President's Corner
Traditionally leaders of organizations use their last article in their newsletter to tout the many accomplishments during their term. While I believe we have made significant progress in process improvements, access to our licenses for recruitment and worked on our funding this year, I want to reflect on our experiences and look forward.
As we continue to address unprecedented financial challenges at the local, state and federal levels, CACASA members have risen to the challenge by offering our creativity in addressing these issues nontraditionally through innovation. Earlier this year CACASA leaders were asked to participate in a government - industry consortium to achieve a total $30 million in general fund reductions for fiscal years 2011-2012 and 2012-2013. CACASA not only joined the consortium, but we made significant contributions to the process. We will be challenged even further as the cuts seem to go deeper and the state considers the complete elimination of state general fund in agricultural programs. We must prioritize our core programs and develop alternative funding mechanisms in cooperation with CDFA and the industry.
CACASA continues to make progress on implementing our new Cal Ag Permits System. Counties will begin putting the new system into service in May. We plan to encourage the participation of our industry partners to develop the means to encourage electronic submission of pesticide use reports to achieve further operational efficiencies. This new program should use the data our applicators keep for themselves to complete the required state records, thereby decreasing redundancies and improving savings for all concerned.
Annually, California issues roughly half of the 550,000 phytosanitary certificates (PCs) in the U.S. CACASA is collaborating with USDA and industry to keep agricultural goods moving into domestic and international markets by issuing the PCs required by the destination. CACASA embraces the efficiencies created by USDA's Phytosanitary Certificate Issuance and Tracking (PCIT) system. PCIT electronically handles funds and inspection data to facilitate agricultural commodities shipments internationally, allowing faster, more consistent, less expensive and more accurate processing. PCIT reduces the risk of shipments being detained at destination due to lost or delayed certification because, if needed, they may be electronically transferred instantly around the world. To date, 41 of the 58 counties use the PCIT program.
CACASA initiated changes in the minimum qualifications for the agricultural and weights and measures inspector positions to improve recruitment by broadening the pool of eligible candidates. We also identified the core competencies to assure an effective level of technical knowledge. We are working with CDFA to improve access to the exams by creating electronic testing that may be proctored at county, state and college testing facilities. We strive to have the exams available on demand to allow applicants to become fully licensed at their own speed. CACASA, collaborating with CDFA, continues to re-invigorate the exam review process and questions. These efforts should improve recruitment and retention of well qualified candidates.
Finally, CACASA is working to improve the organization and find ways to make your membership more meaningful. We are looking into leadership development programs that will enhance members' professional growth. We recently updated our bylaws and are continuing to review CACASA's Mission Statement to ensure the Association's goals are fulfilling current and future needs. We are also looking for efficient and alternative methods that help facilitate our committee structure and timeliness and transparency of our decision-making. We are providing more information and discussion blogs on CACASA.org to improve our timely and effectively addressing emerging issue with complete transparence and maximum participation.
The news is filled with stories about the need to cut government spending and regulations. We need to continue to embrace new technologies and other strategies to provide more efficient and effective service to the public and our industry. One of our strengths is that we look for the best way to fulfill our regulatory duties for the benefit of all concerned. We try not to blindly execute the laws and regulations, but rather to achieve their intended purpose, even when the laws and regulation don't quite fit. We also actively participate in the legislative and regulatory process to correct these flaws.
I want to reiterate to each member that with the challenges facing CACASA and future uncertainties, we rely on your creativity and assistance now more than ever. Every individual has unique strengths and abilities. I encourage each of you to review the issues confronting us and assess your own talents and abilities for where you may best contribute to CACASA. Our strength lies within our members. |
| Upcoming Meetings
2011:
- April 14:
CACASA Coast Region Meeting, Napa - April 20: CACASA North Region Meeting (Webinar) - April 21: CACASA South Region Meeting; Riverside - April 27: CACASA SJ Valley Region Meeting; Stanislaus
- April 28: CACASA Sac. Valley Region Meeting; Nevada
- May 2-5: CACASA Annual (Spring) Meeting; Embassy Suites, South Lake Tahoe
-May 12: CACASA Coast Region Meeting, tbd
- May 18-20: Western Plant Board Annual Meeting, Hotel Murano, Tacoma, WA
- tbd early May; APHIS-CBP Stakeholder Conference, Washington, DC.
