys Andrea Mattingly Williams and Kimberly Henderson Baird are tough prosecutors, they were not argumentative or hostile towards the defense attorney in any way. I was impressed with how well everyone got along. Well, there went my preconceived notion of the courtroom "rumble." Another surprising aspect of trial was that this particular trial only lasted for three days. With the amount of evidence and documents the prosecution had to present, I had expected to be in court for at least two weeks. I mean, I thought that there would be objections and motions that the judge would have to deliberate on. Actually, the trial was finished in two days with Andrea ready to give her closing at the end of the second day. In reality, the trial went swiftly and without a glitch. The longest part of the whole trial was the reading of the jury instructions and the instructions during the penalty phase. By the end of the third day, I realized that trying cases was not exactly like the show "Law and Order," but it was just as exciting. After watching the attorneys speak and relate to the jury, judge, and witnesses, it finally dawned on me that one day I just might be standing in that courtroom trying a case. Although the thought was and is terrifying, I welcome the challenge. I am continually surprised by the dynamics between the Commonwealth's Attorney's Office and the defense attorneys. I am happy to say that I didn't witness a "rumble" at my first trial. Instead, I witnessed professionals willing to help one another in order to seek justice." Jon's Comments: '"'Mr. Foreperson, has the jury reached a unanimous verdict?' Even though I was not an attorney on record, I was extremely nervous as the bailiff took the jury's verdict to the judge. As he read through the charges and repeatedly said 'guilty,' my excitement grew - I had worked on my first criminal conviction.
This week, I had the opportunity to work with Andrea Mattingly Williams and Kimberly Henderson Baird on an identity theft trial in Circuit Court. Throughout the trial, the prosecutors allowed Chantell Foley, Ramsey Groves and me to sit at the attorney's table and help them manage the exhibits being used as evidence. I was struck by the sheer volume of evidence being presented to support the Commonwealth's case. There were 53 exhibits put before the jury, which were then linked together to prove the defendant had actually stolen the bank account information from the victims and used it online. In my opinion, the greatest hurdle the attorneys faced in this trial was tying all of the evidence together. Andrea handled this masterfully and closed the trial with a 40-minute long closing argument accompanied by a PowerPoint presentation visually showing where the evidence fit into the case. After she finished, the jury deliberated for less than an hour before finding the defendant guilty on all 19 counts.
After the jury found the defendant guilty, the Commonwealth then had to present an argument for the type of sentence the defendant should face. Kimberly managed this aspect of the trial and gave an impassioned argument requesting that the jurors give the defendant the maximum penalty for his crimes. The crux of her argument revolved around the defendant's repeated criminal offenses as well as how his crimes invaded the public trust by forcing people to be wary of even the people who deliver their takeout food. When the jury finished deliberating, they suggested that the judge give the defendant 15 years, making him eligible for parole in 3 years.
I thoroughly enjoyed working on a multi-day criminal trial. Throughout the proceedings, I took notice of how the attorneys kept track of all the information they had to present and the ways they packaged it up so that the jurors could comprehend what had occurred. I was most impressed with Andrea's organization and well planned trial strategy and Kimberly's passion in asking the jury for the maximum sentence. Observing the trial from the inside gave me a unique and interesting prospective that only made me more sure I want to practice as a criminal trial prosecutor after law school." |
Intern '09 Reality Series |
|
Episode #22 - Cease-Fire Project
By Intern Ramsey Groves
On June 5, 2009, I was given the opportunity to attend a Cease-Fire meeting in the main conference room of our office. The Cease-Fire Project is a gun and gang violence reduction program, and a number of individuals involved in fighting crime attend these meetings. Ray, several Assistant Commonwealth's Attorneys, attorneys from both the Fayette County Attorney's Office and the U.S. Attorney's Office, and other law enforcement officers were present for this particular meeting. The officers attended because they recently dealt with a case that involved guns and/or gang violence. Each officer then discussed the specifics of their case, and the attorneys decided which agency would prosecute. The attorneys reached a decision by assessing which agency would be able to impose the harshest penalty, and the case at