Greetings!
The September issue of Entrepreneur Magazine contains a good
article, entitled "Freelance Nation,"
that has key tips for making outsourcing work.
While reading the article I thought of the many business
owners who meet with me to create independent contractor agreements, only to
find that the relationship they describe is actually that of employee and
employer. Just because you want a
relationship to be outsourced, doesn't mean it is.
I'm reminded of the old saying: "If it looks like duck,
walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck."
Business owners want to avoid hiring employees because they
don't want the tax and paperwork hassles, they don't want to pay the employer
portion of FICA and Medicare, the cost of additional benefits and the
additional workman's compensation premiums, and they want the flexibility to
terminate the relationship without unemployment claims.
While those are big hassles to be sure, improperly calling
an employee 'independent contractor' will create bigger problems for your
business.
First, if your business is required to withhold taxes and
pay the employer portion of FICA and Medicare to the IRS, you'll face stiff
penalties and interest for failing to do so.
Second, the employee may be subject to minimum wage and
overtime laws. If you don't have
adequate time records and the "employee-called-contractor" makes a claim for
wages based on hours worked that you can't refute, your business (and possibly
you) could be on the hook for damages and the employee's attorneys fees.
And realize that the employee's attorneys fees are the worst
part. A Florida statute allows the employee's
attorney to recover attorney fees if there are wages due the employee.
Contingency fee lawyers are suing small and medium sized
businesses mostly to recover big fees.
Even if the employee-called-contractor recovers only a few hundred
dollars, the lawyer will demand five figure legal fees.
Third, if the employee-called-contractor is hurt 'on the job'
he might be entitled to workman's compensation benefits. His claim starts the ball rolling on the
other problems.
Finally, because claims only come up when the
employee-called-contractor becomes unhappy with your business, you leave
yourself vulnerable to big demands for money.
Even if you have a valid defense, the downside risk is so great that you
cave-in to unreasonable demands rather than risk other problems.
As a result, it's critical to know how the law
characterizes the relationship you've created.
The IRS provides guidance and examples at its website (http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=179116,00.html).
Of course, give me a call if you'd like to discuss this
further.
Events.
This evening I'm speaking at the Disney
Entrepreneur Center
for the Small Business Development
Center on 10 Common and
Costly Business Killing Legal Mistakes.
On Monday, September 20, I'll be at the TRDA in Melbourne to talk about
legal issues for the emerging technology business. Topics will include corporate law, liability
protection, raising capital and intellectual property issues.
On October 7, Scott Faris, of Astralis Group, and I will be
speaking to Rollins College MBA students about terms sheets and raising capital
for the emerging entrepreneurial venture.
Finally, on October 26, I'll be presenting the Legal
Foundations portion of the UCF Techology Incubator Excellence in
Entrepreneurship Course.
Thank you for your continuing referrals.
Ed