A Knowledge Network Asking Tomorrow's Questions
April 2011 |
| Question is, what to do? And answer is, o digerati, think Washington. Swarm Washington. Invest (old meaning; lay siege to) Washington. Work with assiduous focus and strategic resilience to change Washington. Task yourself, techno-America, with this challenge, do-or-die: Transform the political culture of this city, perhaps the most geographical center of power on the planet, into the SXSW of government. - Nigel M. de S. Cameron in SXSW, NXNE, and the new Fundamentalism; a perspective from the analog polis of a digital people. |
|
|
|
|
April Events
|
April 7: C-PET Institute on Security for the 21st Century:
The Arab Revolt and WMD Control
April 22: C-PET Institute on Innovation and the Task Force on American Innovation:
Innovation and Policy
April 27: C-PET Institute on Innovation: Thought Leader Telecon:
Sarah Miller Caldicott
April Event Details:
Weapons of Mass Destruction and Security in a Changing Middle East
C-PET Institute on Security for the 21st Century
When: April 7, 2011 at 2.30, reception to follow at 4.45
Where: 10 G St. NE, Suite 710, Washington DC 20002
Co-sponsored by the International Security and Biopolicy Institute
The winds of change are coming to the Middle East and North Africa. Each day brings news of protests and demand for government reform in a new country, connected or not to Khaled Said's original spark. What will "Revolution 2.0" mean for WMDs and security in the area?
Panelists include:
Terence Taylor, President, International Council for the Life Sciences
Terry Miller, Director, Center for the International Trade & Economics, The Heritage Foundation; former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Economic and Social Council
Bob Ross, Chief, Risk Sciences Branch, Science & Technology Directorate, Department of Homeland Security (discussant)
Barry Kellman, President, International Security and Biopolicy Institute; Professor of International Law and Director of the International Law and Director of the International Weapons Control Center, DePaul University College of Law (discussant)
RSVP with name, affiliation, and contact information to elisabeth.doherty@c-pet.org
Innovation and Policy
C-PET Institute on Innovation and the Task Force on American Innovation invite you to join us for the conclusion of our four-part series on Innovation and Technology Policy.
When: April 22, 2011 at 2.30, reception to follow at 4.45
Where: 10 G St. NE, Suite 710, Washington DC 20002
Panelists include:
Reed Hundt, CEO, The Coalition for Green Capital (CGC); formerly FCC Chairman.
Nagy Hanna, Formerly of World Bank; Senior Fellow C-PET
Naomi Stanford, Special Adviser, GSA
Aneesh Chopra, CTO of the United States (invited)
Moderator: Nigel Cameron, President and CEO, Center for Policy on Emerging Technologies (C-PET)
To register, click here.
Sarah Miller Caldicott Telecon
April 27, 3.00 p.m. (EST)
- Thought Leader Telecons are accessible worldwide
Sarah Miller Caldicott, chairperson of the Edison Awards Steering Committee and president of Power Patterns of Innovation, will be discussing her book "Innovate Like Edison".
To receive call-in information, email elisabeth.doherty@c-pet.org with subject line "telecon". In the body of the email, please reference this event and provide your name, affiliation and title.
|
Upcoming in May
|
Symposium: Biometrics and Security in Global Perspective
C-PET Institute on Security in the 21st Century
When: May 6, 2011 8.30 a.m. - 6.00 p.m.
Where: 10 G St. NE, Suite 710, Washington, DC 20002
In association with Project RISE
9.00 Symposium on comparative and emerging issues in biometrics, data protection, and privacy.
2.30 Roundtable on the trade-off between privacy and security
4.45 Reception
|
|
|
|
Nigel Cameron tells the digerati they are the new Fundamentalists
|
SXSW, NXNE, and the new Fundamentalism; A perspective from the analog polis of a digital people.
Pretty much all of hip and would-be hip America has been lolling, partying, festooning, and tweeting in an alternate universe these past days. Woodstock for the geeks? Neverland of the digerati? Or (ouch) a retreat into a new Century 21 Fundamentalism, a bolt-hole from the realtime world into a might-have-been America?
