Seller S listed her home for sale with REALTORŪ B. The property was priced reasonably and REALTORŪ B was confident it would sell quickly. The listing agreement included the seller's authorization for publication in the MLS and authority to disclose the existence of offers to prospective
purchasers. Within days, REALTORŪ B had shown the property to several prospective purchasers and one of them, Buyer Z, wrote a purchase offer at close to the asking price. REALTORŪ B called Seller S to make an appointment to present the offer. After hanging up with Seller S, REALTORŪ B received another call, this time from REALTORŪ A. REALTORŪ A explained that he represented a buyer who was interested in making an offer on Seller S's property.
REALTORŪ A explained that while his buyer-client was quite interested in the property, price was also a concern. He asked REALTORŪ B if there were other offers on the property, indicating that his buyerclient would likely make a higher offer if there were competing offers on the table. REALTORŪ B responded telling REALTORŪ A, "That's confidential information. Please tell your client to make his best offer." Taken aback by REALTORŪ B's comments, REALTORŪ A shared them with his buyer-client, who chose not to make an offer and instead pursued other properties.
Buyer Z's offer was accepted by Seller S later that evening and, sometime later, the transaction closed. Several months afterward, Seller S and REALTORŪ A met at a social event. REALTORŪ A related his conversation with REALTORŪ B. Seller S asked REALTORŪ A if he thought that REALTORŪ A's buyerclient would have made an offer on Seller S's home absent REALTORŪ B's refusal to disclose whether there were other offers pending. REALTORŪ A responded that it was impossible to tell for certain, but his buyer-client had certainly not been favorably impressed by REALTORŪ B's response to a seemingly routine question. Seller S subsequently filed an ethics complaint against REALTORŪ B alleging violation of Article 1 as interpreted by Standard of Practice 1-15. He noted that he had clearly authorized REALTORŪ B to disclose to buyers and cooperating brokers the existence of pending offers and that REALTORŪ B's arbitrary refusal to share information he was authorized to share could have been the reason, or part of the reason, why REALTORŪ A's client had chosen not to make an offer on Seller S's home. REALTORŪ B defended his actions indicating that while he agreed that he had an obligation to
promote Seller S's interests, his obligation to REALTORŪ A and to REALTORŪ A's buyer-client was simply to be honest. He had not, in any fashion, misrepresented the availability of Seller S's property.
Rather, he had simply told REALTORŪ A to encourage his client to make her best offer. "I'm not required to turn every sale into an auction, am I?" he asked rhetorically. "I feel that I treated all parties honestly and fairly," he concluded.