New Evidence
for Homeopathy
Two new studies conclude that a review which
claimed that homeopathy is just a placebo, published in The Lancet, was seriously flawed.
Press
Release For immediate release 3 November 2008
George Lewith, Professor of Health Research at Southampton University comments: "The review gave no indication of which trials were analysed nor of the various
vital assumptions made about the data. This is not usual scientific practice. If
we presume that homeopathy works for some conditions but not others, or
change the definition of a 'larger trial', the conclusions change. This
indicates a fundamental weakness in the conclusions: they are NOT
reliable."
The background to the ongoing debate is as follows:
In
August 2005, The Lancet published an editorial entitled 'The End of Homeopathy',
prompted by a review comparing clinical trials of homeopathy with trials of
conventional medicine. The claim that homeopathic medicines are just placebo was
based on 6 clinical trials of conventional medicine and 8 studies of
homeopathy but did not reveal the identity of these trials. The review was
criticised for its opacity as it gave no indication of which trials were
analysed and the various assumptions made about the data.
Sufficient
detail to enable a reconstruction was eventually published and two recently
published scientific papers based on such a reconstruction challenge the Lancet
review, showing that:
Analysis of all high quality trials of homeopathy
yields a positive conclusion. The 8 larger higher quality trials of homeopathy
were all for different conditions; if homeopathy works for some of these but not
others the result changes, implying that it is not placebo. The comparison
with conventional medicine was meaningless. Doubts remain about the opaque,
unpublished criteria used in the review, including the definition of 'higher
quality'.
The Lancet review, led by Prof Matthias Egger of the Department
of Social and Preventive Medicine at the University of Berne, started with 110
matched clinical trials of homeopathy and conventional medicine, reduced these
to 'higher quality trials' and then to 8 and 6 respectively 'larger higher
quality trials'. Based on these 14 studies the review concluded that there is 'weak evidence for a specific effect of homoeopathic remedies, but strong
evidence for specific effects of conventional interventions'.
There are a
limited number of homeopathic studies so it is quite possible to interpret these
data selectively and unfavourably, which is what appears to have been done in
the Lancet paper. If we assume that homeopathy does not work for just one
condition (Arnica for post-exercise muscle stiffness), or alter the definition
of 'larger trial', the results are positive. The comparison with conventional
medicine was meaningless: the original 110 trials were matched, but matching
was lost after they were reduced to 8 and 6. But the quality of homeopathic
trials was better than conventional trials. This reconstruction casts serious
doubts on the review, showing that it was based on a series of hidden judgments
unfavourable to homeopathy. An open assessment of the current evidence suggests
that homeopathy is probably effective for a number of conditions including
allergies, upper respiratory tract infections and 'flu, but more research is
desperately needed.
Prof Egger has declined to comment on these
findings.
References Lüdtke R, Rutten ALB. The conclusions on the
effectiveness of homeopathy highly depend on the set of analyzed trials. J
Clin Epidemiol 2008. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.015 Rutten ALB, Stolper
CF. The 2005 meta-analysis of homeopathy: the importance of post- publication
data. Homeopathy 2008. doi:10.1016/j.homp.2008.09.008.
|
Homeopathic Research: Cuba Cuba's Public Health System Before and
After the Introduction of Homeopathy: Patients on Homeopathic vs. Allopathic
Treatment
Pinar del Rio, Cuba (hpathy.com)
Abstract
Homeopathy was reintroduced
in Cuba in 1992. Since then, the Cuban Ministry of Public Health has made great
efforts in the development of homeopathy, as a diagnostic medical system based
on evidence. The Ministry pursues homeopathic investigations with the scientific
rigour characteristic of Cuban medicine. This presentation will include various
double blind studies of patients on homeopathic vs. allopathic treatment, where
homeopathy's usefulness and value will be demonstrated.
