The ut-AAUP Bulletin
"by and for the bargaining units but open to all"

headerimagefinalutaaup

 

In This Issue
Research Active...
World News
Local News
A Word from the ut-AAUP President
See... 
Next Issue.

Quick Links
 
Action Item!
V O T E 
 
 
Know your contracts
(next issue)
 
 
Open Forum 
(your letters)
 
 
How-to....
Check your calendar!
 
Save the date for Capitol Hill Day....
 
. . .
 

Join Our Mailing List
Forward this email to a Friend

Issue 2 2009

Research Active v. Professional Activity 
 
by Don Wedding, UT-AAUP Grievance Chair

muo imagesThe Jacobs Administration has initiated new teaching workload policies based on research activity which is defined as publications and/or grants. New teaching workload policies based on research activity have been and are being introduced in the Bancroft Campus colleges including Business Administration and Engineering. The new policy in the College of Business Administration (COBA) was emailed to COBA faculty by the Dean on March 9, 2009 during semester break.
 
These new policies are in violation of the AAUP-BOT Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), particularly Article 10 that defines workload in terms of teaching, service, and professional activity. Research activity is not mentioned.

The issue is not whether faculty should be doing research, but whether the Jacobs Administration can unilaterally define professional activity as research activity and assign teaching workload based on research activity.  During the recent negotiations, I repeatedly asked the Administration to consider a definition of research and research active faculty, but they declined. Now they bring to the faculty teaching workload polices based on research activity unilaterally created by the Administration without input from the faculty or the AAUP and are attempting to implement it in direct violation of the CBA. This will be strongly opposed by the AAUP. Class action grievances are being filed for external arbitration.   Additional actions are being considered. 

Faculty are free to sign a workload agreement or not. This is an individual decision.  If you feel forced to sign a workload agreement, you may want to note on the form that you are doing so only as an acknowledgment of receipt of the document.  Furthermore,  faculty are free to note their protest on the document.  You may also file a grievance if you believe that Article 10 has not been followed.  The AAUP will assist anyone interested in filing such a grievance.

 
National & International 
 
Taking a Stand  The Louisiana State University AAUP chapter illustrates how faculty can respond when budget cuts and power grabs are in the offing ...   (see also March 18, 2009 Advocate article )

 
It is still early days for fully evaluating higher education's response to the worldwide recession, but a number of institutions are exploring unpaid furloughs...
 
Pay Cuts for Part-time Faculty
While a few institutions have exempted their lowest-paid employees from cost cutting measures (such as furloughs), Weber State University in Utah is taking the opposite approach...
Ohio & Local 
 
MUO Image
Report suggests changes at UT arts-sciences college
The University of Toledo has received an external review report for the college of arts and sciences that suggests ways to achieve a more concrete...
 

So Many Students, So Little Time
For some in higher education, what happened at the University of Toledo earlier this month was a small victory in a simmering war. For others, it was an illustration of academe's resistance...
What would you, the members, like to see covered in future issues?  Submit here! 

newsletter309

Posted 3/27/2009
Publications Chair, Lucy Duhon, Assoc. Prof.
Photos & graphic design by M.J. Erard, UT-AAUP Executive Director
 
UT-AAUP 419.530.7270
 
 
 
The UT-AAUP Bulletin is published occasionally throughout the semester.