Friday 6th November 2009
Clear Directions
In This Issue
Quote for Consideration
Financial Topic Demystified - Currency Hedging
Fascinating Financial Fact - Vanguard's Index Chart
Market News
Debt Recycling - a useful strategy as long as you know how much debt is enough
Eureka Report articles
From the Archives - Transition to Retirement
Three Factor Model in Action
Case Study - Changes to the definition of income for some government payments income tests
Other resource of interest
Quick Links
 
How can we improve our emails?
We value your input.
 
Click on the following link to be taken to be taken to our feedback forum. 
 
Provide a suggestion or cast your vote towards suggestions made by other subscribers.
 
Financial Fortnight emails feedback forum
 

Forward this issue to a Friend

Greetings! 
Top 

Welcome to the latest edition of A Clear Direction's email newsletter.

2009 has been a tumultous year for the global economy and more specifically investment markets.  Interest in our approach to financial and investment planning has driven strong growth for the business with a side effect being a less than consistent delivery of our email newsletter.  In order to rectify this situation we will be reducing the number of newsletters published to one per month.
 

A consequence of this decision is that the name of our newsletter needs to change.  For the time being the newsletter will be titled Clear Directions.

Since that last edition, equity markets had continued to provide solid gains with Australian and global economic indicators on the improve before the recent period of softening returns.  We provide the updated data in our market news section.
 
One particular area of interest at present is the strength of the Aussie dollar.  We look at this issue by demystifying Currency Hedging in this edition.

Also in this edition we:
  • provide a link to Scott Francis' latest Eureka Report articles,
  • link to Vanguard's updated Index Chart and their latest series of video pieces, and
  • provide evidence of the three factor model in action.
Enjoy the read!!

A Quote for Consideration 

"Success in investing doesn't correlate with I.Q. once you're above the level of 25. Once you have ordinary intelligence, what you need is the temperament to control the urges that get other people into trouble in investing."

Warren Buffett
 
Financial Topic Demystified 
Currency Hedging
 
It was interesting to look back at the corresponding edition last year - 30th October 2008.  In that edition we were looking at exchange rate movements with some talk in the press about the Australian dollar reaching parity with the US dollar.  Well we now know that it nearly got there reaching a peak of 98 cents in July 2008.  By October 2008 it was sitting around the 60 cent mark as investors took flight back to the safe haven US dollar and now it has risen strongly back to just over 90 US cents to the Aussie.
 
In this edition we revisit the relationship between the Australian dollar and other currencies and how movement in the Australian dollar impacts on investments.
 
The recent movements in the Australian dollar compared to other currencies has seen a significant appreciation in value across the board.  Since markets turned at the beginning of March we have seen it increase:
- 43% against the US Dollar
- 21% against the UK pound sterling
- 20% against the Euro
- 31% against the Japanese Yen
- 29% against the Trade Weighted Index
 
There can be many reasons for movements in the value of a currency but the basic story is about supply and demand.  Since December 1983 Australia has used a floating exchange system.  Under this system changes in demand and supply of a currency affect its value.  Demand for the Aussie dollar is affected by
- financial flows into Australia from overseas investors which in turn is affected by the level of interest rates and level of confidence in the economy,
- expectations of a future appreciation in the $A will increase demand by speculators,
demand for Australian exports
 
Supply on the other hand is represented by:
- financial flows out of Australia
- speculators expecting the $A to go down
- demand for imports
 
Given the recent appreciation of the $A there appears to be greater pressures on the demand side of the currency which has forced the exchange rate upwards.  A couple of key theories that are being suggested as a cause:

i)The Aussie dollar is seen as a commodity currency as the Australian economy is heavily reliant on the sale of commodities.  As the prices for these commodities rise so to does the exchange rate.

ii)The Reserve Bank has started to lift interest rates and our rates are much higher than other developed economies such as the UK, US & Japan.  The "Carry Trade" seeks out currencies with higher interest rates which increases the demand for the Australian dollar.
 
These are reasonably simplistic economic theories but seem to make sense given the current markets.
 