-May 26: CACASA Sac. Valley Region Meeting; Solano
-June 9: CACASA Coast Region Meeting; Sonoma
-June 16: CACASA South Region Meeting; (Webinar)
-June 23-24: CACASA Sacramento & SJ Valley Region Joint Meeting; San Joaquin
-July 14: CACASA Coast Region Meeting; Contra Costa
-July 20-21: CACASA North Region Meeting; Eureka
-July 21: CACASA South Region Meeting; Ventura
-July 27: CACASA SJ Valley Region Meeting; Merced
-July (tbd) CACASA Board of Directors
-August 7-11: National Plant Board Meeting; Denver, CO
-August 11: CACASA Coast Region Meeting; San Francisco
-August 18: CACASA South Region Meeting (Webinar)
-August 24: CACASA SJ Valley Region Meeting; Kings
-August 25-26: CACASA Joint North & Sacramento Valley Region Meeting; Amador
|
|
POWERFUL PowerPoints
Below are links to PowerPoint presentations produced by many Agricultural Commissioners and Sealers and presented before lawmakers and industry officials. They showcase:
|
|
|
|
 FEATURE ARTICLE
The Road Ahead for California Department of Food and Agriculture
by Karen Ross
Secretary, California Department of Food and Agriculture
I have always appreciated the proverb, "May you live in interesting times." We certainly do, and I am honored to have been chosen to serve as Secretary of Agriculture for California during these interesting, challenging times. The difficult road ahead makes our partnership with California's agricultural commissioners and sealers more important than ever. There is a possibility that our paradigm could shift significantly over the next several years, and we must work together to make sure we continue to protect the agriculture of our state and consumers.
The climate here in Sacramento is tough. You all know that budget problems are ongoing. At CDFA, Governor Brown asked us to work with a consortium of industry members to achieve $15 million in general fund reductions for 2011-2012, and another $15 million for 2012-2013. CACASA joined the consortium and has made crucial contributions. I want to specifically recognize outgoing CACASA president Bob Atkins and incoming president Mary Pfeiffer for their efforts. The consortium represents a broad cross-section of California agriculture. I want to thank those industry leaders personally for their commitment in helping us reach the governor's budget reduction target. We have agreed to a series of proposals that hit at some of the core functions of the department, and we are now continuing to explore ways to augment funding so the threat to our ability to protect California is limited. During this process we kept in mind the core mission of the California Department of Food and Agriculture: To ensure food safety and protect the state from invasive pests and animal diseases. To date, the solutions identified include a mixture of fund shifts, new or increased fees or assessments identified by industry groups, and reduction or elimination of programs.
When I interviewed with the Governor he explained that the budget - getting our fiscal house in order so we could grow the economy and create jobs - had to be our focus or we would not be able to do any of the things we might wish to do. As you may know, he is a frugal man and he is bringing those values to the job. He wants to make sure that all of us, as taxpayers, get what we pay for. At CDFA, we're committed to that principle.
That being said, the Governor is very interested in innovation and capitalizing on our rich history of innovators and inventors, especially around renewable energy and the green economy. He appreciates California agriculture's economic contribution and the impressive growth we continue to show on exports. He is very mindful of agriculture's productivity, our outstanding reputation in fast growing emerging Asian markets, and our ports and infrastructure that support international trade.
At the Department, I am working closely with our Division Directors on a couple of initiatives near and dear to my heart:
1) Our comprehensive surveillance and rapid response systems must be preserved to be sure we can ensure food safety and protect agriculture from invasive pests and diseases. While there will be some reductions in the scope of several of these programs, we will also be undertaking department-wide process improvement initiatives to streamline our systems and look for smarter, more efficient ways of providing our services. These systems have been built over several decades and we should not be afraid to carefully examine them for areas of overlap and duplication and think about new ways to provide the same levels of protection to keep product moving into trade channels. Input from CACASA members is vitally important as we move forward.