The first study
of duodenal ulcer includes a treatment of 120 patients for 8 weeks and 52-week
control follow-up of acid secretion in addition to follow-up with endoscopies at
4, 8, 26 and 52 weeks; also a reconsideration of the symptom progress, the
scarring rate and the negativity rate of Helicobacter pylory. The second study
focuses on the treatment of a Hepatitis-A outbreak, where 3 homeopathic drugs
based on the epidemic genus were used on 351 patients, showing in patients
treated with homeopathy an evident favourable progress, social impact and better
quality of life compared to those treated with allopathic drugs. The third study
looks at 67 patients with idiopathic ulcerative colitis treated with
individualised homeopathic drugs and followed up for 5 years, with clinical,
haematological, endoscopic and histological results. The results reveal, in most
patients, better clinical-endoscopic progress compared to the group treated
allopathically, and the prevention of dysplasia in all
degrees.
Schlüsselwörter:
Kuba, Ulcus duodeni, Hepatitis A,
Colitis ulcerosa.
Korrespondierender Autor: Dr. Jorge Luis Alvarez, Ave.
Comandante Pinares 17, Entre Mar y Maximo Gomez, Pinar del Rio, Cuba
|
High-Priced Chemotherapy Treatments Bankrupting
Families for a Few Months of Low-Quality "Life"
Monday, October 20, 2008 by: David
Gutierrez
(NaturalNews) The American Society of Clinical Oncology
(ASCO) will soon encourage doctors to discuss the financial costs of
chemotherapy as one of the side effects that patients should consider in
deciding which treatment to proceed with, or whether to use treatment at
all.
Many cancer patients know that they cannot be cured, but use drugs
to seek a longer and higher quality life for the time that they have. For these
patients in particular, the cost of drugs can be an important factor. Dr.
Leonard Saltz of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center points to two
different drugs for metastatic colon cancer, one of which costs $60,000 more
than the other.
The more expensive drug does not cause hair loss, but can
cause damage to hands and feet. While these alternate side effects are normally
discussed with patients, many doctors feel uncomfortable discussing
cost.
"These are awkward discussions," Dr. Allen Lichter of the American
Society of Clinical Oncology said. "At least we can bring this out in the
open."
Saltz also points to a pancreatic cancer drug that costs $4,000
per month, but only extends survival for an average of a few weeks.
"Is
it a good investment, a high-risk investment, or buying a lottery ticket?" he
asked.
The price of cancer drugs is rising at a rate of 15 percent per
year, in particular as new and expensive biotechnology drugs hit the market.
Some of these drugs may cost $100,000 or more for a course of
treatment.
Not all drugs are created equal, and doctors need to be honest
with patients about this, said Neal J. Meropol of the Fox Chase Cancer Center in
Philadelphia and head of the panel writing the new ASCO
guidelines.
"Chemotherapy is a fraud," said consumer health advocate Mike
Adams. "Its main purpose is not to save lives but to generate profits for the
drug companies. In order to protect these profits, the FDA and FTC routinely
discredit safer, more natural and more affordable cancer cures that really
work," Adams said.
|
|
Number of medicated kids jumps Study finds increase in children being treated for chronic conditions such as
diabetes
CHICAGO - More and more U.S. children are being given
drugs to fight chronic conditions such as asthma and hyperactivity, according
to a study published on Monday. From 2002 to 2005 prescriptions for medicines
to treat type-2 diabetes doubled, asthma medications rose by more than 46
percent, medicines for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder increased by
more than 40 percent and prescriptions for cholesterol-lowering drugs were up
by 15 percent.
The study was conducted by Emily Cox of Express Scripts
Inc. in St. Louis, a manager of pharmacy insurance benefit plans, Dr. Donna
Halloran of the Pediatric Research Institute in St. Louis, and Douglas Mager
of the Kansas Health Institute in Topeka.
In a report published in the
November issue of Pediatrics, they said the increases could mean that chronic
conditions are on the rise. But they said the trend could also reflect other
factors such as changes in the way doctors prescribe drugs and better
screening that identifies more chronic conditions.
In addition, the
team said federal programs that encouraged research on pediatric drugs
resulted in "increased data on safety and efficacy in children (that) likely
provided physicians with a greater degree of confidence to prescribe (such
drugs)."
