$Account.OrganizationName
The Leadership Advisor
"Helping Leaders Develop Leaders"
April 2009 - Volume 4 Edition 3
Headlines:
Sign Up
Hear I am

"Trust is the lubrication that makes it possible for organizations to work." ~ Warren Bennis

"It is an equal failing to trust everybody and to trust nobody." ~ English Proverb

"Trusting always involves risk." ~ Fernando Flores

"Simple trust is like a vase...once it is broken, it can be fixed but will never look the same." ~ Unknown

"Forgiveness is the shadow of trust standing in the light." ~ Lorene Rasmussen

By: Karl Meinhardt
As the leader, admitting my weaknesses will diminish peoples' respect for my leadership.

By Phil Eastman

Our March leadership myth garnered many positive comments, and it seems that dispelling the myths of leadership is resonating with our readers. It is fun to write about these myths since they are such a pervasive and debilitating part of leadership development.

Years ago I heard the phrase, "You can listen and learn or you can live and learn." This quip stuck with me because it is so true. In all parts of our lives, we can pay attention the experience of others and learn our lessons by listening, or we can experience the pain of mistakes and learn our lessons by living them out. Both approaches, work but our goal is to provide our readers with the lessons we have learned and seen others learn by experience, and thus avoid the pain of personal experience. To refresh your memory we have defined a leadership myth as:

"A traditional and widely held belief about leadership that contains elements of truth but when put into practice proves to be fundamentally flawed."

For most people admitting mistakes is difficult. I think that comes from a genuine desire in people to do the right thing. For most leaders, admitting mistakes is even harder because the stakes are higher. When leaders stumble, the ramifications are not just for them but for those they lead as well. That is why the mantle of leadership is heavy. The weight of leadership responsibility is real, and leaders should keenly feel that pressure of their responsibility.

Our experience is that many leadership mistakes come from the leader's weaknesses or blind spots, those shortcomings of temperament or experience that plague all of us. The reality is that every person has weaknesses. As human beings, we are talented and experienced in different ways, which by definition means that we are great at some things but not at everything. For leaders, the trouble begins when they are convinced that admitting their weaknesses will diminish their leadership in the eyes of their followers. That is not true! The truth is that the people you lead already know your weaknesses; they work with you every day. What they don't know is whether you know what your weaknesses are. Once you admit openly that you recognize your own shortcomings, and then followers are free to augment your leadership with their own strengths. When leaders convince themselves that admitting weaknesses will undermine their authority, then we have the makings of a great leadership myth.

All this leads to a challenge though. How does a leader admit their weaknesses without creating fear in the followers? The goal of transparency is to foster a belief that the leader is real, approachable, pragmatic, realistic, and authentic, yet competent to lead. The best way to manage the twin demands of leadership authenticity and confidence is to talk openly with your team at a neutral time about your self-understanding and your expectations of the team to cover your blind spots. This sort of discussion is best when the pain and the stakes are low. In other words, don't have this discussion when you have just messed up but rather do it before you mess up. Opening this discussion could go something like this:

"I just read Phil Eastman's article this month about leadership myths. In that article, he said that leaders should be open about their weaknesses and yet do that without appearing as though they are frail. I want to talk today about my leadership strengths and weaknesses. Here is what I believe I am best at when leading (you fill in the blank). On the other hand, here is where I am weakest in my leadership (you fill in the blank with your list.) I am hoping that you, as members of the team, will help our team be more effective by making sure I delegate to someone on the team things that don't take advantage of my strengths but in fact do represent your strengths. I also want to give you permission to provide me feedback about where you think I could improve so that I am always building my capabilities. Part of being a good leader is having a team that helps me in my role. Remember, just because I am the leader does not mean I always know what to do. However, even though that's the case, I am still willingly responsible for our collective success even when it's my leadership that is the challenge."

Feel free to edit this to your liking so that it fits your style and your team. However, do not put off too long this important step in your leadership development.

* Photo by : Karl Meinhardt - Thanks for the use! *

As the leader, admitting my weaknesses will diminish peoples' respect for my leadership, is #3 in a series of leadership myths, Phil promises to have fun exploring this year.

Phil Eastman is a partner in the Boise-based consulting firm, Leadership Advisors Group. He combines more than 25 years of leadership experience with his passion for consulting, coaching, and teaching to help leaders grow, build teams, and improve organizational performance. Eastman has served in numerous corporate and community leadership roles. His corporate experience includes 17 years in the banking industry where he served as Chief Credit Officer and CEO. As a consultant and coach, Eastman works with a growing and diverse group of clients in a variety of industries and countries, where he focuses his efforts in strategic planning, change management, and leadership development.

Eastman earned his Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Management and Organization from Idaho State University, and holds a Master of Arts degree in Theological Studies from Bethel Seminary. He is a 1991 graduate of the Pacific Coast Banking School where he is also an instructor. Eastman's first book, The Character of Leadership: An Ancient Model for a Quantum Age, is slated for publication in early summer.
My book shelf
By Lorene Rasmussen

I could tell Peter was furious when he entered my office, but I was still quietly working with Frank, a salesman who had unexpectedly stopped in. I welcomed Frank's interruption because the project I had been working on came to an impasse after several failed attempts of getting answers from Frank's website. It was my newly acquired responsibility to make sure all the "in case of fire" signs were displayed throughout the facility so we could pass a routine fire inspection.

