Abha Light Foundation
Alternative Medicine in the News
November 2008      vol 1-2
in this issue
:: Evidence for Homeopathy
:: Homeopathic Research: Cuba
:: High-Priced Chemotherapy Treatments Bankrupting Families
:: Number of medicated kids jumps
:: Yoga More Effective Treating Diabetes
:: Today's Cartoon
New Evidence for Homeopathy
Two new studies conclude that a review which claimed that homeopathy is just a placebo, published in The Lancet, was seriously flawed.

Press Release
For immediate release 3 November 2008

George Lewith, Professor of Health Research at Southampton University comments: "The review gave no indication of which trials were analysed nor of the various vital assumptions made about the data. This is not usual scientific practice. If we presume that homeopathy works for some conditions but not others, or change the definition of a 'larger trial', the conclusions change. This indicates a fundamental weakness in the conclusions: they are NOT reliable."

The background to the ongoing debate is as follows:

In August 2005, The Lancet published an editorial entitled 'The End of Homeopathy', prompted by a review comparing clinical trials of homeopathy with trials of conventional medicine. The claim that homeopathic medicines are just placebo was based on 6 clinical trials of conventional medicine and 8 studies of homeopathy but did not reveal the identity of these trials. The review was criticised for its opacity as it gave no indication of which trials were analysed and the various assumptions made about the data.

Sufficient detail to enable a reconstruction was eventually published and two recently published scientific papers based on such a reconstruction challenge the Lancet review, showing that:

Analysis of all high quality trials of homeopathy yields a positive conclusion. The 8 larger higher quality trials of homeopathy were all for different conditions; if homeopathy works for some of these but not others the result changes, implying that it is not placebo.
The comparison with conventional medicine was meaningless.
Doubts remain about the opaque, unpublished criteria used in the review, including the definition of 'higher quality'.

The Lancet review, led by Prof Matthias Egger of the Department of Social and Preventive Medicine at the University of Berne, started with 110 matched clinical trials of homeopathy and conventional medicine, reduced these to 'higher quality trials' and then to 8 and 6 respectively 'larger higher quality trials'. Based on these 14 studies the review concluded that there is 'weak evidence for a specific effect of homoeopathic remedies, but strong evidence for specific effects of conventional interventions'.

There are a limited number of homeopathic studies so it is quite possible to interpret these data selectively and unfavourably, which is what appears to have been done in the Lancet paper. If we assume that homeopathy does not work for just one condition (Arnica for post-exercise muscle stiffness), or alter the definition of 'larger trial', the results are positive. The comparison with conventional medicine was meaningless: the original 110 trials were matched, but matching was lost after they were reduced to 8 and 6. But the quality of homeopathic trials was better than conventional trials. This reconstruction casts serious doubts on the review, showing that it was based on a series of hidden judgments unfavourable to homeopathy. An open assessment of the current evidence suggests that homeopathy is probably effective for a number of conditions including allergies, upper respiratory tract infections and 'flu, but more research is desperately needed.

Prof Egger has declined to comment on these findings.

References
Lüdtke R, Rutten ALB. The conclusions on the effectiveness of homeopathy highly depend
on the set of analyzed trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2008. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.015
Rutten ALB, Stolper CF. The 2005 meta-analysis of homeopathy: the importance of post-
publication data. Homeopathy 2008. doi:10.1016/j.homp.2008.09.008.
 
Homeopathic Research: Cuba
Cuba's Public Health System Before and After the Introduction of Homeopathy: Patients on Homeopathic vs. Allopathic Treatment

Pinar del Rio, Cuba
(hpathy.com)

Abstract 

Homeopathy was reintroduced in Cuba in 1992. Since then, the Cuban Ministry of Public Health has made great efforts in the development of homeopathy, as a diagnostic medical system based on evidence. The Ministry pursues homeopathic investigations with the scientific rigour characteristic of Cuban medicine. This presentation will include various double blind studies of patients on homeopathic vs. allopathic treatment, where homeopathy's usefulness and value will be demonstrated.

