Abha Light Foundation
Alternative Medicine in the News
April 2009      edition 18
published weekly

in this issue
:: Monsanto's Many Attempts to Destroy All Seeds but Their Own
:: How to Recognize and Treat Depression Naturally
:: The Dumbest Fundraising Event Ever?
:: Vaccine Studies: Under the Influence of Pharma
:: Vaccines as Biological Weapons?
:: Fresh Pineapple Has Many Benefits
:: Baking Soda Whitens Teeth
Monsanto's Many Attempts to Destroy All Seeds but Their Own
www.mercola.com

Some say that if farmers don't want problems from Monsanto, they simply shouldn't buy Monsanto's GMO seeds. But it isn't quite that simple. Monsanto contaminates the fields, trespasses onto the land taking samples, and then sues, saying they own the crop.

Meanwhile, Monsanto is taking many other steps to keep farmers and everyone else from having any access at all to buying, collecting, and saving of normal seeds:
  1. They've bought up the seed companies across the Midwest.
  2. They've written Monsanto seed laws and gotten legislators to put them through, that make cleaning, collecting and storing of seeds so onerous in terms of fees and paperwork that having normal seed becomes almost impossible.
  3. Monsanto is pushing laws that ensure farmers and citizens can't block the planting of GMO crops even if they can contaminate other crops.
  4. There are Monsanto regulations buried in the FDA rules that make a farmer's seed cleaning equipment illegal because it's now considered a "source of seed contamination."
Monsanto has sued more than 1,500 farmers whose fields had simply been contaminated by GM crops.

Dr. Mercola's Comments:
There is a reason why I believe Monsanto to be one of the most evil companies on the planet, and this is in large part due to its activities relating to controlling food production through controlling the seeds to produce it.

For nearly all of its history the United States Patent and Trademark Office refused to grant patents on seeds, viewing them as life-forms with too many variables to be patented. But in 1980 the U.S. Supreme Court allowed for seed patents in a five-to-four decision, laying the groundwork for a handful of corporations to begin taking control of the world's food supply.

Since the 1980s, Monsanto has become the world leader in genetic modification of seeds and has won at least 674 biotechnology patents, more than any other company.

This is not surprising, considering they invest over $2 million a day on research and development!

But Monsanto is not only patenting their own GMO seeds. They have also succeeded in slapping patents on a huge number of crop seeds, patenting life forms for the first time -- again without a vote of the people or Congress. By doing this, Monsanto becomes sole owner of the very seeds necessary to support the world's food supply ... an incredibly powerful position that no for-profit company should ever hold.

How do they defend this blatant attempt to control the food supply? They write on MonsantoToday.com:

"Patent protection allows companies to see a return on their investment which enables further investment in R-and-D and product development. This profit-investment cycle drives product innovation that is responsive to farmer needs."

Farmers' needs?
Farmers who buy Monsanto's GM seeds are required to sign an agreement promising not to save the seeds or sell them to other farmers. The result? Farmers must buy new seeds every year, and they must buy them from Monsanto.

Meanwhile, these same farmers who Monsanto is claiming to help are being aggressively targeted and pursued for outrageous patent infringements on these same seeds.

The "Seed Police"
Monsanto employs an arsenal of private investigators and agents who secretly videotape farmers, snatch crop samples from their land and even fly helicopters overhead to spy -- all to catch farmers saving or sharing seeds.

As of 2005 Monsanto had 75 employees and a $10-million budget solely to investigate and prosecute farmers for patent infringement.

And until recently, Monsanto has even been known to sue farmers for GM crops growing on their land that got there via cross-contamination. In other words, a neighboring farm's GM seeds blew over onto their land, and Monsanto slaps them with a lawsuit.

I realize this seems incredible, but it is true.

Have You Heard of Terminator Seeds?
Creating and promoting GM crops is, in my opinion, a major threat to public health. Patenting those same seeds takes it to an even higher level of evil. But there is another reason why I don't believe for one second that Monsanto has the virtuous intentions they claim: terminator seeds.

Monsanto is considering using what's known as terminator technology on a wide-scale basis. These are seeds that have been genetically modified to "self-destruct." In other words, the seeds (and the forthcoming crops) are sterile, which means farmers must buy them again each year.