2) For a number of years, the concern of farmers and ranchers about the cumulative impact of regulations that are often conflicting or redundant has been increasing and I am determined to position CDFA to be of assistance. Throughout the Department we have knowledgeable scientific and technical expertise that provides credibility for all of our programs. I believe we can deploy that same level of scientific credibility in providing data, impact assessments and information about alternative strategies to our sister agencies in the regulatory arena. I intend to work closely with Ag stakeholders to ensure that our efforts enhance agriculture's contribution to the state's economic, environmental and public health.
For too many people in urban California, CDFA and how its programs operate are a mystery. We see all around us the lack of public trust in our government and the failure of taxpayers to connect the services they enjoy to the dollars they send to Sacramento and Washington, D.C. Having aggressive public outreach and communication activities on an ongoing basis and immediately starting local community outreach when an eradication program is contemplated are critical to CDFA's ability to successfully protect agriculture. I intend to invest much personal time and attention to build coalitions and broaden the base of support for CDFA and its programs on behalf of the farm community.
I invite each one of you individually and the CACASA organization to join us in this effort. We must all work together to achieve what is, in my mind, the ultimate sustainability - the ability of our grandchildren and their grandchildren to farm productively in California. |
Warmerdam Bids Farewell to Agricultural Commissioners
| | Eric Lauritzen, Monterey County (left) and Dave Whitmer, Napa County (right) were among well-wishers on Mary-Ann Warmerdam's last day as DPR Director. |
Mary-Ann Warmerdam resigned as director of the Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR), effective March 29, to work for Clorox Co. as a research fellow in its research and development organization. Her new position is based in Pleasanton.
Warmerdam, who was appointed director in September 2004 by former Gov. Schwarzenegger, said her new position provides an opportunity to grow both professionally and personally. Heading DPR, recognized for its leadership role on the international stage for regulating pesticides, was both rewarding and challenging.
"I really appreciate my working relationship with the county agricultural commissioners for good and for ill," she said. "I completely respect the challenge they face at the local level, especially the tension between stakeholders. It's not an easy job."
Warmerdam noted that the public's first face of pesticide regulation is usually the county agricultural commissioner. "When commissioners are well respected, it reflects well on DPR," she added.
Warmerdam's accomplishments as director include a statewide pesticide use reporting system under development; takingsteps to ensure consistent, fair enforcement of pesticide laws in California's 58 counties; expanding efforts to educate fieldworkers about pesticide safety and what to do if they are exposed and become ill; streamlining pesticide registration; and laying the foundation to further protect water quality. DPR anticipates submitting proposed regulations this spring to further restrict pyrethroid pesticides in urban settings because of widespread detection in waterways. |
| | San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station is located north of San Diego near the Pacific Ocean. Units 2 and 3 provide enough power for 2 million homes. |
County Agricultural Commissioners Vital to Emergency Preparedness
By John Gardner, San Bernardino County Agricultural Commissioner and Rick LeFeuvre, Orange County Agricultural Commissioner
Agricultural Commissioners from Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and San Diego counties recently took part in the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station's disaster preparedness training in March. This dress rehearsal was conducted in preparation of an evaluation by the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) in April. FEMA's evaluation specifically focuses on controlling ingestion and distribution of contaminated agricultural products after the initial public health concerns are addressed.
Based on radioactive plume scenarios, agricultural staff determines ingestion pathways, effects of radiation on animal and plant agricultural production and recommend protective actions on how best to implement control of agricultural production in impacted regions.
This training is timely as Japan is dealing with its own nuclear disaster after experiencing a magnitude 9.0 earthquake and subsequent tsunami. Despite some signs of hope in recent weeks at Japan's Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant, conditions have taken an increasingly alarming turn, with a possible breach at one of the reactors and highly radioactive water found leaking from that and two other reactors.
In mid-March President Obama reiterated the importance of nuclear power to future U.S. energy policy but out of an abundance of caution he asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to do a comprehensive review of the safety of our domestic nuclear plants. Obama said nuclear power is "an important part of our own energy future, along with renewable sources like wind and solar, natural gas and clean coal." He emphasized that American nuclear power plants have undergone "exhaustive study" and had been declared "safe for any number of extreme contingencies.