In case you didn't know, it's called South by Southwest, or SXSW (which looks like something from the NYSE, but this proleptic and cabalistic stock is not yet traded), or South By, as say the cognoscenti. I suppose it might also be Burning Man. And there's a different sense in which it could be TED. There are (ahem) various denominations. These camp meetings (ouch, sorry, please, don't hit me) of the techno-Fundamentalists are anchor-points of an emerging, intricate, alternative world, a digi-religion, a hip-technological complex that offers hope to those who choose to flee the real world of (deep breath) K Street and approps committees and the Tea Party (TP had the support of 41% of the electorate in November) and the West Wing and deficits and sinophobia and donorphilia and the dire electoral cycle. An alternative world to federal Washington, and the space-time continuum.
Because America qua democracy, qua waning global superpower, is defiantly NXNE. Beltway America. Agency America. 202 and 20002 America. A vast, well-meaning, bureaucratic, Fordist, clunking, machine; swamping the bright and visionary minds who pepper its lumpen molasses, as it sullenly subsides back into the malarial swamp on which it was once built by the idealists of a teenage nation whose premature aging has driven its smart (but perhaps less smart than they think) minds to seek solace in a religion of disengagement. In a mythical America, convened far from the madding crowd's ignoble electoral strife. A theme park, a Westworld (remember the Yul Brinner classic?), a place that multiverse theory says must exist but that for all present purposes is less a wormhole to nirvana than a sinkhole from reality.
Because America is going down. Steve Burrill, doyen of biotech investors (and, full disclosure, member of C-PET's Board of Directors) stated unambiguously at a recent Innovation Roundtable that America has a choice: whether to become a second tier nation, or a third tier. Quite apart from current efforts to slash federal R and D budgets by a Congress newly cognizant of its fiscal responsibilities, there are deep-seated structural disabilities that the world's leading nation has chosen to impose on itself in order to ensure that "world's leading nation" is a title it will before long shed. The conquest of America is no achievement of hell-bent fascists or the bakelite apparachiks of Soviet glory days - back when the IGB (how many at SXSW know that acronym?) was a perilous thin red line and much depended on nuclear bluster and troopships rushing the Atlantic like a football field. No: it is a terrible self-conquest, half-witting, coated in irony and insouciance as well as plain dumb pig-ignorance of where our interest really lies. A self-conquest whose outcome is self-immolation. The triumph of means over ends. As if Pizarro had been an Inca.
But why has digital America decided to give the federal capital and all for which it stands so wide a berth? It is not my point that the Washington Convention Center and its satellite hotels here in the Beltway are where South By and its cognates should assemble, though that would not be entirely bad. The avoidance of NXNE is at a more visceral, strategic, fundamental level, and its implications run far from the epiphenomena of event location. The digital tribes simply don't see Washington as their capital.
Question is, what to do? And answer is, o digerati, think Washington. Swarm Washington. Invest (old meaning; lay siege to) Washington. Work with assiduous focus and strategic resilience to change Washington. Task yourself, techno-America, with this challenge, do-or-die: Transform the political culture of this city, perhaps the most geographical center of power on the planet, into the SXSW of government. And understand that we truly need a Kulturkampf in which the future becomes the lobbyist for America; a struggle for the corporate culture of our political life here in an analog polis blinded by the present to its digitally-driven future.
Back to my theme. Where is techno-corporate America's plan, in parallel with their 10-year plans to build markets in China, to turn Washington into a political capital fit to sustain America's leadership role as Century 21 moves deep into its second decade? Why are the SXSWers not focused NXNE?
Nigel M. de S. Cameron
President and CEO
Center for Policy on Emerging Technologies
Permission granted to reproduce in full and with acknowledgement.