This solves their problem of needing "seed police," but they are obviously looking the other way when it comes to the implications that terminator seeds could have on the world's food supply: the traits from genetically engineered crops can get passed on to other crops, and often do.

Once the terminator seeds are released into a region, the trait of seed sterility could be passed to other non-genetically-engineered crops, making most or all of the seeds in the region sterile.

Not only would this mean that every farm in the world could come to rely on Monsanto for their seed supply, but if the GM traits spread it could destroy agriculture as we now know it.

How Can You Get Through to Monsanto?
First, I urge you to get informed on the issue by watching The Future of Food. This in-depth investigation into the disturbing truth behind genetically modified foods is one of the best documentaries I have ever viewed. It will help you understand the very real threat that ALL future generations face as a result of genetic engineering.

Next, hit Monsanto where it counts ... their bottom line. By boycotting all GM foods and instead supporting organic (and local) farmers who do not use Monsanto's GM seeds, you are using your wallet to make your opinions known.

This means abstaining from virtually all processed food products (most are loaded with GM ingredients) and sticking to fresh, locally grown, organic foodstuffs instead.

The True Food Shopping Guide is a great tool for helping you determine which brands and products contain GMO ingredients. It lists 20 different food categories that include everything from baby food to chocolate.

I've also compiled an excellent list of resources where you can still find pure, GM-free foods, and I encourage you to refer to it often and also share it with your friends and family.
How to Recognize and Treat Depression Naturally
www.naturalnews.com 
Dr S. Tamer

Depression, one of the leading reasons for work absence in the USA, is a sickness that one out of five people experiences during their lifetime. It is a critical medical illness -- a disorder that affects one's whole wellbeing whether physical, mental or emotional. It is commonly described as sadness, the blues, psychological suffering, or down in the dumps.

Depression is more popular in women than men and is particularly prevalent among adolescents. It affects individuals of all races and age groups, but it is three to five times more common among the elderly.

Depression is the main cause of alcoholism, substance abuse and other dependencies. It may also be a symptom of other diseases such as hypothyroidism or anemia.

Symptoms of Depression
Depression is a real malady and exacts a high cost in terms of broken relationships, social isolation, and decreased work productivity. It impacts not only the person suffering from it but those close to them, especially their family, relatives and close friends. Untreated depression may lead to suicide. Most people do not recognize the symptoms of depression or tend to ignore them. Symptoms of depression could include wakefulness, unhappiness, trouble concentrating, anxiousness, loss of appetite, loss of interest in usual hobbies and activities, and mood swings. The most frequent type is reactive depression, which is a depression that is induced by a painful or stressful event.

Treatment of Depression
Eighty percent of the cases of depression are successfully treated, a rate that could be improved to a great extent if the proper medical and social care were to be provided. If you believe you are suffering from depression, please go and visit a professional health practitioner immediately for professional help.

There are many available options of treatment including natural medicine therapies and short-term psychotherapy which have been proven as effective. The use of alternative and complementary medicine to manage depression is becoming more popular. They assist in alleviating the symptoms of depression, especially in cases of mild to moderate depression. Psychotherapy and hypnotherapy are excellent alternatives for mild depression and are highly effective. Psychotherapy provides people the opportunity to understand the factors that lead to their depression and to cope effectively with the mental, behavioral, social, and situational triggers. Hypnotherapy provides people the opportunity to overcome any stressful life situations that lead to their depression.

St. John's wort is one of the most beneficial natural and herbal remedies for depression. It is more potent than a placebo and is as good as antidepressant drugs for mild and moderate depression.

Persistent negative thoughts and emotions will only cause your depression to worsen. Try to focus on the simple things in life that give you happiness and lift up your spirit. Meditiation can help. Accept whatever life offers you, maintain your good spirits, and be optimistic.

Prior to taking any natural treatments, you must seek the advice of your physician or other professional health practitioners.

