Monahan & Cohen
Special Education ENews  
 
Local and National News  
May 17, 2011- Vol 31 Issue 1

From the Desk of Matt Cohen

matt standingWelcome to Monahan and Cohen's newsletter dedicated to bringing you Special Education, Disability Rights and Mental Health Law information  from both the national and local levels.  


                                                                               Sincerely,
                                                                                             Matt Cohen  

What Lessons Are Our Children Really Learning? 

Saturday, May 14, 2011

What lessons are our children really learning? It is time to break the code of silence and the phony outcomes game!

Jimmy has disabilities and struggles at school, but had never been evaluated for special education. Some kids that live near him were bullying him, before, during and after school. His parents complained to the school staff, but little was done..... and he became more and more upset. In an apparent effort to deal with the bullying at school, a speaker was brought in to address all the students about bullying. At the end of the speech, he offered the students his email so they could write him. The next day, Jimmy wrote that he was being bullied and was not getting protected and was having suicidal thoughts. The speaker told the Principal, who called the parents and suggested that Jimmy be hospitalized. When Jimmy returned to school, little changed...... to read the rest of this blog go to http://disablethelabels.blogspot.com/2011/05/what-lessons-are-our-children-really.html#comments

10 Common Myths That Some Schools Purvey

 
  

After working in special education law for more than 30 years, I have found that some schools don't always follow the letter and spirit of the law when it comes to providing accommodations and services for children protected under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (the IDEA, the law governing special ed) and Section 504. The bottom line: Because your special needs child doesn't receive some or any of the educational assistance he deserves, he may find school more challenging or even experience failure, rather than success.

 

    Here are 10 common myths that some schools purvey, either through ignorance or in an attempt to discourage parents from receiving help they are legally entitled to. Remember parents: Knowledge is power.

 

1)   Myth:  ADHD is not a real disorder and does not qualify as a disability.  

Reality: ADHD is among the most thoroughly researched and documented psychiatric disorders, and the U.S. Department of Education has expressly recognized that students with ADHD may qualify for special education (and an IEP to implement their program) under the Other Health Impaired (OHI) Category or a Section 504 plan, even if they don't qualify for an IEP through special education.

 

2)  Myth:  Students with ADHD may only qualify for a Section 504 plan, not an IEP, particularly if they are getting passing grades or adequate achievement scores. 
 

Reality:  Students diagnosed with ADHD can qualify for an IEP if their AD/HD adversely affects educational performance (including social and behavioral performance), and requires special education (including modifying the content, method or mode of delivery of regular instruction,). Special education can be delivered in a regular education classroom. The OHI category of IDEA expressly lists ADHD as one of the Health Impairments that may qualify for special education.   Further, a student with AD/HD may qualify for an IEP even if they are getting passing grades and have good achievement scores, if they are having other serious difficulties at school.

 

3)  Myth:  Students with ADHD can only qualify for an IEPor a Section 504 plan if they are failing or if they have below average achievement test scores.   
 
Reality: Students with ADHD may be eligible under either law if their symptoms affect their performance at school, including problems with organizational skills, time management, behavior and social skills, or even regularly talking without being called on. Failing grades and low achievement scores may be evidence of impairment, but are not the only factors to consider. IEPs should not only identify accommodations or related services to address the student's needs, but also goals for the student to improve the behaviors that result from the ADHD, such as time management problems or being off-task.

 

4)  Myth:  To be eligible for special education or Section 504 plan, the student must be diagnosed with ADHD by a physician.  
 
Reality: While best-practice evaluations of ADHD recognize the importance of comprehensive medical and psychological evaluation of a student suspected of having ADHD, the Department of Education has issued a policy statement stating that if the IEP team includes persons the school believes are qualified to diagnose ADHD-a psychologist trained to evaluate ADHD-a medical evaluation is not legally required.  

 

5)  Myth:  Schools may require a medical diagnosis of ADHD at parent expense prior to proceeding with an evaluation for special education or a Section 504 plan.   
 
