WREN Meeting
Connecting with research evaluators
Evaluation is always a topic of great interest in the
nation's capital, and AEA is increasingly an important
part of the discussion. The association worked with
the Washington Research Evaluation Network
(WREN) to support and learn from a June 6
conference at George Washington University that
brought evaluators together with policymakers,
program managers, and evaluation managers from
science and technology organizations.
AEA President Bill Trochim delivered the keynote
address, in which he described the work of the
association's Evaluation Policy Task Force that is
encouraging federal agencies to incorporate sound
evaluation policies in their efforts to increase
accountability. He also took part in a discussion panel
at the day-long conference.
"This conference was a bit of an experiment around
AEA's engagement in the Washington area," Trochim
said. "Working with AEA members associated with the
federal government, we hope that we might be able to
develop a variety of mechanisms that will enhance our
ability to influence federal evaluation policies."
Gretchen Jordan, chairman of AEA's Research,
Technology, and Development Evaluation TIG, said
her group and WREN had been working jointly in this
area for the last several years - with the TIG holding
academic/practitioner-oriented meetings and WREN
hosting international workshops for government policy
makers and program managers.
Research in this area is now being funded by the
National Science Foundation's "Science of Science
and Innovation Policy" (SciSIP) initiative, and their
announcements describe the sorts of methodology
development for which AEA members can apply for
funding. New methodologies developed by SciSIP will
be presented for discussion at the next WREN
meeting in December this year.
Evaluation is also receiving substantial attention from
a White House Office of Science and Technology
Policy (OSTP) initiative on the "Science of Science
Policy. An OSTP Science of Science Policy task force
comprising evaluation representatives from federal
R&D agencies is developing a "road map" of
research, data, and data tools needed to develop this
science. A preliminary draft of the road map is
expected sometime this summer and will be a major
topic at the next WREN meeting.
"We're still in the beginning phases of coming up with
the best tools for evaluating R&D," said Cheryl Oros,
coordinator of the conference and a member of
WREN's Steering Committee as well as the OSTP
Science of Science Policy workgroup. "It's important
that we bring everybody together to see if anybody in
federal agencies can allocate resources for this and
sponsor pilot evaluations using new tools, perhaps
teaming on efforts. How do we talk the policymakers
into investing in these tools? We see AEA as an
important part of this process."