logo
Project Fellow
 

 Fellow Weekly -  Issue 128

WHAT'S THE LAW

  

 

 
Encouraging intelligent and entertaining debate at your Shabbat table.
 
Fellow Weekly raises issues of business law and ethics through lively emails by featuring your real-life scenarios answered by our leading authorities and professionals.
 

  

 

 

 

 

CLICK HERE  FOR THIS WEEK'S PDF

 

   

-

   

 

Our Hashavas Aveidah textbook is presently being edited by Torah Umesorah.

Click here for dedication opportunities.

It is Your Support which enables us to continue developing educational materials. 

click here to donate. 

 

 

  

Cases 237/238 Pedal to the Metal: Shoprite®  or Shop Right

 

Shop Right:

Today, it is the largest retailer-owned cooperative in the U.S.; Wakefern Food Corporation; Always Fresh... Always for Less. Shoprite does it Right.

 

Inspired by philanthropist Milton Hershey, Ted Bernstein, CEO of Party Streamers Inc. managed a large orphanage in back of his sprawling upstate estate. Continuos arrangements with food distributers proved as an economical and efficient way to run the kitchen.

 

Wakefern agreed to allow Bernstein to purchase wholesale from the cooperative. An order form was generally submitted in the beginning of the month. In conversation with Wakefern at the onset of the relationship, Bernstein requested that Wakefern provide them with fresh produce as well. Wakefern duly informed their produce distributer in Elizabeth NJ.

 

Subsequently, Bernstein found a cheaper produce distributer and signed an agreement...but not before Wakefern had already purchased considerable produce with Bernstein in mind.

 

Pedal to the Metal

"Hit the pedal to the metal. I've got to catch this flight..." pressed Barry Weinstein to his Livery Driver. "The gate to the USAir domestic flight from Newark to O'Hare is closing in forty-five minutes!" Eager to please his frequent customer, the driver complied...but was clocked at 100 miles per hour and was slapped with a hefty ticket and points on his license.

 
 

Wakefern spent money because of Bernstein's request. Is Bernstein required to ensure Wakefern does not incur a loss?

The cab driver sped to help Barry. Is Barry required to pay for the ticket?

 

  

What's the Law? 

 

Please email us with your comments and answers at weekly@projectfellow.org

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LAST WEEK'S CASES ♦ CASE 236/237 ♦ LIP LIABILITIES! Verbal Abuse & Gossip

 

Case 236: Gossip: Many schools require the teacher to arrange for a substitute, should the teacher need to take a leave of absence.

 

R. Berger was an acclaimed and noteworthy educator in a prestigious Jerusalem girl's seminary. As a world renown speaker and sought after inspirer,

 

R. Berger would travel periodically around the globe on speaking tours. He customarily hired R. Adler to teach his classes while on leave.

 

On Sunday January 29th, R. Berger emailed R. Adler and asked him to fill in for the two weeks of February 5th and February 12th. Adler had an alternative option for the week of the fifth, but turned it down in favor of this two week employment.

 

On Feb 1st, the principal's neighbor told her that she is aware of a R. Cohn who is from the most dynamic teachers in the country. "Why don't you hire R. Cohn to cover R. Berger's classes? While R. Adler may be decent, I am sure that Cohn is far more effective.

 

The principal agreed. He called R. Adler to tell him not to bother coming in. Too late to pursue the one week employment option, R. Adler was more than chagrined.

 

Case 237: Verbal Abuse: As a child Aviva suffered verbal abuse from her older sister which severely impaired her productivity as a teen. A caring teacher encouraged her to seek professional help.

 

Must Mrs. Cohn, the principal, and/or R. Berger compensate R. Adler?

Who pays for the therapy, Aviva, her teacher, or her sister?

 

 

                                          

 

 

What's the Law?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Answer

We present you here with a concise ruling. For a more intricate elucidation, please see the detailed explanation below.

 

The principal must compensate R. Adler for one week of lost wages. Aviva's sister must pay for the therapy (see detailed explanation). ..

 

 

 

 

 

 

Detailed Explanation
 
 

 

Lip Liability invokes the following laws:

 

.                                  

 

Gossip

 

1. Barring unforeseen/incontrollable circumstances, if A canceled a verbal employment engagement after B turned down alternative work, A is liable to pay B for his/her loss.

 

2. However, if A cancelled before B began working or travelling to work, A is not required to pay for B's dashed expectations.

 

For example: If 1) B did not turn down alternative employment and 2) did not lose the opportunity to seek out alternative work, A is not required to compensate [Choshen Mishpat 333:2, 334:1].

 

 Application:

 

R. Berger had the right to hire the R. Adler and it is as though the principal hired him. As such, if the substitute turned down employment as a result of the responsible party's verbal commitment, and can no longer find alternative employment, the principal must pay for the week of wages the substitute turned down.

 

The principal is absolved though, from compensating the substitute for the wages for the second week,which amount to no more than dashed expectations.

 

 Verbal Abuse

 

3. One who physically harms his/her fellow must pay for damages and medical expenses incurred amongst other charges [Choshen Mishpat 420: 3, 13].

 

 4. Intentional damage requires the aggressor to compensate the victim for the embarrassment suffered as well [Choshen Mishpat 420: 3, Sm"a ibid. 44, Choshen Mishpat 421: 1].

 

 5. The authority to enforce the numerous charges depends upon the rank of the particular Beit Din. See Choshen Mishpat §1 for detailed discussion.

 

 6. In lieu of medical expenses, even a lower ranking Beit Din retains the authority to compel the aggressor to appease the victim financially compensate him/her in accordance with their evaluation [Choshen Mishpat §1:2 Rema].

 

 7. Verbally abusing a victim who is unable to protect him/herself [See Choshen Mishpat 420:32] from becoming emotionally scarred whereby resulting in the victim's compromised productivity is viewed in the eyes of Dayanim as a clear present and visible damage for which the aggressor should pay.

 

8. The medical expenses would be the cost of therapy.

 

Application:

 

As Aviva was unable to protect herself from the verbal abuse to which her sister subjected her, Aviva's sister is required to pay for her therapy.

 

Dayan Chaim Kohn,

 Dayan K'hal Adath Jeshurn NYC,

Gerrer Shtiebel Flatbush,

Dean of Business Halacha Institute

 

 

Note:
 
Although we aim to present the correct ruling, varying details are always important and decisively influence every individual case. Our readers are thus encouraged to present their personal cases to a competent authority and not solely rely on the information provided.
 

Together...for a better world
 You can help build a better world. Just invite your friends and family to subscribe to
 

Fellow Weekly.

 

To join this mailing list, please click here 
or send an email to weekly@projectfellow.org with the word subscribe in the subject line

  

 

    

CLICK HERE to DONATE to PROJECT FELLOW TODAY!

   

 

A project of
Yesharim Foundation for Ethical LawView our profile on LinkedIn
 
105/21 Sanhedria Murchevet, Jerusalem
ISRAEL 02-581-6337
USA 845-335-5516

Join Our Mailing List