Because of California's diverse agriculture and ecosystems the office of the County Agriculture Commissioner and Sealer is considered a vital component of emergency planning and response to manmade and natural disasters. |
State Legislative Update
By Matt Siverling, Siverling and Associates
Several weeks ago, news broke that meaningful budget negotiations between the Governor and Republicans had stopped, and it became clear that a June special election to extend temporary taxes and constitutionally protect local government was not going to happen.
The Governor had identified March 10th as his "deadline" for approving a Budget to close an estimated $25 billion deficit in the upcoming year. His goal caused all Budget activity to be fast-tracked to the first months of the year, which are typically reserved for Legislative activity. The subcommittees, Conference Committee and both Houses approved a Budget plan and a package of trailer bills and sent them to the Governor's desk. Governor Brown has signed a large package of trailer bills that would close an estimated $11 billion by slashing General Fund expenditures in nearly every corner of State Government, but has yet to address the "Budget Bill", which-without his desired tax extensions-fails to completely balance the books. Missing from the approved bills were plans to completely dissolve redevelopment agencies and authorization to place the tax extensions on the ballot. These items fell two votes short in each House.
Current estimates now place the deficit at over $15 billion.
Today, the specific timeline and path forward to that objective are not entirely clear. CACASA participated in numerous roundtable discussions with an industry consortium and the California Department of Food and Agriculture to identify and address a $15 million cut to current operations and to begin plans for a $15 million reduction in the 2012 Budget year, as requested by the Governor. These "goals" were assuming an opportunity to present taxpayers with a choice to extend expiring taxes for an additional five years, which has subsequently failed to come to fruition. Based on this development, the consortium, and the Association, should brace for revised General Fund reduction goals from the Administration. The odds of an "all-cuts budget" improve with each day that passes.
Despite the urgency and priority of the historic Budget deficit, the 2011 Legislative Session is also officially underway. The Legislature returned from the interim recess earlier this year and introduced the bulk of bills that the Houses will be considering during the year. The deadline for introducing legislation has passed. All proposals were put across the respective Desks by February 18, 2011.
Thus far, the Assembly introduced 1,388 bills and the Senate has introduced 934.
The Senate, and especially the Assembly, have sworn in many new Members this year. In all, there are 35 new Legislators out of the 120 total in both Houses. These new Members were faced with the difficult task of learning all House rules and guidelines as the Session began to quickly move toward deadlines. The next deadline of interest is not until May 6, 2011, which is the last day for fiscal bills to be heard in the first policy committee.
Members will continue to be educated and reminded about the important role the county agricultural commissioner and county sealer fulfills in their Districts. With over 2,000 bills in print, one of which is the "Budget Bill", there are many opportunities that the Association may need to advocate, and also many concerning measures that need to be redirected. The Legislative Committee will be frequently presented with bills of interest throughout the 2011 Legislative Session and will respond appropriately to each issue on behalf of the Association.
I look forward to continuing to advocate for the Association; and will continue to work with CACASA to identify opportunities for agricultural commissioners and sealers to find ways to further the Association mission statement to "promote and protect the agricultural industry, the environment and the public" during this tumultuous era in California. |
Federal Legislative Update
By Tim Cansler
Founder and Chief Strategist
Cansler Consulting
Last week Congress adopted an eighth continuing resolution (CR) that will fund the federal government until the end of the 2011 fiscal year (September 30). Thanks to the dedicated efforts of Congressman Sam Farr, Congressman Joe Baca, Congressman Dennis Cardoza, Congressman Jim Costa and Congressman Jeff Denham, important language was included in the CR that will help states including California continue their efforts combating pests and diseases harmful to agriculture and continue facilitating agricultural trade.
This CR touts $38.5 billion in total mandatory and discretionary spending reductions. USDA programs were cut by a total $1.5 billion; with some of the larger cuts including $350 million from the environmental quality incentives (EQIP) program, $207 million from rural economic development grants, and $176 million from the wetlands reserve (WRP) program.
An estimated $17 billion of the total cuts were achieved through "CHIMPS," Changes in Mandatory Program Spending. CHIMPS are a reduction in mandatory program spending that may be diverted to savings or other discretionary programs. The practice of CHIMPS in recent years has increased according to US House Agriculture Committee Ranking Member Collin Peterson (D-MN). CHIMPS in the FY 2012 budget debate could impact farm bill programs that maintain a 10-year agriculture budget baseline.