hand was then passed to that agency. The combination of working in the Commonwealth's Attorney's Office and observing the Cease-Fire meeting made me realize just how important this particular project is to the community. Prior to this internship, I had no clue that there was a gang problem in Lexington! I also didn't realize that there were so many gun related crimes in this area! To be honest, after reading some of the cases that are prosecuted by our office, I'll think twice before walking my puppy at night or leaving my apartment door unlocked. I feel much safer knowing that Ray and others are working hard to ensure that particularly violent criminals are appropriately punished. The Cease-Fire Project is working hard to make the community safer, one criminal at a time. Peter's Comments: "I entered the Cease-Fire meeting with the expectation that the attorneys from the different governmental offices would exhibit an inherent rivalry. My assumption was that the U.S. Attorneys would act superior to the Commonwealth's Attorneys and the County Attorneys. Instead, I was pleasantly surprised by the cooperation between the offices. They all maintained a common goal of most efficiently bringing the suspects to justice. If one office had a better case than the other, there seemed to be little debate that they would be the best to prosecute. As a whole, Cease-Fire seems to be an excellent way for the different attorneys offices to make sure they are on the same page, share information about each defendant, and ensure that their approach to prosecution is well organized. Not only will this program help to keep criminals off of our streets faster, but also it fosters a growing partnership between the different levels of government that will make cases more consistent and stronger." Ally's Comments: "Like Pete, I automatically assumed the attorneys from the different levels of government would argue more or compete for the cases they wanted. However, they were extremely cooperative and effective in assigning cases to each office. I was expecting the Cease-Fire meeting to take a few hours; yet it was over in 45 minutes. It was most likely attributed to the attorneys' proficient preparation and dedication to the program. I learned a great deal about criminal activity in Lexington from attending the Cease-Fire meeting. I was surprised to hear what kinds of crime are most common in our area and that many of these crimes are committed by the same criminals over and over again. The Cease-Fire program enables the attorneys from all levels of government to come together, compare notes, and stop these relentless criminals from committing yet another crime." |
Intern '09 Reality Series |
|
Episode #24 - Mounted Police Department Tour By Intern Rebecca Wichard
When we were first given our schedules for the summer, I was really excited to see that we would be visiting the Mounted Horse Patrol of the Lexington Police Department. Having spent most of my childhood riding Quarter Horses and being an alumnae member of the University of Kentucky's Equestrian Team, I had very specific beliefs about what goes into the training of these horses and riders and looked forward to learning more about the program. Many of my expectations however, really missed the mark.  I thought that the horses would have to be professionally trained to work as police horses since they are very easily spooked and are also enormous and powerful animals. I also expected that all of the mounted officers would have some kind of background with horses, but both of these assumptions were wrong. Neither Officer Dan Edge nor Marty Parks had any experience with horses before they joined the unit over 10 years ago, and what I found even more interesting was that they trained their horses Zeus and Nomar, by themselves. At first, I thought it was really strange that they would be required to train green horses when they themselves were not professional riders, but I quickly realized that their purpose was not to 'look pretty' with the horses but rather establish an extremely trusting bond with one another and by training the horses themselves, Officers Edge and Parks certainly accomplished that goal.
Watching the police's horses working out.
 |
Watching the police's horses working out. | Officers Parks and Edge explained that some officers do come in with some riding experience, but most are trained at their facility in a 12-week program that teaches the basics of horseback riding as well as the skills that are required to be an effective mounted officer. After this intense training, the officers also take riding lessons periodically to keep their equitation skills in tune. The police department usually chooses to use horses that are a cross between some kind of draft breed (Percheron) and Thoroughbreds. The point of crossing the two breeds is to create a horse that is energetic and enduring (traits of a Thoroughbred) but is also more level headed and one with a large muscular body frame (Percheron). I also learned that their large size allows the mounted patrol to do the work of 20 officers for every one horse. That's a pretty impressive ratio! They are so effective in these situations because the horse can actually use their body to move the crowd or form a blockade to keep large groups of people under control.
