|
Good morning!
Our newsletter is intended to be interesting and
informative covering a range of employment issues,
updating you with employment law and providing
interesting articles relevant to the construction
industry.
If you have any suggestions for future issues or
would like to see a new subject covered please let us
know. Also any nice comments on the newsletter -
or I suppose any criticisms would be welcome.
Any comments or articles in the newsletter that
concern employment law or legal matters are for
information only and you should always take
professional advice.
| Employee/Self Employed Status |
 |
The term 'self-employed' can be used to cover any
individual providing services who does not have a
contract of employment with the company. This may
include for example consultants, services from
partnerships or sole traders. In each case where an
individual tries to claim self-employment for their
engagement with the company, the onus is on the
company in the first instance to apply a number of
tests to the fact of the case, as an incorrect
decision is a breach of tax legislation. It should be
noted that self-employment in one capacity does not
imply self-employment in another capacity. Each
engagement should be looked at separately.
Determining the tax status of workers can be
difficult, but in the construction industry with its 714
certificates and labour only subcontracting it can be
doubly difficult. Recognising the confusion, the
Inland Revenue has issued a guidance paper
specifically addressing this problem (Ref: Business
Series 1R148/CA69). Although the general principles
are explained in leaflet IR56/N139 - Employed or Self-
employed, the new leaflet deals only with
construction.
The tests should determine the extent of control by
the company over the terms of the engagement of
the individual, and are taken from an Inland Revenue
leaflet reference IR56/N139. If the tests suggest the
individual is an employee, then the Institute has an
an obligation to pay the individual through the payroll
and to deduct tax and national insurance
contributions (NIC) from the payment. If the tests
suggest possible self-employment status, then the
evidence should be submitted to the Inland Revenue
by the Institute's Payroll section to obtain a ruling
from the Institute's tax inspector. A purchase order
for the services of a self-employed individual can only
be placed when accompanied by a ruling which states
that payment may be made without deduction of tax
and NIC, as set out in Appendix A paragraph 1 (i) and
the following.
The following questions leading to an answer 'yes' by
you will probably mean that the individual is your
employee and must be paid on the payroll:
- Do they do they have to do the work rather than
hire someone else to do it for them?
- Can someone (i.e. a company employee) tell
them at any time what to do or when and how to do
it?
- Are they paid by the hour, week or month? Can
they get overtime pay? (Though even if the person is
paid by commission or on a piecework basis they may
still be an employee)
- Do you work set hours, or a given number of
hours a week or month?
- Do they work at the premises of the person they
are working for (i.e. a site of the company) or at a
place or places you decide?
The correctness of the decision is the Companys' as
the employer if either the Inland Revenue or DSS
successfully challenge such a decision.
Only if the above questions in paragraph 4 have
produced several 'no' answers should the next tests
be applied. Only if several of these next questions
(still from the perspective of the individual)
produce 'yes' answer should the facts of the case
then be referred to the Payroll Section for further
investigation.
- Does the individual have the final say in how the
business is run?
- Does the individual risk their own money in the
business?
- Is the individual responsible for meeting the losses
as well as taking the profits of the business?
- Does the individual provide major items of
equipment you need to do your job, not just the small
tools which many employees provide for themselves?
- is the individual free to hire other people on terms
of their own choice, to do the work that they have
taken on? Does the individual pay them from out of
thier own pocket?
- Does the individual have to correct unsatisfactory
work in their own time and at thier own
expense? .
This article is intended as a guide to the minefield of
self-employment - all
|
| Motivating employees |
 |
|
Most employees spend less than half their time at
work being genuinely productive. For the business
owner, this is frustrating and expensive.
Ironically, though, the employer is usually the major
cause of the problem. Almost all employees will be
highly productive if they feel enthusiastic and
motivated. This briefing explains:
- How to make people want to work well.
- How to align employees' goals with those of the
business.
- How to handle disagreements.
Motivation is based on giving people an appropriate
combination of rewards.
- Employees need an awareness of the possibilities
for them at work and the freedom to choose options
and goals.
- Most individuals need to feel they have
responsibility and the power to influence results by
their actions.
- People have their own priorities in relation to the
rewards they get from work.
- Rewards may include money, recognition,
friendships, security, the challenge of new projects or
a sense of doing something worthwhile and 'making a
difference'.
- For many people, the chance to achieve
ambitions is a major motivation.
Remember that what motivates you may not motivate
your employees.
Manipulating and bullying people simply does not
work. It leaves them demotivated. The key to
successful motivation is your attitude.