In addition, the spending cuts in the CR are mostly rescissions of funds (earmarks) already obligated, but unspent. Of the announced $38.5 billion in "cuts" it is estimated that $23.8 billion of it (62%) are from rescissions and removing reserve funds. This has irritated some Members of the House and Senate, including freshmen republicans. On Thursday April 14, 59 Republicans in the US House and 14 Republicans in the US Senate voted against their party's leaders on the CR. Republican leaders needed Democratic help to get the CR passed.
When it comes to maintaining federal programs or future levels of funding, Congress is clearly searching for substantive rationale. CACASA recently submitted testimony to the US House Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee as subcommittee members are auditing the efficiencies and effectiveness of federal discretionary government programs. Earlier this year US House Appropriations Committee Chairman Harold Rogers (R-KY) directed each of the 12 appropriations subcommittees to go "line by line to weed out and eliminate unnecessary, wasteful, or excess spending--and produce legislation that will represent the largest series of spending reductions in the history of Congress." Rogers said the subcommittees have been instructed to produce "specific, substantive and comprehensive spending cuts."
In California, County Agricultural Commissioners play a vital role, in coordination with USDA and industry, facilitating and expediting agricultural trade by issuing phytosanitary certificates (PC) required by trading partners. Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) trade barriers imposed by other nations are increasing the difficulties of U.S. producers to ship hundreds of millions of dollars worth of goods, hurting farms and small businesses each year. Local, state and federal governments have been working with industry in a coordinated fashion to keep U.S. agricultural goods moving into domestic and international markets by issuing phytosanitary certificates (PCs) required by the importing country. But, dwindling budgets for these programs are straining efforts and making it increasingly difficult to maintain these dependable export markets for U.S. agricultural producers.
According to the US Trade Representative's Office in their second annual report to Congress significant reductions in SPS trade barriers are not being achieved. For the sixteen year period 1995-2010, 312 SPS trade concerns have been raised in the WTO, with an average of 19.5 per year. Of these, 212 trade concerns remain unresolved; only 82 trade concerns have been reported as resolved and 18 trade concerns have been reported as partially solved.
Without question agriculture trade continues to lead the U.S. economy out of the current doldrums. Overall, U.S. farm exports totaled $108.7 billion in FY 2010. USDA's Economic Research Service estimates that approximately 8,400 jobs on and off the farm are supported by each $1 billion in agricultural exports. CACASA is proud to be an integral part of facilitating US agricultural trade.
On March 31, the US House of Representatives adopted HR 872, the Reducing Regulatory Burden Act of 2011, surpassing the needed two-thirds majority vote by a vote of 292-130. 57 democrats joined 235 republicans in supporting the measure.
The California delegation in the House split their vote 25 supporting, 25 opposing. Most California republicans supported HR 872 and they were joined by 8 democrats including Representatives Mike Thompson, Jerry McNerney, Sam Farr, Dennis Cardoza, Jim Costa, Lois Capps, Laura Richardson and Joe Baca. CACASA appreciates the support of these Members of Congress.
In the US Senate, companion legislation S. 718 was introduced on April 4 and referred to the Agriculture Committee. Ranking Member of the Senate Agriculture Committee Pat Roberts (R-KS) recently sent a letter to Chairwoman Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) encouraging her to take up the measure in the first week of May, after the congressional Easter recess. However, with the federal court extending the deadline for compliance to October 2011, it remains uncertain the level of urgency to adopt the measure. In his letter to Chairwoman Stabenow, Ranking Member Roberts argued that "agriculture producers, forestry interests, public health officials, states, municipalities, and other impacted stakeholders have told us they are in imminent need of certainty for what may be required of them in the near future. State and local officials have made clear that this is not merely a regulatory burden but could endanger public health as we enter mosquito season." (To read S.718 click on "Twitter," below)
On January 20, 2011, GIPSA published a rule (76 FR 3485) that altered scale testing requirements. Stockyard owners, dealers, packers, and live poultry dealers that weigh livestock, poultry, or feed, must have their scales tested at least twice each calendar year.
The new rule required that one of two scale tests must occur between January 1 and June 30, and the second must occur between July 1 and December 31. A minimum of 120 days is required between these two tests and more frequent testing is required for scales that do not maintain accuracy between tests.