Sources:
1- National Institute of Mental Health (www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publication...).
2- MedlinePlus: Depression (www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/depress...).
3- The International Foundation for Research and Education on Depression (http://www.ifred.org/).
The Dumbest Fundraising Event Ever?
American Cancer Society Joins BBQ Meat "Cook Off" to Raise Money for Cancer Research
www.NaturalNews.com 


Texans living in Navarro County are about to win a collective award for being the dumbest people in the world when it comes to diet and nutrition: They are hosting a BBQ meat cook-off to raise money for -- get this -- cancer research! Somebody should stop by the festivities and tell these people something they apparently have no knowledge of: BBQ'd meats cause cancer!

Thus, these participants raising money for so-called "cancer research" are engaging in the very activity that causes cancer in the first place. I wonder what's next? A hard liquor buffet for Alcoholics Anonymous? A cheeseburger eating contest for heart patients? Or how about a diet soda festival to raise money for researching brain tumors?

And wouldn't you know it: A local chapter of the American Cancer Society will reportedly be joining the event, too! (Why doesn't this surprise me?) You can bet your horseshoes that the ACS won't be telling anybody the truth about the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) found in charred meat, nor the fact that excess meat consumption all by itself is strongly correlated with numerous cancers. (See authors' quotes below.)

Cooking For A Cure!
According to the Corsicana Daily Sun (http://www.corsicanadailysun.com/ne...), the event is "sanctioned by the Lone Star BBQ Society" and will stage contests using three different meats: Chicken, Pork and (beef) Brisket.

This is all being called -- hilariously -- "Cooking For A Cure!"

So there you have it, folks: The truth about the "X for a Cure" fundraising scams sponsored by the cancer industry. Whether it's "Running for a Cure" or "Buying pink stuff for a cure" or "Wearing pink ribbons for a cure," the truth is that none of it cures anything. All it does is keep people distracted and ignorant about the true causes of cancer while actually giving them more cancer from all the junk they're buying and consuming. I've actually seen pink-ribbon products sold that contain cancer-causing chemicals!

Vaccine Studies: Under the Influence of Pharma
By Barbara Loe Fisher

If you take more than a casual look at the way the mass vaccination system in the U.S. works, you see that pharmaceutical companies marketing vaccines have a lot of clout.

It was the pharmaceutical industry that told Congress in 1982 that they were going to leave the nation without vaccines if they didn't get liability protection but have opposed making it less difficult for vaccine victims to obtain federal compensation in the U.S. Court of Claims under a 1986 law that gave them liability protection.

It is Pharma lobbyists, who bully the FDA into fast tracking vaccines like Gardasil and who sit at the CDC's policymaking tables urging that new vaccines be recommended for use by all children so they can persuade state legislators to mandate vaccines like influenza vaccine.

How Big Pharma Influences Medical Journals
A recent study published in the British Medical Journal reveals the clout that Big Pharma has in the world of medicine journal publishing, specifically the publishing of scientific articles about vaccines. In a Cochrane Collaboration review and analysis of published influenza vaccine studies found that influenza vaccine studies sponsored by industry are treated more favorably by medical journals even when the studies are of poor quality.

This analysis confirms that drug companies marketing vaccines have a major influence on what gets published and is said about vaccines in medical journals. It is no wonder that there are almost no studies published in the medical literature that call into question vaccine safety.

The preferential treatment of Pharma-funded studies also explains why the risks of an inappropriately fast-tracked vaccine like Gardasil are underplayed in the medical literature and why a physician like Andrew Wakefield, M.D. who dared to publish a study in 1998 in a medical journal (The Lancet) calling for more scientific investigation into the possible link between MMR vaccine and regressive autism, has been mercilessly persecuted for more than a decade, by both Pharma-funded special interest groups, as well as public health officials maintaining close relationships with vaccine manufacturers.

Study Finds No Correlation Between Quality of Study and Publication
This recent review identified and assessed 274 published studies on influenza vaccines for their methodological quality and found no relationship between study quality, publication in prestige journals or their subsequent citation in other articles.

The researchers also found that most influenza vaccine studies are of poor quality but those with conclusions favorable to influenza vaccinations are of significantly lower methodological quality. The single most important factor determining where the studies were published or how much they were cited was sponsorship, with those partially or wholly funded by the pharmaceutical industry having higher visibility.

The authors commented:
    "The study shows that one of the levers for accessing prestige journals is the financial size of your sponsor. Pharma sponsors order many reprints of studies supporting their products, often with in house translations into many languages. They also purchase advertising space in the journal. Many publishers openly advertise these services on their website. It is time journals made a full disclosure of their sources of funding".