What Does This All Mean for Investors?

For mainstream investors (who are not trading currencies) the major implication of changes in exchange rates for investors is that it changes the value of international investments in terms of Australian dollars.  If you bought investments in the US at the beginning of March one $A would have bought you 63.26 US cents of investments.  If you wanted to convert those 63.26 cents back into $A now you would have been able to buy 69.87 Australian cents (at the exchange rate of 90.54).  Without taking into account investment returns and transaction costs you would have lost 30.13 cents on the original dollar.
 
If the dollar was falling in value the opposite would be true leading to a gain.
 
So over the past few months while share markets around the world have been rising strongly, unhedged international share investments have faired worse compared to Australian share investments.

Now if we turned our attention to annual returns to the end of June, an unhedged exposure would have faired much better.
 
Should you be moving to currency hedged international investments?
 
To protect against the negative impact of an appreciation in the Australian dollar compared to other currencies you may think that it is a good idea to employ currency hedging.  What this does is to take out the impact of currency movement.  For example, in US dollar terms the S&P 500 total return has been 49% since the beginning of the turn in markets.  If you had currency hedging in place you would have realised all of that gain whereas with no hedging you would have lost a major part of that gain.
 
This suggests it is a simple decision - put in place hedging when the currency is rising and remove hedging when the Aussie dollar is falling.
 
Unfortunately the ability to accurately time currency movements is even more difficult then trying to time share market movements.

We try not to make bets regarding the movement of ths dollar against other currencies but would throw in this point, with the Aussie dollar fetching over 90 US cents we are at a level well below average.  Since 1983 when the dollar was floated the average rate has been 72 cents.  In recent years this average has tended to be just under 82 cents.  Either way, by locking into a hedged exposure at this point in time you are locking in at a currency level higher than average.  The odds would suggest that it is more likely that the Aussie dollar will fall rather than rise in value over time and this might suggest that now is not the time to be putting in place currency hedged international investments.
 
Our Approach to Currency Hedging
 
In line with our overall philosophy towards investment markets, we do not believe you can time when exchange rates will rise or fall.  Therefore, our philosophy is to incorporate hedged investments in our high yield investments - international fixed interest and listed property.  This protects these more regular and higher income sources from exchange rate movements.  However we also look to expose investment portfolios to some exchange rate risk and diversification through using un-hedged international share funds.
 
This strategy worked well through 2008 but of course does not look so good when the Aussie dollar is rising in value.  Over the long term currencies will fluctuate in value so that there should be no significant difference between holding a hedged v unhedged position.  The only real difference should be the slight extra cost involved with paying for the currency hedging.
 
in a nutshell, as with all investment decisions it really comes down to the individual requirements of each client.
Fascinating Financial Fact

Vanguard's Index Chart

Vanguard have updated their index chart with data up to the end of June 2009.  This is a really useful resource to look at the movement in various asset classes over the past 31 years.

Over that period the averages have been:
- Australian shares 15.0%
- International shares (unhedged) 12.7%
- International shares (hedged) - 10.0%
- US Shares - 14.6%
- Australian Bonds - 9.8%
- Cash - 9.7%

Some might think the average returns from cash look high but keep in mind that this 31 year period included the 80s and early 90s when cash rates were at times in the mid to high teens.

The numbers do remind that there has been a premium for investing in growth assets such as Australian and international shares keeping in mind the following best and worst years as an indication of volatility:
- Australian shares (Best 74.3%) (Worst -29.0%)
- International shares (unhedged) (Best 72.7%) (Worst -23.5%)
- International shares (hedged) (Best 49.6%) (Worst -26.6%)
- US Shares (Best 88.4%) (Worst -26.3%)
- Australian Bonds (Best 25.6%) (Worst -5.1%)
- Cash (Best 18.5%) (Worst 4.7%)

Please clink on the following link to view Vanguard's Index Chart  for yourself.
Return to Top

Market News

 

ASX P/E Ratio and Dividend Yields

 

The P/E ratio is a common broad indicator of the price of shares.  It is a calculation of the price of shares compared to expected earnings.   A higher ratio indicates that share prices are more expensive.  The historical P/E ratio for the ASX has been between 14 & 15.  The dividend yield is the calculation of dividend payments divided by the market capitalisation of the company or index.  The historical average in Australia is around 4%.

