|

|
Alternative Medicine in the News May 2009 edition 23 published weekly
|
|
Your Favorite 'Natural' Brands May Not Be What They Seem
mercola.com
For those of you still under the assumption that your Horizon organic milk,
your Kashi crackers or your Green and Black's chocolate was being
churned out by a small farm or mom-and-pop shop nestled in a pristine
valley, brace yourself for disappointment.
Burt's
Bees lip balm was originally sold at independently owned health food
stores. But more recently, Burt's Bees products have appeared
everywhere -- in grocery stores, drug stores, and big-box stores like
Target and Wal-Mart. That's because Burt's Bees is now owned by Clorox,
a massive corporation that has historically cared very little about the
environment.
Many of the products you may trust and respect for their
independence and social responsibility are now owned by big
corporations that are going out of their way to hide their link to the
small, socially responsible brands.
Tom's of Maine is owned by Colgate-Palmolive, a massive company with
a revenue of approximately $11.4 billion. Danone, the French
conglomerate which also owns Brown Cow, has acquired a majority holding
in Stoneyfield -- the same Danone that had to recall large quantities
of its yogurt in 2007 after it was found to contain unsafe levels of
dioxins. Horizon Organic milk was bought out by the largest dairy
company in the U.S., Dean Foods, in 2005.
Odwalla is now owned by Coca-Cola. Almost as soon as Coca-Cola
bought the company, it stopped selling the fresh-squeezed OJ that had
made Odwalla famous and popular -- fresh squeezed can't last the days
and weeks the juices are now in transit or on the shelf. Pepsi bought
Naked Juice in 2006, in order to compete with Odwalla. Smuckers grabbed
several juice mainstays from the health food store shelves: After The
Fall, R.W. Knudsen and Santa Cruz Organic.
Kashi cereals was bought in July 2000 by Kellogg's, the 12th-largest
company in North American food sales (but if you look at a box of
Kashi's "Go Lean Crunch", for example, you will find not one mention of
the fact that Kellogg's owns them.) Kraft Foods bought the natural
cereal maker Back to Nature. Kraft is a subsidiary of Altria, which
also owns Philip Morris, one of the world's largest producers of
cigarettes.
General Mills owns Cascadian Farm. Barbara's Bakery is owned by
Weetabix, the leading British cereal company. Health Valley and
Arrowhead Mills are owned by Hain Celestial Group, a natural food
company traded on the NASDAQ, with H.J. Heinz owning 16 percent of the
company.
Green and Black's organic chocolate was taken over in 2005 by
Schweppes, the 10th-largest company in North American packaged-food
sales. Dagoba Chocolate is actually owned by Hershey Foods.
Marketing strategies have been fooling you, convincing you to trust
that the niche brands continue to be small, environmentally conscious
businesses with ecologically sound practices. In fact, they are
frequently cogs in the giant corporate wheel. It is time to question
how much the ownership and neglectful marketing of these "pseudo"
responsible brands warrant crossing them off your shopping list. And it
is time to find products more in tune with your values -- at least
until they, too, get bought out by a large conglomerate. |
US Congress Moves to Ban BPA in All Food Containers
Congress
has introduced legislation intended to establish a federal ban on
bisphenol A (BPA) in all food and beverage containers. The measure
would greatly expand earlier efforts to limit the chemical from
products used only by babies and children.
This
move to get BPA out of food and beverage containers is a very positive
step, one that could make your food a lot less toxic. It's about time
Congress got around to it -- BPA has already been detected in the urine
of 95 percent of people tested, probably because it's used so
pervasively in everything from canned goods to plastic water bottles.
The move came a day
after Sunoco, the gas and chemical company, sent word to investors that
it was now refusing to sell BPA to companies for use in food and water
containers for children younger than 3. Sunoco told investors that it
could not be certain of the compound's safety.
Six baby bottle manufacturers, including Playtex and Gerber, have also announced they would stop using BPA to make baby bottles.
Tests
have uncovered toxic levels of the chemical in packaged products,
including some marked as "microwave safe." The amounts detected were at
levels that scientists have found cause neurological and developmental
damage in laboratory animals. The problems include genital defects,
behavioral changes and abnormal development of mammary glands.