 |
Rebecca - saddled up. | What I found most interesting though is that the officers actually compete on a national level with other police departments in competitions that somewhat resemble the type of riding that I am most familiar with. These annual competitions include individual and pairs obstacle courses, where the officers and horses have to complete tasks that may resemble something they might encounter in the field, and a uniform class where the horse and officer are judged on their attire and presentation. The other division of classes is called equitation, which are classes that are very similar to some of the classes that I have competed in for the last 11 years. In these classes, the riders complete various tests in the ring and are judged based on whether the test is completed correctly, how the horse moves throughout the testing, and, finally, the rider is judged on their positioning and how well they ride the horse overall. I had no idea that the officers competed in any events at all and to find out that some of their competitions were so similar to mine was really fascinating.
 |
Rebecca (2nd from left) at National Championship. | Lexington's Mounted Police Department only has 12 horses but they still enter this competition every year and compete against the top programs in the country, and are quite successful. This is also something that I faced as a member of UK's Equestrian Team; for the past three years, we qualified to compete in the national championship for the Intercollegiate Horse Show Association, and like the mounted police, we are usually the underdogs! |
Intern '09 Reality Series |
|
Episode #25 - NIBIN: Tracking Handgun "Fingerprints"
By Intern David StartsmanAt the Cease-Fire Meeting on Friday, June 19, 2009, I had the pleasure to talk with Detective Joe Duerson of the Lexington Police Department. Detective Duerson has been assigned to work with the ATF Task Force, and participates in the Cease-Fire Project. The Cease-Fire Project is collaboration between Lexington law enforcement agencies, Federal law enforcement agencies, and the Commonwealth's Attorney's Office to try and decrease the amount of gun violence occurring in the Lexington-Fayette Urban County area.
The ATF's NIBIN (National Integrated Ballistics Information Network) is an important tool, used by these agencies, to determine links between crimes where a gun was used. Forensic Technologies first developed the NIBIN equipment and marketed it to the ATF.
The system works by reading the markings left by the gun on the spent bullet casings that are found at crime scenes. Each handgun leaves a unique mark on the bullet casings where the firing pin hits the bullet. These indentations are distinctive of one handgun, similar to human fingerprints. The casings are placed under a microscope and the grooves are registered into the database. If these markings match other bullets that have already been entered into the system, then a firearm's examiner will take a closer look to determine if there is an actual match. By tracking this information, it gives law enforcement agencies the ability to quickly link crimes together and combine their efforts to catch the suspects using the particular gun.
Cease-Fire Meeting. The service has been instituted in forty-nine states, Kentucky being the only one that does not have their own NIBIN system. Lexington continues to use the system by sending the evidence found at crime scenes to Forensic Technologies offices in Largo, Florida. Each shell casing costs $48.00 to process. By continuing to register information into the database, the Lexington Police Department, and the other members of the Cease-Fire Project, hopes to dramatically decrease the amount of gun crimes occurring in the city of Lexington.
 |
Cease-Fire Meeting | Currently, there are three cases that could be linked to three other cases in the city. There is a wanton endangerment on the north side of town that could be connected to a wanton endangerment in downtown. The second link could also tie together two separate wanton endangerments from around the city. The third connection could come between an assault first with no suspect and another assault first with a suspect. After a possible match is made by the Forensic Technologies, the company will send the evidence to the Kentucky State Police, where their certified firearms examiner will determine if there is actually a connection between the bullet casings found in one crime scene with those found in the other crime scene. If these possible connections turn out to be accurate, then it would help the Lexington Police Department track down the suspects and put these gun carrying criminals behind bars. |
Intern '09 Reality Series |