 

As of October 27th the P/E ratio for the S&P/ASX 200 was 15.16.  The dividend yield was 3.77%.


Volatility Index (VIX)

 

Another index we are keeping an eye on in the USA is the CBOE Volatility Index.  This index purports to be a key measure of market expectations of near term volatility conveyed by the S&P 500 share index.  The higher the level of index, the higher are expectations for volatility in the S&P 500 index.  For more information on how the VIX is calculated please take a look at  - www.cboe.com/micro/vix/introduction.aspx

 

The close for the VIX on the 30th of October was at a level of 30.69.  This is slightly higher than the 12 month closing low of 20.69 but well off the 12 month closing high of  80.86.  (The latest close on the 5th of November was 25.43) 

 

Market Indices

 

 

October

Since Start of 2009

1 Year

3 Year

5 Year

10 Year

Australian Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

S&P - ASX 200 (accum)

-3.53%

27.86%

19.59%

-1.04%

8.52%

NA *

International Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

MSCI World - Ex Australia

-2.23%

17.83%

11.98%

-7.53%

1.84%

-0.52%

MSCI Emerging Markets

-0.38%

51.24%

51.93%

6.67%

15.78%

11.53%

Property

 

 

 

 

 

 

S&P - REIT (accum)

-8.83%

4.60%

-7.92%

-21.81%

-7.22%

3.39%

S&P/Citigroup Global REIT - Ex Australia - World - AUD

-4.74%

-6.47%

-18.59%

-17.76%

-2.83%

6.61%

Currency

 

 

 

 

 

 

US Exchange Rate

4.09%

32.23%

37.14%

6.00%

4.19%

3.58%

Trade Weighted Index

3.70%

27.16%

29.22%

3.36%

2.50%

2.41%

 * - Data unavailable as ASX 200 only commenced on 31st March 2000

 

General News
 
The following major economic parameters have been announced since the previous edition:
  • RBA have increased official interest rates to 3.50% at the November board meeting.
  • CPI (Inflation) rose by 1% in the September quarter and 1.3% for the year.
  • Business confidence has risen to its highest level in 7 years for the September quarter.
  • Westpac-Melbourne Institue Consumer confidence index has risen for the 5th straight month in October.
  • Housing affordability has worsened through the September quarter.
  • Retail sales have fallen in September.
  • Investor sentiment has continued to rise according to the IFSA / Core Data index.

Return to Top

Debt Recycling - a useful strategy as long as you know how much debt is enough
Scott's Financial Happenings Blog - Posted Sunday 1 November
 
For those investors who are open to using debt in their situation to build wealth the implementation of a debt recycling strategy may be of value.

A Debt recycling strategy is where home owners with a mortgage transfer debt from the non tax deductible home loan to a tax deductible investment loan through the course of paying down the home loan.

The benefit of the strategy is that interest payments on the investment loan are able to be deducted from investment income when it comes to income tax time each year.  In essence, by doing this you are seeking the assistance of the federal government to help build your pool of financial assets.

Is it a good idea for everyone?

Definitely not.  The first key step is to undertake a stress test of your current debt position.  In its simplest form this means looking at the impact on your your cash flow should interest rates rise.  Will you still be able to make loan repayments if interest rates rise to certain levels.  This is very pertinent at the moment as more and more commentary suggests that the Reserve Bank will lift interest rates by 2% over the course of the next 12 to 18 months.  i actually think you should stress test your situation in case rates rise by 3 or 4% to be even more comfortable that you are not holding too much debt.  See the problem becomes that should interest rates rise to levels where you are unable to make loan repayments you will most likely be forced to sell.  If interest rates have risen by significant amounts there is a good chance that this will be exactly the time you do not want to sell.