The HPV Vaccine -- Just One Example of Inappropriate Influence Endangering Public Health
Last month the National Vaccine Information Center (www.NVIC.org) called on the Obama Administration and Congress to investigate Gardasil vaccine risks. NVIC has long questioned the inappropriate influence of vaccine manufacturers in federal vaccine licensing and policymaking and state vaccine mandates.

In 2006, Merck's Gardasil vaccine was fast tracked by the FDA at Merck's request and in 2007 Merck lobbyists mounted an aggressive lobbying campaign to get Gardasil mandated by state legislators for all sixth grade girls, which would have assured the big drug company a predictable market.

The Pharma lobbying effort in 2007 to get all states to mandate Gardasil failed but every other vaccine produced by drug companies and licensed by the FDA in the past quarter century has been mandated. Those new mandates were added to state vaccine laws by legislators and public health officials at the urging of vaccine manufacturer lobbyists and Pharma funded organizations touting vaccine studies published in the medical literature.

Massive Increase in Number of Vaccines Given
In the past three decades, the numbers of doses of government recommended vaccines for children and medical organizations like the American Academy of Pediatrics has tripled to 69 doses of 16 vaccines, with 48 doses of 14 vaccines targeted to children under age six.

Pharma lobbyists have persuaded most states to pass laws requiring two to three dozen doses of most of the 16 government recommended vaccines. Last year New Jersey became the first state to mandate influenza vaccine for children attending daycare and school.

In the past few years, Dr. Jefferson has authored several independent reviews of influenza studies published in the medical literature for the Cochrane Collaboration, which have been published in the British Medical Journal, questioning the quality of published scientific evidence for influenza vaccine effectiveness and safety for the elderly as well as children.

Clearly, if the makers and marketers of vaccines can influence the quality and quantity of the scientific evidence published in the medical literature proving that vaccines are safe and effective -- evidence that is used by states to mandate vaccines and by the U.S. Court of Claims to deny compensation to vaccine injured children -- then Congress was wrong in 1986 to protect the makers and marketers of vaccines from liability for injuries and deaths caused by those vaccines.

Government Vaccine Recommendations Based on Tainted Evidence
The U.S. Court of Claims vaccine injury compensation awards, and state vaccine mandates are justified on the strength of scientific published in medical journals.  

It is time for medical journals to disclose all financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. It is time for studies questioning the safety and effectiveness of vaccines to receive a fair hearing in scientific journals rather than editors confining themselves to primarily publishing studies funded by the pharmaceutical industry maintaining that every vaccine is totally safe, effective and necessary.

Kudos to the British Medical Journal for having the integrity to publish  Dr. Jefferson's comprehensive analysis of pharmaceutical money influence on vaccine studies published in the medical literature. Hopefully, this will be a wake-up call for the scientific community, Congress and the public to put an end to the undue influence the pharmaceutical industry has on the science and policy of mass vaccination in the U.S.
Vaccines as Biological Weapons?
Live Avian Flu Virus Placed in Baxter Vaccine Materials Sent to 18 Countries
www.NaturalNews.com

There's a popular medical thriller novel in which a global pandemic is intentionally set off by an evil plot designed to reduce the human population. In the book, a nefarious drug company inserts live avian flu viruses into vaccine materials that are distributed to countries around the world to be injected into patients as "flu shots." Those patients then become carriers for these highly-virulent strains of avian flu which go on to infect the world population and cause widespread death.

There's only one problem with this story: It's not fiction.
Or, at least, the part about live avian flu viruses being inserted into vaccine materials isn't fiction. It's happening right now.

Deerfield, Illinois-based pharmaceutical company Baxter International Inc. has just been caught shipping live avian flu viruses mixed with vaccine material to medical distributors in 18 countries. The "mistake" (if you can call it that, see below...) was discovered by the National Microbiology Laboratory in Canada. The World Health Organization was alerted and panic spread throughout the vaccine community as health experts asked the obvious question: How could this have happened?

