The CEO (Mayor, Chair, Director)helps a 
transformation succeed by communicating its 
significance, modeling the desired changes, building 
a strong top team, and getting personally involved.
Third and Last Installment
In today’s business environment, companies 
cannot settle for incremental improvement; they must 
periodically undergo performance transformations to 
get, and stay, on top. But in the volumes of pages on 
how to go about implementing a transformation, 
surprisingly little addresses the role of one important 
person. What exactly should the CEO be doing, and 
how different is this role from that of the executive 
team or the initiative’s sponsors?
As the interviews in this publication show, there is 
no single model for success. Moreover, the exact 
nature of the CEO’s role will be influenced by the 
magnitude, urgency, and nature of the transformation; 
the capabilities and failings of the organization; and 
the personal style of the leader.
Adopt a personal approach
Openly engage others
‘Sharing success stories helps crystallize the 
meaning of the transformation and gives people 
confidence that it will actually work’
Spotlight success
Role-modeling desired mind-sets and 
behavior
Transform yourself
Take symbolic action
Building a strong and committed top 
team
The CEO’s team can and should be a valuable 
asset in leading any transformation. As Deutsche 
Post’s Zumwinkel suggests, “You need excellent 
individual players, but you also need players who are 
dedicated to playing as a team.” Sharing a meaningful 
story and modeling the right role will certainly increase 
the odds of getting the team on board, but it is also 
vital to invest time in building that team.
Assess and act
Successful CEOs take time to assess the abilities 
of individual members of the team and act swiftly on 
the result. In some cases, input from third parties 
(such as executive search firms) is sought to create a 
more objective fact base. Many CEOs find it useful to 
map team members on a matrix, with “business 
performance” on one axis and “role-modeling the 
desired behavior” on the other. Those in the top-right 
box (desired behavior, high performance) are the 
organization’s stars, and those in the bottom-left box 
(undesired behavior, low performance) should be 
motivated, developed, or dismissed. The greatest 
potential for sending signals involves the employees 
in the box of “undesired behavior, high performance.” 
When clear action is taken to improve or remove these 
managers, the team’s members know that role-
modeling and teamwork matter. Banca Intesa’s 
Passera affirms that, “If necessary, you have to get rid 
of those individuals, even the talented ones, who 
quarrel and cannot work together.”
How do CEOs know when to intervene with the 
strugglers? They can reflect on the following 
questions:
- Do team members clearly understand what is 
expected of each of them in relation to the 
transformation? 
- Is the CEO serving as a positive role model? 
- Does everyone recognize the down- side and 
upside of getting on board and doing what is 
required? 
- Have struggling team members received a chance 
to build the needed skills?
If the answer to all of these questions is yes, 
decisive action is justified. 
Experienced CEOs attest to the positive impact 
this can have on the rest of the company. EMC’s Tucci 
says he had to take “public” action to tackle the “whiff 
of arrogance” that used to characterize certain parts of 
the company. TXU’s Wilder recalls that “When we did 
a cultural audit, we found that the number-one 
complaint was that management was not dealing with 
employees that everyone knew weren’t carrying their 
load.“
Invest team time
Even with the right team in place, it takes time for a 
group of highly intelligent, ambitious, and independent 
people to align themselves in a clear direction. 
Typically, the first order of business is for members to 
agree on what they can achieve as a team (not as 
individuals), how often the team should meet, what 
transformation issues should be discussed, and what 
behavior the team expects (and won’t tolerate). These 
agreements are often summarized in a “team charter” 
for leading the transformation, and the CEO can 
periodically use the charter to ensure that the team is 
on the right track.
Intesa’s Passera speaks of how he brought his 
team together regularly to “share almost everything,” 
to make it “clear to everyone who is doing what,” and 
to “keep the transformation initiatives, budgets, and 
financial targets knitted together.” P&G’s Lafley 
emphasizes the importance of spending the time 
together wisely: “You need to understand how to enroll 
the leadership team.” As a rule of thumb, 80 percent of 
the team’s time should be devoted to dialogue, with 
the remaining 20 percent invested in being “presented 
to.”
Effective dialogue requires a well-structured 
agenda, which typically ensures that ample time is 
spent in personal reflection (to ensure that each 
person forms an independent point of view from the 
outset), discussion in pairs or small groups (refining 
the thinking and exploring second- and third-level 
assumptions), and discussion by the full team before 
final decisions are made. In this process, little 
tolerance should be shown for minutiae (losing the 
forest for the trees) and for any lack of engagement. 
Face-to-face meetings, as opposed to conference 
calls, greatly enhance the effectiveness of team 
dialogue.
Relentlessly pursuing impact
As this publication consistently emphasizes, 
organizational energy—collective motivation, 
enthusiasm, and intense commitment—is a crucial 
ingredient of a successful transformation. There is no 
substitute for a CEO directing his or her personal 
energy toward ensuring that the company’s efforts 
have an impact.
Roll up your sleeves
Initiatives with a significant financial or symbolic 
value require the CEO’s personal involvement for 
maximum impact. There may be several beneficial 
effects, among them ensuring that important 
decisions are made quickly—without sacrificing the 
value of collective debate—and sowing the seeds of a 
culture of candor and decisiveness.
Leaders must be willing to leave the executive 
suite and help resolve difficult operational issues. 
Peter Gossas, president of Sandvik Materials 
Technology and a man with lifelong experience in the 
steel industry, observes, “If there’s a problem, it can 
be helpful if I come to the work floor, step up on a crate 
so that everyone can see me, and hold a discussion 
with a shift unit that may be negative to change.” He 
adds, “It’s hard for me to walk into a melt shop and not 
begin discussing ways to solve operational problems.”
Hold leaders accountable
Successful CEOs never lose sight of their 
management responsibility to chair review forums. 
Through these, they compare the results of the 
transformation program with the original plan, identify 
the root causes of any deviations, celebrate 
successes, help fix problems, and hold leaders 
accountable for keeping the transformation on track, 
both in activities (are people doing what they said they 
would?) and impact (will the program create the value 
we anticipated?). A central role for the CEO during 
these review forums is to ensure that decision making 
stays grounded in the facts. As Narayana Murthy wryly 
observes, “We have embraced the adage 'In God we 
trust; everyone else brings data to the table.’”
The CEO also plays a critical role in ensuring an 
appropriate balance between near-term profit 
initiatives (those that deliver performance today) and 
organizational-health initiatives (those that build the 
capacity to deliver tomorrow’s results). This is a 
lesson applied by John Varley, CEO of Barclays: “For 
several years, the focus on initiatives to improve 
financial performance dramatically crowded out 
attention on franchise health, leaving us with a set of 
issues in some businesses that needed urgent 
attention. We are addressing those issues.” During 
the transformation, some CEOs even choose to hold 
separate review meetings for short- and long-term 
objectives in order to ensure that companies maintain 
a balance between operational improvement (tactical 
strategies, wage management, productivity, and asset 
management) and long-term growth (revenue and 
volume growth through market share, new products, 
channels and marketing, M&A, talent, and capability 
management).
For CEOs leading a transformation, no single 
model guarantees success. But they can improve the 
odds by targeting leadership functions: making the 
transformation meaningful, modeling the desired 
mind-sets and behavior, building a strong and 
committed team, and relentlessly pursuing impact. 
Together, these can powerfully generate the energy 
needed to achieve a successful performance 
transformation. 
Source: McKinsey & Company, Inc.