When our conversation ended, Frank gathered up his designs, said his good- byes, and walked out the front door. As soon as the door closed, Peter, my supervisor and long-time friend, launched into me as if I had just broken a cardinal rule. With his hands flying and his finger pointed in my direction, he began interrogating me. He wanted to know why I had scheduled the meeting without him, why I thought I could make such an expensive decision without his approval, and why the project had gone on well beyond the scheduled plan.

I sat there listening, trying to take in all his words, actions, and accusations. I wanted to understand exactly where all his frustration was coming from, while still keeping my composure. Just as he was taking a deep breath, I smiled and calmly said, "If you're done ranting, I'm done listening."

Shared Trust: In his soon-to-be-released book, The Character of Leadership, Phil Eastman writes, "Trust is the foundational component for all human relationships. Without trust, relationships are strained and dysfunctional. With trust, relationships are vibrant and powerful." The kind of trust Phil is describing is what we call in our High Performance Team Model, shared trust.

Shared trust takes time to build and time to maintain, but enjoys a lifetime of rewards. Shared trust will not happen just because you think it should be so. It must be articulated, nurtured, and agreed upon within relationship. Shared trust is aware that there will be times of disillusion, conflict, and hurt feelings, yet is ready for continued engagement and forgiveness. Shared trust is drenched with unimagined possibilities and involves personal responsibility, commitment, and change.

If trust is so fundamental, why is it so hard to wrap our arms around it? Eastman believes it is because, "It is difficult to see trust in the affirmative. In other words, it is easier to see trust when it is broken rather than when it is whole." As it turns out, Eastman is not alone in his belief. Fernando Flores, author, engineer, and former Minister of Finance from the country of Chile, states, "Trust is one of those essential human values that everyone understands, until it comes into question and it is time to put it into practice."

Tainted Trust: Fernando Flores came to personally synthesize the issue of trust through hauntingly unusual circumstances as the Minister of Finance in Chile. After the assassination of Salvador Allende and a military coup that brought down his government in 1973, "Fernando found himself betrayed by the country he loved and had served." He went to prison without trial and faced execution. It was there he came to know that self-trust and the resolute trust of those closest to him was paramount for his emotional and physical survival.

Today, Flores is a global consultant. He ascertains that trust and distrust are the greatest concern of companies whether large or small, public or private. "Creating trust has become the primary goal of his business practices."

Building Trust: "Trust is not always a good thing," writes Flores in his book, Building Trust: in business, politics, relationships, and life. Misguided trust can be immature, reckless, gullible, and taken for granted; therefore, the focus must be on building trust. Flores says, "Building trust is: creating trust, maintaining trust, and restoring trust once it has been lost or betrayed. . .building trust requires talking and thinking about trust." When trust is present, it generates a dynamic, flexible, and innovative environment.

Economics of Trust: In his book, Speed of Trust, Stephen M. R. Covey believes "the economics of trust" are tangible and quantifiable. He looks at two recent events, 9/11 and Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which undeniably proves when trust is down, the speed at which things are accomplished goes down, while the cost of doing business goes up. Covey states, "Trust always affects two outcomes-speed and cost."

Fernando Flores makes a distinction between the different kinds of trust we experience. Below are the four most common, illustrated with a personal story:

Basic: "Basic trust provides the basis for one's entire personality and demeanor toward the world." F.F. ~ The chair looked sturdy enough as Kass pulled it out from the table, but once she sat on it, it was obvious the frame was compromised sometime during storage, and she went tumbling to the floor. What is consider humorous on America's Funniest Home Videos, isn't nearly as funny when your friend is lying on your dining room floor with a hurt back and bruised ego. After she quickly regained her composure, Kass pulled herself up and selected a second chair. Even though she had reason not to trust my furniture, her basic trust told her the next chair was going to be fine, and she was right.

Simple: "Simple trust is the utter absence of suspicion." F.F. ~ As much as my Pollyanna personality still wants to believe, rumor has it there is no Santa Claus, Easter Bunny, or Tooth Fairy. Some may have accepted this reality at a very young age, while others (like myself) held onto the magic beyond what was considered socially acceptable. Once simple trust is violated, its innocence can never be restored which is not necessarily negative. It can be the opportunity for better understanding and deeper wisdom.

Blind: "Blind trust is willfully self-deceptive because it refuses to consider the evidence of betrayal." F.F. ~ We sat there listening to her sobs, trying to take in all her words as she told us she could no longer live "the lie." She was seeking advice on how to confront her husband about his infidelity for the last time. This was not the first time she had told us: it wasn't even the second time. Actually, we had lost count over the years. She was a trusting soul, always wanting to believe the best, and desiring to be the bigger person. They had been married for a long time, they had grown children, and she loved him deeply, but the time had come to make the final appeal. Her eyes were wide open, and she was no longer going to be part of the "waking dead." She loved him too much not to do what was right, and she needed the courage tell him.