On April 4, GIPSA clarified their rule offering an exception for the testing of scales used on a limited, seasonal basis. According to GIPSA, "A seasonal scale is one used during any continuous 6-month period. GIPSA requires that seasonal scales be tested once during the calendar year and that the test have been conducted within 6 months prior to its use." As an example GIPSA says, "If a scale is tested on April 15, that test is valid until October 15 and you can use the scale throughout that period. If you want to use the scale after October 15, you would need to have another test conducted and the scale would no longer be considered a seasonal scale for that year." ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Our communications strategy for clients includes:
-
An e-newsletter. -
-
Coordinating that social media with Facebook,
LinkedIn , and
With congressional hearings beginning to shape farm policy and escalating talks on the budget and the 2012 Farm Bill you need to be informed up to the minute.
I hope that you will take advantage of these easier ways to communicate and keep informed by...
|
 Fate of Williamson Act Hangs in the Balance
by Tony Linegar
Chairman
CACASA Natural Resources Committee
As budget pressures mount in Sacramento, the fate of the California's "Land Conservation Act of 1965" commonly referred to as the "Williamson Act" hangs in the balance. Over half of the state's 30 million acres of farmland are currently protected by the Act. Enacted to preserve agricultural and open space land, the Williamson Act has been the state's primary program to counteract development pressures on agriculture. The state has been providing reimbursements to the counties for their lost property taxes. These reimbursements known as "subventions" amounted to $33 million in 2008.
With the economic downturn and subsequent budget pressures in fiscal year 09/10, Governor Schwarzenegger exercised his blue line item veto authority to eliminate all but a $1000 placeholder from the money slated for Williamson Act reimbursements to the counties. The resulting impacts to counties were significant. At a time when counties were already feeling tremendous pressure on their general funds, they were hit with the loss of the subvention money from the state. The amount lost per county varies based on the number of acres enrolled in the program. Large agricultural counties such as Fresno were receiving over $5 million annually in Williamson Act subventions. Counties have reacted to the loss of the subvention funds in a variety of ways. So far, only Imperial County has chosen to non-renew all contracts and withdraw from the program. Some counties have instituted a moratorium on new contracts while others are busy auditing their contracts to cull out those that are out of compliance in an effort to reduce the loss of property taxes to the county. As we approach the third fiscal year without the support of the state subvention money, you can be assured that more counties are likely to follow Imperial's lead.
Last year, in an effort to save the Williamson Act, the California Farm Bureau sponsored SB 863 as a temporary solution to help counties recoup lost state subvention funds. The bill was signed by Governor Schwarzenegger and became effective on October 19, 2010. The bill established a one time $10 million subvention to be divided among participating counties as well as a provision allowing counties to recapture 10% of the property tax benefits provided to owners of Williamson Act lands. To date, eight counties have opted to institute the provisions of SB 863. Unfortunately, on March 24, 2011, Governor Brown followed through on his previous threat to repeal SB 863. The reversal of the $10 million appropriation was not a big surprise, but in a puzzling move the budget trailer bill SB 80 also repealed the provision that the eight counties had adopted allowing them to recoup 10% from the landowners. Speculation continues as to the reason for repealing this provision as there is no apparent financial advantage to the state for doing so. This move left a bad taste in the mouth of the counties that had already spent countless hours and resources implementing SB 863 which requires public hearings and mailing of notifications to affected landowners. Currently there are efforts underway by the Farm Bureau and other proponents of the bill to have it reenacted. You can be assured that this issue will continue to be used as a political football in Sacramento. Reenactment may well be dependent on passage of some of the Governor's budget proposals including the repeal of the Community Redevelopment Law as well as allowing the voters to vote on the extension of the 2009 tax increases. Stay tuned! |
|
PPUR Data-entry Reduction
by Dave Whitmer, Napa County Agricultural Commissioner/Sealer and Chairman of PPUR Steering Committee
During the CDFA/DPR/CACASA Winter Conference held in Sacramento, some new members have been added to the CACASA PPUR Steering Committee. New members include Cathy Fisher representing the South, Rick Gurrola representing the North and Louie Mendoza representing the Sac Valley. They join Eric Lauritzen, Scott Hudson, Bob Rolan, Dave Whitmer, Chuck Andrews, Larry Wasson and John Gless.