- Treat employees as partners in the business.
- Keep people informed about business performance
and management decisions.
- Ask employees for their views before making
decisions which affect them.
- Give each person a good, comfortable working
environment and the right training and equipment for
the job.
- Build up an atmosphere of trust and teamwork,
not defensiveness and fear.
A company run on fear is a miserable place to work,
full of people who avoid making decisions in case they
are wrong.
|
| High rise living |
 |
|
Ten years ago, all people wanted to do was blow
them up, but city centre council flats are now as
trendy as they are high - the des res for the turn of
the century.
British people on the whole have never quite
embraced the concept of high rise living.
We only use the word apartment if a living space
comes complete with concierge and private
porterage - perhaps even underground parking.
A decidedly less glamorous view has been taken over
the years of homes which fall into the category of
social housing.
The demolition of blocks of flats always draws
cheering crowds
"Flat" has dictionary definitions which include, "dull,
lifeless, monotonous" and a "collection of rooms,
usually on one level, used as a dwelling".
But council-built blocks are enjoying a rebirth, with
home buyers actively seeking to move into them,
reversing the traditional perception of tower block
dwellers as people who would rather be elsewhere.
Not only are council-built flats coming on to the
market in increasing numbers, as a result of the '80s
housing policy of giving tenants the right to buy.
But they also tend to be a bit cheaper than their
privately constructed equivalents - and much bigger.
Iain Borden, an architecture lecturer at University
College London, and an expert in urban space,
said: "There is a certain section of London society
that is seeking to move into council properties.
"They tend to be young, tend to be childless, urban
professionals - maybe graphic designers, and they're
often gay."
Speaking at a debate entitled Tower Blocks: Love
them or loathe them? at the Museum of London, he
said people chose to live in council blocks because
they loved the dynamism of being slap-bang in the
centre of town, and the fantastic views from up on
high.
And they benefited from council block design, which
he said was "a lot better than your typical Victorian
house conversion".
There was also, he said, a growing appreciation of
the work of some of the world class architects who
had designed council tower blocks.
Now, tower blocks are cool
Perhaps the most celebrated example of this is the
cult status now enjoyed by Trellick Tower in west
London.
The distinctive landmark was designed by Erno
Goldfinger and completed in 1972. It was made a
grade II* listed building in December 1998.
It has an active residents association, which has
campaigned for a number of changes to the building
and housing policy over the years including better
security, and only putting people there who want to
go there.
Chairman of the residents association Lee Boland is a
staunch proponent of high rise living, saying that
problems only came if tower blocks were not well-
built and maintained, and had people living in them
who did not want to be there.
Trellick Tower
Flats in Trellick Tower are selling for more than
£150,000 - and there is no shortage of people
wanting to buy them.
Ms Boland once told reporters: "I met Mr Goldfinger in
the lift once. I didn't know who he was but he kept
asking me about the faults and what I liked and didn't
like.
"I said I liked everything, except the designer hadn't
put a broom cupboard in the kitchen. 'Bloody women,'
he said. 'Never satisfied'."
[ image: Working in high rises is somehow more
acceptable to people than living in them]
Working in high rises is somehow more acceptable to
people than living in them
But despite their recently bestowed modish status,
council tower blocks didn't earn their down-at-heel
reputation for nothing.
People were placed in them when they didn't want to
go. As cities underwent restructure after the war,
whole communities were split up and rehoused in
sometimes shoddily put together anonymous grey
blocks.
There was often no communal area for children to
play in - or at least not one within easy sight of their
parents.
And poor maintenance of lifts could mean that the
simple act of putting rubbish out might involve
trekking down and up 27 flights of stairs, possibly
with small children in tow.
On a psychological level they represented a loss of
privacy, and when blocks were badly built, the noise
from neighbouring flats intruded from all
directions.
Architect Sam Webb said he viewed tower blocks as
a failed social experiment. He said they were a quick-
fix political decision that forced people to live in poor
housing conditions.
He added: "They are uneconomic. If it was cost
efficient to build housing in great tower blocks,
Barratts would be doing it all over the place."
