When our investigative reporter (that is, do
you remember JJ?) asked the man in the street
JB what he thought of this scene going on right under
our eye[lid]s, he--average joe blow, man about town
JB--said:
When everything in the room is hospital
white (including the room) how do you make a
choice based on color?
|
JJ: What???
JB: The answer of course is: you don't.
JJ: Then what do you do?
JB: You pay attention to Ayn
Rand's 3 rules [warnings?] about compromise (from
1964) as
foreshadowed here for the JC case (page 105) in 2006.
P(ersonal)
S(idebar):
Introspection 101: Or that is,
Ayn Rand please, I'd rather do it
myself.*
rim: Referring of course to the King
James version of The Holy Bible there is no JC
(Jesus Christ) in the Old Testament.
oim: I know that; plus to my knowledge
there is no JC in the Old Testament in any bible
version.
rim: Then why Jimmy Carter (JC) as
new
Old Testament JC? There is no Jimmy Carter in the
Old Testament either.
oim: I know that too. But. I bet there's
some Old Testament in Jimmy Carter.
rim: oh ... OK ... I suppose ... but--
oim: That is, there probably is
some Old
Testament in-addition-to the
obvious New Testament
JC in the Former U.S. President JC as same
is
revealed by the fact that as-a-christian you are
awarded (in your own mind) frequent flyer miles
towards your eventual flight to heaven if
you ... "Love your
enemies" (is not Hamas our
enemy? and did not Jesus say, Mathew 5:44, "Love
your enemies"?); and isn't it "logical" to conclude--
given the
reality of human nature that strives for better
and
better--that the bigger the enemy one
shows 'love' to
the greater the number of frequent flyer
miles?
rim: not if you're a lutheran, they don't
believe in hierarchy. But since I don't know about
Southern Baptists of the JC kind I can't say for sure if
they are the same but since (to my knowledge, in the
realm of total Christian thought)
only Catholics believe in hierarchy I'd say it's
safe to conclude: neither do Southern Baptists believe
in hierarchy. To all non-Catholic
Christians then, 'steal a penny
steal a million bucks', it's the same
thing.
oim: and ... if you ... "turn the other
cheek", how
many miles are you awarded?
rim: we invaded Afghanistan so how you
say we turned the other cheek?
oim: because many felt, myself
included,
that since we were ATTACKED
by the Middle Eastern
Islamist ideology in 2001 that our refusal
(to-act-on-our-feelings) to turn
the whole f...... region into glass was a kind of 'turning
the other cheek', rather than what it
was: the living-up-to-our-
commitment to not be first strikers
when it comes to using nuclear weapons.
rim: jfk, I'm glad you weren't the
President
with your finger poised over "the button" on
September
10th, 2001. For sure even "you" can see that
compared
to the cut-throat--literally--muslims, christians are
harmless; no?
oim: you'd better click on and read those
3 warnings.
_______________________
* Key:
r(eligion)i(n)m(e) -
lower
case because I am beyond its controlling my
psychoepistemology, that is ... more
o(jectivism)i(n)m(e) -
lower case because I own it, it doesn't own me ...
Gary Deering
PsycHHology Engineer
(helping phhilosophhy
build better humans)
05/22/08