Authentic: "Authentic trust is an articulated trust, based on relationship, and incorporates the possibility of betrayal and disappointment. It is complex, innovative, and extraordinary in that it causes you to go beyond the immediate, into the future together." Compilation from Building Trust ~ When the realization hit me, I was ashamed. Once again, I had neglected to take care of a task and then tried to cover it with manufactured excuses. To be honest, my intentions were good, but the outcome was a very disappointed co- worker and both of us scrambling to finish up of the details. There is nothing harder than to look into the face of someone important to you and say, "I am sorry. I failed you. Please forgive me." Yet those could be three of the four most powerful statements one could ever utter. ("I love you!" being the fourth.)

Cordial Hypocrisy: Justification aside, I fell prey to what Flores calls, "cordial hypocrisy." This happens when we want to "save face" by being polite to one another, accepting an assignment, project, or engagement knowing we may not have the time or resources to complete it. Instead of trusting my co- worker and telling her about the time constraint, I accepted the task and failed to produce. If this kind of behavior persists, it will eventually produce a toxic poison of distrust and cynicism undermining any hope of genuine, authentic trust.

Peter heard my strong words! As I watched his arms relax and his face soften, I continued, "When you're ready, I would like to fill you in on some of the details you missed." Peter pulled up a chair and sat down. He looked at me as I shared how Frank had dropped by without an appointment, and since he was there, I asked him all the questions I had accumulated. I explained how Frank took the time to show me how to navigate the website, and even taught me how to use the design tool. As for the budgeted amount, timeline, and authority to make the decision, I reminded Peter about the agreement we had made earlier in the month.

Peter listened intently, admitting he jumped to wild conclusions, and had taken my conversation with Frank out of context. When I was finished talking, Peter walked into his office and closed his door. The emotions from the encounter were more than I could bear and I started to cry. My head was spinning. I played the scenario over repeatedly in my head trying to figure out what went wrong.

Restoring Trust: In hopes to regain composure, I turned back to my computer only to find an email from Peter with the subject line reading, "Please forgive me." Peter went on to share how his morning transpired before coming into the office. He had missed an appointment due to a family emergency; his lunch meeting with a dignitary was cancelled but not until he was seated in the restaurant; and the list went on. By the time Peter arrived at the office, he was ready for a fight, and I got to be his opponent.

I sat back in my chair and through my tears reread his words. I clicked reply and wrote, "Thank you for sharing your day. Apology accepted. Your morning sounded incredibly frustrating. I hope your family crisis has subsided. I will happily reschedule your appointment with Mr. Smith. As for what happened between us, we need to explore alternative ways of dealing with stress and disappointments. We also need to discuss what can be done in the future to circumvent any misplaced outbursts of accusations, and come to a mutual agreement." Two minutes later, I received the message, "Yes! Thank you."

Three books were reviewed for this month's article. Each book offered specific insights to the relevent topic of Trust.

Building Trust: in business, politics, relationships, and life , by Fernando Flores & Robert Solomon is solid reading. It takes a multifaceted and philosphical look at building and sustaining trust.

The Speed of Trust, by Stephen M. R. Covey, is easy to read considering the complex topic of trust. Covey spends ample time on the importance of ethics as a core value, both personally and professionally.

The Character of Leadership: An Ancient Model for a Quantum Age , by Philip H. Eastman ll, is rich with historical stories illuminating leadership principles for a quantum age.

Trust: How Hard Can It Be? is #3 in a series of informal book reviews.

Lorene Rasmussen is the Partner for Business Operations which guides and supports the daily and strategic operations of Leadership Advisors Group. She combines a unique sense of fun and organization to ensure operations run smoothly and that clients receive the highest quality service possible. Lorene earned her Bachelor of Business Administration in Marketing from Boise State University and is a certified Life Coach through Genesis Enterprises in Seattle, Washington.
Web-store
Leadership Advisors Group is pleased to offer HRD Press products in our webstore. For over thirty years, HRD Press has been providing training and human resource personnel products and services. They consistently strive to earn your business by providing:
  • Constant products and innovative solutions
  • Unparalleled breadth of choice - over 1,000 products and counting
HRD Press is a reliable first point of contact for virtually any training or HR challenge, by offering:
  • Training and hiring solutions, and custom product development
  • Licenses that encompass unprecedented collections of development capital, in customizable formats
Leadership Advisors Group helps clients achieve success through:
  • Competency based and character driven leadership development.
  • Comprehensive, flexible, and focused strategic plans.
  • Results oriented change management.

You are receiving this email from Leadership Advisors Group because you are a valued client, have requested information regarding our services, or you are part of a highly respected organization. To ensure that you continue to receive emails from us, please add phil@leadershipadvisors.com to your address book.

"If there's a book you really want to read but it hasn't been written yet, then you must write it." ~Toni Morrison

Classics
Phil Eastman & Lorene Rasmussen
Leadership Advisors Group

phone: (208) 344-0471
Email Marketing by