|
Episode #26 - The Senior Intern Program
By Intern Joy Leksrisawat
The Fayette County Senior Intern Program takes place each summer for a week. The program is offered to senior citizens and is designed to teach them about local government by talking to key decision makers, taking them on different activities, and touring various facilities. It is a great program in which they have a week full of activities to make them more informed citizens.
Today we had the privilege of being a part of the program as the seniors visited the Lexington Police Department. We ate lunch with them, and they asked us questions about law school and our internship at the Commonwealth's Attorney's Office. After lunch, Chuck Ellinger from the Urban County Council introduced Ray as the guest speaker. He informed everyone that Ray is routinely the favorite guest speaker and that they surely would not be disappointed.
As promised, Ray gave a great speech that everyone clearly enjoyed. He explained some basics about the government and prosecutorial process such as the difference between misdemeanors and felonies. A misdemeanor is a crime that carries a punishment of less than 12 months in jail and is handled in district court; whereas a felony is considered to be a more serious offense therefore carrying a more serious punishment of a year or more in prison and is handled in circuit court. The Commonwealth's Attorney's Office prosecutes felonies but also handles some misdemeanors when they are committed in conjunction with a felony.
 |
We never miss a meal! | Ray then introduced each of us interns, and we told the seniors a little bit about ourselves and what our favorite experience of the summer has been so far. The summer is about half over (or half completed for the optimists J), and looking back on all that we have done so far, it was difficult for me to choose one thing. So, I chose two!
My favorite thing so far was going to a suppression hearing for an upcoming trial that Anthony Gray is prosecuting. A suppression hearing occurs when the defense makes a motion to suppress certain evidence from being used at trial based on the allegation that the evidence was obtained improperly. It was very interesting because the defendant actually testified, giving the judge his side of what happened.
The most interesting thing so far was the autopsy that I was able to attend. Notice how I classify the autopsy as the most interesting as opposed to my favorite thing. I have problems with blood and cutting up bodies (which is why I am in law school and not medical school). However, while it was not the most enjoyable experience ever, it was very interesting and educational. It is a very detailed process and requires a very trained eye to know what to look for.
When Ray finished talking, he gave time for a short question and answer session. He was flooded with more questions than he had time to answer. It was great to see how interested everyone was in their government and what we do at the Commonwealth's Attorney's Office. We all really enjoyed ourselves, and I think everyone in the Senior Intern Program did as well.
Natasha's, a.k.a "Natalie's," Comments: "After being introduced as Natalie by Ray, I had to regain my composure and introduce myself to the attendees at the meeting. The program was a very educational experience for the attendees as well as the interns because Ray went over some of the common crimes prosecuted in Fayette County. Each intern shared their most memorable experience from this summer and had the opportunity to spend time with some of the senior interns that were in the program."
Ally's Comments: "The Senior Intern Program was an enjoyable experience because we had the opportunity to socialize with the men and women who were just as fascinated with law and government as we are. They were very easy to talk to and many of they all have lived very interesting lives and have lots and lots of life experiences." |
Information Center |
|
The Fayette Commonwealth's Attorney's Office Criminal Trial Schedule is updated each Monday. To see our trial schedule, click here.
To see the latest returns, including Indictments, Dismissals and cases Returned to District Court, click on the dates below:
Week of August 10, 2009:
Week of August 17, 2009:
|
Who Is On Home Incarceration In Lexington? |
|
Convicted Criminals In The Home Incarceration Program (HIP) in Lexington
Inmates who are nearing the end of their sentences can be placed into the Home Incarceration Program (HIP) under certain circumstances. Offenders who are part of this program are technically still incarcerated; however, they are placed in the community under electronic monitoring rather than being behind the walls of a correctional facility.
To learn the identity of the inmates presently in the Home Incarceration Program in our community, click here. |
Fayette Circuit Court Sentencings |
|
Circuit Court Sentencings Thursday, August 6, 2009 | |
7th Division - Judge Ernesto Scorsone | |
BROWN, Mark Edmond
Age: 21 |