(To add another layer of complexity, it is also worth contemplating what would be the situation if you lost income for whatever reason for a period of time - cut back in hours, ill health, retrenchment - how long could you continue to make repayments on a particular loan value - but lets leave this for another blog.)

Once you have gone through this exercise and decided that you could afford to maintain $X amount of debt even if interest rates rose to a level well above say 10%, you could possibly be looking at a strategy of once paying down so that you home loan is now less than $X every extra dollar you pay off the loan is used to increase an investment loan which is used to invest in other growth assets like shares and listed property.

Is it a good time to invest in shares and listed property?

The next question that should be asked is whether now is a good time to loan money to invest in shares.  With interest rates at between 5 & 6% the odds are in your favour because over the long term shares have provided a return of between 6 & 7% above inflation.  So if the Reserve Bank is targetting inflation of 2 to 3% this suggests that shares should provide a return of 8 to 10% over the long term.  Wo this comparison looks pretty positive.  However as interest rates start to rise in the economy the differential between the cost of the loan and the likely return from the investments starts to narrow and the likelihood of success also narrows.

Now in the interests of providing a full and frank viewpoint, some will suggest that maybe the risk premium for investing in shares is higher than historical levels.  This is saying that the current risks involved with investing in shares, which we have been all clearly reminded off through 2008 and early 2009, may be more than usual and therefore investors expect a higher return than the 6 or 7% premium above inflation.  The period March to September 2009 would suggest this has been the case but we can not be certain that such conditions will continue going forward.

On the opposing side are those that suggest that the world economy is in the middle of an L or W shaped cycle where there is at best a long period of little growth ahead of us or at worst we are in a bear market rally with bad conditions still to be faced.

What do I think?

I claim no ability to predict the future so for me it comes down to this question -

Do you need to take on extra risks to reach your financial goals or are there other strategies at your disposal through cost reductions and the like?
If you don't need to use debt than don't.  If you do, then seriously weigh up the possible outcomes and limit the use of debt to the minimum.

As always the decision comes down to each person's individual circumstances.  If you are thinking of using this strategy it would be very wise to first consult a financial adviser for guidance.

Following up from my previous blog - MLC have a useful case study on their website which explains the strategy of debt recycling.  It is worth a look for those who might be contemplating this approach - MLC Debt Recycling page.

Regards,
Scott Keefer

Other blogs since the last edition have included:
 
7th October
8th October
 
22nd October
 
25th October
 
27th October
 
31st October
Eureka Report Articles

Since our last edition Scott Francis has contributed another six articles to Alan Kohler's Eureka Report.  Click on the link below to be taken to this item:
 

14 September -  What about me? I want my share - Rights issues that put retail investors on the same footing as institutions would be fairer and should be the template for capital raisings. 
 
28 September
 -  
Winning in the retirement risk zone - Minor changes to retirement plans can have a big impact on your situation.

 
14 October - Why executive pay doesn't matter (to shareholders) - Fat pay packets for chief executives have little effect on share prices or earnings.
 
28 October - Buffett's three commandments - Heeding the Gospel according to Warren would have helped investors avoid crippling losses.
 
Case Study - Changes to the definitions of income  in relation to some government payments income test
 
Since the 1st of July, changeds to the definition of income have come into force and may impact you if you ar receiving government payments.  The key changes are that the following are now included as income under some tests:
1. reportable superannuation contributions
2. total net investment losses from rental property and financial investment income
 
So what are these two items and who will be affected?
 
The following is taken directly from Centrelink's website - http://www.centrelink.gov.au/internet/internet.nsf/factors/changes_def_income.htm

Reportable superannuation contributions
Reportable superannuation contributions include discretionary superannuation contributions. These are also referred to as concessional or before-tax contributions. For example:
- voluntary salary sacrificed superannuation contributions made by you or on your behalf by your employer. These contributions are above what is required by law, such as the industrial award or the superannuation guarantee levy (currently 9%)
- total superannuation contributions made by you as a self-employed person, for which you can claim a tax deduction.
 
