Scorecard
When social issues become strategic
Executives ignore sociopolitical debates at
their own peril. – First of two installments
Executives with lingering doubts about the
importance of sociopolitical issues to business will
surely be convinced by this year's eye-catching
McKinsey Quarterly survey on the topic. It's not just
that an overwhelming majority of the respondents
acknowledged a wider role for corporations than just
maximizing investor returns, though this finding is
remarkable in itself. More striking still is the way
participants in our online poll saw environmental
concerns, the offshoring debate, data protection,
and other sensitive matters as potential threats to
the creation of value and frankly conceded that their
companies handled these issues poorly.
Although lobbying—often behind closed doors—is
as old as business itself, high-level and concerted
corporate activism in the social and political arena
has been conspicuous by its absence. That
deficiency, executives tell us, is the result of short-
term financial pressures, a lack of familiarity with the
issues, and the sense that specialists in the public-
affairs and legal departments handle this sort of thing.
Such thinking, we believe, is dangerous and
wrong headed. Business leaders must become
involved in sociopolitical debate not only because
their companies have so much to add but also
because they have a strategic interest in doing so.
Social and political forces, after all, can alter an
industry's strategic landscape fundamentally; they
can torpedo the reputations of businesses that have
been caught unawares and are seen as being
culpable; and they can create valuable market
opportunities by highlighting unmet social needs and
new consumer preferences.
The challenge is to find a way for companies to
incorporate an awareness of sociopolitical issues
more systematically into their core strategic decision-
making processes. Companies must see the social
and political dimensions not just as risks—areas for
damage limitation—but also as opportunities. They
should scan the horizon for emerging trends and
integrate their responses across the organization, so
that the resulting initiatives are coherent rather than
piecemeal.
The social and managerial challenge
Businesses have never been insulated from social
or political expectations. What's different today is
the intensifying pressure and the growing complexity
of the forces, the speed with which they change,
and the ability of activists to mobilize public opinion.
Yet even as the social contract evolves, the typical
corporate response appears to have become
increasingly flat footed.
The changing social contract
Companies have always had a contract with
society. The contract embraces not just direct
stakeholders (such as consumers, employees,
regulators, and shareholders) but also, and
increasingly, a broader set of stakeholders (such as
the communities where companies operate, the
media, academics, and the nonprofit sector).
Part of this contract is formalized in laws and
regulations, and violating them has obvious legal
ramifications. Part of it is semiformal: the
stakeholders' implicit expectations, which if ignored
can bring about swift action. Most multinationals in
the United States, for example, are expected to
maintain at least some labor standards along their
global supply chains, even if they aren't legally
required to do so. Violations of that semiformal
contractual obligation can seriously harm a
company's reputation as well as consumer demand
for its products. Ask Nike.
This social contract is by nature a fluid one.
Often, issues that lead to legislation start out as
semiformal expectations about business; likewise,
some aspects of the formal contract
are "deregulated." Companies in Europe, for example,
are still expected to uphold certain employment
guarantees with their workers, despite their greater
flexibility in deploying labor.
More challenging are the "frontier" issues that
have not yet entered the formal or semiformal
contracts but could, over time, become social
expectations—something that business might not
even realize. Take obesity. It had always been widely
believed that the responsibility for avoiding it lay with
individuals, who choose what they eat, not with the
companies that make or sell fattening products. But
the blame is shifting, much as the debate around
tobacco shifted the responsibility from individuals to
an industry perceived to be aggressively marketing
addictive products. Food companies may not be
forced to modify the fat and sugar content of their
products, but the momentum on this issue could
already be so great that lawmakers or regulators will
step in and formalize social expectations by imposing
new legal restraints.
Rising expectations
Increasingly, a company's sources of long-term value
(for example, its brand, talent, and relationships) are
affected by a rising tide of expectations among
stakeholders about the social role of business. Two
forces are colliding: an emerging set of sociopolitical
megatrends (Exhibit 2) that are upending the lives of
people, communities, and societies, as well as ever-
more-powerful stakeholders wielding wide influence.
Continued Next Week:
Source: McKinsey & Company, 2006
|
|
|
Greetings!
When social issues become strategic - Pt 1
Migraines for Mixed-use Developers
Economic Notes
This Weeks Leads
|
|
|
|
Migraines for Mixed-use Developers |
|
Change orders are a headache for any real
estate developer. For a mixed-use developer,
however, those headaches can become migraines
given the juggling act of managing various office,
residential and retail contractors and subcontractors.
