Abha Light Foundation
Alternative Medicine in the News
March 2010      edition 64
published weekly


in this issue
:: Case study: Problems with removing the contraception Norplant
:: Scientists reveal negative impact of Roundup Ready GM crops
:: Onions are brilliant at absorbing toxins
:: Big Pharma researcher admits to faking dozens of research studies for Pfizer, Merck
:: Finally - how an apple a day keeps the doctor away
:: Hormone replacement therapy now linked to cataracts
:: Heat therapy kills cancer cells, scientists prove
:: Diabetes magic bullet doesn't work - it's back to a good diet
  Greetings!

Two good news items from Abha Light -

1) This Sunday, 21 March and Monday, 22 March, at 9 pm, Citizen TV, Kenya will do spotlights on Abha Light and our College

2) The Abha Light College team are the contributing editors for the April edition of the HPathy.com e-zine. So check it out at the beginning of April at Hpathy.

Enjoy!
Didi
Case study: Problems with removing the contraception Norplant
http://www.wddty.com

[Didi's comment: I get lots women in clinic with similar stories. Homeopathy goes a long way to sort them out]

When my husband and I decided not to have any more children, we agreed to have a Norplant fitted under the skin of my arm by my family doctor.

Once the Norplant rods were implanted, I suffered increasingly heavy periods, sometimes bleeding for up to 30 days, with only a four-day break. At one stage, my blood loss was so excessive that I fainted and had to be taken to hospital. The hospital's specialist recommended that the Norplant be removed immediately by my GP.But when my doctor tried to remove the Norplant, he couldn't find it. Soon after, a representative from Roussel, which manufactures the contraceptive (Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories in the US), told my doctor that if he couldn't remove the Norplant, no one from the drug company could, either. Roussel told me that a Dr Walling in Boston been specially trained to remove the device. They asked him to travel to England to remove the implants, so that they could observe him.

At my doctor's surgery Dr Walling gave me a local anesthetic and managed to extract four of the capsules, but a fifth one broke and only half could be removed. The rest of the implants couldn't be found. By this time, I had four small incisions and a two-inch scar along my arm. Now it appears likely that I'm going to have to undergo major operation under general anesthetic to locate and remove the missing capsules, plus plastic surgery to minimize the scarring. And this is six months after doctors decided that I should have this contraception out immediately! Roussel's patient guide states: "Norplant can be removed at any time during the five years, just make an appointment with your doctor or clinic." J B, Nottingham (initials changed).....

If any other British women have problems with Norplant, Freeth Cartwright Hunt Dickins Solicitors (Willoughby House, 20 Low Pavement, Nottingham, NG1 7EA) are handling multiple cases of litigation against Roussel.
Scientists reveal negative impact of Roundup Ready GM crops

Five studies published in the October 2009 issue of The European Journal of Agronomy reveal the negative impacts of using Monsanto's Roundup herbicide, a formula developed specifically for the company's line of genetically modified (GM) "Roundup Ready" crops. The papers, which were not released in the United States, offer a solid indictment against GM crops and the plight of using the Roundup herbicide.

Robert Kremer, a microbiologist with the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Research Service, co-authored one of the five papers and offered insight into their premise during an interview with The Organic & Non-GMO Report, a monthly newsletter that offers recourse in addressing the challenges of fighting GM foods.

Kremer and his colleagues began studying the effects of Roundup on soil back in 1997. They found that the herbicide was causing an increase in parasitic colonization at the roots of Roundup Ready soybeans and corn. They also observed an increase in fungal growth that leads to sudden death syndrome (SDS) in the plants.

Glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, is systemically changing the soil composition in the fields where it is used, leeching from plant roots into the ground. It is also disrupting the normal microorganism balance on plants and in soil, spurring the growth of harmful bacterial colonies that are destroying the beneficial ones.

According to Kremer, the most apparent disruption by glyphosate is observed in rhizobia, a type of bacterium that fixes nitrogen in the soil. Glyphosate's toxicity inhibits rhizobia from enriching soil with nitrogen, preventing plants from receiving this necessary element.

Despite claims to the contrary, Roundup can deeply penetrate soil and threaten groundwater supplies with contamination. Depending on a particular soil's composition, glyphosate can leech rather quickly into soil and potentially run off into nearby streams and rivers.

The Roundup system has also caused a significant increase in aggressive "super" weeds that are resistant to glyphosate. These weeds have been popping up in fields all over the country where GM Roundup Ready crops are grown, growing increasingly more virulent every year. Genetic engineers continue to develop stronger herbicides to combat them but the weeds keep getting stronger and more resistant.

Genetic modification of food crops is not only unsustainable but it threatens to unhinge the entire agricultural system. Roundup and other herbicides are altering and destroying soil nutrients, beneficial microbes, and other delicate components necessary to grow food.