As published on LifeGen.de (http://www.lifegen.de/newsip/showne...), serious questions like this are being raised:

"Baxter International Inc. in Austria 'unintentionally contaminated samples with the bird flu virus that were used in laboratories in 3 neighbouring countries, raising concern about the potential spread of the deadly disease'. Austria, Germany, Slowenia and the Czech Republic - these are the countries in which labs were hit with dangerous viruses. Not by bioterrorist commandos, but by Baxter. In other words: One of the major global pharmaceutical players seems to have lost control over a virus which is considered by many virologists to be one of the components leading some day to a new pandemic."

Or, put another way, Baxter is acting a whole lot like a biological terrorism organization these days, sending deadly viral samples around the world. If you mail an envelope full of anthrax to your Senator, you get arrested as a terrorist. So why is Baxter -- which mailed samples of a far more deadly viral strain to labs around the world -- getting away with saying, essentially, "Oops?"

But there's a bigger question in all this: How could this company have accidentally mixed LIVE avian flu viruses (both H5N1 and H3N2, the human form) in this vaccine material?

Was the viral contamination intentional?
The shocking answer is that this couldn't have been an accident. Why? Because Baxter International adheres to something called BSL3 (Biosafety Level 3) - a set of laboratory safety protocols that prevent the cross-contamination of materials.

Todays Cartoon
 

 
Quick Links

This mini-ezine was brought to you by
Abha Light Foundation.
Visit our website

:: :: ::
We source our articles from the below links. There's a lot of information out there, perhaps you'd like to subscribe directly to these links free e-zines.
Natural News
Ray Collins Good Life Letter
Hpathy.com
Zeus Info Service
What the Doctors won't Tell You

:: :: ::
Did you miss an earlier edition?
You can visit our archive of previous mini-e-zines. click here

:: :: ::
Why not forward this mini-ezine to a friend or two?
Forward this issue to a Friend
Fresh Pineapple Has Many Benefits
www.naturalnews.com

The pineapple is a member of the bromeliad family. It is extremely rare that bromeliads produce edible fruit. The pineapple is the only available edible bromeliad today. It is a multiple fruit. One pineapple is actually made up of dozens of individual flowerets that grow together to form the entire fruit. Each scale on a pineapple is evidence of a separate flower. Pineapples stop ripening the minute they are picked. No special way of storing them will help ripen them further. Color is relatively unimportant in determining ripeness. Choose your pineapple by smell. If it smells fresh, tropical and sweet, it will be a good fruit. The more scales on the pineapple, the sweeter and juicier the taste. After you cut off the top, you can plant it. It should grow much like a sweet potato will. This delicious fruit is not only sweet and tropical, it also offers many benefits to our health.

Pineapple is a remarkable fruit. We find it enjoyable because of its lush, sweet and exotic flavor, but it may be one of the most healthful foods available today. If we take a more detailed look at it, we will find that pineapple is valuable for easing indigestion, arthritis or sinusitis. The juice has an anthelmintic effect; it helps get rid of intestinal worms. Let's look at how pineapple affects other conditions.

Pineapple is high in manganese, a mineral that is critical to development of strong bones and connective tissue. A cup of fresh pineapple will give you nearly 75% of the recommended daily amount. It is particularly helpful to older adults, whose bones tend to become brittle with age.

Bromelain, a proteolytic enzyme, is the key to pineapple's value. Proteolytic means "breaks down protein", which is why pineapple is known to be a digestive aid. It helps the body digest proteins more efficiently.

Bromelain is also considered an effective anti-inflammatory. Regular ingestion of at least one half cup of fresh pineapple daily is purported to relieve painful joints common to osteoarthritis. It produces mild pain relief. In Germany, bromelain is approved as a post-injury medication because it is thought to reduce inflammation and swelling.

Orange juice is a popular liquid for those suffering from a cold because it is high in Vitamin C. Fresh pineapple is not only high in this vitamin, but because of the bromelain, it has the ability to reduce mucus in the throat. If you have a cold with a productive cough, add pineapple to your diet. It is commonly used in Europe as a post-operative measure to cut mucus after certain sinus and throat operations. Those individuals who eat fresh pineapple daily report fewer sinus problems related to allergies. In and of itself, pineapple has a very low risk for allergies.