|
Sentenced to 90 days in jail for Criminal Mischief Third Degree and 90 days in jail for Failure to Disperse, to run consecutively for a total of 180 days, probated 2 years. Ordered to pay $85.00 in restitution. | |
DONALDSON, James Benjamin
Age: 28 |

|
Sentenced to 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of Sexual Misconduct, probated 2 years. | |
HOWARD, Jesscia Hope
Age: 19 |

|
Sentenced to 12 months in prison for the prosecution's amended charge of 2nd Degree Fleeing or Evading Police and a $300 fine and 30-day license suspension for Operating Motor Vehicle Under the Influence of Drugs/Alcohol 1st Offense, probated 2 years. | |
LAWSON, Casey Ray
Age: 22 |

|
Sentenced to 10 years in prison for the prosecution's amended charge of Burglary 2nd Degree, probated 5 years. | |
NEWBY, Mark
Age: 32 |

|
Sentenced to 1 year in prison for the prosecution's amended charge of Theft by Unlawful Taking > $300, probated 3 years. | |
SHANKS, Emanuel Duane
Age: 32 |

|
Sentenced to 1 year in prison for Theft By Unlawful Taking > $300, probated 3 years. | |
SPURLOCK, Cecil Ray
Age: 45 |

|
Sentenced to 2 years in prison for Flagrant Non Support, probated 4 years. | |
|
Circuit Court Sentencings Friday, August 7, 2009 | |
3rd Division - Judge James Ishmael | |
ATKINS, Samuel Charles
Age: 36 |

|
Sentenced to 2 years in prison for the prosecution's amended charge of 1st degree Possession of a Controlled Substance, 1st Offense, and Contempt of Court, sentences to run consecutively for a total of 2 years and 60 days. Sent to prison. | |
HERNANDEZ, Ulises Tora
Age: 19 |

|
ILLEGAL ALIEN: Sentenced to 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of Possession of Marijuana, conditionally discharged for 2 years to ICE holder. Immigration Customs Enforcement (ICE) notified. | |
LEWIS, Dominic Ladrell
Age: 32 |

|
Sentenced to 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of Trafficking in Marijuana, and 12 months in jail for Use/Possession of Drug Paraphernalia, sentences to run concurrently for a total of 12 months in jail, probated 2 years. | |
SMITH, Amy Lynn
Age: 33 |

|
Sentenced to 12 months in jail each for the prosecution's amended charges of two counts of Criminal Facilitation Attempt/Obtain Controlled Substance by Fraud/False Statement to a Practitioner 1st Offense, sentences to run concurrently for a total of 12 months in jail, probated 2 years. | |
WELLS, Charles Calvini
Age: 44 |

|
Sentenced to 5 years in prison for Burglary 3rd Degree, probated 5 years. | |
|
4th Division - Judge Pamela Goodwine | |
ALONSO-MENDOZA, Ovidio
Age: 21 |

|
Sentenced to 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of Criminal Facilitation to 1st Degree Trafficking in a Controlled Substance and 12 months in jail for Use/Possession of Drug Paraphernalia 1st Offense, sentences to run concurrently for a total of 12 months in jail. Sent to jail. | |
CLAY, Orenthal Lee
Age: 32 |

|
Sentenced to 5 years in prison for the charge of 1st degree Possession of a Controlled Substance, 1st Offense, and status as a Persistent Felony Offender, probated 5 years. | |
DRURY, Jonathan
Age: 31 |

|
REPEAT OFFENDER: Sentenced to 5 years in prison for the charge of 2nd degree Trafficking in a Controlled Substance, 1st Offense, and status as a Persistent Felony Offender, probated 5 years. | |
PURSIFULL, Adam Dewayne
Age: 24 |

|
Sentenced to 2 years in prison for the charge of 1st degree Possession of a Controlled Substance, 1st Offense, 12 months in jail for Fleeing/Evading Police 2nd Degree, and 12 months in jail for Possession of Marijuana, sentences to run concurrently for a total of 2 years in prison, probated 5 years. | |
9th Division - Judge Kimberly Bunnell | |
FINLEY, Roderick
Age: 49 |

|
Sentenced to 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of 3rd degree Possession of a Controlled Substance, 1st Offense, and a $50.00 fine for No Operators/Moped License, probated 2 years. | |
JONES, Clarence
Age: 19 |