The first study of duodenal ulcer includes a treatment of 120 patients for 8 weeks and 52-week control follow-up of acid secretion in addition to follow-up with endoscopies at 4, 8, 26 and 52 weeks; also a reconsideration of the symptom progress, the scarring rate and the negativity rate of Helicobacter pylory. The second study focuses on the treatment of a Hepatitis-A outbreak, where 3 homeopathic drugs based on the epidemic genus were used on 351 patients, showing in patients treated with homeopathy an evident favourable progress, social impact and better quality of life compared to those treated with allopathic drugs. The third study looks at 67 patients with idiopathic ulcerative colitis treated with individualised homeopathic drugs and followed up for 5 years, with clinical, haematological, endoscopic and histological results. The results reveal, in most patients, better clinical-endoscopic progress compared to the group treated allopathically, and the prevention of dysplasia in all degrees.

Schlüsselwörter:

Kuba, Ulcus duodeni, Hepatitis A, Colitis ulcerosa.

Korrespondierender Autor: Dr. Jorge Luis Alvarez, Ave. Comandante Pinares 17, Entre Mar y Maximo Gomez, Pinar del Rio, Cuba
 
High-Priced Chemotherapy Treatments Bankrupting Families
for a Few Months of Low-Quality "Life"

Monday, October 20, 2008 by: David Gutierrez

(NaturalNews) The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) will soon encourage doctors to discuss the financial costs of chemotherapy as one of the side effects that patients should consider in deciding which treatment to proceed with, or whether to use treatment at all.

Many cancer patients know that they cannot be cured, but use drugs to seek a longer and higher quality life for the time that they have. For these patients in particular, the cost of drugs can be an important factor. Dr. Leonard Saltz of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center points to two different drugs for metastatic colon cancer, one of which costs $60,000 more than the other.

The more expensive drug does not cause hair loss, but can cause damage to hands and feet. While these alternate side effects are normally discussed with patients, many doctors feel uncomfortable discussing cost.

"These are awkward discussions," Dr. Allen Lichter of the American Society of Clinical Oncology said. "At least we can bring this out in the open."

Saltz also points to a pancreatic cancer drug that costs $4,000 per month, but only extends survival for an average of a few weeks.

"Is it a good investment, a high-risk investment, or buying a lottery ticket?" he asked.

The price of cancer drugs is rising at a rate of 15 percent per year, in particular as new and expensive biotechnology drugs hit the market. Some of these drugs may cost $100,000 or more for a course of treatment.

Not all drugs are created equal, and doctors need to be honest with patients about this, said Neal J. Meropol of the Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia and head of the panel writing the new ASCO guidelines.

"Chemotherapy is a fraud," said consumer health advocate Mike Adams. "Its main purpose is not to save lives but to generate profits for the drug companies. In order to protect these profits, the FDA and FTC routinely discredit safer, more natural and more affordable cancer cures that really work," Adams said.
 
Number of medicated kids jumps
Study finds increase in children being treated for chronic conditions such as diabetes

CHICAGO - More and more U.S. children are being given drugs to fight chronic
conditions such as asthma and hyperactivity, according to a study published
on Monday. From 2002 to 2005 prescriptions for medicines to treat type-2
diabetes doubled, asthma medications rose by more than 46 percent, medicines
for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder increased by more than 40
percent and prescriptions for cholesterol-lowering drugs were up by 15
percent.

The study was conducted by Emily Cox of Express Scripts Inc. in St. Louis, a
manager of pharmacy insurance benefit plans, Dr. Donna Halloran of the
Pediatric Research Institute in St. Louis, and Douglas Mager of the Kansas
Health Institute in Topeka.

In a report published in the November issue of Pediatrics, they said the
increases could mean that chronic conditions are on the rise.
But they said the trend could also reflect other factors such as changes in
the way doctors prescribe drugs and better screening that identifies more
chronic conditions.

In addition, the team said federal programs that encouraged research on
pediatric drugs resulted in "increased data on safety and efficacy in
children (that) likely provided physicians with a greater degree of
confidence to prescribe (such drugs)."

