CI Header

Sponsored By

 
 
SPBG 
 
Cap Group 

Editorial Board

 
Brad Cook
Sheehan Phinney
Bass + Green

Bruce Berke
Sheehan Phinney
Capitol Group 
 
Valerie Acres
Sheehan Phinney
Capitol Group 

Henry Veilleux
Sheehan Phinney
Capitol Group

Erle Pierce
Sheehan Phinney
Capitol Group
 
Michael Skelton
Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce
michaels@manchester-chamber.org
 
Welcome to Capitol Insight 
 
Sponsor Insight
 
Net Operating Loss Carryovers
 
A House Ways and Means Sub-Committee met on Wednesday for a work session on Senate Bill 383, an act relative to net operating loss (NOL) carryovers under the business profits tax and relative to economic revitalization zone tax credits.
 
This bill was amended in the Senate and would now limit the amount of net operating loss generated in a tax year that may be carried forward under the business profits tax to $10,000,000. It is expected that approximately 110 of the largest companies operating in the State could be affected by this change.
 
The bill would also repeal the 2011 repeal of the economic revitalization zone tax credits and makes certain changes regarding the eligibility for and determination of the eligible amounts for the credits.
 
The Department of Revenue Administration (DRA) and Department of Resources and Economic Development (DRED) state this amended bill, will decrease state general fund and education trust fund revenue by an indeterminable amount in fiscal year 2011 and each fiscal year thereafter.  DRA went on to say this bill increases the limitation amount of net operating loss (NOL) generated in a tax year that may be carried forward under the business profits tax (BPT) from $1 million to $10 million. The Department states they cannot project the loss of revenue due to this expansion of the NOL deduction because the future BPT profits and losses are not known. The Department did, however, provide the following background of the NOL deduction: The NOL deduction is a provision of the BPT law added in 1988. The NOL provision was effective for losses incurred after January 1, 1989. On July 1, 2002, the law was revised to permit carry forward of NOLs for 10 years following the loss year instead of 5 years. The amount of NOL generated each year per entity was limited to $250,000. For taxable periods ending between July 1, 2003 and June 30, 2004, the NOL generated was limited to $500,000, between July 1, 2004 and June 30, 2005, limited to $750,000, and for taxable periods ending on or after July 1, 2005, limited to $1 million and the requirement to carry back losses prohibited.
 
DRA further states that since the expansion of the deduction to $1 million in 2005, there has been an increased loss in BPT revenue of more that $5 million. While unknown, the Department indicates an increase in the NOL deduction to $10 million would result in an indeterminable loss in BPT revenue (a $10M loss would mean $850K in BPT tax credits).
 
There were questions from several committee members suggesting that passage of this law would incent businesses to move and/or expand in New Hampshire but there was no way to determine that fact. Many see this as a jobs creation bill but the conundrum is how can figures be tracked that would identify this tax credit as an incentive to add jobs? There was also some concern that expanding the NOL could draw out the affects of the recession into subsequent state budgets.
 
As for the economic revitalization zone tax (ERZ) credits, The Department of Resources and Economic Development states this bill eliminates the repeal of the ERZ tax credits that was scheduled for July 1, 2011 and makes certain changes regarding the eligibility for and determination of the eligible amounts for the credits. The Department states eligibility criteria changes from a fixed amount, to a variable equation; 80 percent of state median household income will not have a fiscal impact. The repeal change provisions may have a fiscal impact, however. The bill does not change the credit caps that can be taken in any fiscal year: $825,000 in total; $40,000 per taxpayer, but the bill repeals the provision that would have eliminated the credit beginning in FY 2012. Since the tax provisions in this bill impact both business profits and business enterprise taxes, the revenue decrease identified would be split between state general fund revenue and education trust fund revenue in accordance with statute.
 
To learn more about how an ERZ is designated visit the General Court website:
 
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/XII/162-N/162-N-2.htm
 
The committee asked for more information from the DRA and will ask to meet with DRED officials at an upcoming work session.
 
To see more provisions in this bill, please visit the General Court's bill tracking website:
 
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2010/SB0383.html
 
The LLC tax

The Senate Ways and Means committee met on House Bill 1607, the reasonable compensation bill, and there seems to be a clear divide between the House's belief that HB 1607 is the way to go versus the Senate passed Senate Bill 497.
 