|
Sentenced to 1 year in prison for the charge of Receiving Stolen Property > $300, 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of Receiving Stolen Property < $300, 12 months in jail for Possession for the Sale/Transfer of a Simulated Controlled Substance 1st Offense, and $200 fine and 45-day license suspension for Operating a Motor Vehicle Under the Influence of Drugs/Alcohol, sentences to run concurrently for a total of 1 year in prison, probated 5 years. | |
RICHARDSON, Joseph Demetrius
Age: 22 |

|
Sentenced to 5 years in prison for an Alford plea to the prosecution's amended charge of Trafficking in a Controlled Substance without a Firearm, one year in prison for the prosecution's amended charge of 1st degree Possession of a Controlled Substance, 2 years in prison for the prosecution's amended charge of Convicted Felon in Possession of a Firearm Class C, sentences to run concurrently for a total of 5 years in prison. Sent to prison. | |
WALKER, Randy Jay
Age: 26 |

|
Sentenced to 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of Theft By Unlawful Taking < $300, 1 year in prison for Receiving Stolen Property > $300, and 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of Tampering With Physical Evidence, sentences to run concurrently for a total of 1 year in prison, probated 5 years. | | |
Fayette Circuit Court Sentencings |
|
Circuit Court Sentencings Thursday, August 13, 2009 | |
7th Division - Judge Ernesto Scorsone | |
BEELER, Kimberly Jean
Age: 40 |

|
Sentenced to 1 year each in prison for 2 counts of 1st degree Attempting/Obtaining a Controlled Substance by Fraud/False Statements to a Practitioner, to run consecutively for a total of 2 years in prison, probated 5 years. | |
BURGE, David Carlton
Age: 25 |

|
REPEAT OFFENDER: Sentenced to 15 years in prison for 1st degree Trafficking in a Controlled Substance, 1st Offense and status as a Persistent Felony Offender. Sent to prison. | |
FRAUSTO, Jesus M.
Age: 32 |

|
Sentenced to 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of 1st degree Attempted Possession of a Controlled Substance, 1st Offense and 12 months in jail for 1st degree Criminal Trespassing, to run concurrently for a total of 12 months in jail, probated 2 years. | |
JOHNSON, Vicky Lee
Age: 55 |

|
REPEAT OFFENDER: Sentenced to 5 years in prison for 1st degree Possession of a Controlled Substance, 1st Offense and status as a Persistent Felony Offender, probated 5 years | |
MANLEY, Ernest Ulysses II
Age: 36 |

|
Sentenced to 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of Cultivating Marijuana, less than 5 plants, and 12 months in jail for Trafficking in Marijuana less than oz, 1st Offense, to run concurrently for a total of 12 months in jail, probated 2 years. | |
MITCHELL, Erika Sue
Age: 36 |

|
REPEAT OFFENDER: Sentenced to 10 years in prison for Theft by Unlawful Taking over $500 and status as a Persistent Felony Offender. Sent to prison. Ordered to pay $1,932.62 in restitution. | |
POLLITT, William Dean
Age: 33 |

|
Sentenced to 5 years in prison for the prosecution's amended charge of 2nd degree Complicity to Robbery, serve 6 months in jail, probated 5 years. | |
ROBINSON, Kevin Scott
Age: 33
|

|
Sentenced to 6 years in prison for the prosecution's amended charge of 2nd degree Robbery, probated 4 years. Ordered to pay $140 in restitution. | |
SEIVERS, Bobby Thomas
Age: 24 |

|
Sentenced to 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of 2nd degree Criminal Mischief, probated 2 years. Ordered to pay $1,000 in restitution. | |
SMITH, Martez Eugene
Age: 27 |

|
Sentenced to 5 years in prison for 1st degree Trafficking in a Controlled Substance, 1st Offense, probated 5 years. | |
TINCHER, Anthony Scott
Age: 28 |

|
Sentenced to 1 year in prison for the prosecution's amended charge of 3rd degree Burglary. Sent to prison. | |
TOWLES, Jason Clay
Age: 32 |

|
Sentenced to 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of 2nd degree Criminal Attempt to Robbery, probated 2 years. | |
Circuit Court Sentencings Friday, August 14, 2009 | |
3rd Division - Judge James Ishmael | |
BLACK, Delmar Ann
Age: 34 |