One change order that slips through the cracks can
add up to millions of lost dollars.
The trick with a mixed-use project is to
understand how your cash flow works over time, and
see the long-term effects of decisions. For instance,
do you earmark $1 million for engineering a
stormwater system at a mixed-use project? You may
be crazy to spend the $1 million now or it may be the
best $1 million you ever spent.
Source: The National Real Estate Investor
|
|
|
|
Economic Notes: |
|
- Housing Starts
- According to U.S. Commerce Department data
released Dec. 19, housing starts in the U.S.
rebounded 6.7 percent in November from the lowest
level in more than six years, to 1.588 million units.
The data suggests the housing market is stronger
than recent expectations. However, the issuing of
building permits, a relatively reliable measure of
future demand, fell 3.0 percent, to a 1.506 million
pace, the lowest since December 1997.
- More Housing - NAHB Housing Market
Index
- Homebuilder optimism decreased one point to 32
in December. However, the survey index measuring
single-family sales for the next six months increased
three points.
- More Housing - New Residential
Construction (C20)
- Housing starts increased 6.7% to 1.588 million
units in November. Housing permits decreased 3.0%
during the month.
- Risk of Recession
- The Moody’s Economy.com probability of
recession rose in November to 21%, from October’s
upwardly revised 17%. The yield curve went further
into inversion in November, and a moderation in
consumer confidence and average hours worked
supported higher recession risks. Further increases in
the S&P 500 index for the month helped put some
restraint on recession risks. The chance of the
economy being in recession in six months remains
modest.
- Industrial Production
- Industrial production inched up 0.2% in
November, a slightly stronger reading than the
market had anticipated. Gains in manufacturing
production offset marginal declines in utilities and
mining. Total industry capacity utilization held firm at
a downwardly revised 81.8%.
- Chain Store Sales
- Chain store sales increased 1.6% in the week
ending December 16, as sales retained their common
volatile pattern during the holiday season, according
to the ICSC. Year-over-year growth dropped to
2.4%, the weakest in four weeks as the gain failed to
match last year’s gain in the comparable week.
- Treasury International Capital Flows
- In October, long-term net capital inflows were
$82 billion from $70 billion in September. However,
the net overall inflow to the U.S. was $62.2 billion,
compared to $57.8 billion in September. This is in line
with the market consensus and suggests that foreign
flows to U.S. capital markets remain steady for
now.
- More Treasury Budget - Current Account
Deficit
- The U.S. current account deficit widened by
3.9% to $225.6 billion in the third quarter of 2006,
from $217.1 billion in the previous quarter. The
current account deficit came in narrower than the
consensus estimate of $226 billion. The balance on
goods and services widened by 3.7% to $200.3 billion
in the third quarter of 2006, from $193.1 billion in the
previous quarter.
- Consumer Price Index
- The seasonally adjusted consumer price index
was flat in November, after 0.5% declines in both
September and October. A slight decline in energy
prices contributed to flat overall prices. The core
index, excluding food and energy prices, was flat in
November, following a 0.1% increase in October.
Over the past year, core CPI inflation has run at a
2.6% pace. Both the overall and core numbers were
below consensus. Today’s report brings more good
news on inflation.
- More Prices - PPI
- Producer prices for finished goods rose by 2.0%
in November, exceeding expectations. While there
was considerable inflation among finished energy
products, core price increases were substantial as
well. Excluding food and energy products, core prices
for finished goods rose by 1.3%, fully recovering from
the sharp decline seen in October. At earlier stages
of processing, prices for intermediate (0.7%) and
crude (15.7%) producer products both rose sharply
due largely to higher energy prices.
|
|
|
|
This Weeks Leads: |
|
- Godiva Chocolatier
- Campbell Soup Co. trades as Godiva Chocolatier
at 268 locations nationwide and in Canada.
- The stores, offering an assortment of chocolates
and gourmet coffee, occupy spaces of 850 sq.ft. to
1,000 sq.ft. in malls, mixed-use and outlet centers
and urban/downtown areas.
- Plans call for seven to 12 openings nationwide
during the coming 18 months. Typical leases run 10
years.
- A vanilla shell and specific improvements are
required.
- Preferred demographics include a population of
300,000 within five miles earning $65,000 as the
average household income.
