| Executive Council says "no thanks" to facts
Will Stewart, Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce
On Wednesday, the Executive Council voted 3-2 not to authorize $3.6 million in already appropriated funds - 90 percent of which are federal - to conduct a study to evaluate and analyze transit options, costs, benefits, and impacts of a range of transportation alternatives, including passenger rail, within the Boston-Nashua-Manchester-Concord corridor, otherwise known as the New Hampshire Capitol Corridor.
The vote is unfortunate for a number of reasons, but especially because it disregards the responsible practice of data-driven decision making.
Councilor Ray Wieczorek, R-Manchester, was one of two executive councilors to vote for the study, along with Councilor Ray Burton, R-Bath. To their credit, both spoke to the need of having sound information before making any decision on the feasibility of bringing passenger rail back to Manchester and beyond.
As was noted by state Department of Transportation officials, conducting the study would not have committed the state to implement any of its findings, or to spend any money in the future. Indeed, the study could have even concluded that passenger rail is not feasible for southern New Hampshire. But now we won't know.
Voting against obtaining the facts were Councilor Dan St. Hilaire, R-Concord, Councilor Chris Sununu, R-Newfields, and Councilor David Wheeler, R-Milford.
In an email Wednesday afternoon, New Hampshire Department of Transportation Deputy Commissioner Mike Pillsbury said he "will meet soon with the New Hampshire Rail Transit Authority, Federal Transit Administration and Federal Railroad Administration to discuss the effect of today's Council vote....The viability of passenger rail in NH remains an important transportation question that needs to be thoughtfully examined, sooner rather than later."
As disappointing as Wednesday's vote is, and as uncertain as the fate of passenger rail might currently seem, know that your Chamber remains committed to continuing to support and pursue passenger rail as an economic development driver for the greater Manchester region.
|