|
Sentenced to 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of False Statement/Misrepresentation to Receive Benefits under $100, and, in a separate case, 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of False Statement Misrepresentation to Receive Benefits under $100, to run concurrently for a total of 12 months in jail, probated 2 years. Ordered to pay $8,527.50 in restitution. | |
HENDREN, Brian Keith
Age: 32 |

|
Sentenced to 5 years in prison for Theft by Unlawful Taking over $500 and 5 years in prison for 1st degree Fleeing or Evading the Police, to run consecutively for a total of 10 years in prison. Sent to prison. | |
LOCKE, Charles Ray
Age: 53 |

|
REPEAT OFFENDER: Sentenced to 10 years in jail for 2nd degree Escape and status as a Persistent Felony Offender. Sent to prison. | |
WILSON, David Buel
Age: 43 |

|
Sentenced to 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of Theft By Unlawful Taking under $300. Sent to jail. | |
4th Division - Judge Pamela Goodwine | |
GLOVER, Antowan Clell
Age: 34
|

|
Sentenced to 1 year in prison for 1st degree Possession of a Controlled Substance, 1st Offense, probated 3 years | |
GRANVILLE, Kevin Lee
Age: 50 |

|
Sentenced to 2 years in prison for Flagrant Non Support. Sent to prison. Ordered to pay $36,424.35 in restitution. | |
HERNANDEZ-BARRIOS, Wilmer Ezequiel
Age: 21 |

|
ILLEGAL ALIEN: Sentenced to 1 year in prison for 2nd degree Criminal Possession of a Forged Instrument, 1st Offense, 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of 2nd degree Fleeing or Evading the Police, 90 days in jail for No Operators/Moped License, 4 days in jail a $200 fine, court costs, and a 45-day license suspension for Operating a Motor Vehicle under the Influence of Alcohol/Drugs with .08, Aggravator, 1st Offense, and 45 days in jail for Failure of Non-Owner Operator to Maintain Required Insurance, 1st Offense, to run concurrently for a total of 1 year in prison. Sent to prison. IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) NOTIFIED | |
LAYNE, Cynthia
Age: 43 |

|
Sentenced to 3 years in prison for False Statement/Misrepresentation to Receive Benefits over $100, diverted 5 years. | |
SEIVERS, Jamie Lyn
Age: 33 |

|
Sentenced to months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of Theft by Unlawful Taking under $300, probated 2 years. Ordered to pay $1000 in restitution jointly and severally with co-defendant. | |
THOMAS, Jack Lee, Jr.
Age: 37 |

|
Sentenced to 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of Theft by Unlawful Taking under $300. Sent to jail. | |
WINKLE, John Earnest
Age: 26 |

|
Sentenced to 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of Theft by Unlawful Taking under $300, probated 2 years. | |
|
7th Division - Judge Ernesto Scorsone | |
KAVANAUGH, Stephen Darnell, Jr.
Age: 32 |

|
Sentenced to time served in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of Criminal Non Support, time served. | |
|
8th Division - Judge Thomas L. Clark | |
GREEN, Jerome Lee
Age: 26 |

|
Sentenced to 5 years in prison for the prosecution's amended charge of 2nd degree Burglary and 12 months in jail for 4th degree Assault-Domestic Violence, to run concurrently for a total of 5 years in prison. Sent to prison. Ordered to pay $500 in restitution. | |
HALL, Bradley Alexander
Age: 23 |

|
Sentenced to 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of Receiving Stolen Property under $300 and 12 months in jail for 1st degree Criminal Trespassing, to run concurrently for a total of 12 months in jail, probated 2 years. | |
LOPEZ-DOMINGUEZ, Raul
Age: 22 |

|
Sentenced to 5 years each in prison for 2 counts of 1st degree Trafficking in a Controlled Substance, 1st Offense and 1 year in prison for 2nd degree Criminal Possession of a Forged Instrument, 1st Offense, to run concurrently for a total of 5 years in prison. Sent to prison. Ordered to pay $123 in restitution. | |
MUNDY, Nicholas Cordaior
Age: 21 |