Reality: If a school requires or recommends a medical, psychiatric, or neurological evaluation as part of the evaluation process to determine eligibility for special education or a 504 plan, the medical evaluation must be at no cost to the parent. The school must pay for it.

   

6)  Myth:  Schools may require that students with ADHD receive stimulant medication in order to qualify for special education or for other school services or activities.  
 
Reality: Schools may not base a student's eligibility for special education or any school activity on their taking any medication. Medication is a medical decision between the family and their doctor. If the student has ADHD and qualifies for special education through an IEP or a 504 Plan, but is not taking medication, the school still must develop appropriate academic and behavioral supports to meet their needs.

 

7)  Myth: Teachers may decide whether or not they will implement an IEP or 504 plan or even have a student with a disability such as ADHD in their class.  
 
Reality:  If a student has an IEP or a Section 504 plan, the staff  are required to implement it.   Further, teachers may not refuse to have a student with a disability in their class, just as it would be illegal for them to refuse to teach a student based on race, gender or religion.

 

8)  Myth:  Students with ADHD may only qualify for a positive behavior support plan if they are exhibiting disruptive or inappropriate behavior towards others.   
 
Reality:   Under the IDEA and Section 504, positive behavior supports can be included in the plan to address academic and social problems, such as timeliness, work completion, social isolation and on-task behavior, as well as to address aggressive or disruptive behaviors. 

 

9)  Myth:  Students who have ADHD and a 504 Plan are only entitled to accommodations, like preferential seating or untimed tests, not services. 
 
Reality: Under Section 504, students with ADHD (and other disabilities) are not only entitled to accommodations, but may also be entitled to specialized educational services (such as individual instruction or tutoring) and related services (such as counseling).   The Section 504 plan should be designed to meet the individualized needs of the student.

 

 

10)  Myth:  Students with AD/HD can not qualify for 1-1 aides, bus transportation or other more intensive/expensive services. 
 
Reality: Students with ADHD are entitled to any services or supports necessary for them to benefit from their education under IDEA or to have equal access to educational opportunities under Section 504. There is no limitation on the nature or types of services a student may qualify for, if it can be demonstrated that the service is needed for the student to participate in educational activities provided to others and/or to make meaningful progress in the least restrictive environment appropriate to their needs.   Any blanket policy limiting access based on diagnosis or disability label is suspect.

 

This article is written by Matt Cohen and will appear in an upcoming issue of ADDitude Magazine which can be found online at www.additudemag.com .   

Illinois House Committee on Education Set to Consider Repealing Special Education Teacher Certification Requirements

 

Tomorrow, May 18, the House Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education will

consider Amendment #2 to Senate Bill 1799.  This Amendment would repeal the state statute

on mandatory teacher certification and replace it with a general license that would leave it up

to the State Board of Education to determine what standards teachers would have to be to be qualified to teach special education and other subjects.   This change would dramatically dilute the minimum standards for teacher qualifications and would leave to Board rules the criteria for what would be required.   Standards are inadequate as it is.  We can't afford to have them diluted further.   Contact your state representative to urge rejection of this legislation.   To find contact information for your State Representative, go to:

http://chicago.about.com/gi/o.htm?zi=1/XJ&zTi=1&sdn=chicago&cdn=citiestowns&tm=9&f=00&tt=12&bt=0&bts=0&zu=http%3A//www.elections.il.gov/districtlocator/districtofficialsearchbyaddress.aspx

 Illinois Legislative Proposal to Protect Student Stalking Victims Inadvertently Strips Students with Disabilities of Their Rights and Sidesteps Federal and State Procedural Safeguards - CALL TODAY to Delay Senate Action

