January/2011
new logo
BOB Newsletter
Executive Search & Management Consulting Since 1979 
In This Issue
Current Searches
Which Way is Up?
Overcoming the Fear of Hiring
Fun Facts
Follow BOB

Elevator PitchElevator Pitch

linkedn logoyou tube icon

Quick Links
CURRENT SEARCHES
Please think of the excellent people you know who might be interested in hearing about these outstanding opportunities.  


Manufacturer of Complex Machined Aerospace Components

VP of Operations / Supply Chain
Manufacturer of Specialty Electrical Products  

VP of Business Development
Defense Communications Instruments

Producer of Engineered Control Products

Manufacturer of Precision Metal Components

Aerospace Machine Shop
 
Producer of Engineered Control Products
Aerospace Machining & Fabrication
Aerospace
Manufacturer of Assemblies & Kits

Aerospace Electronics Company
 
Director of Compensation, Benefits & HR
Producer of Aircraft for Private & Military Customers

Operations Manager
Machined
 Aerospace Components

Aerospace Manufacturer - Los Angeles

JOIN OUR LINKEDIN GROUPS! 

Simply click the logo to become a member of these growing professional networking groups on LinkedIn!
 

The Defense Executive Network

DEN logo

The Aerospace Executive Network

AEN logo

Meet The Principals
Mark Bregman
CEO

Mark Headshot


Michael Boyle
President
 Mike Headshot

Keith Ogata
Principal

Keith Headshot


More
Greetings!
Happy New Year! Did you make resolutions? This month's articles are about reframing - new ways to look at old experiences. We'll talk about how to have a positive experience in an employment review, and how to turn fear of hiring into comfort and confidence.
WHICH WAY IS UP?

Making Performance Reviews Count

 

Survey

How do you know if your employees are contributing to your company's success?  What do you look at in your performance reviews?  Most executives dread giving performance reviews. And the people receiving them don't exactly look forward to them either.  The biggest issue is that they are often meaningless - they don't really measure anything important, they don't add value, and they don't change the person's performance.  "End of year" reviews are common, so if you haven't done yours yet, here are some tips to improve the quality of your reviews and make them more meaningful for both you and the employee.

 

Prepare.  Don't wing it, or talk off-the-cuff, from a "gut level".  Have notes and really think through what you want to discuss.

 

Dialogue.  Don't talk at people. Most employees are asked to do their OWN review before the boss reviews them.  Read them, and ask questions on how your employee reached their conclusions, then really listen.  Meet them at their model of the world before imposing your own view.  Learn about any personal or "work/life balance" issues that could be impacting performance.

 

Talk big picture.  Don't focus on just one thing that is at the top of your mind, like one recent minor error.  Is the person contributing well overall?

 

Be balanced.  For most employees, you can talk about positives first, then discuss an equal amount of "developmental areas" - areas where your employee has room for improvement.  Remember that accuracy is important.  If your employee is either outstanding or a poor performer, appropriately discuss more of the positives or negatives, to ensure an accurate review.

 

Be constructive.  Telling someone "I need you to stop doing X" is not helpful.  Prescribe the behavior you DO want: "I'd like you to try to be more Y" - and give a concrete example.

 

Don't wait for once a year.   Review time shouldn't be the first time your employee hears from you.  Give feedback continuously.  Experts believe brief monthly reviews are the best interval.

 

And the number one thing you can do to improve reviews:

 

Be specific.  Without goals to measure against, all you really can review are behaviors that are out of context.  Provide that context by giving each person specific measurable performance objectives at the beginning of the year, and your reviews will be more meaningful and go much easier next year.

 

OVERCOMING THE FEAR OF HIRING
Business Man Afraid

Many surveys have shown that two-thirds of hiring managers fear making a bad mistake in hiring. They know mistakes are expensive, and they know mistakes will reflect badly on them. Some of the best performing company executives are actually very poor at interviewing and evaluating candidates. Some consider themselves "bullet proof" and trust their gut, often making a decision about a person within the first five minutes. Others wear their fear on their sleeve, with a checklist of attributes so long, it is easy for a candidate to be deselected - ruled out instead of ruled in. Still others act like a divorced spouse - evaluating candidates based on the mistakes of the person they just let go. These tactics are counterproductive and often lead to hiring mistakes, which in turn lead to greater fear the next time.

The candidate experience also reflects this problem. Many high level candidates report to us that they weren't really "interviewed" or evaluated by a top exec - that the interviewer merely swapped stories and told them about the job and company.

Eliminating the Fear

The best way to get rid of fear in hiring is to have a candidate evaluation process that enables you to proceed with confidence and comfort that you can find the right person. Here are a few key tips to make this happen:

Begin with the End in Mind. Fast forward to one year after the hire. How will you know if the person you hired has done a good job? Use the same criteria to evaluate the person's capability up front.

Be Specific. We say this a lot, because it is so important. Behavioral or competency based interviewing doesn't work without context. "Give me an example of your leadership ability" allows rehearsed, meaningless answers. "What is there in your background to prepare you to transform my culture to a customer-centric organization?" will give you much more relevant information on which to base a hiring decision. Use these performance-based questions to get meaningful answers.

Define the Fit. A pattern of specific questions based on what you actually need the person to accomplish - the specific tangible performance objectives - will give you answers that will tell you if the person is really a fit for the job.

Excellence vs. Mediocrity. A nice bonus to the performance-based process we advocate is that it helps you easily spot excellence. Mediocre candidates will not be able to give you meaningful answers to performance-based questions. Excellent candidates will not only be able to give meaty answers; you will see the excitement and enthusiasm they have, as they describe these substantive positive experiences. The candidate's true personality comes out as they describe their behavioral traits in context of their accomplishments.

Try this approach and you will find it leads to a much higher level of confidence and comfort in evaluating candidates, and by eliminating hiring mistakes, you eliminate the fear.

JOIN OUR NEW LINKEDIN GROUP! 
adhr lOGO The Aerospace & Defense HR Network 
Last year we started two groups on LinkedIn, The Defense Executive Network and The Aerospace Executive Network (now with over 1,000 members).  The wild success and valuable connections seen on these two groups encouraged us to create The Aerospace & Defense HR Network (ADHR), a group designed to facilitate networking amongst HR, Talent Acquisition and Organizational Management Executives within the Aerospace and Defense industries.

Click here to add our group to your profile.

FUN FACTS 

Just 22 percent of all positions with an annual compensation of $200,000 or more are posted on job boards or websites, according to 697 search-firm consultants and HR leaders.  That figure is down from 24 percent in 2009 and 30 percent in 2008.

Execunet.com, Norwalk Conn.

 

Fewer than half (47 percent) of 2,311 workers surveyed say they almost always leave their desks to take lunch breaks each day.

Right Management, Philadelphia

 

A survey of more than 2,500 hiring managers reveals that failure to make eye contact (67 percent), lack of smile (38 percent) and fidgeting too much (33 percent) would make them less likely to hire someone. 

Careerbuilder.com, July 2010

 

The biggest investment challenges facing organizations over the next 10 years are obtaining human capital and optimizing human capital investments (47%), obtaining financial capital and optimizing financial capital investments (29%), and obtaining intellectual capital and optimizing intellectual capital investments (12%).

SHRM.org, 2010

 Visit Our Blog:

Blog logo-small