|
Sentenced to 5 years in prison for 1st degree Trafficking in a Controlled Substance, 1st Offense and 12 months in jail for Use/Possession of Drug Paraphernalia, 1st Offense, to run concurrently for a total of 5 years in prison, probated 4 years. | |
NORMAN, Ron Shareed
Age: 31 |

|
Sentenced to 1 year in prison for 1st degree Fleeing or Evading the Police, 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of Fraudulent Use of Credit Cards under $100, 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of 1st degree Criminal Attempt to Possession of a Controlled Substance, 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of Trafficking in Marijuana under oz, and, in a separate case, 1 year in prison for Theft of Identity of Another without Consent, and 1 year in prison for Fraudulent Use of Credit Cards over $100 within a 6-Month Period, to run consecutively for a total of 2 years in prison, probated 4 years, | |
RICHARDSON, Joseph Demetrius, Jr.
Age: 22 |

|
Sentenced to 1 year in prison for 1st degree Possession of a Controlled Substance, 1st Offense. Sent to prison. | |
ROSEBUD, Jonathan Artry
Age: 23 |

|
Sentenced to 5 years in prison for the prosecution's amended charge of Receiving Stolen Property over $500 and 2 years in prison for 2nd degree Unlawful Transaction with a Minor, to run concurrently for a total of 5 years in prison, probated 4 years. | |
SALAHUDDIN, Jymie Sirone
Age: 41 |

|
REPEAT OFFENDER: Sentenced to 20 years in prison for 1st degree Trafficking in a Controlled Substance, 2nd or greater Offense and status as a Persistent Felony Offender, 1 year in prison for the prosecution's amended charge of Felon in Possession of a Firearm, 90 days in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of Resisting Arrest, 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of Use/Possession of Drug Paraphernalia, 1st Offense, 90 days in jail for Giving an Officer a False Name or Address, and, in a separate case, 1 year in prison for the prosecution's amended charge of 1st degree Possession of Cocaine, 1st Offense, to run consecutively for a total of 21 years in prison. Sent to prison. Ordered to pay $101 in restitution. | |
WALLACE, Lewis Darnelle
Age: 51 |

|
REPEAT OFFENDER: Sentenced to 10 years in prison for Theft by Unlawful Taking over $500 and status as a Persistent Felony Offender and 1 year in prison for the prosecution's amended charge of 3rd degree Burglary, to run concurrently for a total of 10 years in prison. Sent to prison. Ordered to pay $500 in restitution. | |
|
9th Division - Judge Kimberly Bunnell | |
BUTCHER, Richard Wayne
Age: 41 |

|
REPEAT OFFENDER: Sentenced to 10 years in prison for the prosecution's amended charge of Attempting/Obtaining a Controlled Substance by Fraud/False Statement to a Practitioner, 1st Offense and status as a Persistent Felony Offender, probated 5 years. | |
GREEN, Rex Conley
Age: 44 |

|
REPEAT OFFENDER: Sentenced to 5 years in prison for the 4th degree Assault-Domestic Violence and status as a Persistent Felony Offender. Sent to prison. | |
JOHNSON, Jessica Lucille
Age: 26 |

|
Sentenced to 4 years in prison for the prosecution's amended charge of 1st degree Possession of a Controlled Substance, 1st Offense, 12 months in jail for Possession of Marijuana, and 12 months in jail for Use/Possession of Drug Paraphernalia, 1st Offense, to run concurrently for a total of 4 years in prison, probated 5 years. | |
MALONE, Shanil Lavette
Age: 37 |

|
Sentenced to 1 year in prison for 1st degree Possession of a Controlled Substance, 1st Offense, and, in a separate case, 12 months in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of Use/Possession of Drug Paraphernalia, 1st Offense and 12 months in jail for Theft by Unlawful Taking under $300, and. in another case, 90 days in jail for the prosecution's amended charge of Giving an Officer a False Name or Address, to run concurrently for a total of 1 year in prison, probated 5 years. | | | |
|
|