Centrelink does not need to know the balance or value of your superannuation, or the difference between year-to-year dividends from your superannuation provider. Personal post-tax contributions are not included as a reportable superannuation contribution.

If you receive any of the affected payments, you must include reportable superannuation contributions when estimating your income to Centrelink or the Family Assistance Office for the 2009/2010 financial year and subsequent years.

Who will be affected?
From 1 July 2009 customers that may be affected by this change include: Families customers who receive:
Baby Bonus
Child Care Benefit or
Family Tax Benefit.
 
The income test for Family Tax Benefit, Child Care Benefit and Baby Bonus is based on your and your partner's (if applicable) combined adjusted taxable income.
You will be required to include reportable superannuation contributions and total net investment losses when you next report your income to Centrelink or the Family Assistance Office. This will ensure you receive the correct rate of payment.
 
Income support customers under age pension age who receive:
ABSTUDY
Austudy
Bereavement Allowance
Carer Payment
Disability Support Pension
Low Income Health Care Card
Newstart Allowance
Parenting Payment Partnered
Parenting Payment Single
Partner Allowance
Sickness Allowance
Special Benefit
Widow Allowance
Widow B Pension
Wife Pension, or
Youth Allowance.
 
If you receive any of the affected payments you are required to include any reportable superannuation contributions when you next report your income to Centrelink. Your partner's income (if applicable) will also need to include any reportable superannuation contributions.

Note: If you are on an income support payment, the income test is not based on taxable income but on the current rate of ordinary income. Ordinary income is income from all sources except those payments that qualify as either exempt lump sums or child support.
Exempt lump sums are defined by their characteristics. They are unlikely to be repeated, they are not expected or anticipated and there is no receipt of money for services rendered directly or indirectly.

Dependent youth, students and apprentices who receive:
ABSTUDY Living Allowance
Assistance for Isolated Children Scheme (Additional Boarding Allowances), or
Youth Allowance.
 
If you receive any of these affected payments, your eligibility and rate of payment is partially determined by your parent or guardians' income. This is known as the parental means test and is based on assessable income for a particular financial year. You will be required to include additional information on reportable superannuation contributions when declaring parental income to Centrelink for the 2009/2010 financial year.

Commonwealth Seniors Health Card (CSHC) holders

You will be required to provide information on reportable superannuation contributions to satisfy the CSHC income test requirements. Centrelink will write to all CSHC customers after 1 July 2009 to ask if they have income from total net investment losses.

Total net losses from rental property and financial investment income
From 1 July 2009, total net investment losses will be included as income and used to work out eligibility for some Centrelink and Family Assistance Office payments. Centrelink and the Family Assistance Office already include the amount lost from rental properties in assessable income for affected payments. Together, net losses from rental properties and net losses from financial investment are known as total net investment losses.

If you expect to make a loss from rental property income, financial investment income, or both, you need to give details of the total amount of losses. It is important that you record losses from investment earnings only, not capital losses. Investment earning includes taxable and tax-exempt interest, dividends and rental income.
 
Who will be affected?
From 1 July 2009 customers affected by this change may include:
 
Families customers who receive either:
Child Care Benefit
Baby Bonus, or
Family Tax Benefit.
 
Families customers will be required to include total net investment losses when they next report their income to Centrelink or the Family Assistance Office. This will ensure they receive the correct rate of payment.

Dependent youth, students and apprentices who receive:
ABSTUDY Living Allowance
Austudy
Assistance for Isolated Children Scheme (Additional Boarding Allowance) or
Youth Allowance.
 
If you receive any of these affected payments, your eligibility and rate of payment is partially determined by your parent or guardians' income. This is known as the parental means test and is based on assessable income for a particular financial year. You will be required to include additional information on total net investment losses when declaring parental income to Centrelink for the 2009/2010 financial year.

Commonwealth Seniors Health Card (CSHC) holders
You will be required to provide additional information on total net investment losses to satisfy the CSHC income test requirements. Centrelink will write to all CSHC customers after 1 July 2009 to ask if they have income from total net investment losses.