The Committee has been tasked with putting together a plan to reduce the costs of PUR data entry contracts by July 2012. The Committee is seeking feedback and specific suggestions from members on the development of a plan to assist counties in the migration to our improved pesticide permitting and use reporting (PPUR) system and thereby reduce the current level of county pesticide use report data entries. This topic has likely been brought up during respective CACASA regional meetings.
An electronic survey was recently released that is intended to capture the percentages of the current Pesticide Use Report (PUR) "lines" are submitted electronically on an annual basis, as well as identify potential areas where these percentages could be improved. The survey also asks about county resources devoted to such data entry. In working with the PPUR Committee and DPR, to our knowledge a survey of this type has not been conducted in the past. This makes it all the more important for all Commissioner-Sealers to participate so we can get accurate data and plan for the needed resources in the future.
A key element of this plan will be to identify the best strategies for encouraging and educating growers and others to use the new web based PPUR reporting system or one of the third party electronic systems as a more efficient and accurate alternative to submitting hardcopy reports. Some counties have already successfully reduced their level of data-entry reports and CACASA is seeking to emulate those successes to achieve the phased-in reduction of data-entry contracts statewide before FY 12/13. This effort coincides with the new Cal Ag Permits System being developed that will continue capturing needed information and help create additional reporting efficiencies that will help counties reduce the amount of data entries.
Early last year CACASA and DPR entered into a PPUR IT agreement and CACASA agreed to engage our membership to achieve this phased-in reduction. If you have ideas for the plan please contact your area group representative, Dave Whitmer, Chairman, CACASA PPUR Steering Committee or Tim Cansler, Project Director. |
Update: CalAgPermits System
By: John Gless, GeographIT
The month of March was extremely busy for the team developing the new statewide system for pesticide permitting and use reporting, and April promises to be even busier. The most visible development was to christen the system with a permanent name, "CalAgPermits", which received majority support over four other finalist names in an online election with over 200 stakeholder participants. Rebranding is now complete and the previous generic acronym "PPUR" is officially retired.
Of greater consequence overall, CACASA and its CalAgPermits software contractor Environ International Corp. http://www.environcorp.com/ have spent the last several weeks polishing the application, adding new functionality, and performing rigorous internal testing leading up to the release of a new test version on April 7th. Testing is now underway among up to 90 volunteer testers spread among 25+ counties. Phase I of system acceptance testing was conducted by the same testers last December, and the Phase II testing is following a similar protocol, except the emphasis is on evaluating functionality and behavior that was updated in response to the large volume of user feedback provided during Phase I. These updates are substantial, and the development team is confident that the results will make users appreciate the extra time that was taken between testing phases. Phase II testing concludes at the end of April, followed by a rapid turnaround of tester feedback into a production-ready version of the system.
Concurrent with acceptance testing, Environ continues to coordinate with CDPR and the half dozen or so providers of third party software (so called "GMSAs" or Grower Management Software Applications) who require the ability to transmit electronic permit and use report data to and from CalAgPermits. CDPR will be rolling out a much more advanced electronic data acceptance/transmittal capability in conjunction with CalAgPermits, while GMSA providers will be able to employ their existing data flow protocols (CEDTS and/or PUReData) with very minimal changes. This will help ensure that there are no significant disruptions in the flow of electronic use reports to counties from those submitters using GMSAs.
Finally this month, CACASA and Environ will be finalizing plans and schedules for deploying CalAgPermits in each county. This is an individualized process for each county and will extend through November 2011 with an average of 10 counties per month switching over from their current system. Staff have been identified in every county to serve as "transition coordinators", and the CACASA/Environ deployment team will be communicating with them frequently to make sure all the necessary county level preparations are understood and carried out so that the transition process runs as smoothly as possible. It has been, and will continue to be, an exciting ride to say the least. |
|
DPR's
Chuck Andrews
Elected President of Association of American Pesticide Control Officials
Chuck Andrews, DPR's associate director of the Pesticide Programs Division, has been elected president of the Association of American Pesticide Control Officials (AAPCO). AAPCO is comprised of state pesticide control officials in the United States and Canada.