While many farmers are interested in moving away from using GM crops in favor of more organic methods, it is often difficult for many of them to make the conversion.

Sources for this story include:

http://www.non-gmoreport.com/articl...
Onions are brilliant at absorbing toxins

Onions are brilliant at absorbing toxins, bacteria and even paint fumes from the air. If you put a cut onion in a room while painting, for example, you will later find paint between the layers of the onion. If you're suffering from an illness - or want to protect yourself from a flu or other virus - put an onion in a room. The next day you would find traces of virus inside the onion. As one woman described it:

"I contacted pneumonia and needless to say I wasveryill...I came across an article that said to cut both ends off an onion, putoneend on a fork and then place the forked end into an empty jar...placing thejar next to the sick patient at night. It said the onion would be black inthe morning from the germs...sure enough it happened just like that...theonion was amess and I began to feel better."

Big Pharma researcher admits to faking dozens of research studies for Pfizer, Merck

(NaturalNews) It's being called the largest research fraud in medical history. Dr. Scott Reuben, a former member of Pfizer's speakers' bureau, has agreed to plead guilty to faking dozens of research studies that were published in medical journals.

Now being reported across the mainstream media is the fact that Dr. Reuben accepted a $75,000 grant from Pfizer to study Celebrex in 2005. His research, which was published in a medical journal, has since been quoted by hundreds of other doctors and researchers as "proof" that Celebrex helped reduce pain during post-surgical recovery. There's only one problem with all this: No patients were ever enrolled in the study!

Dr. Scott Reuben, it turns out, faked the entire study and got it published anyway.

It wasn't the first study faked by Dr. Reuben: He also faked study data on Bextra and Vioxx drugs, reports the Wall Street Journal.

As a result of Dr. Reuben's faked studies, the peer-reviewed medical journal Anesthesia & Analgesia was forced to retract 10 "scientific" papers authored by Reuben. The Day of London reports that 21 articles written by Dr. Reuben that appear in medical journals have apparently been fabricated, too, and must be retracted.

After being caught fabricating research for Big Pharma, Dr. Reuben has reportedly signed a plea agreement that will require him to return $420,000 that he received from drug companies. He also faces up to a 10-year prison sentence and a $250,000 fine.

He was also fired from his job at the Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, Mass. after an internal audit there found that Dr. Reuben had been faking research data for 13 years. (http://www.theday.com/article/20100...)

Business as usual in Big Pharma
What's notable about this story is not the fact that a medical researcher faked clinical trials for the pharmaceutical industry. It's not the fact that so-called "scientific" medical journals published his fabricated studies. It's not even the fact that the drug companies paid this quack close to half a million dollars while he kept on pumping out fabricated research.

The real story here is that this is business as usual in the pharmaceutical industry.

Dr. Reuben's actions really aren't that extraordinary. Drug companies bribe researchers and doctors as a routine matter. Medical journals routinely publish false, fraudulent studies. FDA panel members regularly rely on falsified research in making their drug approval decisions, and the mainstream media regularly quotes falsified research in reporting the news.

Fraudulent research, in other words, is widespread in modern medicine. The pharmaceutical industry couldn't operate without it, actually. It is falsified research that gives the industry its best marketing claims and strongest FDA approvals. Quacks like Dr Scott Reuben are an important part of the pharmaceutical profit machine because without falsified research, bribery and corruption, the industry would have very little research at all.

Pay special attention to the fact that the Anesthesia & Analgesia medical journal gladly published Dr. Reuben's faked studies even though this journal claims to be a "scientific" medical journal based on peer review. Funny, isn't it, how such a scientific medical journal gladly publishes fraudulent research with data that was simply invented by the study author. Perhaps these medical journals should be moved out of the non-fiction section of university libraries and placed under science fiction.
MalariX now on sale
Homeopathic anti-malarial medicine now available

MalariX
We are happy to announce that our excellent malaria medicine is now registered with the Kenyan Pharma and Poisons Board and is available though
  • Our head office pharmacy
     tel: +254710620323
     sales@abhalight.org
  • Healthy U outlets
  • Elixir, Village Market
  • ABC Pharmacy
Quick Links

This mini-ezine was brought to you by
Abha Light Foundation.
Visit our website

:: :: ::
We source our articles from the below links. There's a lot of information out there, perhaps you'd like to subscribe directly to these links free e-zines.
Natural News
Emaxhealth.com
Ray Collins Good Life Letter
Hpathy.com
Zeus Info Service
What the Doctors won't Tell You

:: :: ::
Did you miss an earlier edition?
You can visit our archive of previous mini-e-zines. click here