For more information please take a look at
 
 
Return to Top
Other resource of interest - Vanguard Investment Videos

Vanguard have recently released a range of videos providing updates on the following market sectors:
 
 
They are a bit of a marketing plug for the Vanguard funds but do give a handy summary of recent events in relation to these sectors.
Return to Top
From the Archives
Transition to Retirement - Eureka Report article - 15th January 2007  
 
PORTFOLIO POINT: Transition to retirement plans offer significant tax savings, including by drawing on super savings to increase super contributions.
 
Three Factor Model in Action 
Dimensional Fund Performance Graphs updated to the end of September 2009
 
Since our last edition we have updated the Dimensional Fund Performance Graphs page on our website.  The graphs show the performance of the Dimensional funds that we use to build investment portfolios for our clients.  They have been updated to contain data up until the end of September 2009.
 
Commentary:
 
The graphs show strong monthly returns over the month for the Australian share asset classes with international share investments relatively flat for the month mainly due to the impact of currency movements.
 
Over the long run, the graphs continue to clearly show the existence of the risk premiums (small, value and emerging markets) that the research tells us should exist.
 
Australian Share Trusts - 7 Year returns:
 

 

7 Yr Return

to Sept 2009

Premium over ASX 200

Accumulation Index

ASX 200 Accumulation Index

13.46%

-

Dimensional Australian Value Trust

16.17%

2.71%

Dimensional Australian Small Company Trust

16.65%

3.19%

 
International Share Trusts - 7 Year returns:
 

 

7 Yr Return

to Sept 2009

Premium over MSCI World (ex Australia) Index

MSCI World (ex Australia) Index

1.96%

-

Dimensional Global Value Trust

4.16%

2.20%

Dimensional Global Small Company Trust

5.14%

3.18%

Dimensional Emerging Markets Trust

15.26%

13.30%


NB - These premiums are higher than what we would expect going forward.
 
Please click on the following link to be taken to the graphs - Dimensional Fund Performance Graphs.
 
For anyone new to our website, it is important to point out that we build investment portfolios for clients based on the best available academic research.  Take a look at our Building Portfolios and Our Research Based Approach pages for more details.  In our view, this research compels us to use the three factor model developed by Fama and French.  In Australia, the most effective method of investing using this model is through trusts implemented by Dimensional Fund Advisors (www.dfaau.com).  We do not receive any form of commission or payment from Dimensional for using their trusts.  We use them because they provide the returns clients are entitled to from share markets.
 
However, academic theory is nothing if it can not be implemented and provide the returns that are promised by the research.  Therefore, we like to provide the historical returns of the funds that we use to build investment portfolios.

Please let us know if you have any feedback regarding these graphs by using the Request for More Information form to the right or via our User Voice feedback forum.
 
Requesting feedback 
   

We encourage subscribers to ask questions or make comments either directly by sending an email to our email address: financialfortnight@acleardirection.com.au or by engaging with our feedback site:

 

Financial Fortnight Feedback Forum

 

After clicking on the link you will be taken to our Financial Fortnight User Voice page.  On that page you will be able to provide suggestions or vote on suggestions that have been made by other subscribers.  By submitting an idea, you enable other users to view your idea and add their vote if they think it is worthwhile.  By casting your vote you are telling us whether you think the ideas are worthy and which ideas should be implemented first.

 
We welcome your feedback. 
 
I hope you have enjoyed reading the latest edition.  If you have any comments or suggestions for future topics please do not hesitate to get in contact.
 
Have a great fortnight!
 
Cheers,
Scott Keefer
 

The Financial Fortnight is a publication of A Clear Direction Financial Planning.  It contains general financial advice.  Readers should check this advice with a professional financial adviser before acting on any of the material contained in this email.

Scott Keefer
1 Park Road - PO Box 1688
Milton QLD 4064
(07) 3876 6223

A Clear Direction Financial Planning is an Authorised Representative (No. 329574)

of FYG Planners Pty Ltd ABN 55 094 972 540

Australian Financial Services Licensee (No. 224543)

Registered Office: Level 1, 10 Wilson Street Burnie Tas 7320