(Image: C-PET President Nigel Cameron speaks on the impact of RFID and other emerging technologies at the 2010 STARS symposium in Switzerland)
|
|
C-PET Updates
|
-G. Steven Burrill, C-PET Board of Directors: News on the upcoming 2011 BIO International Convention, which will include the Burrill State-of-the-Industry Report:
"This presentation will look back over 25 years and describe some of the critical events that have shaped the industry into the global enterprise it is today and discuss what companies will need to do in order to remain competitive in a world being influenced by a tougher financial climate, rapidly evolving technology, globalization and new emerging markets." Read more on this event.
"The digital health world, which has the potential to significantly reduce healthcare costs around the world, is evolving through the convergence of information technology, wireless technology, and the proliferation of mobile devices that will bring about a radical change in how medicine is practiced."- G. Steven Burrill. Read more from 'Burrill Builds Digital Health Team' by Herina Ayot.
"The genomics revolution is here now."- G. Steven Burrill in 'Boom Times for Genomics Startups' by Rob Water.
-Una Ryan, C-PET Board of Directors, will be a featured speaker at the upcoming World Health Innovation Summit, April 4-6 in D.C.. Read more about this event.
-Daniel Sarewitz, C-PET Senior Fellow: "Before research can rebuild the US economy it must learn from the prosperous heyday of the military-industrial complex."- Daniel Sarewitz, read more from 'Science Agencies must Bite Innovation Bullet.'
"Societies actually have abundant tools at their disposal for reducing vulnerability to weather and climate - building codes, land-use planning, insurance programs, poverty-reduction polices, and so on - and much capacity for wielding those tools more effectively, should they focus on doing so. Sending families into their basements is not on that list (except during tornadoes!)."- Daniel Sarewitz in 'Climate Change Narcissism.'
Read 'Should Global Warming Send us to the Bunker?' by Andrew Freedman for more information on 'Climate Change Narcissism.'
-David Goldston, C-PET Board of Directors: "With a government shutdown looming if Republicans and Democrats can't reach an agreement on a spending bill by April 8, budget negotiations are at a critical point."- David Goldston in 'Riding to the Rescue: Key Senators oppose Anti-Environment Provisions.' Read more here.
Goldston is quoted on Wired.com in 'GOP Assault on Environment Defeated- For Now' by Brandon Keim. To read the full article, click here.
"The White House has been clear that their goal is to have a bill without riders but these are negotiations that are tricky and take place in private. We obviously want to keep the pressure on." -David Goldston in 'Budget Fight Faces Hurdle Beyond Price Tag' by Jennifer Steinhauer.
"The reason for the criticism of of regulation 'is not that it doesn't work, but that it does. . .'"
'Bush's Rulemaking Czar Blasts EPA's Use of "Guidance" ' by Gabriel Nelson quotes Goldston. Read the full article here.
-Jules Polonetsky, C-PET Advisory Board:
"They will have hearings but significant work needs to be done on language, coverage, and nailing down details."- Jules Polonetsky in The Latest on the Prospects for Federal Privacy Litigation' by Christopher Wolf.
"The merger pulled this model that had receded from the public eye and put it squarely dead center of the debate."- Jules Polonetsky in 'Is DoubleClick Clicking for Google?' by Brad Stone.
'Proposed Bill Would Cut Curbs on Data Gathering' by Julia Angwin
-"It's not like these companies are patent trolls. They are operating entities that spend hundreds of millions of dollars developing new drugs."- Yali Friedman, C-PET Board of Directors in 'Generics' New Legal Attack: Big Pharma's Aging Patients' by Kit R. Roane.
-'Can Science History Guide the Future?' by Gwyneth K. Shaw focuses on C-PET Advisory Board member David Guston and future implications of technology.
-Read an interview with C-PET Advisory Board member Cynthia P. Schneider on Muslim stereotyping and more. Click here.
|
 |
Editor: Lydia Jordan Staff Writer: Alice Cameron Managing Editor: Melissa Silvers Editor-in-chief: Nigel M. de S. Cameron
|
|
|
|