paramax logo

 AND WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES
M&A Updates from your Friends at Paramax
 
This newsletter highlights recent M&A trends, key Investment Banking Regulations, and thoughts on U.S. Capital Gains tax rates.  Paramax Corporation is a middle market boutique Investment Bank that focuses on sell-side transaction advisory services.

In this issue:

Middle Market Deal Flow Trends
 
Observations and Notes on Investment Banking Regulations
 
Thoughts on U.S. Tax Rates
 
 
 
business pic2
 
 

For more information please contact:

 
Anthony D'Alba 
Marketing Director
Paramax Corporation
333 International Drive
Williamsville, NY 14221
 

   Telephone:    
716-626-1200

       Fax:
716-626-4800
 

Office Locations

BOSTON, MA
ROCHESTER, NY
BUFFALO, NY 
Middle Market Deal Flow Trends

Based on comparative fourth quarter 2008  middle market activity (defined as sales transactions between $10 million and $500 million) as reported in the industry, and our outlook for 2009, there are indications that there will be continuing M&A activity principally driven by strategic deal-making.  (We anticipate reduced levels of financially driven deals.) Trends in the M&A world indicate that the volume of transactions greater than $500 million are significantly down from levels seen in 2007. In addition, the scarcity of available bank financing has contributed to the reduction of volume of financially oriented deals. 

2008 Middle Market Observations
 
Some equity investment firms have published their beliefs regarding global recession fears that are now gripping the market, and the anxiety over what may lie ahead.  It was thought that middle market deal activity may have bottomed out during Q2 '08 and despite the economic decline that occurred during Q3 '08, total disclosed middle market transactions (Enterprise Value greater than $10 million and less than $500 million) actually increased 5% during Q3 '08 over Q2 '08. This increase however, may be attributed in part to a greater number of distressed transactions, and in particular, consolidation within the financial sector. Setting aside financial sector transactions, deal volume in Q3 '08 was down 5% from Q2 '08. Also of note is the observation that even though the credit market virtually seized up in Q3 '08, transaction multiples remained steady, averaging 6.8x enterprise value to EBITDA.  Well-capitalized strategic buyers and private equity compensated for the lack of credit by providing more equity in transactions.  Due to the global economic slowdown and limited credit markets, it is no wonder Q4 '08 middle market activity, as reported, was down nearly 30% compared to Q4 '07.
2009 M&A Outlook
 
business pic 3
At the Deal's M&A Outlook 2009 conference (sponsored by The Deal magazine), a partner at the law firm of Foley & Lardner LLP and the managing director, head of private equity at Guardian debated the M&A outlook for the middle market in 2009.  The partner from Foley & Lardner expects "...there will be a paradigm shift, certainly on the regulatory side, that will impact even middle-market transactions." This statement, most likely prompted by the recent Madoff scandal is worth following, especially by those considering using an intermediary for selling their business.  The panel expert from Guardian believes there are plenty of middle-market opportunities, as he states "If this next fourth recession is any harbinger of what happened in the past, these are going to be the years -- 2009 and 2010 -- to actually place capital."
Observations and Notes on Investment Banking Regulations

According to the Securities and Exchange Commission ["SEC"] acceptance of transaction "success" fees by an advisor in a securities transaction [including, by definition, sales of non-public closely-held stock] mandates that practitioners in the M&A or capital raise industry must be Registered Representatives working under the supervision of licensed broker-dealers.  Unlicensed M&A practitioners may not receive "success fees" even for merely introducing the parties [also known as a Finder's Fee - see HallCap following].  The consequences to the Selling Client and Advisor associated with unlicensed security activity can be severe. Penalties can include retroactive deal rescission perhaps years after the transaction closed. The Seller may end up being responsible to refund the full value of the original transaction, plus costs and expenses.  As stated by the SEC, "If you will be acting as a 'broker' or 'dealer', you must not engage in securities business until you are properly registered. If you are already engaged in the business and are not yet registered, you should cease all activities until you are properly registered."   Also, an individual merely holding a series license is not sufficient.    The SEC's position regarding this is "If you hold a series license, you must be properly associated with a registered broker-dealer to effect securities transactions."   

 
On February 26, 2007, Hallmark Capital Corporation ("HallCap") wrote to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") requesting a "No Action Letter" [attempting to establish a Safe Harbor for their Advisory practice] regarding Finder Activities. HallCap is a financial consultant and finder for small businesses [revenue under $25 million] and others that assists the owners of businesses in raising capital, facilitates mergers and acquisitions in part by identifying and contacting potential buyers and provides strategic business consulting services. Before the commencement of any assignment, HallCap would inform the client that it is not a  broker-dealer. HallCap further stated that it does not act as an agent for the client company and does not effectuate transactions for the account of others. HallCap's final point is they do not offer to sell securities to or solicit investment funds from the general investing public.    The SEC did not grant HallCap's request for a No Action Letter - Finder Activities.  Instead, on June 11, 2007  the SEC stated "...based on the general descriptions of the activities included in your letter... Hallmark Capital Corporation ("HallCap") would be required to register with the Commission as a broker-dealer pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934"
 
See: http://sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/mr-noaction/2007/hcc061107-15b.pdf


For additional information, you may wish to refer to the Division of Market Regulation's "Guide to Broker-Dealer Registration," posted on the Commission's web site at:
 
 
You may also wish to refer to the American Bar Association's Publication "Report and Recommendations of the Task Force on Private Placement Broker-Dealers" published in The Business Lawyer in May 2005.

 

FINRA Definitions
 

business pic 4FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, a self regulating organization and successor to NASD) takes a broad view on what's required under these definitions.  A broker is an individual or firm who acts as an intermediary between a buyer and seller, usually charging a commission.  A dealer is any person or company in the business of buying and selling securities for his or her own account, through a broker or otherwise.   Registered broker-dealers are FINRA firms that act as securities dealers or brokers, or perform both functions, but not in a single transaction.  As indicated above, if your client is a Seller of Securities [i.e., stock transaction as opposed to asset style transaction] and they choose to use an intermediary, then the intermediary should be a registered broker-dealer, such as the wholly owned subsidiary of Paramax Corporation.  If in doubt whether or not a firm is registered as a broker-dealer you can verify their status at the following site: 
  
http://www.finra.org/Investors/ToolsCalculators/BrokerCheck/index.htm

Please visit www.paramaxcorp.com for a more comprehensive list of M&A Definitions.
Thoughts on U.S. Tax Rates
 
It was widely believed in 2008 that one of Congress' first tasks (controlled by what was then expected to be the new Democratic Party including President Barack Obama) would have been an increase in capital gains rates, among other tax increases.  Many felt that these increases would be  made effective in early 2009.  It appears now, because of the condition of the U.S. economy that this may not happen in early 2009.  The uncertain International and U.S. economies have made it more prudent for the incoming party to leave tax rates at existing levels.  Further, it appears that Obama's regime is going to be cautious in regard to increasing taxes, in order to alleviate additional stress on U.S. commerce and  capital. An outcome may be that the capital gains tax rates may not increase in 2009.   It may be that increases could be legislated toward the end of 2009,  or even be deferred until 2010 or later depending on the state of the economy.  The conservative view today is to assume that a change to capital gain tax rates may occur toward the end of 2009 or early 2010, with the effective date to be January 1, 2010.