:: :: ::
Why not forward this mini-ezine to a friend or two?
Forward this issue to a Friend
Finally - how an apple a day keeps the doctor away

03 March 2010

It's taken a few hundred years, but scientists have finally figured out why it is that an apple a day keeps the doctor away. An apple - and, indeed, oats and nuts, too - is rich in soluble fibre, which boosts the immune system. Scientists are recognising that many diseases, such as heart disease and diabetes, are related to inflammation, and apples transform cells into anti-inflammatory ones that can accelerate healing. While health authorities recommend we eat around 25 to 35 grams of fibre a day, they don't point out that you need a mix of both soluble and insoluble. Insoluble fibre is found in whole wheat and green, leafy vegetables such as spinach, and it helps aid digestion. (Source: Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 2010; doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.01.015).
Hormone replacement therapy now linked to cataracts

In fact, as the years passed and rates of breast cancer soared in women who took HRT, the truth began to be revealed. HRT didn't protect health at all. In fact, it caused breast and ovarian cancer (http://www.naturalnews.com/027617_H...), upped heart attack risk and was even linked to brain shrinkage (http://www.naturalnews.com/025371_w...).

Now it turns out there's yet another danger from HRT. New research headed by Birgitta E. Lindblad, MD, of Sundsvall Hospital in Sweden and just published in Ophthalmology, the journal of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, provides evidence that taking HRT causes cataracts. This is no minor potential side effect, either, because vision problems can be devastating. The eye's lens becomes cloudy and stiff when a cataract develops, sometimes making it difficult to read, drive or even see facial expressions clearly.

The eight year prospective study of over 30,000 postmenopausal women compared the cataract status of women who had taken HRT to those who had not used the hormones. The results? The research subjects who were taking or who had ever taken HRT had significantly higher rates of cataracts so severe they had to be removed. Those who drank and also took hormone replacement therapy appeared to be at an even greater risk of serious cataracts.

"If future studies confirm the associations we found, increased risk for cataract removal should be added to the list of potential negative HRT outcomes," Dr. Lindblad said in a statement to the media.

The research team documented that 4,300 cataract removal surgeries were performed in research study participants between 1997 and 2005. In women who had ever taken HRT, the risk for cataract removal was increased by 14 percent. For current HRT users, the increase in risk soared even higher to 18 percent when compared with women who never used HRT. What's more, the longer a woman took HRT, the more the risk for cataracts increased.

For decades, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was pushed by the medical establishment as a kind of youth elixir that offered all sorts of remarkable benefits. Take the hormones Big Pharma concocts from pregnant horses' urine and chemicals and middle-aged and older women would supposedly have better sex lives, fewer wrinkles, protection from heart attacks and no more hot flashes. Only, it was all a huge myth.
Heat therapy kills cancer cells, scientists prove
http://www.wddty.com
17 March 2010

In February 2009, WDDTY told its subscribers that heat treatment is a proven way to kill cancer - and now researchers have demonstrated it in laboratory trials. Cancer cells were altered in one therapy that involved a sustained heat of 43 degrees Celsius for 30 minutes - and the cells started to die when they were exposed to a burst of heat therapy of 50 degrees Celsius for one to two minutes. At that level, there was permanent tissue damage to a prostate tumour, and which led to necrosis, or cell death. The laboratory experiments have been carried out at the Hashemite University in Jordan. In the WDDTY report, other experiments have demonstrated that cancer cells can be killed when exposed to temperatures of 42 to 43 degrees Celsius. (Source: AACR Dead Sea International Conference on Advances in Cancer Research, March 7-10, 2010).

Diabetes magic bullet doesn't work - it's back to a good diet
http://www.wddty.com
17 March 2010

The latest 'magic bullet' drug therapy for diabetes and heart disease doesn't work - which suggests that a good diet is still one of the best ways to treat these diseases. Researchers have given the thumbs down to the anti-hypertensive (high blood pressure) drug Diovan (valsartan) and the anti-diabetes drug Starlix (nateglinide). The two drugs - which are often given in combination - could not reduce the risk of heart problems, and Diovan was only marginally successful in slowing the development of type II diabetes, the 'lifestyle' disease. Lead researcher Robert M Califf from Duke University School of Medicine, commented: "This is a sobering confirmation of the need to continue to focus on lifestyle improvements." Type II diabetes affects around 150 million people around the world, and is often a precursor to heart problems. It is known as a 'lifestyle disease' because it is invariably brought on by eating processed and 'fast' foods. (Source: New England Journal of Medicine, 2010; 0: NEJMoa1001121).
Medical Disclaimer: The information contained within does not take the place of medical diagnosis or prescription. See your health care provider in case of sickness.

Editorial Disclaimer: Publication of these articles are to promote food for thought. The opinions expressed in these articles may not be the opinion of editors.