- For more information, contact
- Bart
Delaney,
- Campbell Soup Co.,
- 595 Westport
Avenue, Norwalk, CT 06851.
- Acorn, Christopher & Banks and C.J.
Banks
- Christopher & Banks Corporation trades as Acorn,
Christopher & Banks and C.J. Banks. Acorn operates
37 locations throughout GA, IL, IN, KY, MI, MN, NC,
OH, SC and VA.
- The stores occupy spaces of
2,000 sq.ft. to 2,400 sq.ft. in malls, lifestyle, powers,
specialty and tourist centers and in urban/downtown
areas.
- Plans call for 30 openings throughout the
Midwest and Southeast during the coming 18
months.
- Typical leases run 10 years. Preferred
cotenants include upscale women’s apparel and home
fashion retailers.
- Preferred demographics include
a population of 100,000 within five miles earning
$75,000 as the average household income.
- Christopher & Banks operates 524 locations
nationwide. The women’s apparel stores occupy
spaces of 3,000 sq.ft. to 3,500 sq.ft. in malls and
lifestyle and power centers.
- Plans call for 75
openings nationwide excluding AL, HI, LA, MS and
southern CA during the coming 18 months.
- Typical leases run 10 years. A vanilla shell and
specific improvements are required. Preferred
cotenants include mid-priced women’s apparel
retailers.
- Preferred demographics include a
population of 100,000 within 10 miles earning $50,000
as the average household income. C.J. Banks
operates 218 locations throughout the northern
states.
- The plus-size stores occupy spaces of
3,200 sq.ft. to 3,600 sq.ft. in malls, lifestyle, powers,
specialty and tourist centers and in urban/downtown
areas.
- Plans call for 60 openings throughout the
existing market during the coming 18 months.
- Typical leases run 10 years.
- Preferred
cotenants include mid-priced women’s apparel
retailers.
- Preferred demographics include a
population of 100,000 within 10 miles earning $50,000
as the average household income.
- For details, contact:
- Nancy Scott
- Christopher & Banks, Corp.
- 2400 Xenium Lane North
- Plymouth, MN 55441
- Email: jtarrant@christopherandbanks.com
- Web site: www.christopherandbanks.com
- Brothers Bar and Grill
- Fortney Cos. trades as Brothers Bar and Grill at
16 locations throughout IA, IL, IN, KS, MN, NE, OH
and WI. T
- he bar/restaurants occupy spaces of
6,000 sq.ft. to 8,000 sq.ft. in freestanding locations,
entertainment centers, and urban/downtown areas.
- Plans call for six openings throughout CO, IA, IL,
IN, KS, KY, MI, MN, PA, TN and WI during the coming
18 months, with representation by UrbanSpace.
- Typical leases run 10 years with two, five-year
options.
- Preferred cotenants include bars and
restaurants in entertainment areas of central
business districts and college towns.
- The
company will also consider acquiring existing bars and
grills and/or real estate.
- For more information, contact
- Gary Perel,
- UrbanSpace,
- 238 South Meridian Street, Suite
201,
- Indianapolis, IN 46225;
- 317-423-1111,
vFax 317-423-0527;
- Email:
gperel@urbanspaceusa.com;
- Web site:
www.urbanspaceusa.com.
|
|
|
|
BONNEVILLE RESEARCH - People, Passion & Pride |
|
Successful client work requires a superior team of
outstanding people working fluidly together.
Bonneville Research is committed to excellence.
We work to help clients achieve enduring results
and improve the communities in which we live.
BONNEVILLE RESEARCH
Bonneville Research is a Utah-based consulting
firm providing economic, financial, market and policy
research to public and private sector clients
throughout the intermountain west.
Our services include:
- Financial Analysis
- Urban Renewal & Redevelopment
Analysis and Budgets
- Strategy and Policy Analysis
- Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis
- Statistical and Survey Research
Each of our studies is tailored to address the
unique needs of our clients and their communities.
If we can help, please call or email us at
- Bob
- 801-364-5300
- BobSpring@BonnevilleResearch.com
- Jon
- 801-746-5706
-
JonSpring@BonnevilleResearch.com
|
|
|
Bonneville Research Closed for Holiday |
|
Bonneville Research will be closed from
December 22nd Until January 2nd 2007.
Peace and Good Will to All
Bob & Jon Springmeyer
Bonneville Research
|
|
|
|