The Illinois House recently passed HB 196, which amends the Illinois Stalking No Contact Order legislation in order to give families with children that are victims of stalking at school to force a mandatory transfer of the stalker to another school.  While this addresses a very important problem for victims of stalking, it does so in a way that totally fails to take into account the circumstances of the "stalking," to provide any clarity for the basis for such an order, nor, most importantly, to address the circumstances where alleged "stalking" may involve a student with a disability engaging in behavior that is either totally innocent in its intentions or intentional but in either case directly related to the student's disability.   The proposed legislation is being voted on by the Illinois Senate Committee tomorrow and does provide any mechanism to address the IDEA and Section 504 safeguards relating to discipline, determination of whether the behavior is related to the child's disability, nor the requirement that change of placement determinations be made by the school IEP team or that the student be moved to an appropriate alternative.  Further, the bill puts the responsibility on the parents of the alleged stalker to provide transportation and pay for the new placement.   This is a clear violation of the IDEA and Section 504 requirement that the education for children with disabilities be free.    Please urge your state senator to contact Senator Ryder to urge that the bill's consideration be delayed so that the concerns of the disability community can be heard and the bill can be amended or revised to provide for a more appropriate solution to these situations.    You can get the phone number for your State Senator at : 

http://chicago.about.com/gi/o.htm?zi=1/XJ&zTi=1&sdn=chicago&cdn=citiestowns&tm=9&f=00&tt=12&bt=0&bts=0&zu=http%3A//www.elections.il.gov/districtlocator/districtofficialsearchbyaddress.aspx.

 

Please call on WEDNESDAY Morning - this is urgent!!!!!

Upcoming Presentations by Matt Cohen

 

July 8, 2011  Matt Cohen

NAMI National Convention 

(July 6-9)

Chicago, IL  

For further information visit their website at  

http://www.nami.org/template.cfm?section=convention

 

July 30, 2011

Matt Cohen

CFC International Conference July 28-30 (Cardio-Facio-Cutaneous Syndrome)

The Westin O'Hare

Rosemont, IL

for further information visit their website at

www.cfcsyndrome.org/conference

    

November 11, 2011 1:30-3:00 p.m.

Matt Cohen

If You Don't Ask, It May Not Go Well - the Right to Test and College Accommodations for Students with ADHD Under the ADA and Section 504 

23rd Annual CHADD International Conference on ADHD  November 10-12, 2011

Disney's Contemporary Resort, Orlando, Florida

for further information visit their website at

http://www.chadd.org/Content/CHADD/Conferences_Training/Annual_Conference/default.htm

 

If you are looking for further information or would like Matt to speak at your parent group, support group, organization, conference or convention or to do staff trainings, please contact Tami at
 
tkuipers@monahan-cohen.com or at 312-419-0252

 

 

 

 

 

 

Disability Related Events, Conference or Services

 

NAMI National Conference
July 6-9, 2011
Chicago,IL

for further information, visit www.nami.org/convention

 

LDA 49th Annual International Conference

February 22-25, 2012

Chicago, IL 

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.ldanatl.org/conference/index.asp

 

JJs List: An on-line Disability Awareness Directory where potential customers with disabilities find disability-aware businesses.  Check out www.jjslist.com

  

 

 

Matt Cohen is a founding partner in the Chicago law firm of Monahan and Cohen. 
His practice is concentrated in representation of children and families in special education and discipline disputes with public schools.  He also has extensive experience in mental health and confidentiality law. 
If you have any questions, please contact his assistant,
Tami Kuipers at 312-419-0252.
logo

Join Our Mailing List!

Monahan and Cohen

55 West Monroe
Suite 3700

Chicago, IL  60603

312-419-0252

fax 312-419-7428

www.monahan-cohen.com

http://disablethelabels.blogspot.com

 

Disclaimer: 
The material in this enews has been prepared by Monahan & Cohen for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice.  We assume no responsibility for the accruracy or timeliness of any information provided herein. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. 

We would be pleased to communicate with you via email.  However, if you communicate with us through the Web site regarding a matter for which we do not already represent you, your communication may not be treated as privileged and confidential.  Do not send us confidential, proprietary or other sensitive information until you speak with one of our attorneys and receive authorization to send that information.  Monahan & Cohen is providing this enews, the information, listings, and links contained herein only as a convenience to you.