An
overwhelming majority of studies show the chemical is harmful, causing
breast cancer, testicular cancer, diabetes, hyperactivity, obesity, low
sperm counts, miscarriage and a host of other reproductive failures in
laboratory animals. More recent studies using human data have also
linked BPA to heart disease and diabetes.
|
10 Ways to Instantly Build Self Confidence
Self
confidence is the difference between feeling unstoppable and feeling
scared out of your wits. Although many of the factors affecting self
confidence are beyond your control, there are a number of things you
can consciously do to build self confidence.
1. Dress Sharp
When you don't look good, it changes the way you carry yourself and
interact with other people. Use this to your advantage by taking care
of your personal appearance. This doesn't mean you need to spend a lot
on clothes. One great rule to follow is "spend twice as much, buy half
as much". Rather than buying a bunch of cheap clothes, buy half as many
select, high quality items.
2. Walk Faster
People with confidence walk quickly. They have places to go, people
to see, and important work to do. Even if you aren't in a hurry, you
can increase your self confidence by putting some pep in your step.
3. Good Posture
People with slumped shoulders and lethargic movements display a lack
of self confidence. They aren't enthusiastic about what they're doing
and they don't consider themselves important. By practicing good
posture, you'll automatically feel more confident.
4. Personal Commercial
One of the best ways to build confidence is listening to a
motivational speech. Unfortunately, opportunities to listen to a great
speaker are few and far between. You can fill this need by creating a
personal commercial. Write a 30-60 second speech that highlights your
strengths and goals, then recite it in front of the mirror aloud
whenever you need a confidence boost.
5. Gratitude
Set aside time each day to mentally list everything you have to be
grateful for. Recall your past successes, unique skills, loving
relationships, and positive momentum.
6. Compliment other people
When we think negatively about ourselves, we often project that
feeling onto others. Get in the habit of praising other people. Refuse
to engage in backstabbing gossip and make an effort to compliment those
around you.
7. Sit in the front row In schools, offices, and
public assemblies around the world, people constantly strive to sit at
the back of the room. By deciding to sit in the front row, you can get
over this irrational fear and build your self confidence. You'll also
be more visible to the important people talking from the front of the
room.
8. Speak up
By making an effort to speak up at least once in every group
discussion, you'll become a better public speaker, more confident in
your own thoughts, and recognized as a leader by your peers.
9. Work out
Physical fitness has a huge effect on self confidence. If you're out
of shape, you'll feel insecure, unattractive, and less energetic. By
working out, you improve your physical appearance, energize yourself,
and accomplish something positive.
10. Focus on contribution
If you stop thinking about yourself and concentrate on the
contribution you're making to the rest of the world, you won't worry as
much about your own flaws. The more you contribute to the world, the
more you'll be rewarded with personal success and recognition.
|
Ginger, Turmeric, Neem Declared "Hazardous" in Thailand After Chemical Companies Try to Protect Pesticide Profits
The government of Thailand has classified 13 plants - traditionally
used as herbal medicines and natural pesticides - as "hazardous
substances," causing outrage among farmers and advocates of traditional
medicine.
The plants - including ginger, turmeric, neem and
chili - have been classified by the Industry Ministry as "hazardous
substances type 1," requiring all manufacturers, growers, importers or
exporters of any products made from the plants to follow strict safety
and quality control rules or face up to six months in jail and a 50,000
baht ($1,400) fine.
Farmers' groups have objected to the new rules as an unfair burden on organic farmers, who will now have to pay more for the registration, packaging and testing of non-synthetic pesticides. They have also objected that the list was developed without any consultation of farmers who would be affected.
"The government keeps promoting organic farming
and reduction of chemical use," said Tussanee Verakan, coordinator of
the Alternative Agriculture Network. "Why did they put such heavy
restrictions on organic substances which are the heart of organic farming?"
Witoon Lianchamroon of the organic farming nonprofit Biothai said he suspects that the move is intended to benefit chemical companies
by putting obstacles in the path of those who would otherwise prefer
natural alternatives. Because natural pesticides are less toxic and
substantially cheaper than imported chemical pesticides, recent years
have seen large numbers of Thai farmers abandoning chemical products.