"Chuck's leadership role gives DPR a national presence when AAPCO works with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on pesticide issues important to California, including endangered species, water quality and fumigants," said DPR Chief Deputy Director Chris Reardon. "Congratulations to Chuck for taking on this responsibility."
One example of AAPCO's efforts is a March 28, 2011, joint letter with the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture to U.S. representatives seeking their support for HR 872, the Reducing Regulatory Burdens Act of 2011. In 2009, the Sixth Circuit Court ruled in National Cotton Council vs. U.S. EPA that U.S. EPA and state regulatory agencies must issue National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits under the Clean Water Act for applications to waters of the United States. However, these new requirements are duplicative of existing requirements under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act that mandate pesticides undergo a rigorous examination of potential environmental impacts and health exposure assessments prior to receiving approval for use.
HR 872 would restore the status quo prior to the court decision. U.S. EPA estimates that an additional 365,000 permittees would be required to obtain NPDES permits, an increase of approximately 60 percent over current levels.
More information about AAPCO is available on its Web site at: http://aapco.ceris.purdue.edu/ |
CACASA Annual Meeting Set for May 3-5
By: Mary Pfeiffer, Shasta County Agricultural Commissioner and Sealer, Incoming CACASA President Delegates to this year's Annual Meeting of the California Agricultural Commissioners and Sealers Association will vote on by-law revisions and changes to committee structure as many county commissioners have been working throughout this year to achieve organizational efficiencies. Members will also strategize on ways to continue to provide vital services that protect the agricultural industry, other business groups, consumers, and the environment in the current economic climate. All non-profit associations, including CACASA, hold an Annual Meeting as prescribed in statute. In addition, members of CACASA are mandated by FAC section 2275 to attend the annual conference. Each year CACASA's annual conference is held in a different region of the state on a rotational basis. This year's conference will be held May 3-5 in South Lake Tahoe. |
Special Local Needs Pesticides Database Launched
DPR has developed an easy-to-use, Web-based database to provide access to special local needs (SLN) pesticides registrations. The database is scheduled to be up and running on April 11.
Over the years, DPR has issued hundreds of SLNs, some of which are registered for use in a specific county and others approved for use statewide. The database provides immediate access to information on both active and inactive SLN registrations. County agricultural commissioners can use the database to identify whether a particular SLN product is registered for use in their county for enforcement purposes.
Previously, requests for SLN information from DPR took up to 10 days to process.
Users can enter crop/site, pest, county, chemical, brand name, U.S. EPA registration number and other criteria to generate a list of SLN registrations. The SLN database is posted at: http://apps.cdpr.ca.gov/sln/ |
|
California Nursery Stock Certificate System Under Review
By Carol Hafner, Chair, CACASA Nursery, Seed and Apiary Committee
The California Nursery Stock Certificate (CNSC) system has been broken for sometime and is now undergoing critical review.
As a consequence of this review, the Nursery Inspection Procedure Manual is being rewritten to revamp the system and the usage of the certificate. Some noteworthy changes to the system include:
1. making the certificates valid for five years and
2. requiring a trace-back system for stock that is shipped out.
The working group reviewing the CNSC system includes CACASA and industry members that represent various segments including container grown stock, bare root plants and trees, bulbs and strawberry plants.
Great progress has been made on the revision and the final version should be completed in the fall of 2011. |
 Joseph Damiano Appointed New Commissioner in Colusa County;
Martin Settevendemie
New Commissioner
in San Luis Obispo County
On March 8, 2011 the San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors announced the appointment of Marty Settevendemie to the position of Agricultural Commissioner/Sealer of Weights and Measures. Previously, Marty held the position of Deputy Agricultural Commissioner in San Luis Obispo County. He has 14 years of experience working in the field of agriculture and has a Bachelor of Science degree from Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo in Forestry and Natural Resources Management. |
Recent Retirements
CACASA bids farewell and best wishes to County Agricultural Commissioners and Sealers who have announced their retirement. Thank you for your service:
December 2010
Christine Turner, Placer
Robert Lilley, San Luis Obispo
Harry Krug, Colusa
Mark Black, Glenn
|
|
|
|
|