The findings were based on insurance claims for 3.2 million children aged 5
to 19.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27515989/
Yoga More Effective Treating Diabetes

Tuesday, November 04, 2008 by: Sheryl Walters

(NaturalNews) Diabetes is an increasingly common problem in society associated with insulin problems. Insulin causes the body's cells to take up glucose from the blood. Because of the standard Western diet that is high in sugar and dead carbohydrates that turn to sugar, the pancreas becomes exhausted and the cells are overworked. Type 1 diabetes occurs when there is a diminished production of insulin, and type 2 diabetes occurs when the cells become resistant to sugar. In addition to a transformation in diet, many studies show that the regular practice of yoga can have a dramatic effect on this lethal condition.

It is well established that exercise is vital for treating diabetes naturally. It is essential to lowering blood sugar levels naturally and maintaining optimum weight levels. Exercise is also an important natural treatment for heart disease, which is another common problem for people with diabetes. But there is something special about the ancient art of yoga. These postures have been used for millennia to treat a wide range of illnesses, and the effects seem to be as relevant today as ever. Performing yoga postures can help most people to control the causes of diabetes.

Two reasons that yoga is particularly great for diabetes is that it:

·Rejuvenates pancreatic cells, through alternate abdominal contractions and relaxation, during asanas (yogic postures which produce relaxation) and breathing exercises.

·Reduces blood sugar due to muscular exercise involved in the asanas.

Researchers at the Laboratory Division, Central Research Institute for Yoga, Delhi, India studied the effects of yoga on 149 non-insulin-dependent diabetics. Sixty-nine percent of the respondents showed a fair to good response. The researchers concluded that yoga was a simple and economical therapy useful for non-insulin dependent diabetics.

Another study at the Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences in New Delhi attempted to discover whether yoga postures could help diabetics release insulin from the pancreas. Twenty healthy young volunteers were given four sets of yoga postures to perform. The asanas given were:

1) Dhanurasana (bow pose)
Matsyendrasana (seated twist)

2) Halasana (plow pose)
Vajrasana (thunderbolt pose)

3) Naukasana (boat pose)
Bhujangasana (cobra pose)

4) Setubandhasana (bridge pose)
Pavanamuktasana (wind relieving pose)

Each volunteer practiced the above sets in random order for five days with a two day interval between consecutive sets of asanas. Blood tests showed that the cumulative effect of yoga led to improved "sensitivity of the b-Cells of the pancreas to the glucose signal."

A study published in the Nepal Medical College Journal put 20 diabetics on a 40 day yoga routine taught by an expert yoga teacher. The postures performed were:

oSurya Namaskar (sun salutation)
oTrikonasana (triangle pose)
oTadasana (mountain pose)
oSukhasana (easy pose)
oPadmasana (lotus pose)
oBhastrika Pranayama (breathing exercise)
oPashimottanasana (posterior stretch)
oArdhmatsyendrasana (half spinal twist)
oPawanmuktasana (joint freeing series)
oBhujangasana (cobra pose)
oVajrasana (thunderbolt pose)
oDhanurasana (bow pose)
oShavasana (corpse pose)

At the end of 40 days of yoga, most of the participants had a decrease in fasting glucose levels, a significant decrease in waist-hip ratio and beneficial changes in insulin levels.

Several studies have focused on why yoga is more profoundly successful in treating diabetes than other forms of exercise. One of the keys seems to come down to stress. Stress plays an important role in diabetes because it elevates blood glucose levels and increases the odds of developing certain complications, such as heart disease, stroke and infections. Yoga and meditation are undoubtedly two of the best practices for reducing stress.

M.V. Bhole and K.N. Udupa, two scientists who research yoga in India, have measured the effects of yoga on mental stresses. They have shown that yoga is more powerful in beneficial in treating stress than regular exercise because it begins to change one's attitude towards the situations of life by developing mental relaxation and balance.

In other studies, yoga dramatically lowers cortisol levels (the stress hormone) in the body.
Yoga More Effective Than Other Forms of Exercise in Treating Diabetes

 
Todays Cartoon
  cartoon

 
Quick Links

This mini-e-zine was brought to you by Abha Light Foundation. Visit our website

:: :: ::
You can visit our archive of previous mini-e-zines. click here

:: :: ::
Did you like this mini-e-zine? Why not forward it to a friend or two?
Forward this issue to a Friend

Disclaimer: The information contained within does not take the place of medical diagnosis or prescription. See your health care provider in case of sickness.