Commentary by Dr. Jay Gordon, MD Associate Professor of Pediatrics, UCLA Medical School
The article in the Los Angeles Times this morning has generated a lot of discussion and I was asked to respond.
Unvaccinated children do not pose a threat to vaccinated children or their families. We all have a responsibility to keep each other's children safe. Choosing to not vaccinate or choosing an alternative vaccine schedule could be
considered a rift in that contract. Medically, scientifically and statistically speaking, it is not. Honest people might disagree.
I have been a pediatrician for thirty years and have watched children receive all scheduled vaccines, some of the vaccines or receive no vaccines at all. I have seen every one of the illnesses against which we vaccinate. The last time I saw bacterial meningitis in a child was 1982 but the extreme rarity of this terrible disease means that it makes the news whenever a case occurs. Denying that childhood meningitis exists is dishonest. Equally dishonest is implying that it is a large threat to any of our children. I see
kids with pertussis every year. I see children misdiagnosed with whooping cough
far more often. Two years ago, the New York Times took note of this phenomenon:
(New York Times article)
2009 marks the thirty year anniversary of the last case of "wild
polio" in the United States. Subsequent cases were caused by the oral polio
vaccine which is no longer used in this country.
(WHO/CDC supported site)
Rubella is no longer an "American" disease .
(CDC Press Conference)
I recently read an article, written in 2009 which chastised
non-vaccinating parents because there had been 131 cases of measles in the U.S.
in the first half of 2008 alone. And how many cases were there in the whole
year? 134. The usual number? 62. Disingenuous reporting. An extra 72 cases
of measles among 300,000,000 Americans made the papers every day or two for
months and the LA Times writers dredge up the child who caught measles on a
Swiss vacation one more time.
Yes, as mentioned, measles and other viruses can cause encephalitis.
It's very, very rare. Implying otherwise could scare parents.
And, no, the law does not allow us to know which children have not
received vaccines any more than it allows other invasions of privacy.
I have received hundreds of emails from people all over the country
and the world reaching out to me and asking me to listen to them about vaccine
issues and injuries because it seems that no one else will. I have permission
from a mother to forward email she sent to me-with a picture-of her four month
old daughter who received four vaccines and died shortly thereafter. I have
dozens and dozens of similar emails and dozens of face-to-face encounters in my
office with parents coming to me after what they considered to be vaccine damage
to their children. I will not forward that email. It creates a different kind
of fear that also doesn't serve the dialogue well.
I think that these possibly injured children and families represent
one end of the bell shaped curve and that scary stories about meningitis in
Minnesota (the first there in 18 years) represent the other end. (I do feel
that the former end of the curve is far fuller than the latter but no proof
exists. None.)
The LA Times stories were "fear-based" just as my forwarding these
emails would have been.
The University of Michigan Law Review recently invited me to write a
journal article about vaccines and tort law and you can read it here:
I sum up my law review presentation to parents every winter by
telling them that the only way to avoid childhood illnesses is "reverse
isolation" of your illness-free child. If you go to a two-year-old' s birthday
party during the winter months . . . You will probably get sick.
Peripherally, let's all remember that it took fifty years or more,
thousands of court cases and a lot of money to finally prove the connection
between cigarettes and cancer. The three court cases showing no connection
between vaccines and autism should make no headlines and should be an impetus to
honest investigative journalism.
We have increased the number of vaccines and the combinations of
vaccines given to babies and children. Adequate testing has not been done. I
have seen a huge rise in the number of children with autism. Neither I nor any
other doctors are hundreds of percent better at diagnosing this spectrum of
developmental delay than ten or twenty years ago. The dramatic rise in the
number of cases of autism spectrum disorders is attributable to something other
than "reclassification" or better diagnosis.
While waiting for scientific proof, we have to tolerate families'
completely legal and scientific desire to have or not have their children given
vaccines according to the current schedule.
Best,
Dr. Jay Gordon
|