But whatever their history, tower blocks are coming
into their own, and the people moving to live in them
value them more than ever.
|
| My Favourites |
 |
|
www.linkedin.com - Great site for finding new business contacts as
well as advertising your own services and talents.
www.bbc.co.uk -
Simply the best place for news, weather, sports
results etc
www.grumbletext
.com - Fascinating to see how your average joe
is getting ripped off these days. How many times do
people have to be told that you aren't buying one
ringtone, you are buying a subscription of £5 a week
for the rest
of your life.
|
| Advice |
 |
|
The contents of this newletter does not purport to
provide any professional advice and nothing on the
pages of this newsletter shall be deemed to
constitute the provision of professional advice in any
way. Clients are advised to take legal advice on all
matters concerning employment law, particularly
before taking any action against an employee.
|
|
Beware of hack headhunters |
|
|
|
Question from a potential candidate
It happened again this week. I got a call from a
headhunter. This happens from time to time and I
usually don't mind, I am generally open to listening
to headhunters since they are usually trying to find
candidates for another job, perhaps a career
improving move. But this one wouldn't tell me where
she got my name. She wouldn't tell me the name of
the company who was looking to hire. When I asked
that she write me on her firm's letterhead (so I could
verify who she was), she referred me to her
company's web site, which I couldn't find.
She wanted me to fax her my resume, along with a
letter stating why I was qualified for the position. I
only had the barest idea of what it entailed, and
again, I had no idea who her client was. She also
wanted to know what I was making now, which I
foolishly told her. I have not sent her my resume and
we have had no further contact. (I don't even know
her phone number!) I'm not looking for a job, but
again, I am always ready to listen.
What information should I expect a headhunter to
give me? I'm looking for a strategy for dealing with
headhunters so that I don't feel like I'm stumbling
around in the dark, while they're operating in bright
daylight. Thanks in advance.
Linda's Reply
This column is a bit of an indictment of headhunters.
And this question shines the light on a really lousy
practice that no one should tolerate. Deification.
Many headhunters act like their proverbial doo-doo
doesn't stink. They hold themselves up as high
priests of access to the inner sanctum of success.
They try to exude mystery and power, and they talk
in whispers. They hide behind a phone. They're full of
hooey.
Oddly, it's the highest-level executive who is most
likely to perceive a headhunter as some deity that
now and then stoops from the heavens to
address "the chosen ones." But a lot of people fumble
and pant when a headhunter calls. In fact, since you
can't readily tell whether you're dealing with a good
headhunter, a lousy one, or a hack dialling for
pounds,
you should be wary from the start. Be polite, but
expect the same courtesy and professionalism from a
headhunter that you would expect from anyone else.
There are a few things worth noting. It's common for
a headhunter not to divulge where she got your
name; the source might not want to be revealed.
Likewise, the client company might want to remain
nameless until the right candidate is identified,
because they don't want their competitors to know
they have a certain job open. In other words, don't
expect full disclosure in the first phone call. But don't
disclose all yourself, either. You have no idea who
you're dealing with. Find out.
The headhunter should be willing to tell you who she
is, about her company, where they're located, and to
provide good references. Yes, references.
Headhunters have these, too, and you should ask for
them. For more about this, please read Joe Borer's
excellent How to Judge a Headhunter., although an
American article it covers many relevant points.
Since you probably would not give your home
address, private phone number, and other personal
information to a stranger who approaches you on the
street, you should not hand these over to a voice on
the phone, either. A good headhunter will show
respect for your privacy and gladly provide
verification of her identity. She should give you a
credible link back so you can check out who she is.
Her firm's web site is fine: visit it, look her up in the
"About us" section, and call her
back at the number provided on the site. Then, look
her firm up in the phone book (and on Google) before
you talk further. Get third-party validation. Best of
all, talk with her references.
It's not unheard of (though rare) for a manager to
check up on employees by having someone call them
claiming to be a headhunter. But it's more common
for fast-buck employment agencies to call you
pretending to be exclusive headhunters, get your
resume, then broadcast it to every company under
the sun, hoping to hit on a placement. That does
your privacy (and reputation) no good. So, you're
right to be concerned about who you're talking to.
I'm not suggesting all headhunters are hacks, any
more than I suggest that all resume-writers, career
counsellors or personnel managers are. However, the
person who called you did not deserve your time. You
should have divulged nothing. There are not many
crooks in this business, and absolutely no gods. But
there are a lot of hacks, and they pose the biggest
risk to you.
You asked for a strategy to deal with headhunters
who call out of the blue. It's simple. Treat them the
same way you'd treat any salesperson. You wouldn't
give your credit card to a telesales person. Don't give
your personal information to a headhunter. Not until
you're sure who you're talking to. And don't be too
impressed with even the best of the headhunters you
encounter. To one extent or another, all we do is fill
jobs.
All the best
Linda Hilliard
|
|