CI Header
Sponsors
new SPB+G logo



Cap Group

Editorial Board

Brad Cook
Sheehan Phinney
Bass + Green
  
Bruce Berke
Sheehan Phinney 
Capitol Group
 
Sheehan Phinney 
Capitol Group

 

Sheehan Phinney 
Capitol Group

 

Sheehan Phinney 
Capitol Group
  
Will Stewart 
Greater Manchester
Chamber of Commerce

Join Our Mailing List

A little something for our hospitality members

Bruce Berke, Sheehan Phinney Capitol Group 

 

More often than not, these reports focus on the "big" issue(s) of the day and we overlook some of the everyday matters that are important to many of our members. This week we take a look at a few hospitality related issues as well as one of the "big" issues.

 

TIP POOLING:  The Senate agreed to the House-passed version of SB 49 this past Wednesday.  Back in January, the House passed SB 49 with amendment.  As amended, the bill clarifies the role and responsibilities of employers when it comes to tip pools. It says that, "Tips are wages and shall be the property of the employee receiving the tip and shall be retained by the employee, unless the employee voluntarily and without coercion from his or her employer agrees to participate in a tip pooling or tip sharing arrangement." It then goes on to say that, "No employer is precluded from administering a valid tip pooling or tip sharing arrangement at the request of the employee, including suggesting reasonable and customary practices, and mediating disputes between employees regarding a valid tip pooling or tip sharing arrangement." The bottom line is that it remains voluntary on behalf of the employee to participate in a tip pooling or sharing arrangement, but employers can suggest reasonable practices. The bill now goes to the governor for his signature.

 

NO LIQUOR IN GROCERY STORES:  The Senate killed HB 1251 on a voice vote. Throughout this legislative year, there has been a fairly vigorous debate about whether spirits or hard liquor should be sold in grocery stores. The State Liquor Commission argued against the idea saying that the state would lose money and branding in New England as the least expensive place to buy booze in the northeast. At the end of the debate on the bill, even establishing a committee to study whether liquor should be sold in grocery stores was unable to gain passage. 

 

ALLOWING KENO IN NEW HAMSPHIRE:  The Senate killed HB 1698 on a voice vote. This bill would only have established a study committee to make a recommendation on whether or not NH should allow keno. A vote like this shows just how anti-gambling (or at least an expansion of gambling) this Legislature is as they chose to not even study the matter.

 

WHERE DOES RGGI GO NEXT

The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) or alternatively referred to as a "cap and trade" program was debated at length this week in the State Senate.  The House had sent the Senate a bill (HB 1490) that would repeal New Hampshire's participation in the RGGI program, a position that the House and Senate endorsed last year but it was vetoed by the Governor and his veto was sustained.

 

On Wednesday, the Senate amended the bill to restructure the allocation of the dollars in the program and to drop out of the RGGI program two other New England states or a New England state with 10 percent of the energy load also drops out.  This trigger and accompanying dollar allocation change was rejected by the House last year but this year it is uncertain whether the House will accept this compromise or not. 

 

Interestingly, a few weeks ago, there were several bills that the Senate refused to let in from the House because those issues had been defeated in the Senate last year. This Senate amendment of RGGI represents an issue that the House defeated last year so it will be interesting to see whether the House gives this repeat issue from the Senate the same treatment.

Giving credit where credit is due

Will Stewart, Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce 

     

While the House has taken some criticism of late with regard to their "hostage taking" of some Senate bills and the adding of controversial, non-germane amendments to otherwise pro-business bills, the lower body of the state legislature deserves credit for passing Senate Bill 291.

 

SB 291 would allow municipalities to use any traffic impact fees they assess on development projects to make project-related capital improvements to state roads and highways that connect to said developments, something that is not currently allowed. At present, the fees paid by developers to help municipalities mitigate the higher traffic counts caused new developments can only be used on municipal roads.

 

The bill's prime sponsor is Sen. David Boutin, R-Hooksett. Co-sponsors include Sen. Tom De Blois, R-Manchester, and Sen. Lou D'Allesandro, D-Manchester.

 

The impetus for this bill came after the opening of Market Basket on Route 3A in Hooksett, where town officials wanted to make improvements to the highway to accommodate the increased numbers of vehicles attracted by the popular low-cost grocery chain, but were prevented from doing so because it was a state highway.

 

While SB 291 passed both houses of the legislature, it didn't pass without being amended (though, in fairness, not many bills do). In this case, the amended version of the bill also authorizes $550,000 from the state's fire standards and training and emergency medical services fund to be used to establishe a North Country fire training facility.

 

So it goes.

 

Input sought on definition of "independent contractor"

 

Of the issues being addressed by the Committee to Study Business Regulations in New Hampshire, one that keeps getting brought up is the state's definition of "independent contractor," which requires an individual one pays to meet each criteria of a 12-point test in order to be considered an "independent contractor" as opposed to an "employee."

 

Strictly speaking, the above-mentioned 12-point test/definition isn't the state's definition per se. It's the state Department of Labor's. The state Department of Employment Security has its own definition. And then there's the IRS definition of an independent contractor. In short, keeping up with all of the differences and variations is confusing and frustrating for many employers.

 

Rep. Carl Seidel, R-Nashua, a member of the Commission, heads a subcommittee studying this definition and is interested in obtaining input from mid to large size companies in the greater Manchester region who are interested in seeing changes in the state's definition of independent contractor or an adoption of the federal definition.

 

Rep. Seidel says he is willing to hold a hearing in Manchester at a convenient time if there is sufficient interest from the local business community. If this is a subject that affects your company and you'd like to work on changes to the definition, contact me at 792-41078 or wills (at) manchester-chamber (dot) org.