The findings were based on insurance claims for 3.2 million
children aged 5 to 19.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27515989/
|
Yoga More
Effective Treating Diabetes
Tuesday,
November 04, 2008 by: Sheryl Walters
(NaturalNews) Diabetes is an
increasingly common problem in society associated with insulin problems. Insulin
causes the body's cells to take up glucose from the blood. Because of the
standard Western diet that is high in sugar and dead carbohydrates that turn to
sugar, the pancreas becomes exhausted and the cells are overworked. Type 1
diabetes occurs when there is a diminished production of insulin, and type 2
diabetes occurs when the cells become resistant to sugar. In addition to a
transformation in diet, many studies show that the regular practice of yoga can
have a dramatic effect on this lethal condition.
It is well established
that exercise is vital for treating diabetes naturally. It is essential to
lowering blood sugar levels naturally and maintaining optimum weight levels.
Exercise is also an important natural treatment for heart disease, which is
another common problem for people with diabetes. But there is something special
about the ancient art of yoga. These postures have been used for millennia to
treat a wide range of illnesses, and the effects seem to be as relevant today as
ever. Performing yoga postures can help most people to control the causes of
diabetes.
Two reasons that yoga is particularly great for diabetes is
that it:
·Rejuvenates pancreatic cells, through alternate abdominal
contractions and relaxation, during asanas (yogic postures which produce
relaxation) and breathing exercises.
·Reduces blood sugar due to muscular
exercise involved in the asanas.
Researchers at the Laboratory Division,
Central Research Institute for Yoga, Delhi, India studied the effects of yoga on
149 non-insulin-dependent diabetics. Sixty-nine percent of the respondents
showed a fair to good response. The researchers concluded that yoga was a simple
and economical therapy useful for non-insulin dependent
diabetics.
Another study at the Department of Physiology, All India
Institute of Medical Sciences in New Delhi attempted to discover whether yoga
postures could help diabetics release insulin from the pancreas. Twenty healthy
young volunteers were given four sets of yoga postures to perform. The asanas
given were:
1) Dhanurasana (bow pose) Matsyendrasana (seated
twist)
2) Halasana (plow pose) Vajrasana (thunderbolt pose)
3)
Naukasana (boat pose) Bhujangasana (cobra pose)
4) Setubandhasana
(bridge pose) Pavanamuktasana (wind relieving pose)
Each volunteer
practiced the above sets in random order for five days with a two day interval
between consecutive sets of asanas. Blood tests showed that the cumulative
effect of yoga led to improved "sensitivity of the b-Cells of the pancreas to
the glucose signal."
A study published in the Nepal Medical College
Journal put 20 diabetics on a 40 day yoga routine taught by an expert yoga
teacher. The postures performed were:
oSurya Namaskar (sun
salutation) oTrikonasana (triangle pose) oTadasana (mountain
pose) oSukhasana (easy pose) oPadmasana (lotus pose) oBhastrika
Pranayama (breathing exercise) oPashimottanasana (posterior
stretch) oArdhmatsyendrasana (half spinal twist) oPawanmuktasana (joint
freeing series) oBhujangasana (cobra pose) oVajrasana (thunderbolt
pose) oDhanurasana (bow pose) oShavasana (corpse pose)
At the end
of 40 days of yoga, most of the participants had a decrease in fasting glucose
levels, a significant decrease in waist-hip ratio and beneficial changes in
insulin levels.
Several studies have focused on why yoga is more
profoundly successful in treating diabetes than other forms of exercise. One of
the keys seems to come down to stress. Stress plays an important role in
diabetes because it elevates blood glucose levels and increases the odds of
developing certain complications, such as heart disease, stroke and infections.
Yoga and meditation are undoubtedly two of the best practices for reducing
stress.
M.V. Bhole and K.N. Udupa, two scientists who research yoga in
India, have measured the effects of yoga on mental stresses. They have shown
that yoga is more powerful in beneficial in treating stress than regular
exercise because it begins to change one's attitude towards the situations of
life by developing mental relaxation and balance.
In other studies, yoga
dramatically lowers cortisol levels (the stress hormone) in the body.
Yoga More Effective Than Other Forms of
Exercise in Treating Diabetes
|
Quick Links
This mini-e-zine was brought to you by Abha Light Foundation. Visit our website
:: :: ::
You can visit our archive of previous mini-e-zines. click here
:: :: ::
Did you like this mini-e-zine? Why not forward it to a friend or two?
|
|