Pineapple is also known to discourage blood clot development. This makes it a valuable dietary addition for frequent fliers and others who may be at risk for blood clots.

An old folk remedy for morning sickness is fresh pineapple juice. It really works! Fresh juice and some nuts first thing in the morning often makes a difference. It's also good for a healthier mouth. The fresh juice discourages plaque growth.
Baking Soda Whitens Teeth

For just Ksh 22/- you can keep your teeth healthy. Next time you brush your teeth, try dipping your toothbrush into baking soda. You don't need much. Too much will make your gums feel raw.

One idea is to squeeze out some of your regular toothpaste into a small cup. Add some baking soda and stir it up. Use the new mixture as your toothpaste.

Freshens breath and prevents decay.

A natural buffer, Baking Soda maintains good pH levels inside the mouth by neutralizing acids. Baking Soda helps keep breath fresh for hours by neutralizing the production of Volatile Sulfur Compounds (VSCs) which cause bad breath.

Whitens teeth gently.
Baking Soda removes tough stains caused by coffee, tea, red wine and smoking. By dissolving deep into tooth surface crevices, Baking Soda removes dulling plaque and deep stains embedded there. And it's one of the least abrasive cleaning agents you can use on your teeth.

Here's a research report:
Plaque Formation/Removal by Baking-Soda and Antimicrobial Dentifrices over 4 Weeks
http://iadr.confex.com/iadr/2008Toronto/techprogram/abstract_107080.htm

M.S. PUTT1, K.R. MILLEMAN1, A. GHASSEMI2, W. HOOPER2, L. VORWERK2, and A.E. WINSTON3, 1University Park Research Center, Fort Wayne, IN, USA, 2Church & Dwight Co., Inc, Princeton, NJ, USA, 3R&D for Hire, East Brunswick, NJ, USARecent clinical studies have shown that a single, supervised brushing with baking soda-containing dentifrices removed significantly more plaque than dentifrices without baking soda.  

Objective:  To determine whether a baking-soda toothpaste, when used unsupervised at home for 4 weeks, can maintain its plaque-removing superiority over an anti-microbial toothpaste.
 
Method: A 4-wk, randomized, blinded, parallel-group clinical study of 2 marketed dentifrices was conducted.  At baseline and after 2 and 4 wks of 2x/day (60-sec) manual brushing, 24-hr plaque was assessed by the same examiner using the Turesky Modified Quigley-Hein Index.  Plaque also was measured at the baseline and 4-wk visits after a single, supervised 60-sec brushing. 

Treatments comprised dentifrices containing 20% baking soda (BS) and 0.3% triclosan/copolymer (TC).  Between-group comparisons were based upon post-ANCOVA t-tests. 
Results:  Baseline mean 24-hr plaque scores were well balanced between groups (2.895±0.401 and 2.896±0.389 for BS and TC groups, respectively).  Reductions from baseline in 24-hr whole-mouth plaque scores after 2 and 4 wks of brushing are summarized below (Mean±SD):
Examination BS (N=105) TC (N=102) BS / TC p-value
2-week 0.398±0.300 0.215±0.251 1.85X <0.0001
4-week 0.342±0.316 0.154±0.241 2.21X <0.0001

In addition, the BS dentifrice showed significantly (p<0.0001) greater reductions than the TC dentifrice in mean, whole-mouth plaque scores following single-brushings at the baseline visit (BS 0.535±0.260; TC 0.284±0.179; BS/TC 1.88X) and 4-wk visit (BS 0.809±0.341; TC 0.379±0.256; BS/TC 2.13X).  Similar reductions were observed for less accessible tooth areas when analyzed separately.

Conclusion:  Twice-daily brushing with a baking soda dentifrice resulted in significantly less plaque accumulation than a triclosan/copolymer dentifrice when assessed after 2 and 4 weeks.  Single, supervised brushings with the baking soda dentifrice removed significantly more plaque than the triclosan/copolymer dentifrice at both baseline and 4-week visits.
Sponsored by The Church & Dwight Co., Inc.

Medical Disclaimer: The information contained within does not take the place of medical diagnosis or prescription. See your health care provider in case of sickness.

Editorial Disclaimer: Publication of these articles are to promote food for thought. The opinions expressed in these articles may not be the opinion of editors.