"Instead
of tightening controls on these farmer-friendly herbal plants, the
committee should crack down on multinational companies who exploit Thai
farmers by luring them into buying their highly toxic and costly
products," Witoon said.
Alternative medicine
practitioners have also reacted angrily to the decision. According to
Prapot Paetrakas, deputy director-general of the Department for
Development of Thai Traditional and Alternative Medicine, all 13 newly
regulated plants are central to the practice of traditional Thai
medicine. |
|
|
|
|
Daily Aspirin Useless in Preventing Heart Attacks in Diabetics
Taking aspirin daily has no effect on the risk of heart attacks and
strokes among diabetics and should no longer be recommended as a
routine medical practice, according to a study conducted by researchers
from the University of Dundee, Scotland, and published in the "British Medical Journal.
"We
found no evidence to support the use of either aspirin or antioxidants
in the primary prevention of cardiovascular events and mortality in
people with diabetes," the researchers wrote.
Researchers assigned 1,276 diabetic women and men with no history or symptoms of cardiovascular disease to take either aspirin, an antioxidant or a placebo once per day. After eight years, they found no difference in the rate of heart attacks and strokes between the three groups.
Prior research has indicated that a regular dose of aspirin can reduce the risk of cardiovascular events by 25 percent in people with coronary artery disease or a history of heart attack or stroke. Because diabetes is regarded as a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and 80 percent of diabetics
die of cardiovascular causes, many doctors and professional
organizations have also begun recommending treatment of diabetics with
aspirin in recent years.
Aspirin can have serious side effects, however, such as gastrointestinal bleeding.
"We
have gotten a bit ahead of ourselves with aspirin," lead researcher
Jill Belch said. "We need to think again about using it for primary
prevention."
The study was welcomed by clinical pharmacology expert Peter Sever of Imperial College London.
"It
confirms many concerns we have that aspirin is very widely used in the
general population without an evidence base to support its overall
benefits," Sever said. "Thousands of people buy aspirin over the
counter -- I'm forever saying to patients you shouldn't be taking this.
I have had a couple of patients admitted to hospital with major
gastrointestinal bleeding when there was no evidence it was doing any
good."
|
Beta-Blocker Drugs Cause 400 Percent Increase in Heart Attacks
Surgical patients who are given blood pressure drugs known as
beta-blockers around the time of surgery are four times more likely to
suffer heart attacks and death than patients who are not given such
drugs, according to a study conducted by researchers from the Veterans
Affairs (VA) Boston Health Care System and published in the journal Archives of Surgery.
Because
many surgeries place patients at an increased risk of heart problems,
it has become standard procedure among many doctors to give all
surgical patients beta-blockers before surgery, regardless of whether
they have pre-existing blood pressure problems or not.
Researchers reviewed the medical records of more than 1,200 patients who had undergone surgeries
including hernia, orthopedic or vascular procedures at a VA hospital in
Houston in 2000. Based on these records, researchers noted each
patient's heart rate before and after surgery, and also classified
their risk of heart problems as either low, intermediate or high.
The
researchers found that the 238 patients who were either given
beta-blockers before their surgery or who were already taking the drugs
were four times more likely to suffer from heart attacks or death
within 30 days of their surgery than 408 patients of similar, age, sex,
heart and kidney health, smoking status and surgical risk who had not
been given the drug -- 2.94 percent, as opposed to 0.74 percent. None
of the patients who died had been placed into the high heart risk
group, leading the researchers to speculate that beta-blockers might
offer some protection to those who already have heart problems while
harming those who do not.
The researchers also found that the
patients in the beta-blocker group who died had average pre-surgery
heart rates of 86 beats per minute, significantly higher than the 70
beats per minute among survivors in the same group. This suggests that
having a lower heart rate might be an important part of protecting
against heart complications from beta-blockers.
|
Medical Disclaimer:
The information contained within does not take the place of medical diagnosis or
prescription. See your health care provider in case of sickness.
Editorial Disclaimer: Publication of these articles are to promote food for thought. The opinions expressed in these articles may not be the opinion of editors.
|
|
|