House leaders tried to portray the SB 497 as the rich man's or big business version as opposed to the small businessman's version in HB 1607.
 
House Ways and Means committee member Rep. Vachon described the difference as the SB497 being focused on an individual's return on investment vs. that same indivdual's definition of reasonable compensation in the HB1607.  Rep. Vachon went on to say that the Senate bill is too cookie cutter in its approach to this issue.  Different types of businesses ought to be treated differently. Then he said that service-oriented businesses will never pay the BPT under SB 497.
 
Two other members of House Ways & Means spoke; Rep. Walsh addressed Sec. 162 of the Revenue Code and Rep. Johnson touched on the provision permitting the carry forward of net operating losses.
 
Next week's hearing on SB 497 before the House Ways & Means Committee should be interesting.  It is scheduled for April 13, 2010 at 1:15 PM in Room 202 at the Legislative Office Building.
 
Ensuring a Balanced Budget
 
On Thursday Governor Lynch rolled out his plan to make up the projected shortfall of $210 - $220M by the end of fiscal year 2011 (July 2011). He hopes to accomplish the task with a series of spending reductions (including layoffs of 30 -35 state workers) debt restructuring, and an increase in the cigarette tax. The Governor believes this plan will ensure a balanced budget while protecting core services. We hope he is successful as we all have much to lose in the long run.
 
To view the Governor's plan in its entirety, please visit the web at:
 
Erle Pierce
Sheehan Phinney Capitol Group
 
Chamber Insight 
 
Two of the Chamber's top legislative priorities will see considerable action next week. Here is quick rundown of what to expect while these issues are debated and why these issues are important to the business community.
 
SB 334 - Manchester Solar Array
 
The House Science, Technology, and Energy Committee will hold a public hearing on SB 334 next week. As mentioned in previous editions of Capitol Insight, SB 334 will facilitate the development of a major solar array project at the capped landfill in Manchester.
 
The GMCC supports SB 334 as the project (at its full build out) will create 300 jobs, make effective and efficient use of ratepayer dollars that are earmarked to support renewable energy projects (as part of the state's Renewable Energy Portfolio program), and will put Manchester on the map regionally and nationally as a "green" city. SB 334 makes this project a reality by allowing PSNH to hold onto ratepayer funds they collect and otherwise would send to Public Utilities Commission, who then disperses them to applicants across the state.
 
Opposition to the bill lies among some in the renewable energy community who object to amending the Renewable Energy Portfolio statute only a few years after its passage, and those who believe Manchester should not be the sole beneficiary of such a change. In reality, SB 334 will pave the way for future renewable energy projects and is a measurable step forward in fulfilling New Hampshire's obligation to create more renewable energy. In addition to these benefits and the job creation the project will bring, the Chamber believes the long term opportunity for the City and region to use this project as a marketing tool is very significant.
 
The public hearing for SB 334 is slated for Thursday April 15th at 1 pm.
 
SB 497 - LLC Tax and Reasonable Compensation
 
The House Ways and Means committee will get their crack at the Senate's version of the LLC Tax repeal bill and reasonable compensation reform next week. The Chamber supports SB 497 as it's the last remaining vehicle to repeal the LLC tax and it addresses the issue of reasonable compensation. Thanks to the increased auditing practices of NH Department of Revenue Administration, determing what is reasonable compensation has become a major cost to businesses of all shapes and sizes. The Chamber believes the legislature needs to address this issue by adding clarity and more robust safe harbors to our business tax laws.
 
Chamber members are encouraged to attend the hearing for SB 497 on April 13th at 1:15 pm in room 202 of the Legislative Office Building in Concord.
 
For more information on how to get invovled in this important issue, please email michaels@manchester-chamber.org.
 
Legislative Dinner Recap
 
The Chamber's annual Legislative Dinner was held this past week and featured a packed house of House and Senate Members, and local business leaders. State Party Chair's Ray Buckley and John Sununu sparred on a variety issues, including state spending, the tea party movement, the politics of healthcare, and what party is best positioned for success in November. Buckley and Sununu were each so confident that a $100 bet over which party would see the most success was agreed upon.
 
Michael Skelton
Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce
michaels@manchester-chamber.org